A European pilot study in Dravet Syndrome to delineate what really matters for the patients and families.

We aimed to identify caregivers' opinions on the outcome measures that matter in clinical trials in individuals with Dravet syndrome (DS). We conducted a prospective European multicenter study based on an 11 closed questions survey developed by the French reference center for rare epilepsies and DS patients' advocacy groups. Items included questions on seizures and daily life outcomes that a clinical trial on a therapy for individuals with DS should target. Statistical analyses were performed to evaluate the impact of the country of residence and of the patients' age. The survey was answered by 153 caregivers (68%: France, 28%: Germany, and 24%: Italy) off individuals with DS. Individuals with DS included 86 males (mean age of 11.4 [interquartile: 7-20.4] years). Families ranked as important almost all the items proposed. However, items related to daily life had the highest rank in all three countries compared to items about seizures (P = 0.02). Increase in individuals' age was associated with a higher age at diagnosis (ρ = 0.26, P = 0.02), and a lower impact of seizure duration (ρ = -0.25, P = 0.005) and on the need of hospital referral (ρ = -0.26, P = 0.005). These data can help tailor patient-centered outcome measures in future clinical and real-life trials for DS.

Impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on patients and families with Dravet syndrome.

We explored the impact of coronavirus virus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on patients with Dravet syndrome (DS) and their family. With European patient advocacy groups (PAGs), we developed an online survey in 10 languages to question health status, behavior, personal protection, and health services before and after lockdown. Approximately 538 European PAG members received electronic invitations. Survey ran from April 14, to May 17, 2020, with 219 answers; median age 9 year 10 months. Protection against infection was highly used prior to COVID-19, but 88% added facemask-use according to pandemic recommendations. Only one patient was tested positive for COVID-19. Most had stable epilepsy during lockdown, and few families (4%) needed emergency care during lockdown. However, behavior disorder worsened in over one-third of patients, regardless of epilepsy changes. Half of appointments scheduled prior to lockdown were postponed; 12 patients (11%) had appointments fulfilled; and 39 (36%) had remote consultations. Responders welcomed remote consultations. Half of responders were unsatisfied with psychological remote support as only few (21 families) received this support. None of the five of patient in clinical trials stopped investigational treatment. Prior adoption of protective measures against general infection might have contributed to avoiding COVID-19 infections. Protocols for the favored remote contact ought to now be prepared.