Adequacy of EGD Reporting: a Review of 100 Reports from 100 Endoscopists.

INTRODUCTION: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is commonly performed in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). An EGD report should document pertinent findings such as esophagitis, a columnar-lined esophagus (CLE), the location of the squamo-columnar and gastroesophageal junctions, the size and type of a hiatal hernia and the number and location of any biopsies. The aim of this study was to evaluate how commonly these findings were noted in the EGD reports of patients referred for antireflux surgery. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of patient charts from 2012 to 2015 to identify 100 consecutive EGD reports from different endoscopists in different patients. Each EGD report was reviewed for pertinent findings and the use of a classification system for esophagitis (Savory-Miller or Los Angeles) and for reporting a CLE (Prague). RESULTS: In 100 EGD reports, esophagitis was noted in 33 patients, but was graded in only 14 (42%). A CLE was noted in 28 patients, but the length was reported in only 16 (57%) and no report used the Prague classification system. A hiatal hernia was noted in 61 patients, measured in 31 (51%) and the type classified in 26%. A biopsy was taken in 93 patients and the location noted in 86 patients (93%). The number of biopsies was recorded in only 20 patients (22%). In 12 patients the EGD was for Barrett's surveillance, yet a Seattle biopsy protocol was reported to be used in only 3 patients. CONCLUSION: Endoscopy reports frequently do not include the use of a grading system for esophagitis or the Prague system for CLE. This hampers the assessment of change with therapy or over time. The size of a hiatal hernia was typically reported in a subjective fashion and only infrequently was the type specified. Lack of clarity about the presence of a paraesophageal hernia can impede evaluation of acute symptoms. In patients with Barrett's esophagus a standard biopsy protocol was infrequently reported to be used. These findings raise concern about the quality of upper endoscopy, both in the performance of the procedure and the documentation of findings. A consistent reporting system is recommended for routine use with upper endoscopy.

Consensus for Thoracoscopic Left Upper Lobectomy-Essential Components and Targets for Simulation.

BACKGROUND: Simulation-based training is a valuable component of cardiothoracic surgical education. Effective curriculum development requires consensus on procedural components and focused attention on specific learning objectives. Through use of a Delphi process, we established consensus on the steps of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) left upper lobectomy and identified targets for simulation. METHODS: Experienced thoracic surgeons were randomly selected for participation. Surgeons voted and commented on the necessity of individual steps comprising VATS left upper lobectomy. Steps with greater than 80% of participants in agreement of their necessity were determined to have established "consensus." Participants voted on the physical or cognitive complexity of each, or both, and chose steps most amenable to focused simulation. RESULTS: Thirty thoracic surgeons responded and joined in the voting process. Twenty operative steps were identified, with surgeons reaching consensus on the necessity of 19. Components deemed most difficult and amenable to simulation included those related to dissection and division of the bronchus, artery, and vein. CONCLUSIONS: Through a Delphi process, surgeons with a variety of practice patterns can achieve consensus on the operative steps of left upper lobectomy and agreement on those most appropriate for simulation. This information can be implemented in the development of targeted simulation for VATS lobectomy.

Clinical outcome after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication in patients with GERD and PPI refractory heartburn.

Typical reflux symptoms that respond well to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy are key factors predictive of an excellent outcome with antireflux surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Our aim was to evaluate whether poor preoperative heartburn (HB) relief with PPIs was associated with a worse outcome after Nissen fundoplication. Patients with a main symptom of HB and a positive pH-test who had a laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication between January 2008 and December 2014 were included. Prior to surgery, patients graded how effectively their HB symptoms were relieved by PPIs. Three groups were defined: good response (76-100% relief), partial response (26-75% relief) and poor response (0-25% relief). Outcomes and satisfaction were assessed at a minimum of 1 year after fundoplication. There were 129 patients who met inclusion criteria and 75 agreed to participate. The median follow-up was 48 months. Prior to Nissen fundoplication 13 patients had a good HB response to PPI-therapy, 36 had a partial response and 26 had a poor response. All patients were satisfied with their HB relief after fundoplication (mean satisfaction score: 9.5/10) and there was no difference in satisfaction score or heartburn relief between groups. Heartburn symptoms that respond poorly to PPI therapy are reliably relieved with a Nissen fundoplication in patients with objectively confirmed GERD. Patient satisfaction after Nissen fundoplication was excellent and was similar in patients with poor versus excellent HB relief with preoperative PPI therapy. Therefore, antireflux surgery is an option for patients with HB and confirmed GERD regardless of the degree of relief of HB symptoms provided by PPI medications.

Clinical Significance of Esophageal Outflow Resistance Imposed by a Nissen Fundoplication.

BACKGROUND: Attention has been focused on the amplitude of esophageal body contraction to avoid persistent dysphagia after a Nissen fundoplication. The current recommended level is a contraction amplitude in the distal third of esophagus above the fifth percentile. We hypothesized that a more physiologic approach is to measure outflow resistance imposed by a fundoplication, which needs to be overcome by the esophageal contraction amplitude. STUDY DESIGN: The esophageal outflow resistance, as reflected by the intra-bolus pressure (iBP) measured 5 cm above the lower esophageal sphincter (LES), was measured in 53 normal subjects and 37 reflux patients with normal esophageal contraction amplitude, before and after a standardized Nissen fundoplication. All were free of postoperative dysphagia. A test population of 100 patients who had a Nissen fundoplication was used to validate the threshold of outflow resistance to avoid persistent postoperative dysphagia. RESULTS: The mean (SD) amplitude of the iBP in normal subjects was 6.8 (3.7) mmHg and in patients before fundoplication was 3.6 (7.0) mmHg (p = 0.003). After Nissen fundoplication, the mean (SD) amplitude of the iBP increased to 12.0 (3.2) mmHg (p < 0.0001 vs normal subjects or preoperative values). The 95th percentile value for iBP after a Nissen fundoplication was 20.0 mmHg and was exceeded by esophageal contraction in all patients in the validation population, and 97% of these patients were free of persistent postoperative dysphagia at a median 50-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Nissen fundoplication increases the outflow resistance of the esophagus and should be constructed to avoid an iBP > 20 mmHg. Patients whose distal third esophageal contraction amplitude is >20 mmHg have a minimal risk of dysphagia after a tension-free Nissen fundoplication.

Accuracy of Clinical Staging and Outcome With Primary Resection for Local-Regionally Limited Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of clinical staging, to assess survival with surgical resection alone, and to determine factors associated with understaging in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma thought to have limited local-regional disease. BACKGROUND: Primary surgical resection is the preferred treatment in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma clinically staged to have limited nodal disease. This approach requires reliable clinical staging. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed of all patients who had primary esophagectomy for clinical stage T1-3 N0-1 adenocarcinoma (seventh edition AJCC) from January 2002 to May 2013. Clinical and pathologic stages were compared and overall survival was analyzed. RESULTS: There were 88 patients who met inclusion criteria. Final pathology confirmed appropriate clinical staging (≤T3N1) in 76% of patients (67/88). There were 21 patients who were understaged (>T3N1), and in all cases, understaging was based on the presence of advanced nodal (N2 or N3) disease. Factors independently associated with understaging were the presence of dysphagia, tumor length >3 cm, and poor differentiation. At a median follow-up of 35 months, 63% of all patients (55/88) remain alive. The 5-year survival in correctly staged patients was 67%, compared with 33% for those who were understaged (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Modern clinical staging will accurately identify the majority of patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma and limited local-regional disease (≤pT3N1). Survival with surgery alone in correctly staged patients was excellent and unlikely to be improved with neoadjuvant therapy. A combination of dysphagia, poor differentiation, and tumor length >3 cm was associated with understaging in 92% of patients. Patients with these factors are likely to have more advanced disease than clinically suspected and may benefit from neoadjuvant therapy before resection.

Esophageal adenocarcinoma stage III: Survival based on pathological response to neoadjuvant treatment.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment for locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinomas (EAC). Pathological response is thought to be a major prognostic factor. Aims of this study were to determine the frequency of complete response and to compare the survival of complete and incomplete responders in stage III EAC. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all stage III patients that underwent neoadjuvant therapy followed by esophagectomy between 1999 and 2015. Patients were classified into complete (pCR) versus incomplete responders (pIR). RESULTS: 110 patients were included. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was applied in 25 (23%) and chemoradiotherapy in 85 (77%) patients. Pathologic response was complete in 25% (n = 27) and was more common after chemoradiotherapy. Mean F/U interval was 36 months (0.3-173). There was a significant difference in the overall survival between complete and incomplete responders (p = 0.036). Median survival in the pIR group was 24.4 months and the median survival was not reached during the observation time in pCR. The 3-year-survival-rate was 70% in pCR and 40% in pIR (p = 0.01). Positive lymph nodes (ypN+) were present in 56 patients (51%). The 3-year-survival-rate was 59% in pIR with ypN0 and 29% in pIR with ypN+ (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Complete response to neoadjuvant therapy has a significantly better overall and 3-year-survival after esophagectomy than incomplete response. In incomplete responders, residual lymph node disease was associated with a significantly worse survival. These findings suggest that the degree of pathologic response and lymph node status are major prognostic factors for survival in EAC patients with stage III disease.

Outcome with Primary En-bloc Esophagectomy for Submucosal Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Intramucosal esophageal adenocarcinoma can be reliably treated endoscopically. Controversy exists about the use of endotherapy versus esophagectomy for submucosal tumors. Increasingly endotherapy is considered for submucosal tumors in part because of the presumed high mortality with esophagectomy and the perceived poor prognosis in patients with nodal disease. This study was designed to assess survival following primary en bloc esophagectomy (EBE) in patients with submucosal esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). METHODS: This is a retrospective review of all patients who underwent EBE for submucosal EAC between 1998 and 2015. No patient had neoadjuvant therapy. RESULTS: There were 32 patients (28M/4F; median age 64 years). The median tumor size was 1.5 cm (0.4-8.0), and the median number of resected nodes was 48 (23-85). There was one perioperative death. Lymph node metastases were present in 7 patients (22%). There was one involved node in four patients and 2, 3, and 31 nodes in one patient each. The one N3 patient received adjuvant therapy. The median follow-up was 87 months. Overall survival at 5 and 10 years was 84 and 70% respectively. Disease-specific survival at 10 years was 90%. Eight patients died, but only three deaths (9%) were related to EAC. Disease-specific survival at 10 years in node-positive patients was 71%. CONCLUSIONS: Survival after primary en bloc esophagectomy for submucosal adenocarcinoma was excellent even in node-positive patients. Mortality with esophagectomy was low and far less than the 22% risk of node metastases in patients with submucosal tumor invasion. Esophagectomy should remain the preferred treatment for T1b esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Post-Nissen Dysphagia and Bloating Syndrome: Outcomes After Conversion to Toupet Fundoplication.

INTRODUCTION: Protracted dysphagia and bloating are potential troublesome side effects following Nissen fundoplication. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of conversion from Nissen to Toupet on dysphagia and bloating. METHODS: The study used a retrospective chart review of all patients who had undergone conversion from Nissen to Toupet between 2001 and 2014. Endpoints were to determine the effect of conversion on dysphagia, bloating, and reflux control. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients underwent conversion at a median of 3.7 years (1.4-10.5) after initial fundoplication. Indications were dysphagia in 19 (76%) and bloating syndrome in 6 (24%) patients. The median operative time was 104 min (86-146). There were no serious complications or mortality. Median follow-up was 27 months (0.8-130). Dysphagia was relieved in 16 (84%) and bloating in all 6 patients. Two patients developed reflux requiring a redo-Nissen. Two patients had persistent dysphagia and required endoscopic dilation. The GERD-HRQL post-conversion showed a median score of 5 (3-13). CONCLUSIONS: Conversion relieved dysphagia in 84% and bloating in 100%. Significant recurrence of GERD was rare. Given the absence of serious complications, conversion should be considered in patients with severe bloating or dysphagia.

Public perceptions on robotic surgery, hospitals with robots, and surgeons that use them.

OBJECTIVE: The use of robotic-assisted surgery (RS) has rapidly increased, but public perceptions about RS are largely unknown. The aim of this study was to gain insight into public perceptions about RS, hospitals that have robots, and surgeons that use them. METHODS: A Web-based survey was distributed worldwide. Surveys were collected from July to September 2014, and those with 50% or greater completion were used for analysis. RESULTS: There were 789 surveys, and 747 (95%) were used for analysis. The mean age of respondents was 38.5 years. Most (94%) were from the USA. Over half (53%) had a background in health care, and 13% were physicians. The majority of respondents (86%) had previously heard of RS, but almost 25% indicated that RS was like open, laser, or scarless surgery. Over 20% of respondents indicated that the robot had some degree of autonomy during surgery. Most respondents (72%) indicated that RS was safer, faster, and less painful or offered better results, but when asked if they would choose to have RS, 55% would prefer to have conventional minimally invasive surgery. Hospitals with a robot were thought to be better hospitals by 53% of the respondents. Fewer physicians perceived advantages to RS (30% physicians vs 78% non-physicians p < 0.001), and fewer physicians would prefer RS if they needed surgery (30 vs 49% p = 0.001). One-half of respondents would prefer remote RS by a renowned expert they had never met over having RS by a local non-expert surgeon. CONCLUSIONS: Most respondents perceived benefits to RS, but still preferred conventional minimally invasive surgery if necessary. Misperceptions about the robot indicate a need for patient education prior to RS. Interest by 50% of respondents in remote surgery might allow expert surgeons to do complex procedures without necessitating regionalization of care. Issues identified in this survey merit further exploration.

Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in Patients Younger than 40 Years: A Two-Decade Experience at a Public and Private Hospital.

Esophageal adenocarcinoma is typically observed in the older non-Hispanic white population. Changing demographics are altering the epidemiology of the disease. The aim of this study is to review the presentation and outcomes of esophageal adenocarcinoma patients <40 years old at our institution. A retrospective review was performed of patients diagnosed with esophageal adenocarcinoma between 1990 and 2013. Demographics, presentation, and outcomes were compared in those <40 years old and those ≥40 years old. There were 772 total cases with 42 (5%) <40 years old consisting of 37 (88.1%) males, five females and median age of diagnosis of 35 (interquartile range: 31-38). The two most common ethnicities were White non-Hispanic/Latino in 19 (45.2%), Hispanic /Latino in 18 (42.9%). Compared with patients 40 years and older, the younger group had more Hispanic/Latinos than the older group (43% vs 17%, P < 0.001), more frequently presented with stage IV disease (50% vs 29%) and had a shorter median survival. In conclusion, younger patients tend to present at a much later stage than the older counterparts, which may be due to a delay in diagnosis as well as more aggressive biology. Esophageal adenocarcinoma seems to be increasing in the Hispanic/Latino population.

Timing and Pattern of Recurrence after Gastrectomy for Adenocarcinoma.

Gastric adenocarcinoma has a high recurrence rate. The goal of this study was to determine the timing and pattern of recurrence after gastrectomy. A retrospective review was performed of patients with gastric adenocarcinoma having curative partial or total gastrectomy with R0/D2 lymph node resection from 1999 to 2013. Follow-up included CT scans of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis at 3-month intervals for the first three years, at 6-month intervals for the next two years, and annually thereafter. There were 62 patients, 38 males and 24 females, with a median age of 65 years. Median follow-up was 29 months and recurrence was identified in 21 per cent of patients. Median time to recurrence was 12 months and 92 per cent of recurrences occurred within two years. The last recurrence was identified at 34 months. Abdominal CT scan identified all patients with recurrence, although some patients had disease elsewhere in addition to the abdominal disease. There were no extra-abdominal isolated recurrences. In conclusion, recurrence after complete resection for gastric adenocarcinoma typically occurs within the first two years, and can be found by abdominal CT scan. Close cancer follow-up appears unnecessary after three years because all recurrences were identified within 34 months of resection.

Long-Term Outcome of the Treatment of Zenker's Diverticulum.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of Zenker's diverticulum can be accomplished by use of a transcervical myotomy (TCM) with diverticulopexy/diverticulectomy or by the transoral endoscopic stapling (TOS) approach. Our aim was to evaluate the short-term and long-term outcomes of these two techniques. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed to identify all patients who had received either treatment for Zenker's diverticulum from July 1998 to August 2013. Telephone interviews were attempted of all surviving patients to assess long-term outcome. RESULTS: There were 77 patients, with a median age of 71 years (range, 37 to 97 years). All patients had dysphagia, and 33 (43%) had regurgitation. TCM was performed in 68 patients, and TOS was done in nine. The median size of the diverticulum was 2.5 cm in the TCM group and 4 cm in the TOS group (p = 0.13). The operation was primary in 66 patients (86%) and a reoperation in 11 patients. The median hospital stay was 1 day for TOS and 3 for TCM (p = 0.0005). The median time to oral intake for both groups was 1 day. There were three adverse events in the TCM group and none in the TOS group. Early outcome was assessed in all 77 patients at a median of 4 months (interquartile range [IQR], 1 to 13.5 months). Symptomatic improvement occurred in all patients, with 55 patients (71%) reporting complete resolution. Long-term symptoms were assessed at a median of 54 months (IQR, 34 to 77 months) in 38 of 59 (64%) surviving patients. CONCLUSIONS: Cricopharyngeal myotomy with diverticulopexy/diverticulectomy and TOS are both safe and effective treatments for Zenker's diverticulum. All patients reported improvement in symptoms, with complete resolution in the majority of patients.

High resolution manometry sub-classification of Achalasia: does it really matter? Does Achalasia sub-classification matter?

BACKGROUND: Three variants of Achalasia have been described using high-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM). While manometrically distinct, their clinical significance has yet to be established. Our objective was to compare the outcome after myotomy in patients with these Achalasia subtypes. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed to identify patients with Achalasia who had HRM and who underwent Heller myotomy or Per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). Symptoms and esophageal clearance by timed barium study were compared before and after treatment. RESULTS: We identified 49 patients, 21 males and 28 females, with a median age of 52 years. The primary symptom in all patients was dysphagia, with a median duration of 4 years (range 4 months-50 years). By HRM, ten patients (20 %) were classified as Type I, 30 (61 %) as Type II, and 9 (18 %) as Type III. At a median follow-up of 16 months after myotomy (range 1-63 months), the median Eckardt score was zero and was similar across subtypes. Relief of dysphagia was also similar across subtypes (80 % of Type I, 93 % of Type II and 89 % of Type III). On pre-treatment timed barium study, no patient had complete emptying at 1 or 5 min. After myotomy, complete emptying occurred within 1 min in 50 % (20/40) and within 5 min in 60 % (24/40) and was similar across groups. CONCLUSION: Myotomy for Achalasia results in excellent symptomatic outcome and improvement in esophageal clearance. There was no difference among the described HRM Achalasia variants. This calls into question the clinical utility of Achalasia sub-classification and affirms the benefit of myotomy for this disease.

Intraoperative Assessment of Perfusion of the Gastric Graft and Correlation With Anastomotic Leaks After Esophagectomy.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate laser-assisted fluorescent-dye angiography (LAA) to assess perfusion in the gastric graft and to correlate perfusion with subsequent anastomotic leak. BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leaks are a major source of morbidity after esophagectomy with gastric pull-up (GPU). In large part, they occur as a consequence of poor perfusion in the gastric graft. METHODS: Real-time intraoperative perfusion was assessed using LAA before bringing the graft up through the mediastinum. When there was a transition from rapid and bright to slow and less robust perfusion, this site was marked with a suture. The location of the anastomosis relative to the suture was noted and the outcome of the anastomosis ascertained by retrospective record review. RESULTS: Intraoperative LAA was used to assess graft perfusion in 150 consecutive patients undergoing esophagectomy with planned GPU reconstruction. An esophagogastric anastomosis was performed in 144 patients. A leak was found in 24 patients (16.7%) and were significantly less likely when the anastomosis was placed in an area of good perfusion compared with when the anastomosis was placed in an area of less robust perfusion by LAA (2% vs 45%, P < 0.0001). By multivariate analysis perfusion at the site of the anastomosis was the only significant factor associated with a leak. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative real-time assessment of perfusion with LAA correlated with the likelihood of an anastomotic leak and confirmed the critical relationship between good perfusion and anastomotic healing. The use of LAA may contribute to reduced anastomotic morbidity.

Long-term quality of life and alimentary satisfaction after esophagectomy with colon interposition.

BACKGROUND: The long-term outcome after colon interposition for esophageal reconstruction is not well documented. Our objective was to assess quality of life and alimentary satisfaction 10 or more years after colon interposition. METHODS: Patients who had an esophagectomy that was reconstructed using a colon interposition before April 2003 were identified. Symptoms, alimentary satisfaction, and quality of life were assessed by telephone interview and questionnaires. RESULTS: We identified 79 surviving patients, and follow-up was obtained in 63 (80%). The indication for esophagectomy was cancer in 45 patients and benign disease in 18. Vagal-sparing esophagectomy was performed in 48% of patients, en bloc in 44%, and transhiatal in 8%. Median follow-up was 13 years (range, 10 to 38 years). The median Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index score was 3 of 4 and results from the RAND 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (RAND Corp, Santa Monica, CA) were at or above the published normal means in all categories. Most patients were free of dysphagia (89%), regurgitation (84%), and heartburn (84%). The most common postprandial symptom was early satiety (40%). The body mass index was within normal reference ranges in 90% of patients. Follow-up esophagogastroduodenoscopy in 30 patients at a median of 6 years showed no Barrett's metaplasia in the residual esophagus. Seven patients had a reoperation for colon redundancy. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term alimentary satisfaction and quality of life were excellent after colon interposition. Most patients were free of dysphagia and few needed revision for redundancy. These results should encourage the use of a colon interposition in patients expected to survive long-term after esophagectomy.