MRI following UKA: The component-bone interface.

BACKGROUND: Loosening is one of the major long-term failure modes in unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA). The aim of the study is to describe and characterize implant-bone interface of femoral and tibial components after UKA by means of magnet resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIAL AND METHODS: MRI tailored to reduce metallic artefact of the knee after medial UKA was performed in 10 patients as a pilot study. The component-bone interface at femoral and tibial components was evaluated by two independent investigators. They gave degree of confidence to their evaluation of each parameter on a five-point scale. Inter-observer reliability was determined. RESULTS: Artefacts provoked by the implants were rare. Inter-observer reliability and confidence were excellent for the femoral interface. They were lower at the tibial interface but results were still satisfactory. CONCLUSIONS: Tailored MRI allows reproducible analysis of the component-bone interface after UKA. It is helpful in assessment of suspected loosening after UKA.

MRI after unicondylar knee arthroplasty: rotational alignment of components.

INTRODUCTION: This pilot study used magnet resonance imaging (MRI) to analyse the rotation of medial unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) components and assessed how accurately the results could be reproduced. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Knee MRI using a special protocol to reduce metal artefact was performed in ten patients who had undergone medial UKA. Two independent investigators measured the rotation angle of femoral (zirconium) and tibial (cemented full-poly or cemented modular metal-backed) components applying different reference lines for the latter. Statistical analysis comprised tests for reliability, variance between measurement techniques, standard deviations and limits of agreement. RESULTS: For all methods tested, there was sufficient inter- and intra-observer reliability. Lowest variances were, however, found for the femoral epicondyles, for both femoral and tibial components. A tangent to the dorsal epicondyles of the tibia also gave reproducible results with low variances for the tibial component. DISCUSSION: Almost all applied measurement techniques were reproducible by statistical definition, although some of them resulted in substantial differences between both, observations and observers. A variance test helps to distinguish better between clinically useful and less accurate references. CONCLUSION: MRI allows good reproducible rotation analysis via the femoral epicondyles for both femoral and tibial UKA implants. For the tibia, the tibial tuberosity, the eminentia and the tibial epicondyles in particular were shown to be less reliable. The dorsal epicondyles seem to be most suitable for the tibial component.

MRI after patellofemoral replacement: the component-bone interface and rotational alignment.

BACKGROUND: In an earlier paper, it was shown that tailored magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allows for reproducible analysis of the preserved knee joint structures after patellofemoral replacement (PFR). PURPOSES: This pilot study investigates to what degree MRI could produce reliable assessment of the implant-bone interface of femoral and patellar components and rotational alignment following PFR. METHODS: MRI tailored for reduction of metallic artefacts was performed in seven patients who had undergone PFR. Two independent investigators evaluated the implant-bone interface at femoral and patellar components and the rotational alignment of the femoral component. They also assessed their degree of confidence in evaluation using a five-point scale. The inter-observer reliability was determined. RESULTS: Implant-induced MRI artefact was barely observed and there was no interference with component-bone interface evaluation. There was excellent inter-observer reliability, inter-observer agreement, and confidence for the implant-bone interface at femoral and patellar components and for rotational alignment. The applied score for the interface was found to be reliable. CONCLUSION: Tailored MRI allows reproducible analysis of the implant-bone interface and of rotational alignment of the femoral component in patients who have had PFR. It might prove helpful in the assessment of painful PFR.

MRI after unicondylar knee arthroplasty: the preserved compartments.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the reproducibility of using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to analyze the preserved anatomic knee compartments following unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) with zirconium femoral components. It was hypothesized that evaluation of the cartilage, ligaments, meniscus, and tendons would result in a high rate of inter-observer reliability. SCOPE: Ten patients underwent MRI of the knee tailored to reduce metallic artifact following medial UKA with zirconium femoral implants. Cartilage, external meniscus, collateral and cruciate ligaments, the quadriceps and patellar tendons, and the presence of joint effusion were evaluated by two independent investigators. The reviewers provided degrees of confidence with their evaluation of each parameter through the use of a five-point scale. Inter-observer agreement was calculated and inter-observer reliability was determined by use of Cohen's Kappa. Artifacts originating from the implants were rarely observed. There was excellent inter-observer reliability (i.e., high Cohen's Kappa) for all assessed structures, and a high level of observer confidence for the evaluation of the cartilage, meniscus, tendons, ligaments, and joint effusion. CONCLUSION: In this study tailored MRI allows for reproducible analysis of the preserved knee joint compartment after UKA for zirconium implants. This technique might prove helpful in the assessment of painful knee joints after UKA with other metallic materials as new MRI software programs, which suppress metal artifacts, are developed.

MRI after patellofemoral replacement: the preserved compartments.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to assess the reproducibility of magnet resonance imaging (MRI) analysis of preserved anatomic structures of the knee after patellofemoral replacement (PFR). It was hypothesized that evaluation of cartilage, ligaments, meniscus and tendons would result in high inter-observer reliability after PFR. MATERIAL AND METHODS: MRI, tailored to reduce metallic artefacts of the knee, after PFR was performed in seven patients. Two independent investigators evaluated cartilage, menisci, collateral and cruciate ligaments, the quadriceps and patellar tendons and the presence of joint effusion. The reviewers used a five-point scale to give a degree of confidence to their evaluation of each parameter. Inter-observer reliability was determined by calculation of Cohen's Kappas. RESULTS: Artefact provoked by the implants was not observed. For all assessed structures, there was excellent inter-observer reliability, with high Cohen's Kappas. There were also high levels of inter-observer agreement and observer confidence in the evaluation of cartilage, meniscus, tendons, ligaments and joint effusion. CONCLUSION: Tailored MRI allows reproducible analysis of the preserved knee joint structures after PFR. It might prove helpful in assessment of painful knee joints after PFR.