Current clinical practice of electroconvulsive therapy and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in psychiatry, a German sample.

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the current clinical practice of Electroconvulsive Therapy and Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in German psychiatry. Case-based data (> 1.000.000 cases) were collected according to §21 of the German hospital remuneration law from January 2015 to December 2017. The study cohort comprises approximately 35-40% of the annual psychiatric cases and hospitals in Germany. Frequency of ECT and rTMS cases were investigated considering main diagnoses according to ICD-10 and treatment settings (inpatient vs. day-care). ECT cases with short-term hospitalization (≤ 4 days) were supposed to be maintenance ECT cases. A linear regression analysis was conducted to estimate trends in the use of ECT and rTMS. Different groups were compared using Chi-square tests. ECT and rTMS cases appear to increase in total during the observation period possibly due to facilities newly introducing ECT and rTMS but also to increased frequency of treatments. Both treatments were rarely performed in day-care settings (0.89% and 11.25%). ECT was performed in 1.72% of all cases with affective disorders and in 1.48% with major depressions, respectively. Age ≥ 65 years, females, severe and psychotic depression were significantly associated with a higher rate of ECT cases. > 40% of all ECT cases were possibly maintenance ECT cases. Only 0.60% of these were performed in day- care settings. rTMS was primarily performed in major depression (86,7% of all rTMS cases). This study suggests a growing demand for ECT and rTMS. Nevertheless, the use of ECT is still low compared to the high prevalence of treatment resistant depression. The use of rTMS is even lower and seems to be restricted to specialized institutions. Maintenance ECT is frequently carried out in an inpatient setting. Limitations of this study are the case- and group-based analysis, missing data on outpatient services and treatment sessions per case. Therefore, the database is not necessarily representative for the entire German healthcare system. Further studies are needed to verify the presented findings and should address the feasibility of ambulatory and day-care ECT services.

Nuclear medical imaging as part of dementia diagnostics in psychiatric day-care clinics and inpatient care settings.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines support the use of nuclear medical imaging (NMI) techniques for differential diagnostics of certain cases of dementia. AIMS: We aimed at studying the association between using NMI and the accuracy of dementia diagnoses. Additionally, we evaluated the effect of conducting NMI on the duration of hospital treatment. METHODS: This study was based on data collected according to §21 of the German hospital remuneration law, including relevant diagnostic and procedural codes for NMI in dementia patients. In total, more than 7.2 million cases treated in German psychiatric and somatic hospitals between 2015 and 2017 were included. Associations between the frequency of NMI and the accuracy of dementia diagnoses in terms of specific vs. unspecific diagnostic codes were analyzed using Fischer's exact test. RESULTS: In total, 351,106 cases with a dementia diagnosis were encoded during the study period. NMI was performed in 1.03% or 0.15% of all patients with dementia in psychiatric or somatic clinics, respectively. In psychiatric clinics, the proportion of unspecific dementia diagnoses decreased from 20.86% in 2015 to 17.73% in 2017. NMI was mainly performed within psychiatric day-care settings. Interestingly, patients receiving NMI stayed shorter within day-care settings (8.1 ± 16.0 days) compared to inpatient settings (38.3 ± 44.7 days). CONCLUSIONS: Nuclear medical imaging is often performed in psychiatric day-care settings. Further studies are warranted to understand the predictive diagnostic value of NMI in dementia diagnosis compared with clinical, CSF and structural imaging in different healthcare settings.

Prevalence of affective disorders and dementia in inflammatory polyarthropathies.

Comorbid disorders are common in psychiatric diseases and understanding the risk of secondary diseases can aid successful clinical treatment. The objective of this study was to compare the frequency of comorbid dementia, affective disorders, and inflammatory polyarthropathies. Healthcare data obtained via the German Hospital Fees Act from two independent databases with more than 7.4 million cases were analyzed to compare the prevalence of comorbid disorders. Comorbid inflammatory polyarthropathy was observed in 2.27% of patients diagnosed with affective disorders and 1.35% of patients with dementia (p < 0.001). Among patients with a primary diagnosis of inflammatory polyarthropathy, 1.27% of patients were diagnosed with dementia, whereas 4.55% of age-matched patients without inflammatory polyarthropathies had comorbid dementia (p < 0.001). The opposite effect was demonstrated for affective disorders, as 5.77% of patients with a primary diagnosis of inflammatory polyarthropathy also had comorbid affective disorders, while 4.87% of age-matched patients without inflammatory polyarthropathy had an accompanying affective disease (p < 0.001). These findings show an association between the occurrence of inflammatory polyarthropathies, dementia, and affective disorders. This correlation might improve diagnosis and treatment for patients with comorbidities. Moreover, further exploration of the molecular pathophysiology underlying these relationships could be relevant for the development of novel treatment options.