FROM LEFT TO RIGHT. PARA-AORTIC LYMPH NODES SAMPLING DURING PANCREATODUODENECTOMY FOR PANCREATIC CANCER.

BACKGROUND: Para-aortic lymph nodes involvement in pancreatic head cancer has been described as an independent adverse prognostic factor. To avoid futile pancreatic resection, we systematically perform para-aortic lymphadenectomy as a first step. AIMS: To describe our technique for para-aortic lymphadenectomy. METHODS: A 77-year-old female patient, with jaundice and resectable pancreatic head adenocarcinoma, underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy associated with infracolic lymphadenectomy. RESULTS: The infracolic anterior technique has two main advantages. It is faster and prevents the formation of postoperative adhesions, which can make subsequent surgical interventions more difficult. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend systematic para-aortic lymphadenectomy as the first step of pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic head adenocarcinoma by this approach.

From left to right. para-aortic lymph nodes sampling during pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer / Da esquerda para a direita. ressecção de linfonodos para-aórticos durante duodenopancreatectomia para câncer pancreático

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Para-aortic lymph nodes involvement in pancreatic head cancer has been described as an independent adverse prognostic factor. To avoid futile pancreatic resection, we systematically perform para-aortic lymphadenectomy as a first step. AIMS: To describe our technique for para-aortic lymphadenectomy. METHODS: A 77-year-old female patient, with jaundice and resectable pancreatic head adenocarcinoma, underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy associated with infracolic lymphadenectomy. RESULTS: The infracolic anterior technique has two main advantages. It is faster and prevents the formation of postoperative adhesions, which can make subsequent surgical interventions more difficult. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend systematic para-aortic lymphadenectomy as the first step of pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic head adenocarcinoma by this approach.

RESUMO RACIONAL: O envolvimento dos gânglios linfáticos para-aórticos no câncer da cabeça do pâncreas tem sido descrito como um fator prognóstico adverso independente. Para evitar a ressecção pancreática inútil, realizamos sistematicamente linfadenectomia para-aórtica. OBJETIVOS: Descrever a técnica de linfadenectomia para-aórtica. MÉTODOS: Paciente do sexo feminino, 77 anos, com quadro de icterícia e adenocarcinoma da cabeça do pâncreas ressecável, submetida à duodenopancreatectomia associada à linfadenectomia infracólica. RESULTADOS: Esta técnica anterior infracólica tem duas vantagens principais: é mais rápida e evita a formação de aderências pós-operatórias, o que pode dificultar as intervenções cirúrgicas subsequentes. CONCLUSÕES: Recomendamos a linfadenectomia para-aórtica sistemática como o primeiro passo da duodenopancreatectomia para o adenocarcinoma da cabeça do pâncreas por esta abordagem.

Systematic C-reactive protein monitoring reduces hospital stay after laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. A comparative study of 158 consecutive patients with ulcerative colitis.

AIM: C-reactive protein (CRP) is a common biomarker of inflammation which has largely been used to predict the risk of postoperative septic complications after colorectal surgery. However, no data exist concerning its potential benefit after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis (UC). The aim of this study was to evaluate a CRP-driven monitoring discharge strategy after laparoscopic IPAA for UC. METHODS: Since 2012, 158 patients undergoing a laparoscopic IPAA for UC have been included: 66 patients (CRP group) operated since 2016 had a CRP-driven monitoring discharge on postoperative day 5 (POD 5) and were discharged on POD 6 if CRP < 100 mg/L; these patients were matched (according to age, gender, body mass index, IPAA in two or three steps) to 92 patients operated between 2012 and 2016 without any CRP monitoring (control group). RESULTS: Median length of hospital stay was shorter in the CRP than the control group (7 vs. 9 days; P < 0.001) and discharge on POD 6 occurred more frequently in the CRP group (47% vs. 7%, P < 0.001). No difference was observed between the two groups concerning overall morbidity (P = 0.980), surgical site infection (P = 0.554), Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIa morbidity (P = 0.523), unplanned rehospitalization (P = 0.734) and 30-day reoperation (P = 0.240). CONCLUSION: CRP-driven monitoring discharge strategy after laparoscopic IPAA for UC is associated with a significant reduction in length of hospital stay, without increasing morbidity, reoperation or rehospitalization rates.

Performance of non-invasive biomarkers compared with invasive methods for risk prediction of posthepatectomy liver failure in hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) is a rare but dreaded complication. The aim was to test whether a combination of non-invasive biomarkers (NIBs) and CT data could predict the risk of PHLF in patients who underwent resection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: Patients with HCC who had liver resection between 2012 and 2020 were included. A relevant combination of NIBs (NIB model) to model PHLF risk was identified using a doubly robust estimator (inverse probability weighting combined with logistic regression). The adjustment variables were body surface area, ASA fitness grade, male sex, future liver remnant (FLR) ratio, difficulty of liver resection, and blood loss. The reference invasive biomarker (IB) model comprised a combination of pathological analysis of the underlying liver and hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement. Various NIB and IB models for prediction of PHLF were fitted and compared. NIB model performances were validated externally. Areas under the curve (AUCs) were corrected using bootstrapping. RESULTS: Overall 323 patients were included. The doubly robust estimator showed that hepatitis C infection (odds ratio (OR) 4.33, 95 per cent c.i. 1.29 to 9.20; P = 0.001), MELD score (OR 1.26, 1.04 to 1.66; P = 0.001), fibrosis-4 score (OR 1.36, 1.06 to 1.85; P = 0.001), liver surface nodularity score (OR 1.55, 1.28 to 4.29; P = 0.031), and FLR volume ratio (OR 0.99, 0.97 to 1.00; P = 0.014) were associated with PHLF. Their combination (NIB model) was fitted externally (2-centre cohort, 165 patients) to model PHLF risk (AUC 0.867). Among 129 of 323 patients who underwent preoperative HVPG measurement, NIB and IB models had similar performances (AUC 0.753 versus 0.732; P = 0.940). A well calibrated nomogram was drawn based on the NIB model (AUC 0.740). The risk of grade B/C PHLF could be ruled out in patients with a cumulative score of less than 160 points. CONCLUSION: The NIB model provides reliable preoperative evaluation with performance at least similar to that of invasive methods for PHLF risk prediction.