Results on patient-reported outcomes are underreported in summaries of product characteristics for new drugs.

BACKGROUND: Summaries of product characteristics (SmPCs) are regulatory documents published upon drug approval. They should report all relevant study data and advise how to use drugs safely and effectively. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly used in clinical trials to incorporate the patient perspective-SmPCs should thus adequately report PROs. In Germany, new drugs undergo mandatory early benefit assessment. Pharmaceutical companies submit dossiers containing all evidence; the subsequent dossier assessments focus on patient-relevant outcomes and comprehensively report PROs. OBJECTIVE: The primary aim was to investigate to what extent PROs recorded as outcomes in clinical trials of new drugs are reported in SmPCs. METHODS: We analysed dossier assessments with randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of new drugs entering the market between 01/2014 and 07/2018 and the corresponding SmPCs, and compared PRO reporting in both document types. For this purpose, we evaluated dossier assessment characteristics (e.g. drug name, indication, disease category) and study characteristics (e.g. evaluable PROs available?). PROs were divided into symptoms and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). SmPCs were screened to identify RCTs. We conducted 3 main evaluation steps: (1) Did the RCT included in the dossier assessment contain evaluable PROs? (2) If yes, was the RCT included in the SmPC? (3) If yes, were the PROs reported in the SmPC? Results are presented descriptively. RESULTS: 88 dossier assessments including 143 RCTs on 72 drugs were considered: 109 (76.2%) RCTs included evaluable PROs, of which 89 were included in SmPCs. 38 RCTs (42.7%) investigated oncologics, 18 (20.2%) anti-infectives, and 33 (37.1%) other drugs. The RCTs considered symptoms more often than HRQoL (82 vs. 66 RCTs). In SmPCs, PROs were reported for 41 RCTs (46.1%), with a slightly higher reporting rate for RCTs considering HRQoL (43.9%) than for RCTs considering symptoms (41.5%). In oncologic indications, PROs were reported for 36.7% of RCTs considering HRQoL and 33.3% of RCTs considering symptoms. In infectious diseases, the rates were 21.4% (symptoms) and 0% (HRQoL), and for other diseases about 60% (symptoms) to 70% (HRQoL). CONCLUSION: Even though a large amount of PRO data on new drugs is available from clinical trials included in SmPCs, the corresponding results are underreported.

Information on new drugs at market entry: retrospective analysis of health technology assessment reports versus regulatory reports, journal publications, and registry reports.

BACKGROUND: When a new drug becomes available, patients and doctors require information on its benefits and harms. In 2011, Germany introduced the early benefit assessment of new drugs through the act on the reform of the market for medicinal products (AMNOG). At market entry, the pharmaceutical company responsible must submit a standardised dossier containing all available evidence of the drug's added benefit over an appropriate comparator treatment. The added benefit is mainly determined using patient relevant outcomes. The "dossier assessment" is generally performed by the Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG) and then published online. It contains all relevant study information, including data from unpublished clinical study reports contained in the dossiers. The dossier assessment refers to the patient population for which the new drug is approved according to the summary of product characteristics. This patient population may comprise either the total populations investigated in the studies submitted to regulatory authorities in the drug approval process, or the specific subpopulations defined in the summary of product characteristics ("approved subpopulations"). OBJECTIVE: To determine the information gain from AMNOG documents compared with non-AMNOG documents for methods and results of studies available at market entry of new drugs. AMNOG documents comprise dossier assessments done by IQWiG and publicly available modules of company dossiers; non-AMNOG documents comprise conventional, publicly available sources-that is, European public assessment reports, journal publications, and registry reports. The analysis focused on the approved patient populations. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. DATA SOURCES: All dossier assessments conducted by IQWiG between 1 January 2011 and 28 February 2013 in which the dossiers contained suitable studies allowing for a full early benefit assessment. We also considered all European public assessment reports, journal publications, and registry reports referring to these studies and included in the dossiers. DATA ANALYSIS: We assessed reporting quality for each study and each available document for eight methods and 11 results items (three baseline characteristics and eight patient relevant outcomes), and dichotomised them as "completely reported" or "incompletely reported (including items not reported at all)." For each document type we calculated the proportion of items with complete reporting for methods and results, for each item and overall, and compared the findings.Results 15 out of 27 dossiers were eligible for inclusion and contained 22 studies. The 15 dossier assessments contained 28 individual assessments of 15 total study populations and 13 approved subpopulations. European public assessment reports were available for all drugs. Journal publications were available for 14 out of 15 drugs and 21 out of 22 studies. A registry report in ClinicalTrials.gov was available for all drugs and studies; however, only 11 contained results. In the analysis of total study populations, the AMNOG documents reached the highest grade of completeness, with about 90% of methods and results items completely reported. In non-AMNOG documents, the rate was 75% for methods and 52% for results items; journal publications achieved the best rates, followed by European public assessment reports and registry reports. The analysis of approved subpopulations showed poorer complete reporting of results items, particularly in non-AMNOG documents (non-AMNOG versus AMNOG: 11% v 71% for overall results items and 5% v 70% for patient relevant outcomes). The main limitation of our analysis is the small sample size. CONCLUSION: Conventional, publicly available sources provide insufficient information on new drugs, especially on patient relevant outcomes in approved subpopulations. This type of information is largely available in AMNOG documents, albeit only partly in English. The AMNOG approach could be used internationally to develop a comprehensive publication model for clinical studies and thus represents a key open access measure.

Pulmonary fibroblasts, an emerging target for anti-obstructive drugs.

Fibrotic alterations are part of the airway re-modelling processes observed in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. There is increasing evidence that in addition to acute bronchodilatory effects, classical anti-obstructive drugs such as muscarinic antagonists and beta-adrenoceptor agonists may also modulate long-term re-modelling processes. The present review aims to summarise muscarinic and beta-adrenergic effects on pulmonary fibroblasts. Recent experimental evidence demonstrated muscarinic stimulatory effects on pulmonary fibroblasts, and long-term blockade of these pro-fibrotic effects may contribute to the beneficial effects of muscarinic antagonists, as observed particularly for the long-acting muscarinic antagonist tiotropium. On the other hand, beta-adrenoceptor agonists, via activation of adenylyl cyclase, can also exert various inhibitory effects on pulmonary fibroblasts, and these anti-fibrotic effects are mimicked by other agents that cause an increase in intracellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP), such as phosphodiesterase inhibitors or EP2 prostanoid receptor agonists. In addition, the role of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase-mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway, protein kinase A and exchange protein activated by cAMP (Epac) and potential interactions between these cellular signalling pathways are discussed.

Inflammatory responses after endothelin B (ETB) receptor activation in human monocytes: new evidence for beneficial anti-inflammatory potency of ETB-receptor antagonism.

Endothelin (ET) stimulates potent ETA/ETB receptors important in the pathogenesis of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and fibrosis. Though therapy with ET-receptor antagonists is well established uncertainty exists whether selective ETA or dual ETA/ETB-receptor antagonism is superior in PAH. The objective of this study was to further elucidate the pro-inflammatory effects of ET-1 on ETB receptors in cultured human monocytes (10(5)/20 h) compared with non-specific stimulation with LPS in vitro and to define the antagonizing effects of bosentan, a dual ETA/ETB-receptor antagonist, on inflammatory mediator production. We further hypothesized that ETB-receptor antagonism reduces the requirement of PGE2 to control inflammatory mediator production. Activation of the monocyte ETB subtype by ET (1 ng/ml) concentration-dependently stimulated TNF-alpha (744%) >PGE2 (570%) > IL-1 beta (112%) and had no effect on 5-lipoxygenase metabolism. Compared with ET a different profile of IL-1 beta >TNF-alpha >PGE2 was induced by LPS. ETB-receptor antagonism attenuated ET- and LPS-responses in monocytes, in particular of TNF-alpha and PGE2 to a similar extend (40%) that were only demonstrable following LPS at therapeutic plasma concentrations of bosentan and had no effect on IL-1 beta. Inhibition of ETB receptors in LPS-stimulated monocytes by bosentan was responded with suppression of PGE2 and increased production of leukotrienes indicating strong effects in the cyclooxygenase pathway that is known to control cellular ET transcription. These data suggest an important signaling pathway between ET-induced cytokine production following ETB-receptor activation with no further control of ET transcription by PGE2 required following ETB receptor antagonism. Therefore, in states of inflammation increased ETB-receptor expression and activation mediated by elevated ET concentrations may be an underestimated mechanism, which warrants the application of combined ETA/ETB-receptor antagonists.

Muscarinic receptors mediate stimulation of human lung fibroblast proliferation.

Airway remodeling is a structural alteration associated with chronic inflammatory and obstructive airway diseases, wherein fibroblasts are crucially involved. The present study investigates whether lung fibroblast proliferation is influenced by muscarinic mechanisms. For this purpose, expression of muscarinic receptors in MRC-5 human lung fibroblasts was characterized by semiquantitative RT-PCR, and the effects of muscarinic agonists and antagonists on ((3)H)-thymidine incorporation as a measure of proliferative activity were studied under different culture conditions. MRC-5 fibroblasts express mRNA encoding different subtypes of muscarinic receptors (M(2) > M(3) > M(4), traces for M(5) and no M(1)). Expression of M(2) and M(3) receptors was confirmed at the protein level by immunoblot analysis. Under different culture conditions, carbachol (up to 10 microM) or oxotremorine (10 microM) stimulated ((3)H)-thymidine incorporation, with maximum increases between about 40 and 100%. The stimulatory effect of 10 microM carbachol was prevented by pretreatment with pertussis toxin and antagonized in a concentration-dependent manner by the muscarinic receptor antagonists tiotropium, AQ-RA 741, AF-DX 384, 4-diphenylacetoxy-N-methylpiperidine methoiodide, himbacine, p-fluorohexahydrosiladifenidol, and pirenzepine, with concentrations producing 50% inhibition of 14 pM, 24, 64, 127, 187, 452 nM, and 1.5 microM, respectively. Primary human lung fibroblasts were also found to express mRNA for muscarinic receptors (M(2) > M(1) > M(3), traces for M(4) and no M(5)), and showed a pertussis toxin-sensitive proliferative response to muscarinic receptor stimulation. In conclusion, proliferation of human lung fibroblasts can be stimulated by activation of muscarinic receptors with a pharmacologic profile correlating best to M(2) receptors.