RESUMO
Context: In the surgical treatment of primary hyperparathyroidism, intraoperative localization of the diseased glands is an essential issue. We aimed to evaluate the impact of the intraoperative frozen section during radio-guided focused parathyroidectomy and compare its efficiency with intraoperative gamma probe survey and measurement of intraoperative quick parathyroid hormone. Methods: All consecutive patients underwent radio-guided focused parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism due to solitary parathyroid adenoma. The outcomes of parathyroidectomy were evaluated by serum levels of calcium and parathyroid hormone. The primary outcome was the surgical cure diagnosed by normal serum calcium levels in the sixth postoperative month. Results: A total of 55 patients with a mean age of 54.3±12.2 years were evaluated. The diagnostic accuracy of the preoperative localization tests was calculated as 92.7%. The intraoperative gamma probe survey impacted the operative plans of four patients (7.3%) by localizing the diseased gland in other positions. The accuracy of intraoperative quick parathyroid hormone and frozen section analysis was 100% for both. In all patients, serum calcium and PTH levels dropped to normal in the sixth postoperative month. There were no cases of the persistent or recurrent disease during the follow-up period. Conclusion: The results of the intraoperative gamma probe survey, intraoperative quick parathyroid hormone, and frozen section were concordant with the final pathology in all cases. In four patients (7.3%), intraoperative gamma probe survey impacted the operative plans. The intraoperative gamma probe survey may be used as the sole intraoperative method to locate the correct position of the solitary parathyroid adenoma.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Due to variable rates of colon carcinoma or advanced adenoma mimicking an acute diverticulitis episode, the necessity of colonoscopy to detect colon cancer or advanced adenoma remains to be explored. This study investigated the incidence and predictive factors of colon cancer or advanced adenoma following acute diverticulitis. METHODS: We evaluated retrospectively all consecutive patients with an episode of computed tomography-proven acute diverticulitis between June 2016 and August 2019. A follow-up colonoscopy was performed. Demographic and clinical parameters were recorded. Patients with clinically substantial colonic neoplasia (colon cancer or advanced adenoma) were classified as Group A, while Group B included patients without clinically significant colonic neoplasia. The incidence of clinically significant colonic neoplasia in acute diverticulitis patients was regarded as the primary outcome. RESULTS: The mean age of 233 patients with acute diverticulitis was 58.6 ± 12.7 years. Complicated diverticulitis was detected in 39 patients (16.7 %). Sixteen patients (6.9 %) were assigned to Group A and 217 patients (93.1 %) to Group B. The age of the patients in group A was significantly higher than in Group B (p =0.001). Age above 50 and 65 years was also significantly associated with clinically significant colonic neoplasia (p =0.015 and p =0.012, respectively). The other variables did not influence the development of clinically significant colonic neoplasia (p >0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Colonoscopy examination following an episode of acute diverticulitis may not be recommended for all patients due to the rare occurrence of colon cancer or clinically significant colonic neoplasia in those younger than 50 years. HIPPOKRATIA 2021, 25 (2):69-74.