Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Sci Total Environ ; 643: 1514-1521, 2018 Dec 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30189567

RESUMO

Human noroviruses (NoVs) are responsible for 50% of food-related disease outbreaks and are notably associated with shellfish consumption. Despite the detrimental health impacts of human NoV-contaminated seafood to public health, there is a lack of knowledge on the physicochemical conditions that govern NoV transmission in aquatic ecosystems. In the present study, we investigated the propensity for NoVs to associate with aquatic aggregates, which have been shown to efficiently deliver nano-sized particles to shellfish. Specific physicochemical conditions characteristic of shellfish cultivation waters, specifically salinity and transparent exopolymer particles (TEP), were targeted in this study for investigating aggregate formation and NoV association dynamics. Murine norovirus (MNV) was used in aggregation experiments as a model surrogate for NoVs. Results demonstrate increased aggregate formation as a function of increasing salinity and TEP concentrations, as well as greater numbers of MNV genomes incorporated into aggregates under conditions that favor aggregation. As aggregate formation was enhanced in waters representing optimal conditions for shellfish production, specifically saline and high TEP waters, the implications to virus transport and shellfish food safety are profound: more aggregates implies increased scavenging of virus particles from surrounding waters and therefor greater risk for bivalve contamination with nano-sized pathogens. These novel data provide insight into where and when NoVs are most likely to be ingested by shellfish via contaminated aggregates, thereby informing best management and water quality monitoring practices aimed at providing safe seafood to consumers.


Assuntos
Bivalves/virologia , Norovirus , Frutos do Mar/virologia , Animais , Humanos , Camundongos , Polissacarídeos Bacterianos , Salinidade
2.
Water Res ; 71: 227-43, 2015 Mar 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25618519

RESUMO

Elevated levels of fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) have been observed at Topanga Beach, CA, USA. To identify the FIB sources, a microbial source tracking study using a dog-, a gull- and two human-associated molecular markers was conducted at 10 sites over 21 months. Historical data suggest that episodic discharge from the lagoon at the mouth of Topanga Creek is the main source of bacteria to the beach. A decline in creek FIB/markers downstream from upper watershed development and a sharp increase in FIB/markers at the lagoon sites suggest sources are local to the lagoon. At the lagoon and beach, human markers are detected sporadically, dog marker peaks in abundance mid-winter, and gull marker is chronically elevated. Varied seasonal patterns of FIB and source markers were identified showing the importance of applying a suite of markers over long-term spatial and temporal sampling to identify a complex combination of sources of contamination.


Assuntos
Fezes/microbiologia , Microbiologia da Água , Poluentes da Água/isolamento & purificação , Animais , Bacteroides/isolamento & purificação , Praias , California , Charadriiformes , Cães , Enterobacteriaceae/isolamento & purificação , Enterococcaceae/isolamento & purificação , Monitoramento Ambiental , Fezes/química , Humanos , Rios/microbiologia , Estações do Ano
3.
Sci Total Environ ; 502: 462-70, 2015 Jan 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25285421

RESUMO

We compared host-associated Bacteroidales qPCR assays developed in the continental United States and Europe for the purpose of measuring the effect of improved sanitation on human fecal exposure in rural Indian communities where both human and animal fecal loading are high. Ten candidate Bacteroidales qPCR assays were tested against fecal samples (human, sewage, cow, buffalo, goat, sheep, dog and chicken) from a test set of 30 individual human, 5 sewage, and 60 pooled animal samples collected in coastal Odisha, India. The two universal/general Bacteroidales assays tested (BacUni, GenBac3) performed equally well, achieving 100% sensitivity on the test set. Across the five human-associated assays tested (HF183 Taqman, BacHum, HumM2, BacH, HF183 SYBR), we found low sensitivity (17 to 49%) except for HF183 SYBR (89%), and moderate to high cross-reactivity with dog (20 to 80%) and chicken fecal samples (60 to 100%). BacHum had the highest accuracy (67%), amplified all sewage samples within the range of quantification (ROQ), and did not cross-react with any fecal samples from cows, the most populous livestock animal in India. Of the ruminant- and cattle-associated assays tested (BacCow, CowM2), BacCow was more sensitive in detecting the full range of common Indian livestock animal fecal sources, while CowM2 only detected cow sources with 50% sensitivity. Neither assay cross-reacted with human sources. BacCan, the dog-associated assay tested, showed no cross-reactivity with human sources, and high sensitivity (90%) for dog fecal samples. Overall, our results indicate BacUni, BacHum, HumM2, BacCan and BacCow would be the most suitable MST assays to distinguish and quantify relative amounts of human-associated and livestock/domestic animal-associated contributions to fecal contamination in Odisha, India.


Assuntos
Bacteroidetes/genética , Monitoramento Ambiental/métodos , Fezes/microbiologia , Esgotos/microbiologia , Animais , Bacteroidetes/classificação , Humanos , Índia , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real
4.
J Environ Manage ; 136: 112-20, 2014 Apr 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24583609

RESUMO

Some molecular methods for tracking fecal pollution in environmental waters have both PCR and quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays available for use. To assist managers in deciding whether to implement newer qPCR techniques in routine monitoring programs, we compared detection limits (LODs) and costs of PCR and qPCR assays with identical targets that are relevant to beach water quality assessment. For human-associated assays targeting Bacteroidales HF183 genetic marker, qPCR LODs were 70 times lower and there was no effect of target matrix (artificial freshwater, environmental creek water, and environmental marine water) on PCR or qPCR LODs. The PCR startup and annual costs were the lowest, while the per reaction cost was 62% lower than the Taqman based qPCR and 180% higher than the SYBR based qPCR. For gull-associated assays, there was no significant difference between PCR and qPCR LODs, target matrix did not effect PCR or qPCR LODs, and PCR startup, annual, and per reaction costs were lower. Upgrading to qPCR involves greater startup and annual costs, but this increase may be justified in the case of the human-associated assays with lower detection limits and reduced cost per sample.


Assuntos
Charadriiformes , DNA Bacteriano/isolamento & purificação , Limite de Detecção , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/economia , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos , Água/química , Animais , Bacteroidetes/isolamento & purificação , Bioensaio/economia , Bioensaio/métodos , Custos e Análise de Custo , Determinação de Ponto Final/economia , Determinação de Ponto Final/métodos , Poluição Ambiental/análise , Fezes/química , Marcadores Genéticos , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Modelos Logísticos , Microbiologia da Água/normas , Qualidade da Água/normas
5.
Water Res ; 47(18): 6897-908, 2013 Nov 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23992621

RESUMO

A number of PCR-based methods for detecting human fecal material in environmental waters have been developed over the past decade, but these methods have rarely received independent comparative testing in large multi-laboratory studies. Here, we evaluated ten of these methods (BacH, BacHum-UCD, Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron (BtH), BsteriF1, gyrB, HF183 endpoint, HF183 SYBR, HF183 Taqman(®), HumM2, and Methanobrevibacter smithii nifH (Mnif)) using 64 blind samples prepared in one laboratory. The blind samples contained either one or two fecal sources from human, wastewater or non-human sources. The assay results were assessed for presence/absence of the human markers and also quantitatively while varying the following: 1) classification of samples that were detected but not quantifiable (DNQ) as positive or negative; 2) reference fecal sample concentration unit of measure (such as culturable indicator bacteria, wet mass, total DNA, etc); and 3) human fecal source type (stool, sewage or septage). Assay performance using presence/absence metrics was found to depend on the classification of DNQ samples. The assays that performed best quantitatively varied based on the fecal concentration unit of measure and laboratory protocol. All methods were consistently more sensitive to human stools compared to sewage or septage in both the presence/absence and quantitative analysis. Overall, HF183 Taqman(®) was found to be the most effective marker of human fecal contamination in this California-based study.


Assuntos
Bactérias Anaeróbias/classificação , DNA Bacteriano/análise , Monitoramento Ambiental/métodos , Fezes/microbiologia , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real/métodos , Microbiologia da Água , Poluição da Água/análise , Bactérias Anaeróbias/genética , Bactérias Anaeróbias/isolamento & purificação , Bactérias Anaeróbias/metabolismo , California , Humanos , Limite de Detecção , Águas Residuárias/microbiologia
6.
Water Res ; 47(18): 6839-48, 2013 Nov 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23911226

RESUMO

Many PCR-based methods for microbial source tracking (MST) have been developed and validated within individual research laboratories. Inter-laboratory validation of these methods, however, has been minimal, and the effects of protocol standardization regimes have not been thoroughly evaluated. Knowledge of factors influencing PCR in different laboratories is vital to future technology transfer for use of MST methods as a tool for water quality management. In this study, a blinded set of 64 filters (containing 32 duplicate samples generated from 12 composite fecal sources) were analyzed by three to five core laboratories with a suite of PCR-based methods utilizing standardized reagents and protocols. Repeatability (intra-laboratory variability) and reproducibility (inter-laboratory variability) of observed results were assessed. When standardized methodologies were used, intra- and inter-laboratory %CVs were generally low (median %CV 0.1-3.3% and 1.9-7.1%, respectively) and comparable to those observed in similar inter-laboratory validation studies performed on other methods of quantifying fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) in environmental samples. ANOVA of %CV values found three human-associated methods (BsteriF1, BacHum, and HF183Taqman) to be similarly reproducible (p > 0.05) and significantly more reproducible (p < 0.05) than HumM2. This was attributed to the increased variability associated with low target concentrations detected by HumM2 (approximately 1-2 log10copies/filter lower) compared to other human-associated methods. Cow-associated methods (BacCow and CowM2) were similarly reproducible (p > 0.05). When using standardized protocols, variance component analysis indicated sample type (fecal source and concentration) to be the major contributor to total variability with that from replicate filters and inter-laboratory analysis to be within the same order of magnitude but larger than inherent intra-laboratory variability. However, when reagents and protocols were not standardized, inter-laboratory %CV generally increased with a corresponding decline in reproducibility. Overall, these findings verify the repeatability and reproducibility of these MST methods and highlight the need for standardization of protocols and consumables prior to implementation of larger scale MST studies involving multiple laboratories.


Assuntos
Bactérias/classificação , Monitoramento Ambiental/métodos , Fezes/microbiologia , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real/métodos , Microbiologia da Água/normas , Poluição da Água/análise , Bactérias/genética , Bactérias/metabolismo , California , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
7.
Water Res ; 47(18): 6909-20, 2013 Nov 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23916711

RESUMO

The contribution of fecal pollution from dogs in urbanized areas can be significant and is an often underestimated problem. Microbial source tracking methods (MST) utilizing quantitative PCR of dog-associated gene sequences encoding 16S rRNA of Bacteroidales are a useful tool to estimate these contributions. However, data about the performance of available assays are scarce. The results of a multi-laboratory study testing two assays for the determination of dog-associated Bacteroidales (DogBact and BacCan-UCD) on 64 single and mixed fecal source samples created from pooled fecal samples collected in California are presented here. Standardization of qPCR data treatment lowered inter-laboratory variability of sensitivity and specificity results. Both assays exhibited 100% sensitivity. Normalization methods are presented that eliminated random and confirmed non-target responses. The combination of standardized qPCR data treatment, use of normalization via a non-target specific Bacteroidales assay (GenBac3), and application of threshold criteria improved the calculated specificity significantly for both assays. Such measures would reasonably improve MST data interpretation not only for canine-associated assays, but for all qPCR assays used in identifying and monitoring fecal pollution in the environment.


Assuntos
Bacteroidetes/classificação , Cães/microbiologia , Monitoramento Ambiental/métodos , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real/métodos , Microbiologia da Água , Poluição da Água/análise , Animais , Bacteroidetes/genética , Bacteroidetes/isolamento & purificação , Bacteroidetes/metabolismo , California , DNA Bacteriano/classificação , DNA Bacteriano/genética , DNA Bacteriano/metabolismo , Fezes , RNA Ribossômico 16S/classificação , RNA Ribossômico 16S/genética , RNA Ribossômico 16S/metabolismo , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Método Simples-Cego
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA