Acute human defibrillation performance of a subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator with an additional coil electrode.

BACKGROUND: The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) delivers 80 J shocks from an 8 cm left-parasternal coil to a 59 cm3 left lateral pulse generator (PG). A system that defibrillates with lower energy could significantly reduce PG size. Computer modeling and animal studies suggested that a second shock coil either parallel to the left-parasternal coil or transverse from the xiphoid to the PG pocket would significantly reduce the defibrillation threshold. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to acutely assess the defibrillation efficacy of parallel and transverse configurations in patients receiving an S-ICD. METHODS: Testing was performed in patients receiving a conventional S-ICD system. Success at 65 J was required before investigational testing. A second electrode was temporarily inserted from the xiphoid incision connected to the PG with an investigational Y-adapter. Phase 1 (n = 11) tested the parallel configuration. Phase 2 (n = 21) tested both parallel and transverse configurations in random order. RESULTS: This study enrolled 35 patients (28 males (80%); mean age 51 ± 17 years; left ventricular ejection fraction 40% ± 15%; body mass index 26 ± 4 kg/m2; prior myocardial infarction 46%; congestive heart failure 49%; cardiomyopathy 63%). Compared to the conventional S-ICD system, mean shock impedance decreased for both parallel (69 ± 15 Ω vs 86 ± 20 Ω; n = 33; P < .001) and transverse (56 ± 14 Ω vs 81 ± 21 Ω; n = 20; P < .001) configurations. Shock success rates at 20, 30, and 40 J were 55%, 79%, 97%, and 25%, 70%, 90% for parallel and transverse configurations, respectively. Defibrillation threshold testing was well tolerated with no serious adverse events. CONCLUSION: Adding a second shock coil, particularly in the parallel configuration, significantly reduced the impedance and had a high likelihood of defibrillation success at energies ≤40 J. This may enable the development of a smaller S-ICD.

A new algorithm to reduce inappropriate therapy in the S-ICD system.

INTRODUCTION: The subcutaneous ICD system (S-ICD) has been shown to be a safe and effective treatment for patients at risk for sudden cardiac death. This device reliably detects ventricular tachyarrhythmias with a low incidence of inappropriate shocks for supraventricular arrhythmias. However, T-wave oversensing (TWOS) is more common with the S-ICD compared with transvenous systems. We developed a novel discrimination algorithm to reduce TWOS without compromising tachyarrhythmia discrimination. METHODS AND RESULTS: The algorithm was developed using a database of recorded episodes, including 244 appropriate therapies for ventricular arrhythmias and 133 episodes with an inappropriate detection due to TWOS, and using a computer model that simulates the S-ICD system. An independent set of data of 161 TWOS episodes, 137 ventricular and 328 supraventricular episodes, was used to validate the algorithm on actual device hardware. The S-ICD performance with the new algorithm was compared with the S-ICD without the new algorithm. Development results showed a decrease in inappropriate charge due to TWOS by 30.7 ± 18%. All ventricular arrhythmias were appropriately detected and the time to appropriate charge initiation was not increased. System validation showed that the new algorithm avoided an inappropriate charge due to TWOS by 39.8 ± 11.4%. No decrease in ventricular arrhythmia sensitivity and no significant change in supraventricular specificity were observed. CONCLUSIONS: A new algorithm that uses correlation of the existing complex to previous complexes reduced TWOS episodes by approximately 40%. The algorithm has potential for a clinically meaningful decrease in inappropriate shocks.

Effects of a rate smoothing algorithm for prevention of ventricular arrhythmias: results of the Ventricular Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (VAST).

BACKGROUND: Rate smoothing, which is available in some pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs), has been used to prevent Torsades de Pointes in patients with long QT syndrome. Its efficacy in general ventricular arrhythmia prevention has not been determined. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the Ventricular Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (VAST) was to prospectively investigate whether rate smoothing could significantly reduce the incidence of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in a large, broad population of patients with ICDs. METHODS: Five hundred sixty-nine patients were enrolled at 57 participating centers and implanted with a commercially available Guidant ICD. A single-blinded crossover design was used in which each patient was randomized at implant to one of two treatment sequences: either rate smoothing on (RS On) followed by rate smoothing off (RS Off), or RS Off followed by RS On. This mode sequence was randomly determined and assigned in a 1:1 fashion using randomized permuted blocks by site. Each mode was followed for 6 months. Programming of rate smoothing was prescribed as 12% Down and 12% Up for the duration of the RS On period. RESULTS: Of enrolled patients, 281 were randomized to RS Off followed by RS On, and 288 to RS On followed by RS Off. With RS On, 75 (23%) patients experienced a reduction in arrhythmias, 76 (23%) saw an increase in arrhythmias, and the remaining 176 (54%) had no difference. No significant difference (P = .58) in frequency of arrhythmias with RS On vs RS Off was found. CONCLUSION: Rate smoothing does not result in a reduction in ventricular arrhythmias in a heterogeneous population of patients receiving ICDs.

ICD Therapy for the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death in Post-MI Patients.

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are unequivocally the treatment of choice for patients who have already experienced a near-fatal tachyarrhythmic event. Recently, studies have conclusively demonstrated that extending the benefits of ICD therapy to postinfarction patients with resultant left ventricular dysfunction results in dramatic additional lifesaving without the need for complex risk- stratification procedures. The landmark Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial II (MADIT II) shows that patients with reduced left ventricular function (ejection fraction < 30%) 1 month after a myocardial infarction should receive an ICD to prevent sudden cardiac death.

Defibrillation efficacy and pain perception of two biphasic waveforms for internal cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.

UNLABELLED: Efficacy and Pain Perception of Two Biphasic Waveforms. INTRODUCTION: We evaluated the influence of the peak voltage of waveforms used for internal cardioversion of atrial fibrillation on defibrillation efficacy and pain perception. A low peak voltage biphasic waveform generated by a 500-microF capacitor with 40% tilt was compared to a standard biphasic waveform generated by a 60-microF capacitor with 80% tilt. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 19 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (79% male, age 55 +/- 11 years, 21% with heart disease), the atrial defibrillation threshold (ADFT) was determined during deep sedation with midazolam for both waveforms in a randomized fashion using a step-up protocol. Internal cardioversion with a single lead (shock vector: coronary sinus to right atrium) was successful in 18 (95%) of 19 patients. ADFT energy and peak voltage were significantly lower for the low-voltage waveform (2.1 +/- 2.4 J vs 3.5 +/- 3.9 J, P < 0.01; 100 +/- 53 V vs 290 +/- 149 V, P < 0.01). Sedation then was reversed with flumazenil after ADFT testing. Two shocks at the ADFT (or a 3-J shock if ADFT >3 J) were administered to the patient using each waveform in random order. Pain perception was assessed using both a visual scale and a numerical score. ADFTs were above the pain threshold in 17 (94%) of 18 patients, even though the ADFT with the 500-microF waveform was <100 V in 63% of the patients. Pain perception was comparable for both waveforms (numerical score: 6.5 +/- 2.4 vs 6.3 +/- 2.6; visual scale: 5.4 +/- 2.6 vs 5.2 +/- 3.1; P = NS, 500-microF vs 60-microF). The second shock was perceived as more painful in 88% of the patients, independent of the waveform used. CONCLUSION: Despite a 66% lower peak voltage and a 40% lower energy, the 40% tilt, 500-microF capacitor biphasic waveform did not change the pain perceived by the patient during delivery of internal cardioversion shocks. Pain perception for internal cardioversion probably is not influenced by peak voltage alone and increases with the number of applied shocks.

Safety of a single successful conversion of ventricular fibrillation before the implantation of cardioverter defibrillators.

UNLABELLED: Multiple successful conversions of ventricular fibrillation (VF) at 10 J below the maximum output of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) have been recommended as a minimum device implantation criterion. This recommendation is based on the probabilistic properties of defibrillation that necessitates multiple shocks to establish an adequate safety margin for the conversion of subsequent spontaneous arrhythmias. We hypothesized that a single successful shock at a 14 J may suffice. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Low Energy Safety Study (LESS) enrolled 720 patients undergoing initial ICD implantation with a dual-coil transvenous lead and active pulse generator. At implant, an enhanced defibrillation threshold (DFT++) was determined by a rigorous protocol beginning at 14 J, and requiring at least 4 shocks. Fifty percent of all patients were then randomized to full output shock energy and the conversion rates for spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmias at rates > 200 beats/min were measured. There were 318 patients randomized to 31 J, of whom 254 were successfully defibrillated by an initial 14 J shock. During a mean follow-up of 24 +/- 12 months, 112 spontaneous VF episodes occurred in 31 patients. The combined conversion success of the first and second shock (when needed) did not differ between the subgroup of patients who were successfully defibrillated by an initial 14 J shock, regardless of the results of additional testing, and the whole cohort who underwent more systematic testing (97% vs 97%). All spontaneous episodes of VF were successfully treated during long-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: A first successful shock of 14 J may be a sufficient endpoint to allow the implantation of ICDs with the Triad lead configuration, when programming all shocks to 31 J.

The Low Energy Safety Study (LESS): rationale, design, patient characteristics, and device utilization.

BACKGROUND: A 10-J energy safety margin has traditionally been used in programming implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). The Low Energy Safety Study (LESS) tests the hypothesis that programming shocks to lower energy margins is safe and effective. METHODS: Patients with standard ICD indications undergo defibrillation threshold testing (DFT) at the time of ICD implant, with reconfirmation of lowest successful energy twice (DFT++). Patients are randomized to 2 groups: the first has the initial 2 shocks for ventricular fibrillation conversion programmed at 2 energy steps above DFT++ (typically 4-6 J, maximum 10 J) with subsequent shocks at maximum energy, and the second has all shocks programmed at maximum energy. Patients are followed up every 3 months for 2 years to assess shock conversion efficacy of spontaneous arrhythmias. In a subgroup of patients, there is a second randomization to energy levels of 0, 1, 2, 3, or 4 steps above implant DFT++ for conversion testing of 3 induced ventricular fibrillation episodes at prehospital discharge, 3 months, and 12 months after implant. RESULTS: Enrollment is complete (702 patients), but follow-up results are pending. There were no significant variations in implant indications and baseline antiarrhythmic drug use over the 3-year enrollment period, although an increase in the percentage of dual-chamber ICDs implanted occurred, with the majority (65%) of implanted ICDs being dual-chamber devices by the end of the enrollment period. CONCLUSION: The results of LESS should facilitate the development of algorithms for programming ICD energy safety margins.