Premature morbidity and mortality associated with potentially undiagnosed familial hypercholesterolemia in the general population.

Background: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is common, but underdiagnosed, and few systematic early screening programs exist. Objective: To assess health outcomes among those with a recorded diagnosis of FH and potential cases of FH with no recorded diagnosis. Methods: Retrospective cohort study using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Records of adults were classified as diagnosed FH (FHCoded), or via accepted algorithms using LDL-C and clinical characteristics as potential FH (FHPotential) or unlikely FH (FHUnlikely) using the DLCN or EUROASPIRE criteria (but no record of FH). Outcomes assessed were premature cardiovascular (CV) events, premature deaths and life expectancy. Results: Among 1,729,046 individuals free from CV events, a record of FHCoded before the age of 40 was 0.3/1000 (IQR 0.3-0.4) and increased with age. Where LDL-C levels were available, 1.8/1000 (IQR 1.6-2.0) could be classified as FHPotential. LDL-C was higher for both FHCoded and FHPotential vs FHUnlikely (185.6 and 216.6 vs 116 mg/dL, respectively, p<0.001). Compared to FHUnlikely both FHCoded and FHPotential cohorts had a higher risk of premature cardiovascular events (both p<0.001) with highest rates among FHCoded. Risk of premature deaths did not differ between FHCoded and FHUnlikely, but was 1.88 (95% CI 1.27-2.78, p = 0.002) for FHPotential vs FHCoded and 2.40 (95% CI 1.57-3.67, p<0.001) for FHPotential vs FHUnlikely. At age 18, the FHPotential cohort had a life expectancy 16 years lower than the FHCoded cohort (p<0.001). Conclusions: Potential cases of FH had a doubling in risk of premature death and a large reduction in life expectancy compared to individuals with a recorded diagnosis of FH. These findings strengthen the critical importance of identifying potential cases of FH early and early treatment.

Urinary drug metabolite testing in chronic heart failure patients indicates high levels of adherence with life-prolonging therapies.

AIMS: Despite medical therapy for heart failure (HF) having proven benefits of improving quality of life and survival, many patients remain under-treated. This may be due to a combination of under-prescription by medical professionals and poor adherence from patients. In HF, as with many other chronic diseases, adherence to medication can deteriorate over time particularly when symptoms are well controlled. Therefore, detecting and addressing non-adherence has a crucial role in the management of HF. Significant flaws and inaccuracies exist in the methods currently used to assess adherence such as patient reporting, pill counts, and pharmacy fill records. We aim to use high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS) to detect metabolites of HF medications in the urine samples of chronic HF patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Urine samples were collected from 35 patients in a specialist HF clinic. Patients were included if they had an ejection fraction <45% and were taking at least two disease-modifying HF medications. They were excluded if they had been admitted to hospital for HF in the 3 months preceding clinic attendance. These samples were sent for HPLC-MS and tested for all HF medications prescribed for that patient. A high rate of complete adherence of 89% was detected in these patients, with 94% being partially adherent (at least one HF medication detected) to therapy (at least one HF medication detected). This analysis also highlighted that mineralocorticoid antagonists represent both the most under-prescribed (67%) and poorly adhered (75%) medication class. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis revealed a surprisingly high level of adherence to disease-modifying therapy in chronic HF patients and highlights that most of our 'total' under-treatment is likely to be from a failure to prescribe rather than a failure to adhere. Testing for metabolites of disease-modifying HF drugs in urine using HPLC-MS is feasible and is a useful adjunct to a specialist HF service. At present, the distinction between treatment failure and failure to take treatment is not always clear, which is important because the investigation and potential solutions are different. The former needs initiation of additional therapies and consideration of additional diagnoses, whereas the latter requires strategies to understand reasons underlying poor adherence and collaborative working to improve this: the wrong strategy will be ineffective.

Cholesterol-Lowering Agents.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of death worldwide. To date, decades of research has established LDL-C (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol) as a causal factor in the development of atherosclerotic CVD. Statin therapy, supported by a broad evidence base, has demonstrated its superior efficacy in reducing LDL-C and subsequent cardiovascular risk. It therefore currently forms the mainstay of lipid-lowering therapy as recommended by international guidelines. Statin therapy is indicated in the secondary prevention of atherosclerotic CVD, as well as genetic causes of dyslipidemia (such as familial hypercholesterolemia). Although this strategy targets those most at risk, it merely addresses those most susceptible and does not account for the fact that most cardiovascular events occur in those at moderate to low risk. In addition, there is evidence for use in primary prevention such as in those with diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, and high risk of future atherosclerotic CVD as determined by risk prediction calculators. Risk prediction tools, however, are far from perfect and do not accurately account for those at low short-term but high lifelong risk. Considering the log-linear relationship between LDL-C reductions and reductions in risk of atherosclerotic CVD, even in those at very low risk of future events, a clinical question posed is can we and should we shift the entire risk distribution by treating everyone? The present review discusses these issues in more detail outlining arguments for and against each approach.

Lipids and Lipoproteins in Risk Prediction.

Ischemic heart disease remains the leading cause of death worldwide. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) has proved to have a causal relationship with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Lowering LDL-C improves outcomes, although some patients continue to have residual risk of cardiovascular disease. Cardiovascular risk prediction calculators are routinely used in to identify patients most at risk. Research into other lipoprotein factors has suggested that they may have advantages over LDL-C and improve the ability to identify those most at risk. Although some technology is not widely available, there is potential for better risk prediction in specific groups.

PCSK9 inhibition and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease prevention: does reality match the hype?

Within this review we look at whether the potential provided by proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibition for prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease matches the excitement generated. Two fully human monoclonal antibodies to PCSK9 are currently licenced for clinical use both in the USA and the European Union: evolocumab and alirocumab. These reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol by over 50% across a range of populations and were generally found to have a safety profile comparable with placebo. The development programme for a third humanised monoclonal antibody, bococizumab, was terminated early due to the presence of neutralising antibodies reducing its efficacy over time. Results from the first cardiovascular outcomes trial, FOURIER, have demonstrated significant reductions in cardiovascular events in a population with stable cardiovascular disease over a 2-year period. The ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial comparing alirocumab to placebo is expected to report in 2018 and provide cardiovascular outcome data in a post acute coronary syndrome population. Monoclonal antibodies have an injection burden of 12-26 injections per year. An alternative approach to reducing PCSK9 is to inhibit translation of the messenger RNA for PCSK9. The phase II ORION-1 study using inclisiran, a small interference RNA to PCSK9, suggested that two doses of inclisiran produced time averaged reductions in LDL cholesterol of 50% over 9 months. The ORION-4 cardiovascular outcome trial will assess the cardiovascular benefits of two injections per year using inclisiran. With further outcome trials expected, appropriate patient selection will be key considering the higher drug costs of these therapies.

Cardiorenal syndrome: review of our current understanding.

Renal and cardiac diseases are both prevalent and carry significant morbidity and mortality. They share common vascular risk factors and are physiologically interlinked. Dysfunction in one organ affects the other. Concurrent renal and cardiac disease is associated with a poor prognosis. This close relationship is reflected through cardiorenal syndrome. A classification system has been proposed; however, the underlying process is complex and multifactorial. Management of this syndrome focuses on improving heart function, reducing volume overload, and managing heart failure and chronic kidney disease. This, however, is challenging, limited by paucity of evidence and may lead to suboptimal therapy. Increased recognition of this syndrome should raise awareness in providing early therapy and avoiding adverse outcomes due to under-treatment. In this article, we provide an overview of our current understanding of cardiorenal syndrome, as well as its pathophysiology and treatment options.

Doctors' attitudes towards prescribing opioids for refractory dyspnoea: a single-centred study.

OBJECTIVE: Dyspnoea is a distressing and common symptom in palliative care. There is evidence that opioids can improve the experience of dyspnoea. Limited data suggest that doctors' attitudes may be a barrier to prescribing opioids for the relief of refractory dyspnoea. This study explored UK hospital doctors' experience of, and attitudes towards, prescribing opioids for refractory dyspnoea in advanced disease. METHODS: Anonymous semistructured questionnaires were distributed by convenience sampling. Data were collated and descriptive analysis performed. Doctors of all grades attending routine educational events within the medical directorate of a UK district general hospital were included in this study. RESULTS: Sixty-five questionnaires were analysed. Most doctors (61/64) reported a willingness to prescribe opioids for refractory dyspnoea, although the majority felt less confident than when prescribing opioids for pain. Three-quarters of doctors (49/65) had initiated, or under supervision, prescribed opioids for refractory dyspnoea. This was most often for a patient in the last hours/days of life (44/49), followed by patients with cancer (34/49), heart failure (26/49) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (21/49). Confidence in prescribing was highest in relation to the dying and lowest in COPD. A significant proportion (40/64) of respondents expressed concerns when prescribing. CONCLUSIONS: This group of doctors was aware of the use of opioids for refractory dyspnoea and reported a willingness to prescribe opioids for this symptom. However, confidence varied considerably depending on clinical context. Fears about side effects were prevalent and should be addressed. Doctors would benefit from clearer guidance on prescribing regimes, specifically in circumstances other than the dying patient.

Promoting antimicrobial stewardship: using video tools for junior doctors' induction.

Antimicrobial prescribing is linked to key issues in infection control and patient safety. This article presents a novel video tool for junior doctors promoting antimicrobial stewardship, and thus safe antimicrobial prescribing, through improved awareness of local information technology systems.