Economic burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Morocco: a cost of illness study.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) carries an important economic burden worldwide. However, the cost of this disease in Morocco is not well explored. This study aimed to estimate the economic cost associated with COPD in Morocco and identify its determinants. A cost of illness, prevalence-based study using a bottom-up approach method, including COPD patients, was carried out in 2021-2022. The cost was estimated from a societal perspective, and the time horizon was 1 year. Data collection was performed using a questionnaire including socio-demographic, clinical data, and utilization of health care resources in 2019: hospitalization, medical tests, medications, and medical visits. Direct health cost (DHC) was estimated by multiplying the use of health services by the official prices (unit costs) published by the National Agency for Health Insurance. The indirect cost (IC) represented by labor productivity losses was calculated using the human capital method. Costs were compared according to different socio-demographic and clinical factors. We included 159 patients; 82.4% were men, 80.4% were current or former smokers, and 78.7% were categorized as "high-risk" groups (grades C-D). The DHC was estimated at $1816.6 per patient per year. Pharmaceutical and hospitalization costs represented the highest part of the total DHC (42.5% and 22.1%, respectively). The IC was estimated at $709.5±1081.3 per patient per year. DHC increased with increasing disease severity and with the number of severe exacerbations (p<0.001). Current and former smokers were more costly to the healthcare system than nonsmokers (p=0.029). IC also increased with the number of severe exacerbations (p=0.003). In this study, we showed that COPD in Morocco generates important costs for the health system, mainly related to smoking and the severity of the disease. It is therefore important to strengthen tobacco control measures in our country.

Self-care intervention using mobile apps for sexual and reproductive health in the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region.

Sexual and reproductive health (SRH) concerns physical, mental, and social well-being as related to sexual and reproductive systems. Self-care, which is the ability to promote health without the support of a health-care provider, can advance SRH, especially for fragile populations. Mobile health (mHealth) solutions can be used to raise awareness about SRH. We performed a structured literature review and analysis of mHealth-based approaches for delivering self-SRH services and interventions in the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMR). A fuzzy-based framework for assessing those mHealth apps was proposed. We identified 6 out of 737 papers, and 23 (5.7%) out of 400 mHealth apps retrieved from app-stores, describing mHealth use for self SRH with only 10 apps developed in EMR countries, namely Morocco, Pakistan, Egypt, Iran, and Jordan. Our fuzzy-based framework proposes guidelines regarding the implementation of self-care interventions to help project leaders promote their adoption in the SRH systems.

Effectiveness of a participatory approach to develop school health interventions in four low resource cities: study protocol of the 'empowering adolescents to lead change using health data' cluster randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Comprehensive local data on adolescent health are often lacking, particularly in lower resource settings. Furthermore, there are knowledge gaps around which interventions are effective to support healthy behaviours. This study generates health information for students from cities in four middle-income countries to plan, implement and subsequently evaluate a package of interventions to improve health outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a cluster randomised controlled trial in schools in Fez, Morocco; Jaipur, India; Saint Catherine Parish, Jamaica; and Sekondi-Takoradi, Ghana. In each city, approximately 30 schools will be randomly selected and assigned to the control or intervention arm. Baseline data collection includes three components. First, a Global School Health Policies and Practices Survey (G-SHPPS) to be completed by principals of all selected schools. Second, a Global School-based Student Health Survey (GSHS) to be administered to a target sample of n=3153 13-17 years old students of randomly selected classes of these schools, including questions on alcohol, tobacco and drug use, diet, hygiene, mental health, physical activity, protective factors, sexual behaviours, violence and injury. Third, a study validating the GSHS physical activity questions against wrist-worn accelerometry in one randomly selected class in each control school (n approximately 300 students per city). Intervention schools will develop a suite of interventions using a participatory approach driven by students and involving parents/guardians, teachers and community stakeholders. Interventions will aim to change existing structures and policies at schools to positively influence students' behaviour, using the collected data and guided by the framework for Making Every School a Health Promoting School. Outcomes will be assessed for differential change after a 2-year follow-up. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by WHO's Research Ethics Review Committee; by the Jodhpur School of Public Health's Institutional Review Board for Jaipur, India; by the Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research Institutional Review Board for Sekondi-Takoradi, Ghana; by the Ministry of Health and Wellness' Advisory Panel on Ethics and Medico-Legal Affairs for St Catherine Parish, Jamaica, and by the Comité d'éthique pour la recherche biomédicale of the Université Mohammed V of Rabat for Fez, Morocco. Findings will be shared through open access publications and conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04963426.

Action on the social determinants for advancing health equity in the time of COVID-19: perspectives of actors engaged in a WHO Special Initiative.

Since the 2008 publication of the reports of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health and its nine knowledge networks, substantial research has been undertaken to document and describe health inequities. The COVID-19 pandemic has underscored the need for a deeper understanding of, and broader action on, the social determinants of health. Building on this unique and critical opportunity, the World Health Organization is steering a multi-country Initiative to reduce health inequities through an action-learning process in 'Pathfinder' countries. The Initiative aims to develop replicable and reliable models and practices that can be adopted by WHO offices and UN staff to address the social determinants of health to advance health equity. This paper provides an overview of the Initiative by describing its broad theory of change and work undertaken in three regions and six Pathfinder countries in its first year-and-a-half. Participants engaged in the Initiative describe results of early country dialogues and promising entry points for implementation that involve model, network and capacity building. The insights communicated through this note from the field will be of interest for others aiming to advance health equity through taking action on the social determinants of health, in particular as regards structural determinants.

Leveraging Global Fund investments for health systems strengthening: a qualitative case study on Morocco's Concept Note development.

BACKGROUND: In 2014, the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (Global Fund) introduced a new funding model. Following notice of their 2014-2016 allocation, Morocco took the bold decision to reallocate its entire allocated investment (US$ 8 029 632) for health systems strengthening (HSS) and submitted a comprehensive request for funding solely for interventions to strengthen the health system. AIMS: To explore the specific barriers and facilitators to Morocco's novel development and submission of a cross-cutting HSS funding request to the Global Fund and to document lessons learned and recommendations for policy and programme leaders interested in leveraging Global Fund investments for health systems. METHODS: A thorough desk review of key documents and 15 in-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with key stakeholders in Morocco in 2017. RESULTS: In preparation for the funding request, Morocco carried out a comprehensive assessment of the health system, which included extensive dialogue with stakeholders and partners. This action was critical to developing a shared understanding and support for adopting a cross-cutting HSS approach. Despite concerns about potential negative effects of diverting funding from disease-specific programmes, visionary leadership advocated effectively for investing in HSS, and this paved the way for the development of a clear Concept Note requesting Global Fund financial support for the health system more broadly. CONCLUSION: Morocco was the first country in the Global Fund's Middle/East North Africa region to invest its entire Global Fund allocation in strengthening the health system. Many important lessons have been learned from this novel experience and these are presented for shared learning. This opportunity for learning is timely as countries begin preparations for the upcoming funding cycle.

Policy dialogue and participation: a new way of crafting a national health financing strategy in Morocco.

BACKGROUND: Policy dialogue for health policies has started to gain importance in recent years, especially for complex issues such as health financing. Moroccan health financing has faced several challenges during the last years. This study aims to document the Moroccan experience in developing a consolidated health financing strategy according to the policy dialogue approach. It especially considers the importance of conceptualising this process in the Moroccan context. METHOD: We documented the process of developing a health financing strategy in Morocco. It concerned four steps, as follows: (1) summarising health financing evidence in preparation of the policy dialogue; (2) organising the health policy dialogue process with 250 participants (government, private sector, NGOs, civil society, parliamentarians, technical and financial partners); (3) a technical workshop to formulate the strategy actions; and (4) an ultimate workshop for validation with decision-makers. The process lasted 1 year from March 2019 to February 2020. We have reviewed all documents related to the four steps of the process through our active participation in the policy debate and the documentation of two technical workshops to produce the strategy document. RESULTS: The policy dialogue approach showed its usefulness in creating convergence among all health actors to define a national shared vision on health financing in Morocco. There was a high political commitment in the process and all actors officially adopted recommendations on health financing actions. A strategy document produced within a collaborative approach was the final output. This experience also marked a shift from previous top-down approaches in designing health policies for more participation and inclusion. The evidence synthesis played a crucial role in facilitating the debate. The collaborative approach seems to work in favouring national consensus on practical health financing actions. CONCLUSION: The policy dialogue process adopted for health financing in Morocco helped to create collective ownership of health financing actions. Despite the positive results in terms of national mobilisation around the health financing vision in Morocco, there is a need to institutionalise the policy dialogue with a more decentralised approach to consider subnational specificities.