RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer ranks third in global cancer prevalence and stands as the second leading cause of cancer-related mortalities. With obesity recognized as a pivotal risk factor for colorectal cancer, the potential protective role of bariatric surgery, especially laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, has garnered attention. AIM: To investigate the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) vs sleeve gastrectomy (SG) effect on colorectal cancer incidence in obese individuals. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Seventeen studies with a total of 12497322 patients were included. The primary outcome was the relative risk (RR) of developing colorectal cancer in obese patients who underwent weight loss surgery compared to those who did not. Secondary outcomes included determining the RR for colon and rectal cancer separately and subgroup analyses by gender and type of weight loss surgery. RESULTS: The meta-analysis revealed a 54% reduction in colorectal cancer risk in morbidly obese patients who underwent bariatric surgery compared to those who did not. A significant 46% reduction in colorectal cancer risk was observed among female patients. However, no significant differences were found in the meta-analysis for various types of bariatric surgery, such as SG and RYGB. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis reveals weight loss surgery, regardless of type, reduces colorectal cancer risk, especially in women, as indicated by RR and hazard ratio assessments. Further validation is essential.
RESUMO
Background: X-inactive specific transcript (XIST), it has been found, is abnormal expression in various neoplasms. This work aims to explore its potential molecular mechanisms and prognostic roles in types of malignancies. Methods: This research comprehensively investigated XIST transcription across cancers from Oncomine, TIMER 2.0 and GEPIA2. Correlations of XIST expression with prognosis, miRNAs, interacting protens, immune infiltrates, checkpoint markers, mutations of tumor-associated genes and promoter methylation were also analyzed by public databases. In addition, 98 BRCA samples were collected to investigate XIST expression and evaluate its clinicopathological value. Results: In public databases, compared to normal tissues, XIST was lower in BRCA, CESC, COAD and so on, but increased in KIRC and PRAD. Databases also showed that XIST was a good indicator of prognosis in BRCA, COAD and so on, but a bad one in KIRC, KIRP and so on. From starBase, we found 29 proteins interacting with XIST, and identified 4 miRNAs which might be sponged by XIST in cancers. Furthermore, XIST was linked with immune infiltration, especially T cell CD4+, and was related to over 20 immune checkpoint markers. Moreover, several tumor-associated gene mutations and promoter methylation were negatively related to its expression. In addition, IHC showed that XIST in BRCA was obviously lower in comparison of normal tissues and was negatively related to lymph node invasion and TNM stage. Conclusion: In summary, abnormal expression of XIST influenced prognosis, miRNAs and immune infiltration across cancers, especially BRCA.