Contributors to high left ventricular ejection fraction in women with ischemia and no obstructive coronary artery disease: Results from the Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation-Coronary Vascular Dysfunction (WISE-CVD) Study.

BACKGROUND: There are sex differences in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) relevant to prognosis where women experience greater mortality at relatively higher LVEF compared to men, yet mechanistic understanding of this adverse prognosis is limited. Women with suspected ischemia with no obstructive coronary disease (INOCA) develop heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), yet contributors to LVEF remain largely unknown. METHODS: In 370 women with suspected ischemia with no obstructive coronary disease (INOCA) who prospectively underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI), we investigated the contributions of LV morphology, function, and myocardial perfusion reserve on LVEF using univariate and multiple linear regression. RESULTS: A majority 71% of participants had high LVEF (>65%), followed by 24% having normal LVEF (55%-65%), and only 5% having low EF (<55%). Baseline characteristics were comparable among the 3 groups, with the exception of age which was 6 years higher in the high LVEF group (P < .01). Women in the high LVEF group also had the lowest LV cavity volume, greatest LV mass-volume ratio, and highest LV end-systolic elastance (all P < .05, adjusted for age, BMI, diabetes, and blood pressure). Myocardial perfusion reserve index was low in all groups (mean MPRI < 2.1) but was not significantly different across the spectrum of LVEF (P = .458). CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, these data demonstrate that the majority of women with suspected INOCA have elevated LVEF related to smaller, thicker ventricles with greater contractility. Future work is needed to better understand the specific mechanisms driving morphologic and functional changes in women with INOCA, and relations to longer-term HFpEF and mortality. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT02582021.

Impact of epicardial fat on coronary vascular function, cardiac morphology, and cardiac function in women with suspected INOCA.

INTRODUCTION: Epicardial fat is a metabolically active adipose tissue depot situated between the myocardium and visceral pericardium that covers ∼80% of the heart surface. While epicardial fat has been associated with the development of atherosclerotic coronary artery disease (CAD), less is known about the relationship between epicardial fat and coronary vascular function. Moreover, the relations between excess epicardial fat and cardiac morphology and function remains incompletely understood. METHODS AND RESULTS: To address these knowledge gaps, we retrospectively analyzed data from 294 individuals from our database of women with suspected ischemia with no obstructive coronary disease (INOCA) who underwent both invasive coronary function testing and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI). Epicardial fat area, biventricular morphology, and function, as well as left atrial function, were assessed from cine images, per established protocols. The major novel findings were twofold: First, epicardial fat area was not associated with coronary vascular dysfunction. Second, epicardial fat was associated with increased left ventricular concentricity (ß= 0.15, p= 0.01), increased septal thickness (ß= 0.17, p= 0.002), and reduced left atrial conduit fraction (ß= -0.15, p= 0.02), even after accounting for age, BMI, and history of hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, these data do not support a measurable relationship between epicardial fat and coronary vascular dysfunction but does suggest that epicardial fat may be related to concentric remodeling and diastolic dysfunction in women with suspected INOCA. Prospective studies are needed to elucidate the long-term impact of epicardial fat in this patient population.

Contribution of Clinical Trial Event Data by Data Source: A Prespecified Analysis of the ADAPTABLE Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Pragmatic randomized clinical trials (RCTs) often use multiple data sources to examine clinical events, but the relative contribution of data sources to clinical end-point rates is understudied. Objective: To assess the contribution of data sources (electronic health records [EHRs], public/private insurance claims, and/or participant-reported data) to clinical end points among ADAPTABLE participants who had available data. Design, Setting, and Participants: The ADAPTABLE study was an open-label, pragmatic RCT from April 2016 through June 2019 conducted in research networks within clinical practice. Participants had existing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and available data to analyze. The characteristics of patients by combinations of data source availability were compared to examine the contribution of each of the data sources to end-point ascertainment. Data for this prespecified analysis were examined from January 2022 to June 2023. Exposures: Randomized exposure to 81 mg or 325 mg of aspirin daily. Main Outcomes and Measures: Number of events for the primary end point (composite of death, hospitalization for myocardial infarction, and hospitalization for stroke) that were contributed by EHR or claims data and then number of events contributed by each additional data source. Results: Of 15 006 participants randomized with at least 1 other source of data available beyond participant-reported data, there were 8756 (58.3%) with participant-reported and EHR data; 4291 (28.6%) with participant-reported, EHR, and claims data; 1412 (9.4%) with EHR-only data; 262 (1.7%) with participant-reported and claims data; 202 (1.3%) with EHR and claims data; and 83 (0.6%) with claims-only data. Participants with EHR-only data were younger (median age, 63.7 years; IQR, 55.8-71.4) compared with the other groups (range, 65.6-71.9 years). Among participants with both EHR and claims data, with or without participant-reported data (n = 4493), for each outcome, most events (92%-100%) were identified in the EHR or in claims data. For all clinical end points, participant-reported data contributed less than 10% of events not otherwise available from claims or EHR data. Conclusions and Relevance: In this analysis of a pragmatic RCT, claims and EHR data provided the most clinical end-point data when compared with participant-reported events. These findings provide a framework for collecting end points in pragmatic clinical trials. Further work is needed to understand the data source combinations that most effectively provide clinical end-point data in RCTs.

Endogenous androgens, coronary atheroma and remodeling in women with suspected ischemic heart disease: A report from the Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) study.

Background: Women have smaller coronary size than men independent of body surface area. Female to male heart transplantation demonstrates coronary lumen enlargement. Purpose: To investigate relationships between endogenous androgens and coronary luminal size in women with suspected ischemic heart disease (IHD). Methods: We analyzed 69 women with available androgen levels. Results: Group mean age was 54 ± 10 years with 64 % post-menopausal. Lumen cross-sectional area (CSA) and external elastic membrane (EEM) CSA positively correlated with free testosterone (FT) (r = 0.29, p = 0.049; r = 0.29, p = 0.01), respectively, and negatively correlated with SHBG (r = -0.26, p = 0.03; r = -0.29, p = 0.02), respectively. Atheroma CSA positively correlated with FT (r = 0.24. p = 0.05). These correlations became non-significant after adjusting for waist circumference. Conclusions: In women with suspected ischemic heart disease, endogenous androgens, coronary atheroma and luminal size are related, and may be moderated by waist circumference.

Comparison of risk profiles of participants in the Women's IschemiA TRial to Reduce events In non-ObstRuctive CAD (WARRIOR) trial, using Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography vs Invasive Coronary Angiography.

OBJECTIVE: To compare baseline characteristics of participants in the Women's IschemiA TRial to Reduce Events In Non-ObstRuctive CAD (WARRIOR) trial by qualification by Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA) or Invasive Coronary Angiography (ICA). METHODS: The WARRIOR trial (NCT03417388) is an ongoing multicenter, prospective, randomized, blinded outcome evaluation of intensive medical therapy vs. usual care in women with suspected Ischemia and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease (INOCA) identified by either CCTA or ICA on the outcome of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). No obstructive coronary artery disease is defined as <50% luminal stenosis and normal coronary arteries is defined as no evidence of atherosclerosis including calcified and non-calcified plaque. Data presented was extracted on May 27, 2020. No clinical outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: An initial sample cohort of 797 women was included. The majority were younger than 65 years, White participants (73.3%), 159 had diabetes (19.9%), and 676 had angina (84.8%) with the remainder having symptoms of suspected ischemic heart disease. Over 50% of randomized participants had normal coronaries without luminal irregularities by ICA or CCTA. Participants randomized to ICA were more likely to have worse baseline clinical risk profiles with older age, higher burden of cardiac risk factors and poor quality of life with disabling angina. CONCLUSIONS: Among this initial sample of women with suspected INOCA randomized in the WARRIOR trial, there is a differential baseline cardiac risk of participants enrolled after CCTA or ICA. However, the majority had no evidence of atherosclerotic plaque or obstructive stenosis, after evaluation by ICA or CCTA. These results suggest that non-invasive evaluation with CCTA is likely to be associated with lower risk of MACE.

Elevated high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and adverse outcomes in women with symptoms of ischemic heart disease.

Background: Emerging data in the general population and those with coronary artery disease demonstrate higher risk of adverse outcomes with high (>70 mg/dL) HDL-C levels. There are limited data on the risk of adverse outcomes in women with suspected ischemic heart disease. Objective: To investigate relationships between high (>70 mg/dL), average (50-70 mg/dL), and low (<50 mg/dL) HDL-C levels with major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and heart failure hospitalization), and all-cause mortality in women referred for coronary angiography for suspected myocardial ischemia. Methods: A total of 607 women enrolled in the Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) original cohort (NCT00000554) with available HDL-C values were included in this analysis. Associations between HDL-C level and outcomes were evaluated using both multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression and spline regression analysis. Results: The mean age was 59 ± 12 years, 62 % had 3 or more cardiac risk factors, and 66 (10.9 %) had a high HDL-C. High and low HDL-C were both associated with higher MACE risk compared to average HDL-C after adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics (HR 1.80, CI 1.03-3.14, p = 0.038; HR 1.63, CI 1.09-2.42, p = 0.016, respectively). Similarly, high, and low HDL-C were associated with higher risk of all-cause mortality (HR 3.64, CI 1.84-7.20, p < 0.001; HR 2.81, CI 1.67-4.71, p < 0.001, respectively). Conclusions: High and low HDL-C levels are both independently associated with higher MACE and all-cause mortality in women with suspected ischemia undergoing coronary angiography.

Dietary Composition, Angiographic Coronary Disease, and Cardiovascular Outcomes in the WISE Study (Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation).

BACKGROUND: Studies relating diet to angiographic coronary artery disease (CAD) and subsequent major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in women are limited. Information on diet was collected in the Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE), a prospective cohort study of symptomatic women referred for coronary angiography to evaluate suspected ischemic heart disease. METHODS: A consecutive subgroup (n = 201 of 936) of enrolled women completed the modified Block food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). Data on outcomes were collected and adjudicated after 8-year follow-up. A set of logistic regression models were fitted for non-obstructive versus obstructive coronary stenosis (<50% versus ≥50%). Cox proportional hazard regression models were fitted for outcomes, with each dietary composition variable adjusted for the degree of coronary stenosis. RESULTS: At baseline, the subgroup cohort was 58 ± 12 years old with a body mass index (BMI) of 30 ± 7 kg/m2. An increased proportion of calories consumed from protein was associated with higher levels of baseline obstructive coronary stenosis. Those individuals who ate a higher amount of protein, carotene, and servings of vegetables and meat, however, were each associated with lower subsequent adverse outcomes, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Among women undergoing coronary angiography for suspected CAD, a higher percentage of protein intake was associated with higher baseline stenosis severity; however, the amount of protein intake, vegetable, meat, and carotene intake, was conversely associated with subsequent lower adverse cardiovascular outcome risk.

Symptom Presentation among Women with Suspected Ischemia and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease (INOCA).

Identifying ischemic heart disease (IHD) in women based on symptoms is challenging. Women are more likely to endorse non-cardiac symptoms. More than 50% of women with suspected ischemia have no obstructive coronary disease (and thus, INOCA) and impaired outcomes during follow-up. We aimed to identify symptoms having predictive capacity for INOCA in women with clinical evidence of coronary ischemia. We included 916 women from the original WISE cohort (NCT00000554) who had coronary angiography performed for suspected ischemia and completed a 65-item WISE symptom questionnaire. Sixty-two percent (n = 567) had suspected INOCA. Logistic regression models using a best subsets approach were examined to identify the best predictive model for INOCA based on Score χ2 and AICc. A 10-variable, best-fit model accurately predicted INOCA (AUC 0.72, 95% CI 0.68, 0.75). The model indicated that age ≤ 55 years, left side chest pain, chest discomfort, neck pain, and palpitations had independent, positive relationship (OR > 1) to INOCA (p < 0.001 to 0.008). An inverse relationship (OR < 1) was observed for impending doom, and pain in the jaw, left or bilateral arm, and right hand, interpreted as INOCA associated with the absence of these symptoms (p ≤ 0.001 to 0.023). Our best-fit model accurately predicted INOCA based on age and symptom presentation ~72% of the time. While the heterogeneity of symptom presentation limits the utility of this unvalidated 10-variable model, it has promise for consideration of symptom inclusion in future INOCA prediction risk modeling for women with evidence of symptomatic ischemia.

Longitudinal cardiac remodeling in collegiate American football players as assessed by echocardiography during their collegiate career.

BACKGROUND: Studies on the longitudinal effects of intense physical training on cardiac remodeling are limited, especially in American collegiate football players. HYPOTHESIS: College-level American football training will result in remodeling in a pattern consistent of a sport with moderate static and dynamic demands with increases in both wall and chamber sizes. METHODS: We studied 85 American collegiate football players who underwent transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) for asymptomatic or mild COVID-19-related illness and compared the changes in echo dimensions to their preparticipation screening TTE. Pre- and posttraining variables were compared using a paired t-test for normally distributed variables. RESULTS: Mean age was 19 years ± 1 and 61% of athletes were Black. Mean follow-up between TTEs was 21 ± 13 months. There was an increase in left atrial volume index (26.4 ± 5.5 to 32.8 ± 8.4 mL/m2 , p < .001), LV end diastolic diameter (5.13 ± 0.4 to 5.27 ± 0.4 cm, p = .003), basal RV diameter (3.28 ± 0.7 to 3.83 ± 0.5 cm, p = <.001), LV mass index (86.7 ± 15.3 to 90.1 ± 15.3, p = .015), and aortic root diameter (3.1 ± 0.4 to 3.2 ± 0.3 cm, p = .03) from pre- to posttraining, with a slightly greater magnitude in athletes with >2 years of training. Presence of left atrial enlargement (≥35 mL/m2 ) increased from 2.9% to 29% pre- to postparticipation in athletes with >2 years training. No significant changes in wall thickness, diastolic function, or right ventricular systolic function were observed. CONCLUSION: American football players college-level training was associated with increases in left and right ventricular chamber sizes, left atrial size, and aortic root diameter.

Autoimmune rheumatic diseases in women with coronary microvascular dysfunction: a report from the Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation-Coronary Vascular Dysfunction (WISE-CVD) project.

Background: While autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs) have been linked with coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), the relationship between ARD and CMD in women with signs and symptoms of ischemia and no obstructive arteries (INOCA) are not well described. We hypothesized that among women with CMD, those with ARD history have greater angina, functional limitations, and myocardial perfusion compromise compared to those without ARD history. Methods: Women with INOCA and confirmed CMD by invasive coronary function testing were included from the Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation-Coronary Vascular Dysfunction (WISE-CVD) project (NCT00832702). Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ), Duke Activity Status Index (DASI), and cardiac magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion reserve index (MPRI) were collected at baseline. Chart review was performed to confirm self-reported ARD diagnosis. Results: Of the 207 women with CMD, 19 (9%) had a confirmed history of ARD. Compared to those without ARD, women with ARD were younger (p = 0.04). In addition, they had lower DASI-estimated metabolic equivalents (p = 0.03) and lower MPRI (p = 0.008) but similar SAQ scores. There was a trend towards increased nocturnal angina and stress-induced angina in those with ARD (p = 0.05 for both). Invasive coronary function variables were not significantly different between groups. Conclusions: Among women with CMD, women with a history of ARD had lower functional status and worse myocardial perfusion reserve compared to women without ARD. Angina-related health status and invasive coronary function were not significantly different between groups. Further studies are warranted to understand mechanisms contributing to CMD among women with ARDs with INOCA.

Left ventricular ejection fraction and long-term outcomes in women presenting with signs and symptoms of ischaemia.

BACKGROUND: Although women are known to have a relatively higher left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) compared with men, a sex-neutral LVEF threshold continues to be used for clinical management. We sought to investigate the relationship among high (>65%), normal (55%-65%) and low (<55%) LVEF and long-term all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in women presenting with suspected myocardial ischaemia. METHODS: A total of 734 women from the Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) were analysed. LVEF was calculated by invasive left ventriculography. The relationship between baseline characteristics, LVEF and outcomes was evaluated. A multivariable Cox regression model was used to assess the association of LVEF with outcomes, after adjusting for known risk factors. RESULTS: Low LVEF was associated with higher rates of mortality and MACE compared with normal and high LVEF (p<0.0001). Normal LVEF was associated with higher mortality (p=0.047) and rate of myocardial infarctions (MIs) compared with high LVEF (p=0.03). Low LVEF remained a significant predictor of mortality compared with high LVEF (p=0.013) in a multivariable regression model and normal compared with high LVEF trended towards higher mortality (p=0.16). CONCLUSION: Among women with suspected ischaemia, women with LVEF above the defined normal threshold (>65%) had lower rates of all-cause mortality and non-fatal MI. Further investigation is needed to determine the optimal LVEF in women. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00000554.

Fitness attenuates long-term cardiovascular outcomes in women with ischemic heart disease and metabolic syndrome.

Background: The prevalence of metabolic syndrome continues to increase steadily while fitness remains relatively low. The contribution of fitness on longer-term cardiovascular outcomes and mortality in individuals with cardiovascular disease and metabolic syndrome remains unknown. Design: Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) prospective cohort (enrolled 1996-2001) of women undergoing invasive coronary angiography with signs/symptoms of ischemic heart disease. Methods: Investigated the association of fitness, defined as >7METs measured by self-reported Duke Activity Status Index (DASI), and both metabolic syndrome (ATPIII criteria) and dysmetabolism (ATPIII criteria and/or treated diabetes) with long-term cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause mortality risk. Results: Among the 492 women followed for a median of 8.6 years (range 0-11 years), 19.5% were fit-metabolically healthy (reference), 14.4% fit-metabolic syndrome, 29.9% unfit-metabolically healthy, and 36.2% unfit-metabolic syndrome. Compared to reference, MACE risk was 1.52-fold higher in fit-metabolic syndrome women (HR 1.52, 95% CI 1.03-2.26) and 2.42-fold higher in unfit-metabolic syndrome women (HR 2.42, 95% CI 1.30-4.48). Compared to reference, mortality risk was 1.96-fold higher in fit-dysmetabolism (HR 1.96, 95% CI 1.29-3.00) and 3-fold higher in unfit-dysmetabolism women (HR 3.0, 95% CI 1.66-5.43). Conclusions: In a high risk cohort of women with signs/symptoms of ischemic heart disease, unfit-metabolically healthy and fit-metabolically unhealthy women were at higher risk of long-term MACE and mortality compared to fit-metabolically healthy women; and women who were unfit and metabolically unhealthy were at the highest risk. Our study demonstrates that metabolic health and fitness play an important role in long term outcomes that warrants further investigation. Registration: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00000554 (NCT00000554).

Clinically stable covid-19 patients presenting to acute unscheduled episodic care venues have increased risk of hospitalization: secondary analysis of a randomized control trial.

BACKGROUND: Assessment for risks associated with acute stable COVID-19 is important to optimize clinical trial enrollment and target patients for scarce therapeutics. To assess whether healthcare system engagement location is an independent predictor of outcomes we performed a secondary analysis of the ACTIV-4B Outpatient Thrombosis Prevention trial. METHODS: A secondary analysis of the ACTIV-4B trial that was conducted at 52 US sites between September 2020 and August 2021. Participants were enrolled through acute unscheduled episodic care (AUEC) enrollment location (emergency department, or urgent care clinic visit) compared to minimal contact (MC) enrollment (electronic contact from test center lists of positive patients).We report the primary composite outcome of cardiopulmonary hospitalizations, symptomatic venous thromboembolism, myocardial infarction, stroke, transient ischemic attack, systemic arterial thromboembolism, or death among stable outpatients stratified by enrollment setting, AUEC versus MC. A propensity score for AUEC enrollment was created, and Cox proportional hazards regression with inverse probability weighting (IPW) was used to compare the primary outcome by enrollment location. RESULTS: Among the 657 ACTIV-4B patients randomized, 533 (81.1%) with known enrollment setting data were included in this analysis, 227 from AUEC settings and 306 from MC settings. In a multivariate logistic regression model, time from COVID test, age, Black race, Hispanic ethnicity, and body mass index were associated with AUEC enrollment. Irrespective of trial treatment allocation, patients enrolled at an AUEC setting were 10-times more likely to suffer from the adjudicated primary outcome, 7.9% vs. 0.7%; p < 0.001, compared with patients enrolled at a MC setting. Upon Cox regression analysis adjustment patients enrolled at an AUEC setting remained at significant risk of the primary composite outcome, HR 3.40 (95% CI 1.46, 7.94). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with clinically stable COVID-19 presenting to an AUEC enrollment setting represent a population at increased risk of arterial and venous thrombosis complications, hospitalization for cardiopulmonary events, or death, when adjusted for other risk factors, compared with patients enrolled at a MC setting. Future outpatient therapeutic trials and clinical therapeutic delivery programs of clinically stable COVID-19 patients may focus on inclusion of higher-risk patient populations from AUEC engagement locations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04498273.

Influence of Butyrate on Impaired Gene Expression in Colon from Patients with High Blood Pressure.

Hypertension (HTN) is associated with gut dysbiosis and the depletion of butyrate-producing bacteria in animal models and people. Furthermore, fecal material transfer from donor hypertensive patients increases blood pressure in normotensive recipient animals and ameliorates HTN-associated pathophysiology. These observations have implications in the impaired interactions between the gut and gut microbiota in HTN. Although this concept is supported in animal models, little is known about human HTN. Therefore, our objective for this study was to compare gene expression with transcriptomics and its potential to influence microbiota in subjects with normal and high blood pressure (HBP). Colon samples from reference subjects with normal blood pressure (REF) and HBP were used for RNA-seq to analyze their transcriptomes. We observed the significant downregulation of gene sets governing immune responses (e.g., SGK1 and OASL), gut epithelial function (e.g., KRT20 and SLC9A3R1), gut microbiota (e.g., PPARG and CIDEC) and genes associated with cardiovascular and gut diseases (e.g., PLAUR and NLN) in HBP subjects; the expression of genes within these pathways correlated with blood pressure. Potential drug targets in the gut epithelium were identified using the Drug Gene International Database for possible use in HTN. They include peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPRG), active serum/glucocorticoid regulated kinase 1 (SGK1) and 3 beta-hydroxysteroid isomerase type II inhibitor (HSD3B). Finally, butyrate, a microbiota-derived short-chain fatty acid, restored the disrupted expression of certain functional genes in colonic organoids from HBP subjects. Patients with HBP exhibit a unique transcriptome that could underlie impaired gut-microbiota interactions. Targeting these interactions could provide a promising new therapeutic intervention for hypertension management.

Association of abnormal electrocardiography response on dobutamine stress echocardiogram with longer-term major adverse cardiovascular events in women with symptoms of ischemic heart disease.

Background: Prior work demonstrates patients with positive (+) electrocardiogram (ECG) but negative (-) echocardiogram wall motion abnormalities (WMAs) on dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) testing have an elevated of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). In this study, we aimed to evaluate the long-term prognosis of women with suspected ischemia with no obstructive coronary artery (INOCA) disease by utilizing core lab read DSE, specifically focusing on those with + ECG findings. Methods: Among women with signs and symptoms of myocardial ischemia undergoing clinically indicated coronary angiography enrolled in the Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) [1997-2001], a prospective cohort study, 99 underwent standardized DSE by site design. Women with positive DSE (n=17), defined as an increase in score based on wall motion scoring index were excluded except for akinetic to dyskinetic (n=10), providing 82 patients in this analysis. ECG was assessed by core laboratory and (+) ECG was defined as >1 mm ST change. Non-obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) was assessed by core laboratory quantitative coronary angiography and defined as <50% epicardial stenosis. All-cause death follow-up was an average of 8 years, while adjudicated MACE [all-cause mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), nonfatal stroke, heart failure hospitalization] was an average of 5.5 years. Comparisons among subject groups [i.e., (+) ECG and (-) ECG] were made using chi-square or Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables and t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables. Results: Demographic profile included a mean age 59±10 years; 55% had hypertension (HTN), 29% diabetes mellitus (DM), and 72% non-obstructive CAD. Overall, 9/82 women (11%) had (+) ECG in the absence of WMAs. There were significant differences in family history of CAD (P=0.009) and vasodilator (P=0.042) use between the (+) ECG and (-) ECG groups, but otherwise had no significant demographic or clinical differences. At longer-term follow up, patients with (+) ECG had higher risk of MACE [unadjusted hazard ratio (HR): 4.91, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.83, 13.19, P=0.002]. Conclusions: Abnormal stress ECG findings on dobutamine stress testing with a negative DSE should be viewed as an indicator of longer-term risk in women with signs and symptoms of ischemia.

Latest from the WISE: Contributions to the Understanding of Ischemia and Heart Failure among Women with No Obstructive Coronary Arteries.

Since 1996, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-sponsored Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) has been investigating pathophysiological processes underlying ischemic heart disease in women and related outcomes. Recent findings have focused on women with signs and symptoms of ischemia and no obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA) and their elevated risk for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). This review summarizes the latest WISE findings related to INOCA and pre-HFpEF characteristics, addressing our understanding of contributions from traditional vs nontraditional risk factors in women.