Validation of a pre-established triage protocol for critically ill patients in a COVID-19 outbreak under resource scarcity: A retrospective multicenter cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: In case of COVID-19 related scarcity of critical care resources, an early French triage algorithm categorized critically ill patients by probability of survival based on medical history and severity, with four priority levels for initiation or continuation of critical care: P1 -high priority, P2 -intermediate priority, P3 -not needed, P4 -not appropriate. This retrospective multi-center study aimed to assess its classification performance and its ability to help saving lives under capacity saturation. METHODS: ICU patients admitted for severe COVID-19 without triage in spring 2020 were retrospectively included from three hospitals. Demographic data, medical history and severity items were collected. Priority levels were retrospectively allocated at ICU admission and on ICU day 7-10. Mortality rate, cumulative incidence of death and of alive ICU discharge, length of ICU stay and of mechanical ventilation were compared between priority levels. Calculated mortality and survival were compared between full simulated triage and no triage. RESULTS: 225 patients were included, aged 63.1±11.9 years. Median SAPS2 was 40 (IQR 29-49). At the end of follow-up, 61 (27%) had died, 26 were still in ICU, and 138 had been discharged. Following retrospective initial priority allocation, mortality rate was 53% among P4 patients (95CI 34-72%) versus 23% among all P1 to P3 patients (95CI 17-30%, chi-squared p = 5.2e-4). The cumulative incidence of death consistently increased in the order P3, P1, P2 and P4 both at admission (Gray's test p = 3.1e-5) and at reassessment (p = 8e-5), and conversely for that of alive ICU discharge. Reassessment strengthened consistency. Simulation under saturation showed that this two-step triage protocol could have saved 28 to 40 more lives than no triage. CONCLUSION: Although it cannot eliminate potentially avoidable deaths, this triage protocol proved able to adequately prioritize critical care for patients with highest probability of survival, hence to save more lives if applied.

Impact of nursing care on lung functional residual capacity in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients.

BACKGROUND: The respiratory consequences of daily nursing care interventions in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are not clearly established. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The main objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of alveolar collapse analysis by the measurement of lung impedance distribution technique during nursing care in patients with ARDS. DESIGN: Prospective observational pilot physiologic study in a surgical intensive care unit of a tertiary care hospital including adult intubated patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS. METHODS: Each patient was monitored for 12 hours using a chest impedance device. Daily care interventions studied were as follows: endotracheal suctioning, mouth care, bed-bathing, and blood sampling. The primary endpoint was the variation in end-expiratory lung impedance (reflecting functional residual capacity) before and 1, 5, 15, and 30 minutes after nursing care interventions. Data are presented as median (interquartile-range). RESULTS: One hundred and eight events were collected in 18 patients. Endotracheal suctioning (n = 42), mouth care (n = 26), and bed-bathing (n = 23) induced a significant decrease in lung impedance after care: endotracheal suctioning (-40.0 [-53.8; -28.6]% at 1 minute [P < .001], -10.4 [-27.9; 1.8]% at 30 minutes [P = .03]; mouth care -17.9 [-45.4; -14.6]% at 1 minute [P < .001], -10.4 [-21.3; 3.4]% at 30 minutes [P = .01]; bed-bathing -40.2 [-53.5; -14.3]% at 1 minute [P < .001], -10.6 [-36.4; 1.6]% at 30 minutes [P = .01]). Blood sampling (n = 17) did not induce significant changes in lung impedance. CONCLUSIONS: The lung impedance distribution technique during nursing care appears feasible in the majority of patients with ARDS. Some daily nursing care in ARDS patients (including bed-bathing and mouth care) resulted in a prolonged decrease in lung functional residual capacity and therefore could be associated with pulmonary de-recruitment. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: A caregiver who has to assess the functional residual capacity of these patients should probably be informed of the schedules of the nursing care interventions.

Epidemiology of Weaning Outcome according to a New Definition. The WIND Study.

RATIONALE: The weaning process concerns all patients receiving mechanical ventilation. A previous classification into simple, prolonged, and difficult weaning ignored weaning failure and presupposed the use of spontaneous breathing trials. OBJECTIVES: To describe the weaning process, defined as starting with any attempt at separation from mechanical ventilation and its prognosis, according to a new operational classification working for all patients under ventilation. METHODS: This was a multinational prospective multicenter observational study over 3 months of all patients receiving mechanical ventilation in 36 intensive care units, with daily collection of ventilation and weaning modalities. Pragmatic definitions of separation attempt and weaning success allowed us to allocate patients in four groups. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 2,729 patients were enrolled. Although half of them could not be classified using the previous definition, 99% entered the groups on the basis of our new definition as follows: 24% never started a weaning process, 57% had a weaning process of less than 24 hours (group 1), 10% had a difficult weaning of more than 1 day and less than 1 week (group 2), and 9% had a prolonged weaning duration of 1 week or more (group 3). Duration of ventilation, intensive care unit stay, and mortality (6, 17, and 29% for the three groups, respectively) all significantly increased from one group to the next. The unadjusted risk of dying was 19% after the first separation attempt and increased to 37% after 10 days. CONCLUSIONS: A new classification allows us to categorize all weaning situations. Every additional day without a weaning success after the first separation attempt increases the risk of dying.

[Successful treatment of extreme hypernatremia by continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration]. / Une hypernatrémie extrême traitée avec succès par hémodiafiltration veino-veineuse continue.

Extreme hypernatremia in intensive care unit are frequently associated with a poor prognosis and their treatment, when associated with acute renal failure, is not consensual. We report the case of a 39-year-old man admitted in our intensive care unit for coma who presented extreme hyperosmolar hypernatremia (sodium 180 mmol/L, osmolarity 507 mOsm/L) associated with acute renal failure (urea 139.3 mmol/L, creatinine 748 µmol/L) and many other metabolic abnormalities. He was treated with hypotonic fluid administration and continuous renal replacement therapy (veno-venous hemodiafiltration) using an industrial dialysate fluid. Natremia was controlled by modulating intravenous water and sodium intake according to biological data. After 10 days, continuous renal replacement therapy was stopped and neurological exam was normal. Continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration may be useful for treatment of extreme hypernatremia by allowing gradual correction of fluid and electrolyte disorders.

Residents in tutored practice exchange groups have better medical reasoning as measured by the script concordance test: A pilot study.

BACKGROUND: This pilot study attempted to evaluate the impact of a practice exchange group (PEG) tutored by a senior anaesthesiologist on clinical reasoning performance of anaesthesiology residents for uncertain situations. Changes in clinical reasoning were measured by script concordance tests (SCT). METHODS: First, a curriculum, with educational objectives and assessment tools, was proposed to all residents at the beginning of their 6-month training. The first group (control) consisted of residents undergoing a 6-month rotation without PEG training. The second group (PEG group) consisted of the residents starting a new rotation 6 months later, who followed a weekly PEG session. In both groups, clinical reasoning was assessed in the same manner, with SCTs, multiple-choice questions (MCQs) and questions with short answers. The primary outcome measurement of this study was the SCT results in the group with PEG training (PEG group) in comparison with those without (control group). RESULTS: The performance in the SCT, expressed as the degree of concordance with the panel [95% confidence interval or CI], was better in the PEG group including 19 residents (72 [68 to 76] %) as compared to the control group including 17 residents (60 [57 to 63] % P<0.001). Performances (mean [95% CI]) in MCQs and short answers were better in the PEG group (64 [57 to 71] and 74 [68 to 72] %, respectively) when compared with the control group (32 [28 to 36]% [P<0.001] and 60 [52 to 68] % [P<0.01], respectively). CONCLUSION: Our pilot study suggested that a senior-directed, peer-conducted educational training might improve the clinical reasoning of anaesthesia residents as measured by the SCT.

Is continuous subglottic suctioning cost-effective for the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia?

OBJECTIVE: To establish whether continuous subglottic suctioning (CSS) could be cost-effective. DESIGN: Cost-benefit analysis, based on a hypothetical replacement of conventional ventilation (CV) with CSS. SETTING: A surgical intensive care unit (SICU) of a tertiary care university hospital in France. PATIENTS: All consecutive patients receiving ventilation in the SICU in 2006. METHODS: Efficacy data for CSS were obtained from the literature and applied to the SICU of our hospital. Costs for CV and CSS were provided by the hospital pharmacy; costs for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) were obtained from the literature. The cost per averted VAP episode was calculated, and a sensitivity analysis was performed on VAP incidence and on the number of tubes required for each patient. RESULTS: At our SICU in 2006, 416 patients received mechanical ventilation for 3,487 ventilation-days, and 32 VAP episodes were observed (7.9 episodes per 100 ventilated patients; incidence density, 9.2 episodes per 10,000 ventilation-days). Based on the hypothesis of a 29% reduction in the risk of VAP with CSS than CV, 9 VAP episodes could have been averted. The additional cost of CSS for 2006 was estimated to be €10,585.34. The cost per averted VAP episode was €1,176.15. Assuming a VAP cost of €4,387, a total of 3 averted VAP episodes would neutralize the additional cost. For a low VAP incidence of 6.6%, the cost per averted VAP would be €1,323. If each patient required 2 tubes during ventilation, the cost would be €1,383.69 per averted VAP episode. CONCLUSION: Replacement of CV with CSS was cost-effective even when assuming the most pessimistic scenario of VAP incidence and costs.