Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
J Vasc Surg ; 72(4): 1184-1195.e3, 2020 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32682063

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: During the COVID-19 pandemic, central venous access line teams were implemented at many hospitals throughout the world to provide access for critically ill patients. The objective of this study was to describe the structure, practice patterns, and outcomes of these vascular access teams during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional, self-reported study of central venous access line teams in hospitals afflicted with the COVID-19 pandemic. To participate in the study, hospitals were required to meet one of the following criteria: development of a formal plan for a central venous access line team during the pandemic; implementation of a central venous access line team during the pandemic; placement of central venous access by a designated practice group during the pandemic as part of routine clinical practice; or management of an iatrogenic complication related to central venous access in a patient with COVID-19. RESULTS: Participants from 60 hospitals in 13 countries contributed data to the study. Central venous line teams were most commonly composed of vascular surgery and general surgery attending physicians and trainees. Twenty sites had 2657 lines placed by their central venous access line team or designated practice group. During that time, there were 11 (0.4%) iatrogenic complications associated with central venous access procedures performed by the line team or group at those 20 sites. Triple lumen catheters, Cordis (Santa Clara, Calif) catheters, and nontunneled hemodialysis catheters were the most common types of central venous lines placed by the teams. Eight (14%) sites reported experience in placing central venous lines in prone, ventilated patients with COVID-19. A dedicated line cart was used by 35 (59%) of the hospitals. Less than 50% (24 [41%]) of the participating sites reported managing thrombosed central lines in COVID-19 patients. Twenty-three of the sites managed 48 iatrogenic complications in patients with COVID-19 (including complications caused by providers outside of the line team or designated practice group). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a dedicated central venous access line team during a pandemic or other health care crisis is a way by which physicians trained in central venous access can contribute their expertise to a stressed health care system. A line team composed of physicians with vascular skill sets provides relief to resource-constrained intensive care unit, ward, and emergency medicine teams with a low rate of iatrogenic complications relative to historical reports. We recommend that a plan for central venous access line team implementation be in place for future health care crises.


Assuntos
Cateterismo Venoso Central , Infecções por Coronavirus/terapia , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Doença Iatrogênica/prevenção & controle , Controle de Infecções/organização & administração , Pneumonia Viral/terapia , Betacoronavirus/patogenicidade , COVID-19 , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Infecções por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/virologia , Estudos Transversais , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Interações Hospedeiro-Patógeno , Humanos , Doença Iatrogênica/epidemiologia , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/diagnóstico , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Viral/virologia , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , SARS-CoV-2
2.
World J Transplant ; 8(3): 68-74, 2018 Jun 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29988933

RESUMO

Due to the increased burden of infectious complications following solid organ transplantation, vaccination against common pathogens is a hugely important area of discussion and application in clinical practice. Reduction in infectious complications will help to reduce morbidity and mortality post-transplantation. Immunisation history is invaluable in the work-up of potential recipients. Knowledge of the available vaccines and their use in transplant recipients, donors and healthcare providers is vital in the delivery of quality care to transplant recipients. This article will serve as an aide-memoire to transplant physicians and health care professionals involved in managing transplant recipients as it provides an overview of different types of vaccines, timing of vaccination, vaccines contraindicated post solid organ transplantation and travel vaccines.

3.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 51: 298-305, 2018 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29772317

RESUMO

Central venous catheter (CVC) use is common among patients undergoing hemodialysis. Catheter-related vascular thrombosis is a frequent complication, which results in catheter dysfunction. This may eliminate the affected vein as a potential route of vascular access and leads to significant morbidity of the limbs involved. Despite increasing prevalence, there is a dearth of evidence-based guidelines for managing such catheter-related thrombi, often leading to treatment dilemmas in clinical practice. Minimizing the use of CVCs for hemodialysis remains the best approach in preventing such adverse complications. Furthermore, meticulous planning and care when using such catheters in unavoidable circumstances along with vigilant surveillance to identify complications early will allow to avoid associated morbidity.


Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Obstrução do Cateter/etiologia , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Remoção de Dispositivo/métodos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/métodos , Diálise Renal , Irrigação Terapêutica , Terapia Trombolítica/métodos , Trombose Venosa Profunda de Membros Superiores/diagnóstico por imagem , Trombose Venosa Profunda de Membros Superiores/terapia , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentação , Cateteres de Demora , Cateteres Venosos Centrais , Remoção de Dispositivo/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Fatores de Risco , Irrigação Terapêutica/efeitos adversos , Terapia Trombolítica/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Trombose Venosa Profunda de Membros Superiores/etiologia , Trombose Venosa Profunda de Membros Superiores/fisiopatologia
4.
HPB (Oxford) ; 13(6): 391-9, 2011 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21609371

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Biliary complications following liver transplantation result in major morbidity. We undertook a 10-year audit of the incidence, management and outcomes of post-transplant biliary complications at the New Zealand Liver Transplant Unit. METHODS: Prospectively collected data on 348 consecutive liver transplants performed between February 1998 and October 2008 were reviewed. The minimum follow-up was 6 months. RESULTS: A total of 309 adult and 39 paediatric transplants were performed over the study period. Of these, 296 (85%) were whole liver grafts and 52 (15%) were partial liver grafts (24 split-liver, eight reduced-size and 20 live-donor grafts). There were 80 biliary complications, which included 63 (18%) strictures and 17 (5%) bile leaks. Partial graft, a paediatric recipient and a Roux-en-Y biliary anastomosis were independent predictors of biliary strictures. Twenty-five (40%) strictures were successfully managed non-operatively and 38 (60%) required surgery (31 biliary reconstructions, three segmental resections and four retransplants). Seven (41%) bile leaks required surgical revision and 10 (59%) were managed non-operatively. There was no mortality related directly to biliary complications. CONCLUSIONS: Biliary complications affected one in five transplant recipients. Paediatric status, partial graft and Roux-en-Y anastomosis were independently associated with the occurrence of biliary strictures. Over half of the affected patients required surgical revision, but no mortality resulted from biliary complications.


Assuntos
Fístula Anastomótica/etiologia , Doenças Biliares/etiologia , Transplante de Fígado/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Fístula Anastomótica/diagnóstico por imagem , Fístula Anastomótica/terapia , Doenças Biliares/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças Biliares/terapia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Biliar , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/instrumentação , Dilatação , Drenagem , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Lactente , Transplante de Fígado/mortalidade , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Auditoria Médica , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nova Zelândia , Razão de Chances , Reoperação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Stents , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
5.
Ann Vasc Dis ; 4(4): 313-8, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23555470

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: In the absence of endovascular aneurysm repair due to financial constraints, Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) in Sri Lanka is managed exclusively by open surgery. We report our experience with open AAA repair with emphasis on peri-operative morbidity and mortality. METHODS: Seventy nine consecutive open AAA repairs were carried out between April 2004 and March 2010. A multiple regression model was used to identify predictors of significant peri-operative morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Mean age of the study cohort was 68 years. There were 63 (80%) males and 16 (20%) females. Mean aneurysm diameter was 6.4 (3.5-9.70) cm. Twenty seven (34%) underwent emergency surgical repair (group-1) while 52 (66%) had elective repair (group-2). The peri-operative mortality was 10/27 (37%) in group-1, 4/52 (7.6%) in group-2, (p = 0.0035). Significant post-operative morbidity was seen in 5/17 (29%) in group-1 and 7/48 (15%) in group-2, (p = 0.27). Aneurysm diameter >7 cm (p = 0.001), emergency repair (p = 0.004), history of smoking (p = 0.002), aortic cross-clamp time >60 minutes (p = 0.044), and need for post-operative ventilwation >24 hours (p = 0.024) were found to be independent predictors of peri-operative mortality or significant morbidity. CONCLUSION: Open aneurysm repair still has a strong place especially in the limited resource setting, with acceptable outcomes.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA