Phase of Care Mortality Analysis According to Individual Patient Risk Profile.

BACKGROUND: Phase of care mortality analysis (POCMA) is a quality improvement tool categorizing triggers for mortality into phases of patient care. However, the relationship between a patient's risk profile and the triggers for mortality is incompletely understood. METHODS: POCMA was implemented for cases with available Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) risk models. Risk-adjusted rates were obtained from the STS database. Mortality triggers were categorized by the phase of occurrence (preoperative, intraoperative, intensive care unit [ICU], postoperative floor, and discharge). Patients were then stratified by STS risk score: low risk (<4%), intermediate (4% to 8%), and high risk (>8%). RESULTS: A total of 3,919 isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), 901 isolated valve, and 321 CABG plus single-valve procedures were performed from 2012 to 2018, with 4.6% crude mortality and a median STS risk score of 5.8%. POCMA was performed on 67 patient mortalities, with triggers occurring in the following phases of care: 49.3% preoperative, 13.4% intraoperative, 23.9% ICU, 3.0% postoperative floor, and 10.4% discharge phase. Mortality distribution was bimodal, occurring mostly in low-risk (37.3%) and high-risk (38.8%) patients. For low-risk patients, the trigger for mortality most frequently occurred during the postoperative ICU phase, while for high-risk patients, the trigger for mortality most frequently occurred during the preoperative phase. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality had a bimodal distribution with respect to patient risk profile. Phase-of-care triggers for mortality differed according to patient risk profile: low-risk triggers during the postoperative ICU phase versus high-risk triggers typically during the preoperative phase. Specific focus on phases according to the patient's risk profile represents an opportunity to improve quality and outcomes.

A 2015-2016 Survey of American Board of Cardiovascular Perfusion Certified Clinical Perfusionists: Perfusion Profile and Clinical Trends.

To document the current perfusion workforce status and to anticipate the future demands of an ever-changing perfusion workplace environment, a valid survey is needed to help guide the future of the perfusion workforce. The American Board of Cardiovascular Perfusion (ABCP) sponsored a survey of Certified Clinical Perfusionist (CCP) demographic and clinical trends that was linked electronically to the 2015-2016 ABCP online recertification process. Of 3,875 eligible CCP's, 3,056 (78.9%) responded to the survey. The 12 survey questions covered the topics of gender, age, education levels, years of clinical experience, annual clinical activity exposure, high fidelity simulation experience, recertification requirement satisfaction and professional activity requirement contentment. The results of the ABCP annual survey are being published in accordance with the ABCP's commitment to establish and maintain interactive communication with the community of CCPs. The goal of this survey is to present the perfusion and health-care community with important statistics related to the current field of perfusion and establish trends to guide the future of perfusion.