Intestinal anisakiasis treated successfully with conservative therapy: importance of clinical diagnosis.

Intestinal anisakiasis is not only a rare parasitic disease, but is also difficult to diagnose. The symptoms are not specific and are often very severe and abrupt, and the findings of clinical imaging are very remarkable. Therefore, intestinal anisakiasis is often misdiagnosed as acute abdomen or intestinal obstruction and is treated surgically. However, if intestinal anisakiasis could be diagnosed correctly, it is well treated conservatively. We experienced three cases of intestinal anisakiasis, which were diagnosed correctly and treated successfully with conservative therapy. A correct clinical history and imaging interpretation helped us diagnose intestinal anisakiasis correctly and thus treat the patients successfully with conservative therapy.

Use of hand-held ultrasonography to confirm the correct placement of a central venous catheter tip.

To avoid severe complications resulting from malpositioning of a central venous catheter, removal and recannulation of the catheter may be necessary, thus wasting medical equipment and increasing stress on the patient. Therefore, central venous catheters should be inserted correctly the first time. We tested whether real-time hand-held ultrasound-guided confirmation of the location of the tip of a central venous catheter inserted from the femoral vein could reduce the rate of malpositioning. Catheters were inserted using conventional methods for 65 patients, and using ultrasound guidance for 29 patients. For the latter group, when a central venous catheter was inserted, the ultrasound examiner first identified its tip located dorsal to the liver in the inferior vena cava and then fixed the catheter in position. We considered a central venous catheter to be malpositioned when its tip appeared in neither the inferior vena cava nor the right atrium-inferior vena cava junction in X-rays. Flexed or inverted catheters were also considered to be malpositioned. We compared the malpositioning rates for the ultrasound and conventional groups. Malpositioning was identified for two (6.9%) patients in the ultrasound group and 19 (29.2%) patients in the conventional group. The relative risk of ultrasound-guided versus conventional catheter insertion was 0.23 (95% confidence interval, 0.09-0.62). Our data suggest that real-time ultrasound monitoring is useful for avoiding malpositioning of central venous catheters inserted from the femoral vein.