Application of Collagen Matrix in Peri-Implant Dehiscence 1 Defect: A Case Series.

During implant placement, dehiscence defects can result in complications like mucosal recession and peri-implantitis. While guided bone regeneration (GBR) is a common approach to managing these defects, it is often complex and time-intensive. This case series evaluates an alternative method using a collagen matrix (Collagen Graft2®) applied to peri-implant dehiscence defects without GBR. Through three case series, this approach effectively preserves buccal contour, enhances gingival thickness, and supports bone regeneration, leading to favorable peri-implant conditions. These findings suggest that collagen matrix application is a viable and less invasive option for treating peri-implant dehiscence defects; however, further studies are required to validate these results.

Alveolar Ridge Preservation Using a Collagenated Xenograft: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the efficacy of cancellous bovine bone mineral granules and 10% porcine collagen (deproteinized bovine bone mineral with collagen [DBBM-C]; (OCS-B Collagen® [Straumann XenoFlex], NIBEC, Korea) in a mouldable block form, with or without socket seal, using autogenous free gingival graft (FGG). METHODS: Fifty-four patients were included and randomly assigned to one of three groups: (1) spontaneous healing (control group), (2) alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) using DBBM-C (DBBM-C group), and (3) ARP employing DBBM-C sealed with FGG (DBBM-C/FGG group). Bone biopsy and implant fixture placement were performed 180 days after ARP. Cone-beam computed tomography, histological analysis, implant stability, and three-dimensional volumetric analysis were conducted. RESULTS: Of the 54 patients, 4 dropped out owing to loss of follow-up and osseointegration failure. The changes in alveolar bone during follow-up were not significantly different. Between 84- and 180-day postextraction, the volume of the DBBM-C and DBBM-C/FGG groups was maintained at 3 mm below the alveolar ridge crest (0.72 ± 0.80 mm, 6.05 ± 6.69%), whereas the volume in the control group decreased (-0.37 ± 1.31 mm, -2.10% ± 8.37%) (P = .026). The DBBM-C/FGG group exhibited less horizontal ridge resorption at 1 mm below the alveolar crest (-9.19 ± 5.09 mm, -73.67% ± 32.53%) between preextraction and 84 days postextraction (P = .049). In all groups, the implant stability quotient remained above 70. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study, both ARP using DBBM-C with and without socket sealing effectively preserved the width dimension of the alveolar ridge, with no significant difference in alveolar bone resorption. However, socket sealing appeared to enhance the stability of the bone graft and bone quality. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The use of DBBM-C for ARP seems to aid in volume maintenance as compared with spontaneous healing. Gingival sealing with an FGG can help maintain the width of the alveolar ridge. This clinical trial was not registered prior to participant recruitment and randomization. This study was registered at WHO ICTRP (https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=KCT0008266).

The activin/BMP-2 chimera AB204 promotes periodontal tissue regeneration in a buccal dehiscence model: a pilot study.

PURPOSE: A combination of activin and bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2), termed AB204, has been shown to improve osteogenic potential with fewer side effects than BMP-2 alone. This study was performed to evaluate the effect of AB204 on periodontal tissue regeneration in a dog buccal dehiscence model. METHODS: Buccal dehiscence defects were created on the maxillary premolars (P1, P2, and P3) of 6 mongrel dogs. After 5 weeks, the dogs were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups: the control, collagen matrix (CM), and CM/AB204 groups. Grafting procedures were then performed. The dogs were sacrificed 8 weeks after the grafting procedure, and volumetric and histological analyses were conducted. RESULTS: The thickness of the buccal gingiva in the CM/AB204 group was greater than those in the other groups at 2 weeks (P<0.05). The ridge width in the AB204/CM group exceeded the width in the other groups at 4 and 8 weeks; however, the difference was not statistically significant. Histological analysis revealed that the CM/AB204 group demonstrated the formation of new bone surrounded by newly formed periodontal ligament and cementum (P=0.035). CONCLUSIONS: The combined application of CM and AB204 shows promise in facilitating the regeneration of periodontal attachment, including the formation of new bone, cementum, and periodontal ligament.

Bone regeneration using activin A/BMP2 chimera (AB204) with collagen membrane in rats with calvarial defects.

PURPOSE: Collagen has long been recognized as an excellent carrier for growth factors, and membrane-type collagen has been widely applied in dentistry for guided bone regeneration. This study was conducted to examine the effects of an activin A/BMP2 chimera (AB204) combined with a collagen membrane (CM) on bone repair in a rat calvarial defect model. METHODS: A unilateral calvarial defect measuring 5.0 mm was surgically created in 32 Sprague-Dawley rats. The rats were then randomly assigned to 1 of 4 groups, each consisting of 8 animals: control (untreated), CM (treated with a CM only), CM/bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP2) (treated with a CM and 1.0 µg of BMP2), and CM/AB204 (treated with a CM and 1.0 µg of AB204). Bone regeneration was evaluated using micro-computed tomography (CT) and histological analysis at 2 and 4 weeks following surgery. RESULTS: Micro-CT analysis revealed that bone formation in the CM/BMP2 and CM/AB204 groups was superior to that observed in the control and CM groups at both 2 and 4 weeks postoperatively. BMP2 induced greater bone regeneration than AB204 at 2 weeks; however, AB204 resulted in a greater bone volume at 4 weeks, achieving the highest values recorded. No significant differences were found between the CM/BMP2 and CM/AB204 groups at either time point (P>0.05). On histological examination, new bone formation was evident in both CM/BMP2 and CM/AB204 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study, the findings indicate that AB204 may enhance osteogenic potential when used in combination with CM for bone regeneration.

Effectiveness of a collagen matrix seal and xenograft in alveolar ridge preservation: an experimental study in dogs.

Majority of previous studies on alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) used collagen membranes as barrier membranes, and further evidence for ARP in dehiscent extraction sockets with a deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) and matrix is needed. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of non-cross linked collagen membranes (membrane) and crosslinked collagen matrices (matrix) on ARP using DBBM in extraction sockets with buccal dehiscence. In six mongrel dogs, the mesial roots of three mandibular premolars (P2, P3, and P4) were extracted 1 month after dehiscence defect induction. Two experimental groups were randomly assigned: (1) DBBM with a membrane (DBBM/membrane group) and (2) DBBM with a matrix (DBBM/matrix group). Three-dimensional (3D) volumetric, microcomputed tomography (µCT), and histologic analyses were performed to assess the ridge preservation. Both groups were effective to maintain the ridge width (p > 0.05), and the DBBM/matrix group showed more favorable soft tissue regeneration and bone quality in the histological analysis (p = 0.05). Based on these results, DBBM/matrix could be better choice for ARP in cases of buccal dehiscence defects.

Evaluation of alveolar ridge preservation in sockets with buccal dehiscence defects using two types of xenogeneic biomaterials: An in vivo experimental study.

OBJECTIVES: Alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) has been extensively investigated in various preclinical and clinical studies, yielding favorable results. We aim to evaluate the effects of ARP using collagenated bovine bone mineral (CBBM) alone or particulated bovine bone mineral with a non-cross-linked collagen membrane (PBBM/NCLM) in tooth extraction sockets with buccal dehiscence in an experimental dog model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The mesial roots of three mandibular premolars (P2, P3, and P4) were extracted from six mongrel dogs 4 weeks after inducing dehiscence defects. ARP was randomly performed using two different protocols: 1) CBBM alone and 2) PBBM/NCLM. Three-dimensional (3D) volumetric, micro-computed tomography, and histological analyses were employed to determine changes over a span of 20 weeks. RESULTS: In 3D volumetric and radiographic analyses, CBBM alone demonstrated similar effectiveness to PBBM/NCLM in ARP (p > .05). However, in the PBBM/NCLM group (3.05 ± 0.60 mm), the horizontal ridge width was well maintained 3 mm below the alveolar crest compared with the CBBM group (2.11 ± 1.01 mm, p = .002). CONCLUSION: Although the radiographic changes in the quality and quantity of bone were not significant between the two groups, the use of PBBM/NCLM resulted in greater horizontal dimensions and more favorable maintenance of the ridge profile.

The cumulative survival rate of sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched dental implants: a retrospective analysis.

PURPOSE: This retrospective study aimed to assess the long-term cumulative survival rate of titanium, sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched implants over a 10-year follow-up period and investigate the factors affecting the survival rate and change in marginal bone loss (MBL). METHODS: The study included 400 patients who underwent dental implant placement at the Department of Periodontology of Seoul National University Dental Hospital (SNUDH) between 2005 and 2015. Panoramic radiographic images and dental records of patients were collected and examined using Kaplan-Meier analysis, Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, and multiple regression analysis to determine the survival rates and identify any factors related to implant failure and MBL. RESULTS: A total of 782 implants were placed with a follow-up period ranging from 0 to 16 years (mean: 8.21±3.75 years). Overall, 25 implants were lost, resulting in a cumulative survival rate of 96.8%. Comparisons of the research variables regarding cumulative survival rate mostly yielded insignificant results. The mean mesial and distal MBLs were 1.85±2.31 mm and 1.59±2.03 mm, respectively. Factors influencing these values included age, diabetes mellitus (DM), jaw location, implant diameter, bone augmentation surgery, and prosthetic unit. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that the implant survival rates at SNUDH fell within the acceptable published criteria. The patients' sex, age, DM status, implant location, implant design, implant size, surgical type, bone augmentation, and prosthetic unit had no discernible influence on long-term implant survival. Sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched implants might offer advantages in terms of implant longevity and consistent clinical outcomes.

Gingival biotype modification with collagen matrix or autogenous subepithelial connective tissue graft: Histologic and volumetric analyses in a beagle model.

Objectives: To evaluate the volumetric effect and biocompatibility of porcine tendon-derived type I collagen matrix graft (CG) in gingival biotype modification (GBM) compared with subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) in a beagle model. Methods: Surface analysis using scanning electron microscopy and a collagen degradation assay of CG was performed in vitro. Six adult dogs were used in in vivo experiment, and each received autologous SCTG or CG at the anterior side. Histometric and three-dimensional digital volume analyses were conducted to compare quantitative changes in CG and SCTG in GBM. Immunohistochemical analysis was performed for the qualitative evaluation of CG compared to SCTG. Results: CG had a double-layered structure, and its degradation was slower than that of other well-reported materials. No critical problems were associated with the healing procedure. Changes in gingival thickness and volume in the CG and SCTG groups were equivalent, with no significant differences between the groups. Type I collagen and vascular endothelial growth factor expression levels were similar in both groups. Significance: CG and SCTG had equivalent potential for GBM in terms of quantity and quality. Additionally, CG could be used as a reasonable substitute for SCTG, making surgery convenient and predicting successful clinical outcomes.

Improvement of halitosis by probiotic bacterium Weissella cibaria CMU: A randomized controlled trial.

Several in vitro and in vivo studies have evaluated the effect of probiotics on oral health; however, human clinical studies are still limited. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the effects of Weissella cibaria Chonnam Medical University (CMU)-containing tablets on halitosis. This randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study included 100 adults with halitosis (age, 20-70 years). The participants were randomly assigned to the test group (n = 50) and control group (n = 50). One tablet [1 × 108 colony forming units (CFU)/tablet] was to be taken each day over 8 weeks. The concentrations of volatile sulfur compounds (VSCs), bad breath improvement scores, and oral colonization of W. cibaria were measured. Psychosocial indicators including depression, self-esteem, oral health-related quality of life, and subjective oral health status were evaluated. Most variables were assessed at baseline, 4, and 8 weeks, and W. cibaria number and safety variables were assessed at baseline and 8 weeks. Intergroup comparisons were carried out using Student's t-test, Chi-square test, or Fisher's exact test on per-protocol analysis. Intragroup differences before and after intake were analyzed using the linear mixed-effect model (LMM). Per-protocol analysis was carried out in the test group (n = 45) and control group (n = 46). Total VSC was significantly lower in the probiotics group than in the placebo group at baseline (week 0, p = 0.046) and at 8 weeks (p = 0.017). The sum of hydrogen sulfide and methyl mercaptan did not differ significantly between the groups at baseline; however, it was significantly lower in the probiotics group than in the placebo group at week 8 (p = 0.012). Bad breath improvement (BBI) scores were significantly reduced at week 8 (p = 0.006) in the probiotics group. Statistically significant intergroup differences were observed for changes in the level of W. cibaria at week 8 (p < 0.001). Psychological indicators significantly improved from baseline to week 8 in the probiotics group. No safety issues were observed in either group. The levels of W. cibaria was higher in patients with halitosis using W. cibaria CMU-containing tablets. The subjective degree of bad breath and psychological indicators were improved in patients with halitosis using W. cibaria CMU-containing tablets.

Dental implant proximity to adjacent teeth: A retrospective study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the occurrence and prognosis of dental implant proximity or direct contact with the adjacent tooth and to evaluate the symptoms and complications in both the implant and the adjacent tooth. We then elaborate on treatment modalities and discuss the prevention of this phenomenon. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted based on the dental clinical and radiographic records of 43 patients with implant-tooth proximity of <1.0 mm or direct implant-tooth contact. Multivariate Bayesian logistic regression was performed to examine the influence of individual variables on correcting major clinical variables. RESULTS: In the multivariate regression analysis, the rate of occurrence of tooth symptom decreased by about 95% with every increase of 1.0 mm distance between implant and tooth (odds ratio [OR] = 0.1, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.004-0.680, p = 0.024). In the case of implant-tooth root proximity in the anterior area, the OR of peri-implantitis occurrence was 30.4-fold greater than in posterior sites (OR = 30.4, 95% CI: 1.189-785.914, p = 0.040). CONCLUSION: Implant-tooth root proximity or direct implant-tooth contact is an iatrogenic factor that causes various complications, including devitalization of the adjacent tooth and peri-implantitis. Proactive prevention with surgical stents and intra-operative periapical radiographs is needed. If proximity or contact is found during surgery, repositioning of the fixture to the correct location is recommended in order to maintain peri-implant health and prevent complications.