Simultaneous integrated boost on pathologic lymph nodes safely improves clinical outcomes compared to sequential boost in locally advanced cervical cancer: a multicenter retrospective study.

Objective: This multicenter study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the impact of high boost simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to pathologic lymph nodes compared to Sequential boost (Seq) in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). Materials and methods: 97 patients with pelvic and/or para-aortic (PAo) node-positive LACC treated by definitive chemoradiation were included. Two groups were analyzed: Sequential boost group and simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) group. Endpoints were Distant Recurrence Free Survival (DRFS), Recurrence Free Survival (RFS), Overall Survival (OS), locoregional pelvic and PAo control and toxicities. Results: 3-years DRFS in SIB and Seq groups was 65% and 31% respectively (log-rank p < 0.001). 3-years RFS was 58% and 26% respectively (log-rank p = 0.009). DRFS prognostic factors in multivariable analysis were SIB, PAo involvement and maximum pelvic node diameter ≥ 2cm. Adenocarcinoma histology and absence of brachytherapy tended to be prognostic factors. SIB provided the best pelvic control at first imaging with 97%. There was no significant difference in terms of toxicities between groups. Conclusions: Nodal SIB seems to be unavoidable in the treatment of node-positive LACC. It provides the best DRFS, RFS and pelvic control without additional toxicity, with a shortened treatment duration.

Impact of Radiation Therapy Modalities on Loco-regional Control in Inflammatory Breast Cancer.

PURPOSE: In inflammatory breast cancer, radiation therapy intensification is considered a standard of care by some teams, although the level of evidence remains low. We sought to analyze the impact of radiation therapy modalities on the risk of loco-regional and distant relapse. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This retrospective multicenter study included patients with localized inflammatory breast cancer treated between 2010 and 2017. Standard postmastectomy radiation therapy consisted of daily fractions to a total dose of 50 Gy equivalent without a boost or bolus, while intensified radiation therapy referred to the use of a boost or bolus. The cumulative incidence curves of locoregional and distant recurrence were displayed using the competing risk method. RESULTS: Of the 241 included patients, 165 were treated with standard and 76 with intensified radiation therapy. There was significantly more nodal involvement in the intensified group. With a median follow-up of 40 months postradiation therapy, there was no difference between standard versus intensified radiation therapy regarding the cumulative incidence of locoregional (P = .68) or distant recurrence (P = .29). At 5 years, the risks of locoregional and distant recurrence were 12.1% (95% CI, 7.5; 17.7) and 29.4% (95% CI, 21.8; 37.3) for patients treated with standard radiation therapy and 10.4% (95% CI, 4.4; 19.3) and 21.4% (95% CI, 12.6; 31.9) for those treated with intensified radiation therapy. In multivariate analyses, triple-negative subtype and absence of complete pathologic response were associated with a higher risk of loco-regional recurrence. Radiation therapy intensification had no significant impact on locoregional and distant recurrence. For patients with a non-complete pathologic response (n = 172, 71.7%), no significant differences were observed between the 2 groups for loco-regional (P = .80) and distant (P = .39) recurrence. Severe toxicity rates were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to other important series, this large retrospective multicentric study did not show a locoregional or distant control benefit of intensified radiation therapy. Pooled prospective studies and meta-analyses of intensified radiation therapy are warranted to endorse this approach.

Different Prognostic Values of Tumour and Nodal Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Depending on Subtypes of Inflammatory Breast Cancer, a 317 Patient-Study.

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare entity with a poor prognosis. We analysed the survival outcomes of patients with nonmetastatic IBC and the prognostic value of tumour or nodal responses to assess their individual prognostic impact across IBC subtypes. This retrospective multicentre study included patients diagnosed with IBC between 2010 and 2017 to account for advances in neoadjuvant systemic therapies and modern radiotherapy at seven oncology centres in France. Three hundred and seventeen patients were included and analysed. After a median follow-up of 52 months, the 5-year DFS was lower for triple-negative (TN) (50.1% vs. 63.6%; p < 0.0001). After multivariate analyses, incomplete nodal response was the only significant prognostic factor in the triple-negative group (HR:6.06). The poor prognosis of TN-IBC was reversed in the case of nodal response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast response does not appear to be a decisive prognostic factor in patients with TN-IBC compared to lymph node response. Despite improvements in neoadjuvant treatments, IBC remains associated with a poor prognosis. In TN-IBC patients, lack of pathological complete node response was associated with poorer survival than any other group. Treatment intensification strategies are worth investigating.