Ultrasonographic examination of acute soft tissue lesions in the elbow has good inter-rater reliability and acceptable agreement with magnetic resonance imaging.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasonography (US) has been suggested as a valuable complement to clinical and radiologic examinations in elbow trauma. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been the method of choice, despite fair to moderate inter-rater reliability (IRR). US has potential advantages but is assessor dependent and the IRR scarcely examined. The primary aim of the present study was to investigate IRR for US and secondarily interobserver agreement (IOA) between US and MRI in the acute phase after elbow trauma. Acute phase was defined as 2 weeks and, if applicable, the following weekend. The hypothesis was that US reliability would be at least substantial for complete muscle or ligament lesions. METHODS: A total of 116 patients (50 men, median age 47 [range 19-87] years) who had an elbow trauma with dislocation and/or fracture were included. Exclusion criteria were prior injury to the same elbow, and US and/or MRI not possible within 16 days. During US, the condition of muscle origins at the epicondyles and collateral and annular ligament complexes was recorded in a predesigned protocol, with the alternatives intact, partially or completely torn. Seventy-two patients had a second US examination the same day by an independent upper extremity surgeon, and 58 of the 116 patients underwent an MRI before or after the US, evaluated by 2 radiologists using the same protocol. IOA and IRR between assessors and modalities were analyzed with kappa statistics and interpreted according to Landis and Koch. Perfect agreement (PA) was reported in percentages. RESULTS: US examination within 2 weeks was feasible with tolerable discomfort. Defining muscle origins and ligaments as intact or completely torn, the US IRR ranged from substantial to near perfect (kappa 0.63-1, PA 93%-100%). Intact tissues vs. tear (partial and complete tear combined) or intact vs. partial vs. complete tear resulted in kappa values from moderate to substantial and PA 74%-96% with lowest reliability for the muscle origins. The IOA between MRI and US ranged from fair to near perfect for no tear vs. complete tear (kappa 0.25-1, PA 65%-100%). Agreement between no tear and tear (partial and complete together) ranged from fair to substantial (0.25-0.66, PA 63%-89%) and no tear vs. partial or complete tear ranged from fair to moderate (0.25-0.53, PA 50%-79%). CONCLUSION: US in the acute setting is suitable and reliable for diagnosis of ligament injuries in the elbow and is in addition fast, cheap, and easily accessible. The agreement with MRI seems to vary with the structure assessed and severity of the lesions, ranging from fair to near perfect.

Elbow hemiarthroplasty and total elbow arthroplasty provided a similar functional outcome for unreconstructable distal humeral fractures in patients aged 60 years or older: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Semiconstrained total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is an established treatment for elderly patients with distal humeral fractures not amenable to stable internal fixation (unreconstructable). In recent years, there has been increasing interest in elbow hemiarthroplasty (EHA), a treatment option which does not entail restrictions on weight-bearing as opposed to TEA. These 2 treatments have not been compared in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). The aim of this study was to compare the functional outcome of EHA and TEA for the treatment of unreconstructable distal humeral fractures in elderly patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT). Patients were included between January 2011 and November 2019 at one of 3 participating hospitals. The inclusion criteria were an unreconstructable distal humeral fracture, age ≥60 years and independent living. The final follow-up took place after ≥2 years. The primary outcome measure was the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score. Secondary outcome measures were the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), the EQ-5D index, range of motion (flexion, extension, pronation, and supination) and grip strength. RESULTS: Forty patients were randomized to TEA (n = 20) and EHA (n = 20). Five patients died before completing the final follow-up, leaving 18 EHA and 17 TEA patients for analysis. There were 31 women. The mean age was 74.0 (SD, 8.5) years in the EHA group and 76.9 (SD, 7.6) in the TEA group (P = .30). The mean DASH score was 21.6 points in the EHA group and 27.2 in the TEA group (P = .39), a difference of -5.6 points (95% CI: -18.6 to 7.5). There were no differences between treatment with EHA and TEA for the mean values of the MEPS (85.0 vs. 88.2, P = .59), EQ-5D index (0.92 vs. 0.86, P = .13), extension (29° vs. 29°, P = .98), flexion (126° vs. 136°, P = .05), arc of flexion-extension (97° vs. 107°, P = .25), supination (81° vs. 75°, P = .13), pronation (78° vs. 74°, P = .16) or grip strength (17.5 kg vs. 17.2 kg, P = .89). There were 6 adverse events in each treatment group. CONCLUSION: In this RCT, both elbow hemiarthroplasty (EHA) and total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) resulted in a good and similar functional outcome for unreconstructable distal humeral fractures in elderly patients at a minimum of 2 years of follow-up.

Ultrasound guided lavage with corticosteroid injection versus sham lavage with and without corticosteroid injection for calcific tendinopathy of shoulder: randomised double blinded multi-arm study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare treatment effects between ultrasound guided lavage with corticosteroid injection and sham lavage with and without corticosteroid injection in patients with calcific tendinopathy of the shoulder. DESIGN: Pragmatic, three arm, parallel group, double blinded, sham controlled, randomised, superiority trial with repeated measurements over 24 months. SETTING: Six hospitals in Norway and Sweden. PARTICIPANTS: 220 adults with calcific tendinopathy of the shoulder, persistent for at least three months. INTERVENTIONS: Ultrasound guided deposit lavage plus subacromial injection of 20 mg triamcinolone acetonide and 9 mL 1% lidocaine hydrochloride (lavage+steroid); sham lavage plus subacromial injection of 20 mg triamcinolone acetonide and 9 mL 1% lidocaine hydrochloride (sham lavage+steroid); or sham lavage plus subacromial injection of 10 mL 1% lidocaine hydrochloride (sham). All patients received a physiotherapeutic treatment regimen consisting of four home exercises. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the result on the 48 point scale (0=worst; 48=best) of the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) at four month follow-up. Secondary outcomes included measurements on the short form of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (QuickDASH) and of pain intensity up to 24 months. The influence of the size of the deposit at baseline and of the persistence or disappearance of the deposit was investigated. RESULTS: Data from 218 (99%) participants were included in the primary analysis. Differences between groups on the OSS at four months were not significant: lavage+steroid versus sham 0.2 (95% confidence interval -2.3 to 2.8; P=1.0); sham lavage+steroid versus sham 2.0 (-0.5 to 4.6; P=0.35); lavage+steroid versus sham lavage+steroid -1.8 (-4.3 to 0.7; P=0.47). After four months, 143 patients with insufficient treatment effect received supplementary treatment. At 24 months, none of the study procedures was superior to sham. No serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: This study found no benefit for ultrasound guided lavage with a corticosteroid injection or for sham lavage with a corticosteroid injection compared with sham treatment in patients with calcific rotator cuff tendinopathy of the shoulder. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02419040EudraCT 2015-002343-34; Ethical committee Norway 2015-002343-34; Ethical committee Sweden 2015/79-31; Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02419040.

Magnetically controlled growing rod treatment for early-onset scoliosis: analysis of 52 consecutive cases demonstrates improvement of coronal deformity.

Background: The purpose of this study was to report the radiographic results and complications of magnetically controlled growing rod (MCGR) treatment in patients with early-onset scoliosis (EOS). Methods: Patient records and radiographs from a consecutive series of patients treated with MCGR for EOS at two Swedish institutions were reviewed retrospectively. Radiographic analysis included Cobb angle, T1-T12 height, T1-S1 height, thoracic kyphosis, and lung height. Subgroup analyses were performed on primary versus conversion cases and single versus dual rods using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and independent samples t-test. Results: Fifty-two cases treated with MCGR (24 single rods, 28 dual rods) were included from local surgical records into this cohort study, 32 primary and 20 converted from other growth friendly surgical treatment. Mean age at MCGR implantation was 7.4 (2.0-14.6) years old in the primary group and 9.3 (5.0-16.1) years old in the converted group. Mean follow-up time was 3.7 (2.0-7.6) years. Mean (standard deviation; SD) Cobb angle of the major curve changed from 62° (17°) preoperatively to 42° (16°) postoperatively to 46° (18°) at final follow-up (P<0.001). Mean (SD) overall thoracic kyphosis changed from 41° (19°) preoperatively to 32° (14°) postoperatively to 39° (17°) at final follow-up (P=0.018). Mean T1-T12 height was 177 mm (34 mm) preoperatively, 183 mm (35 mm) immediate postoperative and 199 mm (35 mm) at final follow-up (P=0.047). The mean T1-T12 height increased significantly in the primary group but not in the converted group. The number of surgeries was 114 (78 planned, 36 unplanned). The rate of unplanned surgeries did not differ significantly between single and dual rods. The total number of complications was 70 of which 38 were implant related. The overall mean complication rate was 1.4 (0-4). There were no significant differences in complication rates between subgroups. Conclusions: MCGR treatment enabled and maintained correction of spinal deformity while allowing spinal growth. There were no significant differences in complication rates or unplanned surgeries between the groups treated with single or dual rods.

An intact lacertus fibrosus improves strength after reinsertion of the distal biceps tendon.

PURPOSE: The importance of an intact lacertus fibrosus in distal biceps tendon injury is uncertain. This study aimed to assess long-term outcome following distal biceps tendon repair with focus on the significance of the lacertus fibrosus. METHODS: Thirty-six patients surgically treated for primary distal biceps tendon rupture were identified. Medical records were reviewed for patient demographics in addition to surgery-related data. All patients underwent a targeted clinical examination to assess elbow function and they completed a patient reported questionnaire. Radiographs were obtained at time of follow-up and evaluated for the presence of osteoarthritis (OA) and heterotopic ossification (HO). RESULTS: All patients were male. Median age at injury was 48 years (34-69) and median time of follow-up of was 71 months (23-165). All patients presented functional range of motion in the elbow. Median flexion strength was 76 Nm (45-135) (median 99% of uninjured side; range 66-128) with intact lacertus fibrosus and 70 Nm (43-124) (88%, 62-114) with torn lacertus fibrosus. Median supination strength was 6 Nm (3-11) (86%, range 36-144) with intact lacertus fibrosus and 8 Nm (3-17) (67%, 28-118) with torn lacertus fibrosus. No signs of OA were revealed, but three patients had major HO of which one patient had minor limitations in range of elbow motion. CONCLUSION: An intact lacertus fibrosus contributes to elbow strength and should be preserved in distal biceps tendon repair. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

KALK study: ultrasound guided needling and lavage (barbotage) with steroid injection versus sham barbotage with and without steroid injection - protocol for a randomized, double-blinded, controlled, multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: For the treatment of calcific tendinitis of the shoulder a variety of treatment regimes exist. Commonly used treatment measures include medication with oral analgesics, corticosteroid injections, extracorporeal shockwave therapy, ultrasound guided needling and lavage, and surgical treatment. Earlier cohort studies suggest that patients may benefit from these treatments, but there are few randomized studies and conflicting evidence about the effectiveness of the various treatments. In the present study we aim to compare the effectiveness of ultrasound guided needling and lavage (barbotage) together with a steroid injection to sham barbotage with and without an additional steroid injection. METHODS: The study will be performed in six secondary-care institutions in Norway and Sweden. It is designed as a pragmatic, randomized, three-arm, parallel group, double-blinded, sham-controlled clinical trial with a 2-year follow-up. It will be performed on 210 patients, aged 30 years or older, presenting with painful arc, positive impingement sign and a calcium deposit > 5 mm. Randomization to one of the three treatment options will be performed by using an online central randomization system. The three treatment groups are barbotage together with a subacromial steroid injection (the barbotage group), sham barbotage together with a subacromial steroid injection (the steroid group) or sham barbotage without a subacromial steroid injection (the placebo group). In the placebo group the steroid injection will be replaced by a short-acting local anaesthetic. Standardized home-based post-treatment physiotherapy will be performed by all patients for 8 weeks. Follow-ups are at 2 and 6 weeks, 4, 8, 12 and 24 months after treatment was given and will be performed with the patients and the outcome assessors blinded for group assignment. Primary outcome will be the Oxford shoulder score at 4 month follow-up. Secondary outcome measures are the QuickDASH upper extremity score, the EQ-5D-5L general health score and visual analogue scales for pain at rest, during activity, and at night. DISCUSSION: The scientific evidence from this placebo-controlled trial will be of importance for future treatment recommendations in patients with calcific tendinitis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02419040 , registered 10 April 2015 EudraCT: 2015-002343-34, registered 23 September 2015 (retrospectively registered).

Effect of specific exercise strategy on need for surgery in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome: randomised controlled study.

STUDY QUESTION: Can a specific exercise strategy improve shoulder function and pain in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome, thereby decreasing the need for arthroscopic subacromial decompression? SUMMARY ANSWER: Compared with a control exercise group, patients in the specific exercise group had significantly greater improvements in shoulder function and pain and fewer patients needed surgery at the three month assessment. WHAT IS KNOWN AND WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: Different exercise programmes are used as first line treatment in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome, but conclusive evidence to support the efficacy for these programmes is lacking. This specific exercise strategy proved effective in improving shoulder function and pain in patients in whom earlier conservative treatment had failed.

Can new inflammatory markers improve the diagnosis of acute appendicitis?

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of appendicitis is difficult and resource consuming. New inflammatory markers have been proposed for the diagnosis of appendicitis, but their utility in combination with traditional diagnostic variables has not been tested. Our objective is to explore the potential of new inflammatory markers for improving the diagnosis of appendicitis. METHODS: The diagnostic properties of the six most promising out of 21 new inflammatory markers (interleukin [IL]-6, chemokine ligand [CXCL]-8, chemokine C-C motif ligand [CCL]-2, serum amyloid A [SAA], matrix metalloproteinase [MMP]-9, and myeloperoxidase [MPO]) were compared with traditional diagnostic variables included in the Appendicitis Inflammatory Response (AIR) score (right iliac fossa pain, vomiting, rebound tenderness, guarding, white blood cell [WBC] count, proportion neutrophils, C-reactive protein and body temperature) in 432 patients with suspected appendicitis by uni- and multivariable regression models. RESULTS: Of the new inflammatory variables, SAA, MPO, and MMP9 were the strongest discriminators for all appendicitis (receiver operating characteristics [ROC] 0.71) and SAA was the strongest discriminator for advanced appendicitis (ROC 0.80) compared with defence or rebound tenderness, which were the strongest traditional discriminators for all appendicitis (ROC 0.84) and the WBC count for advanced appendicitis (ROC 0.89). CCL2 was the strongest independent discriminator beside the AIR score variables in a multivariable model. The AIR score had an ROC area of 0.91 and could correctly classify 58.3 % of the patients, with an accuracy of 92.9 %. This was not improved by inclusion of the new inflammatory markers. CONCLUSION: The conventional diagnostic variables for appendicitis, as combined in the AIR score, is an efficient screening instrument for classifying patients as low-, indeterminate-, or high-risk for appendicitis. The addition of the new inflammatory variables did not improve diagnostic performance further.