RESUMO
The classification and management of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) arising in the tubular gastrointestinal (GI) tract and pancreas have significantly evolved over the last decades. In the latest WHO classification published in 2022, NENs are separated regardless of their primary origin into two main groups: well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). The substantial changes in the grading system changed the definition of grade 3 to include high-grade well-differentiated NETs (G3-NETs), and poorly differentiated NECs (-NECs). Although these two subgroups are considered high grades with Ki-67 >20%, they have different genomic profiles, prognosis, and clinical behavior, which critically influence their treatment strategies. The available clinical trial data to guide therapy of these high-grade subgroups are extremely limited, which impacts their management. In this review, we will summarize the current advances in the multidisciplinary approach for the management of high-grade gastroenteropancreatic NENs (GEP-NENs) including G3-NETs and NECs.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Intestinais , Tumores Neuroendócrinos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/classificação , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/genética , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/terapia , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/patologia , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/classificação , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/genética , Neoplasias Intestinais/patologia , Neoplasias Intestinais/terapia , Neoplasias Intestinais/classificação , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Neoplasias Gástricas/terapia , Neoplasias Gástricas/classificação , Neoplasias Gástricas/genética , Gradação de TumoresRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Dual checkpoint inhibitor therapy with anti-programmed cell death protein 1 and anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 therapy has shown promising results in patients with high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs), demonstrating varying response rates of 9%-44%. More data are needed to evaluate the true response in a real-world cohort of patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of all patients with high-grade NENs treated at the Moffitt Cancer Center and Mayo Clinic between September 2017 and July 2020 who received combination therapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients met the eligibility criteria. Patients had received an average of two prior lines of therapy, including at least one cytotoxic chemotherapy regimen. Twenty-seven (79.4%) patients had poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas, and seven (20.6%) had well-differentiated high-grade neuroendocrine tumors. The most common primary site (10, 29.4%) was pancreas; other primary sites of disease included colon (n = 5), endometrium (n = 3), anorectum (n = 2), esophagus (n = 2), cervix (n = 1), stomach (n = 1), small intestine (n = 1), and unknown primary (n = 9). Five patients (14.7%) exhibited a best response of partial response as per RECIST 1.1 criteria, 9 (26.5%) stable disease, and 17 (50%) progressive disease: 3 patients did not have a follow-up scan as they discontinued treatment shortly after initiation due to clinical progression. The objective response rate was 14.7%, and disease control rate was 41.2%. Median progression-free survival was 1 month [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.54-1.46 months]; median overall survival (OS) from time of treatment initiation was 5.0 months (95% CI, 4.07-5.93 months), and median OS from diagnosis was 14.0 months (95% CI, 11.79-16.21 months). The median duration of treatment was 1 month (range 0-10 months). Twenty-eight patients discontinued treatment for progression, four patients for toxicity, and two remain on treatment at the time of data cut-off. Twelve patients (35%) experienced grade 3 and 4 treatment-emergent toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: The ipilimumab and nivolumab regimen has modest activity in aggressive and heavily pretreated high-grade NENs who have progressed on prior cytotoxic chemotherapy.
Assuntos
Tumores Neuroendócrinos , Nivolumabe , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Ipilimumab/farmacologia , Ipilimumab/uso terapêutico , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/tratamento farmacológico , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/patologia , Nivolumabe/farmacologia , Nivolumabe/uso terapêutico , Estudos RetrospectivosAssuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/efeitos adversos , Diafragma/efeitos dos fármacos , Diafragma/patologia , Miosite/induzido quimicamente , Insuficiência Respiratória/induzido quimicamente , Idoso , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino , Melanoma/tratamento farmacológico , Miosite/patologia , Insuficiência Respiratória/patologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Treatment for pancreatic cancer with pharmacological ascorbate (ascorbic acid, vitamin C) decreases tumor progression in preclinical models. A phase I clinical trial was performed to establish safety and tolerability of pharmacological ascorbate combined with gemcitabine in patients with biopsy-proven stage IV pancreatic adenocarcinoma. DESIGN: Nine subjects received twice-weekly intravenous ascorbate (15-125 g) employing Simon's accelerated titration design to achieve a targeted post-infusion plasma level of ≥350 mg/dL (≥20 mM). Subjects received concurrent gemcitabine. Disease burden, weight, performance status, hematologic and metabolic laboratories, time to progression and overall survival were monitored. RESULTS: Mean plasma ascorbate trough levels were significantly higher than baseline (1.46 ± 0.02 vs. 0.78 ± 0.09 mg/dL, i.e., 83 vs. 44 µM, p < 0.001). Adverse events attributable to the drug combination were rare and included diarrhea (n = 4) and dry mouth (n = 6). Dose-limiting criteria were not met for this study. Mean survival of subjects completing at least two cycles (8 weeks) of therapy was 13 ± 2 months. CONCLUSIONS: Data suggest pharmacologic ascorbate administered concurrently with gemcitabine is well tolerated. Initial data from this small sampling suggest some efficacy. Further studies powered to determine efficacy should be conducted.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Antimetabólitos Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Antioxidantes/administração & dosagem , Ácido Ascórbico/administração & dosagem , Ácido Ascórbico/sangue , Cromatografia Líquida de Alta Pressão , Desoxicitidina/administração & dosagem , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Glutationa/sangue , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cooperação do Paciente , Segurança do Paciente , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela , GencitabinaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) are uncommon neoplasms that can present with symptoms of hormone overproduction. We evaluated the incidence, prognosis, and temporal trends of PNETs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed all cases of PNETs registered in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 1973 to 2000. Age-adjusted incidence and survival rates were calculated and survival trends over time were evaluated. RESULTS: We identified 1483 cases of PNETs. The crude annual incidence per 1,000,000 was 1.8 in females and 2.6 in males and increased with advancing age. The incidence increased over the study period. Most patients (90.8%) had nonfunctional tumors. Advanced stage, higher grade, and age were the strongest predictors of worse survival. Patients with functional tumors had better outcomes than patients with nonfunctional tumors in both univariate and multivariate analysis (P = 0.004). Survival time increased over the period from 1973 to 2000. No differences were seen in the distribution of stage or age at diagnosis among time periods. CONCLUSION: PNETs are uncommon neoplasms but the incidence may be increasing. Age, grade, stage, and functional status predict survival in patients with PNETs. Survival has improved over time, but this is not explained by earlier diagnosis or stage migration.
Assuntos
Tumores Neuroendócrinos/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/epidemiologia , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/patologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Prognóstico , Programa de SEER , Fatores Sexuais , Taxa de Sobrevida/tendências , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaAssuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Citosina/análogos & derivados , Soronegatividade para HIV , Linfoma/tratamento farmacológico , Organofosfonatos/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Cidofovir , Terapia Combinada , Citosina/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Imunofenotipagem , Linfoma/imunologia , Linfoma/radioterapia , Masculino , Indução de RemissãoRESUMO
Hepatocellular carcinoma is a neoplasm with a uniformly poor prognosis. Risk factors for its development include chronic hepatitis B or C infection, haemochromatosis and alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency, but individuals with any type of chronic liver disease are predisposed. The incidence is significantly higher in Asia and Africa although it has been noted to be increasing in the United States. We present a patient with notable atypical clinical features for hepatocellular carcinoma. The patient had neither predisposing risk factors nor a primary liver lesion causing obstructive jaundice. After multiple tissue specimens were obtained, the final pathological diagnosis was established. Hepatocellular carcinoma generally requires a surgical cure, but patients who are icteric often portend poorer prognoses. For those at high risk, screening may be indicated to identify early curative treatment.