Preoperative Ultrasound-guided Sub-areolar Biopsy in Predicting Occult Nipple Involvement in Breast Cancer Patients: Proposal for a Methodological Approach.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The prediction of a sub-areolar tissue infiltration in breast cancer (BC) patients could be helpful in selecting the best functional outcome according to several reconstructive oncoplastic or radical techniques. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of preoperative ultrasound (US) guided sub-areolar biopsy (SAB) in detecting occult nipple involvement, in comparison with the definitive pathological examination of tissue after surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively recorded clinical and pathological data of 46 consecutive patients scheduled for breast conserving surgery or nipple-areola sparing mastectomy. All cases underwent preoperative SAB and the results were compared with the histopathology of the dissected tumors and their biological characteristics. All parameters were correlated with nipple involvement by univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, overall accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the SAB examination for nipple staging were 60%, 97.5%, 75% and 95.2%, respectively. According to the clinicopathological features, the bivariate analysis did not show a significant interaction between patient age, tumor size or type, lymph node status, lymphatic vascular invasion, histologic grade, ER, PR, Ki-67 status, HER2 amplification, multifocal or multicentric disease and positive NAC assessment (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: A preoperative sample of retroareolar tissue obtained by US-guided biopsy could be considered a reproducible, mini-invasive diagnostic procedure useful to facilitate immediate breast reconstruction with implants or through conservative oncoplastic approaches, thereby guiding clinical practice.

Heterogeneous risk profiles among B3 breast lesions of uncertain malignant potential.

BACKGROUND: Most cases of breast lesions of uncertain malignant potential (B3) undergo surgical intervention. We aimed to analyze the outcome of B3 lesion subtypes in a large series of screen-detected cases. METHODS: We screened 2,986 core needle biopsies to classify B3 lesions. Positive predictive values (PPVs) for malignancy were calculated for a comprehensive risk characterization according to clinicopathologic and morphologic variables. RESULTS: B3 lesions comprised 35% atypical ductal hyperplasia (PPV = 20%), 16.7% flat epithelial atypia (PPV = 12%), 22.7% lobular neoplasia (PPV = 16.2%), 9% papillary lesion (PPV = 18.5%), 8.6% phyllodes tumor (PPV = 3.8%), and 8% radial scars (PPV = 4.1%) based on histopathologic diagnosis. Upgrade rates were 15.9% for calcifications, 13.7% for mass lesions, and 16.7% for architectural deformities, with 8.3% of malignant lesions classified as ductal carcinoma in situ and 6.7% as invasive cancers (PPV = 15%). CONCLUSION: B3 lesions entail a heterogeneous risk of malignancy, and careful radiologic-pathologic correlation is required for optimal treatment.

Role of sentinel lymph node biopsy procedure in cervical cancer: a critical point of view.

OBJECTIVE: To report our experience about the role of sentinel node biopsy in cervical cancer patients while debating provocatory arguments concerning this procedure. METHODS: From June 2001 to February 2003, patients affected by stage IB(1) cervical cancer were submitted to the sentinel node biopsy procedure. Patients were submitted to lymphoscintigraphy and, subsequently, to laparoscopy in order to locate the sentinel lymph node. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients were enrolled in the study. Sentinel node(s) was(were) identified with preoperative lymphoscintigraphy in 89% of the patients. Intraoperative detection rate was 70%. During surgery in 31% of the patients, sentinel node was detected bilaterally; in 15%, two sentinel nodes on the same side of the lymphatic vessels were detected. The sentinel node was located at the level of superficial common iliac vessels (26%), external iliac vessels (69%), and superficial obturator vessels (49%). In 77% of the patients, the histologic specimen sent by the surgeon as unique sentinel node contained two or more nodes. Metastatic sentinel nodes were found in 23% of the patients. There was no case with a positive nonsentinel node in the presence of a negative sentinel node. CONCLUSION: Sentinel node detection is a feasible procedure in cervical cancer patients. However, a high percentage of patients is found with bilateral and/or more than one sentinel lymph node. Improvements in detection rate and pathological analysis are needed prior to consider the sentinel node biopsy a routine procedure in cervical cancer patients.