Dosimetric Approaches for Radioimmunotherapy of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma in Myeloablative Setting.

Radioimmunotherapy (RIT) is a safe and active treatment available for non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs). In particular, two monoclonal antibodies raised against CD20, that is Zevalin (90Y-ibritumomab-tiuxetan) and Bexxar (131I-tositumomab) received FDA approval for the treatment of relapsing/refractory indolent or transformed NHLs. RIT is likely the most effective and least toxic anticancer agent in NHLs. However, its use in the clinical setting is still debated and, in case of relapse after optimized rituximab-containing regimens, the efficacy of RIT at standard dosage is suboptimal. Thus, clinical trials were based on the hypothesis that the inclusion of RIT in myeloablative conditioning would allow to obtain improved efficacy and toxicity profiles when compared to myeloablative total-body irradiation and/or high-dose chemotherapy regimens. Standard-activity RIT has a safe toxicity profile, and the utility of pretherapeutic dosimetry in this setting can be disputed. In contrast, dose-escalation clinical protocols require the assessment of radiopharmaceutical biodistribution and dosimetry before the therapeutic injection, as dose constrains for critical organs may be exceeded when RIT is administered at high activities. The aim of the present study was to review and discuss the internal dosimetry protocols that were adopted for non-standard RIT administration in the myeloablative setting before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with NHLs.

Detailed dosimetry calculation for in-vitro experiments and its impact on clinical BNCT.

PURPOSE: Boron Neutron Capture Therapy (BNCT) is a form of hadrontherapy based on the selective damage caused by the products of neutron capture in 10B to tumour cells. BNCT dosimetry strongly depends on the parameters of the dose calculation models derived from radiobiological experiments. This works aims at determining an adequate dosimetry for in-vitro experiments involving irradiation of monolayer-cultured cells with photons and BNCT and assessing its impact on clinical settings. M&M: Dose calculations for rat osteosarcoma UMR-106 and human metastatic melanoma Mel-J cell survival experiments were performed using MCNP, transporting uncharged particles for KERMA determinations, and secondary particles (electrons, protons, 14C, 4He and 7Li) to compute absorbed dose in cultures. Dose-survival curves were modified according to the dose correction factors determined from computational studies. New radiobiological parameters of the photon isoeffective dose models for osteosarcoma and metastatic melanoma tumours were obtained. Dosimetry implications considering cutaneous melanoma patients treated in Argentina with BNCT were assessed and discussed. RESULTS: KERMA values for the monolayer-cultured cells overestimate absorbed doses of radiation components of interest in BNCT. Detailed dose calculations for the osteosarcoma irradiation increased the relative biological effectiveness factor RBE1% of the neutron component in more than 30%. The analysis based on melanoma cases reveals that the use of survival curves based on KERMA leads to an underestimation of the tumour doses delivered to patients. CONCLUSIONS: Considering detailed dose calculation for in-vitro experiments significantly impact on the prediction of the tumor control in patients. Therefore, proposed methods are clinically relevant.