Targeting the PANoptosome with 3,4-Methylenedioxy-ß-Nitrostyrene, Reduces PANoptosis and Protects the Kidney against Renal Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were a) to investigate the effect of targeting the PANoptosome with 3,4-methylenedioxy-ß-nitrostyrene (MNS) on PANoptosis in the Renal ischemia-reperfussion (RIR) model b) to investigate the kidney protective effect of MNS toward RIR injury. METHODS: Thirty-two rats were divided into four groups randomly. The groups were assigned as Control, Sham, DMSO (dimethyl sulfoxide) and MNS groups. The rats in the MNS group were intraperitoneally given 20 mg/kg of MNS 30 minutes before reperfusion. 2% DMSO solvent that dissolves MNS were given to the rats in DMSO group. Left nephrectomy was performed on the rats under anesthesia at the 6th hour after reperfusion. Glutathione peroxidase (GPx), malondialdehyde (MDA), catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD) and 8-Okso-2'-deoksiguanozin (8-OHdG) levels were measured. Immunohistochemical analysis, electron microscopic and histological examinations were carried out in the tissues. RESULTS: Total tubular injury score was lower in the MNS group (p < 0.001). Caspase-3, Gasdermin D and MLK (Mixed Lineage Kinase Domain Like Pseudokinase) expressions were considerably decreased in the MNS group (p < 0.001). Apoptotic index (AI) was found to be low in the MNS group (p < 0.001). CAT and SOD levels were higher in the MNS Group (p = 0.006, p = 0.0004, respectively). GPx, MDA, and 8-OH-dG levels were similar (p > 0.05) in all groups. MNS considerably improved the tissue structure, based on the electron microscopic analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggested that MNS administrated before the reperfusion reduces pyroptosis, apoptosis and necroptosis. These findings suggest that MNS significantly protects the kidney against RIR injury by reducing PANoptosis as a result of specific inhibition of Nod-like receptor pyrin domain-containing 3 (NLRP 3), one of the PANoptosome proteins.

The effect of fucoidin on kidney and lung injury in a rat infrarenal aortic ischemia-reperfusion model.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of fucoidin on rat kidney and lung in an infraaortic ishemia reperfusion model. METHODS: Forty Wistar rats were randomly divided into five groups (n = 8) as sham, control (IR), before ischemia (BI), before reperfusion (BR), and before ischemia and before reperfusion (BI/BR). Rats were subjected to 120 minutes ischemia followed by 120 minutes reperfusion with application of infrarenal aortic clamping. BI received intravenous fucoidin (25 mg/kg) ten minutes before establishing ischemia and BR received ten minutes before reperfusion. BI/BR group received half equal doses of fucoidin both before ischemia (12.5 mg/kg) and reperfusion (12.5 mg/kg) periods, respectively. After sacrification blood and tissue samples were obtained for biochemical (Malondialdehyde (MDA), Nitric oxide (NO), Myeloperoxidase (MPO), Catalase (CAT), Plasma Chitotriosidase (CHIT) and serum ischemia modified albumin (IMA)) and histologic examinations. RESULTS: MDA, NO, MPO, CAT, and IMA levels were lower in BR and BI/BR groups compared to control group (p < 0.001). Plasma CHIT levels in BR and BI/BR groups were lower than in control group (p < 0.05). According to histological examination kidney and lung injury scores were lower in BR and BI/BR groups compared to control group (p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: The study showed that fucoidin is effective in preventing kidney and lung injury if administered before reperfusion or both before ischemia and reperfusion. However, it has no effect if administered only before ischemia.

Effects of ischemic preconditioning protocols on skeletal muscle ischemia-reperfusion injury.

BACKGROUND: Ischemic preconditioning (IPC) is described as brief ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) cycles to induce tolerance to subsequent in response to longer I/R insults. Various IPC protocols can be performed in four combinations as follows: at early or late phases and on local or distant organs. Although many experimental studies have been performed on IPC, no consensus has been established on which IPC protocol is most effective. The aims of the present study were as follows: (1) to compare the variables of preconditioning in different combinations (in early versus late phases; local versus remote organ implementations) and (2) to determine the most therapeutic IPC protocol(s). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A subtotal hind limb amputation model with clamping an intact femoral pedicle was used for I/R injury. IPC was induced using hind limb tourniquet with 3 × 10 min I/R cycles before longer I/R insult. Forty-nine rats were divided into seven groups (n = 7), sham, IsO (ischemia only), I/R, early ischemic preconditioning (e-IPC), late ischemic preconditioning (l-IPC), early remote ischemic preconditioning (e-RIPC), and l-RIPC (late-remote) groups, respectively. In the sham group, pedicle occlusion was not performed. Six hours ischemia was challenged in the IsO group. Three hours ischemia followed by 3 h reperfusion was performed in the I/R group. The e-IPC group was immediately preconditioned, whereas the l-IPC group was preconditioned 24 h before I/R injury on the same hind limb. In the e-RIPC and l-RIPC groups, the same protocols were performed on the contralateral hind limb. At the end of the experiments, skeletal muscle tissue samples were obtained for biochemical analysis (Malondialdehyde [MDA], catalase, myeloperoxidase [MPO], and nitric oxide end products [NOx]), light microscopy, and caspase-3 immunohistochemistry for determination of apoptosis. RESULTS: Tissue biochemical markers were improved in nearly all the IPC groups compared with IsO and I/R groups (P < 0.05). Similarly, the histologic damage scores were decreased in all the IPC groups (P < 0.05). The lowest damage score was in the e-RIPC group followed by the l-RIPC, e-IPC, and l-IPC groups, respectively. The apoptosis scores were significantly high in the I/R group compared with the e-RIPC and l-RIPC groups (P < 0.05). Although apoptosis scores of the e-IPC and l-IPC groups were lower than the I/R group, this finding was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: All IPC protocols were effective in reducing I/R injury. Among these protocols, e-RIPC achieved most protection.