Categorization and recommendations for outcome measures for lower limb absence by an expert panel.

BACKGROUND: Understanding the psychometric strengths and limitations of outcome measures for use with people with lower limb absence (LLA) is important for selecting measures suited to evaluating patient outcomes, answering clinical and research questions, and informing health care policy. The aim of this project was to review the current psychometric evidence on outcome measures in people with LLA to determine which measures should be included in a stakeholder consensus process. METHODS: An expert panel was assembled, and a 3-stage review process was used to categorize outcome measures identified in a systematic literature review into 3 distinct categories (recommended for measures with better than adequate psychometric properties; recommended with qualification; and unable to recommend). Panelists were asked to individually categorize measures based on results of a systematic review of identified measures' psychometric properties. Each measure's final categorization was based on ≥70% agreement by all panelists. RESULTS: No outcome measure attained the ≥70% consensus threshold needed to achieve a rating of "recommend." Hence, panelists suggested combining "recommend" and "recommend with qualifications" into a single category of "recommend with qualifications." Using this approach, consensus was reached for 59 of 60 measures. Consensus could not be reached on 1 outcome measure (socket comfort score). Thirty-six outcome measures were categorized as "unable to recommend" based on available evidence; however, 23 (12 patient-reported measures and 11 performance-based measures) demonstrated adequate psychometric properties in LLA samples and were thus rated as "recommend with qualification" by the expert panel. The panel of experts were able to recommend 23 measures for inclusion in the subsequent stakeholder review. A key strength of this process was bringing together international researchers with extensive experience in developing and/or using LLA outcome measures who could assist in identifying psychometrically sound measures to include in a subsequent stakeholder consensus process. CONCLUSION: The above categorizations represent the current state of psychometric evidence on outcome measures for people with LLA and hence may change over time as additional research becomes available. The results will be used to achieve wider consensus from clinicians, health policymakers, health clinic managers, researchers, and end users (i.e., individuals with LLA) on outcome measures for the International Society of Prosthetics and Orthotics lower limb Consensus Outcome Measures for Prosthetic and Amputation ServiceS.

Psychometric properties of outcome measures for lower-limb absence: A protocol for a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Outcome measures are an important part of clinical practice to assist with the care of individuals with lower-limb absence (LLA). They aid with the devising and evaluation of rehabilitation plans, and guide decisions regarding the provision and funding of prosthetic services worldwide. To date, no outcome measure has been identified as a gold standard for use in individuals with LLA. Furthermore, the large number of outcome measures available has created uncertainty regarding outcome measures that are most appropriate for individuals with LLA. OBJECTIVE: To critically appraise the existing literature related to the psychometric properties of outcome measures for use in individuals with LLA and provide evidence as to which outcome measures may be most appropriate for this clinical population. STUDY DESIGN: This is a systematic review protocol. METHODS: CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE (PubMed), and PsycINFO databases will be searched using a combination of Medical Subject Headings terms and keywords. Search terms that define the population (people with LLA or amputation), intervention (outcome measures), and outcome (psychometric properties) will be used to identify studies. The reference lists of included studies will be hand-search to identify other pertinent articles, with a further search conducted through Google Scholar to ensure that all studies not yet indexed through MEDLINE are captured. Full-text peer-reviewed journal studies published in English will be included, with no date limit set. Included studies will be appraised using the 2018 and 2020 COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklists. Data extraction and study appraisal will be completed by two authors, with a third author serving as an adjudicator. Quantitative synthesis will be used to summarize characteristics of the included studies, with kappa statistics used to determine agreement between authors for study inclusion and the application of COSMIN. Qualitative synthesis will be conducted to report on both quality of the included studies and psychometric properties of the included outcome measures. CONCLUSION: This protocol was designed to identify, appraise, and summarize patient-reported and performance-based outcome measures that have been psychometrically tested in people with LLA. Results from this review will be used to guide a consensus process on outcome measure use for people with LLA.Systematic review registration: PROSPERO registry number: CRD42020217820.

Recommendations from the ISPO lower-limb COMPASS: Patient-reported and performance-based outcome measures.

BACKGROUND: Outcome measures (patient-reported and performance-based) are used widely but not uniformly within the clinical setting for individuals with lower-limb absence (LLA). The need for more detailed information by funding bodies, service planners and providers, and researchers requires the systematic and routine use of outcome measures. Currently, there is no consensus on which outcome measure(s) should be used for individuals with LLA. The aim of the International Society of Prosthetics and Orthotics (ISPO) lower-limb Consensus Outcome Measures for Prosthetic and Amputation Services (COMPASS) was to produce a recommended list of outcome measures to be actively promoted for routine use within clinical practice before and after an episode of care. METHODS: Between May and June 2021, 46 users, clinicians, researchers, managers, and policymakers working in the field of LLA and prosthetic users met virtually. Consensus participants were first asked to complete an online survey with questions based on the results from a systematic review and the outcomes from an expert panel. A modified Delphi technique was used to determine outcome measures for use in routine clinical practice. This paper discusses the ISPO lower-limb COMPASS process from which recommendations were made. RESULTS: The ISPO lower-limb COMPASS resulted in the following 6 recommendations: (1) Amputee Mobility Predictor, Timed Up and Go, Two-Minute Walk Test, Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire-Residual Limb Health, Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire-Utility, and Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales-Revised, which make up the ISPO lower-limb COMPASS ; (2) Comprehensive High-Level Activity Mobility Predictor and Six-Minute Walk Test are 2 additional outcome measures recommended for higher-activity-level individuals with LLA, which make up the COMPASS+ ; (3) Patient-Specific Function Scale makes up the COMPASS Adjunct ; (4) a generic health-related quality of life outcome measure such as the European Quality of Life-5D-5L or Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 item can be used to supplement the COMPASS; (5) outcome measures suited to low- and middle-income countries need to be developed with a focus on activities such as sitting cross-legged, kneeling, squatting, and other culturally important mobility-related activities; and (6) translation, validation, and open sharing of translated outcome measures included in the COMPASS, COMPASS+, and COMPASS Adjunct occurs. CONCLUSION: The above recommendations represent the current status of knowledge on outcome measures for LLA based on research and international consensus and hence, will change over time. This work has been developed for clinicians and researchers to improve knowledge on outcome measures to guide clinical decision-making and future research initiatives.