Biopsy-verified vulvar lichen sclerosus: Incidence trends 1997-2022 and increased risk of vulvar squamous precancer and squamous cell carcinoma.

Population-based data on the epidemiology of vulvar lichen sclerosus (LS) are sparse and only few prospective studies have investigated the malignant potential of the disease. We used the nationwide Danish Pathology Registry to first assess the incidence of biopsy-verified vulvar LS in the period 1997-2022 and second to examine the incidence of vulvar high-grade squamous precancer and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in women with biopsy-verified vulvar LS (1978-2019) compared with that expected in the general female population. For the latter aim, we computed standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). During our study period, the age-standardized incidence rate of vulvar LS increased from 5.0 (1997-1998) to 35.7 (2021-2022) per 100,000 person-years. Compared with the general female population, women with biopsy-verified vulvar LS had significantly increased rates of vulvar high-grade squamous precancer (SIR = 8.5; 95% CI: 7.2-10.0) and SCC (SIR = 16.2; 95% CI: 14.2-18.4). The SIRs of vulvar high-grade squamous precancer and SCC did not vary substantially according to length of follow-up. This nationwide and population-based study shows a 7-fold increase in the incidence of biopsy-verified vulvar LS since 1997. Data also show that women with biopsy-verified vulvar LS have 8.5 and 16 times higher than expected incidence of vulvar high-grade squamous precancer and SCC, respectively. The substantially increased incidence of vulvar high-grade squamous precancer and SCC following LS is important in relation to the clinical management and follow-up of LS patients.

Risk of nonovarian cancer in a nationwide-based study of nearly 5000 women with borderline ovarian tumors in Denmark.

Evidence regarding cancer risk after borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) is limited. We conducted a nationwide cohort study examining the incidence of nonovarian cancers in women with serous or mucinous BOTs compared with the general female population with up to 41 years of follow-up. Through the nationwide Pathology Registry, we identified nearly 5000 women with BOTs (2506 serous and 2493 mucinous) in Denmark, 1978 to 2018. We computed standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) as relative risk estimates of specific nonovarian cancers. Compared with general female population rates, women with serous BOTs had increased rates of particularly malignant melanoma (SIR = 1.9; 95% CI: 1.3-2.6), thyroid cancer (SIR = 3.0; 95% CI: 1.4-5.4) and myeloid leukemia (SIR = 3.2; 95% CI: 1.5-5.8), and women with mucinous BOTs had elevated rates of lung cancer (SIR = 1.7; 95% CI: 1.3-2.1), pancreatic cancer (SIR = 1.9; 95% CI: 1.2-2.9) and myeloid leukemia (SIR = 2.3; 95% CI: 0.9-4.7). We found no convincing association with neither breast nor colorectal cancer in women with BOTs. This is the first large nationwide study showing that women with specific types of BOTs have increased risks of several nonovarian cancers, likely due to some shared risk factors or genetic characteristics.

Long-term survival of nonlocalized epithelial ovarian cancer among women using menopausal hormone therapy prior to diagnosis: The extreme study.

Prediagnostic use of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) has been suggested to be associated with improved survival of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). We investigated the potential long-term survival benefit of prediagnostic MHT use in women ≥50 years with nonlocalized EOC using the Extreme study including all women in Denmark registered with nonlocalized EOC during 2000 to 2014 (N = 3776). We obtained individual-level information on prediagnostic use of systemic estrogen therapy (ET) and estrogen plus progestin therapy (EPT) from the National Prescription Registry and estimated absolute and relative 5- and 10-year survival probabilities with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using pseudo-values, taking into account histology, comorbidity, income and residual disease. Among women not having used prediagnostic MHT, 5- and 10-year absolute survival probabilities were 19% and 11%, respectively. Compared to MHT nonusers, prediagnostic systemic ET use for 3 to 4 years and ≥ 5 years was associated with 1.43 (95% CI: 1.01-2.02) and 1.22 (95% CI: 0.96-1.55) times higher 5-year survival probabilities, respectively. Ten-year survival probabilities were also increased but not statistically significantly. Among prediagnostic EPT users, increased 5-year (1.14, 95% CI: 0.85-1.53) and 10-year (1.38, 95% CI: 0.91-2.08) survival probabilities were observed after use for 3 to 4 years compared to MHT nonuse, whereas EPT use for ≥5 years was not associated with long-term survival of nonlocalized EOC. Our findings may suggest a better long-term survival of nonlocalized EOC in women having used long-term prediagnostic ET. However, the statistical precision of our results did not allow firm conclusions and more studies are needed.

Correction: BRAFV600E -mutated ovarian serous borderline tumors are at relatively low risk for progression to serous carcinoma.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.27326.].

Risk of specific types of ovarian cancer after borderline ovarian tumors in Denmark: A nationwide study.

Population-based evidence regarding risk of ovarian cancer after a borderline ovarian tumor (BOT) is sparse. We aimed to examine the incidence of specific types of ovarian cancer in women with serous or mucinous BOTs in a nationwide cohort study with up to 36 years of follow-up. Using the nationwide Danish Pathology Data Bank, we identified 4,281 women with a BOT (2,058 serous BOTs and 2,223 mucinous BOTs) in Denmark during 1978-2012. We computed standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) to compare the incidence of ovarian cancer among women with BOTs compared to general population rates. We found that a serous BOT was especially and strongly associated with subsequent serous ovarian cancer (SIR = 9.2; 95% CI: 6.8-12.2), and that a mucinous BOT was strongly related to mucinous ovarian cancer (SIR = 18.6; 95% CI: 10.8-29.8). The SIRs remained elevated ≥10 years after a serous BOT and up to 5-9 years after a mucinous BOT. The increased incidence of serous ovarian cancer in women with a serous BOT was mostly pronounced in women <50 years at the serous BOT diagnosis. In conclusion, women with a serous BOT experience long-term increased incidence of serous ovarian cancer, and women with a mucinous BOT have long-term elevated incidence of mucinous ovarian cancer compared to the general population. This is the first population-based study to show compelling evidence of the histo-specific increased risk of ovarian cancer following specific types of BOTs. Thus, these results are supportive of the hypothesis that BOTs may be precursor lesions to carcinomas of the corresponding histologic type.

BRAFV600E -mutated ovarian serous borderline tumors are at relatively low risk for progression to serous carcinoma.

Ovarian serous borderline tumor (SBT) is a known precursor of low-grade serous carcinoma. While most SBTs are cured surgically, some progress to carcinoma and a risk predictor for malignant relapse is needed to ensure vigilant follow-up and additional treatment. Activating mutations in KRAS or BRAF are present in around 60% of SBTs, but their relative impact on progression is unclear. We performed mutational analysis of KRAS and BRAF on 201 SBTs identified from a longitudinal cohort of SBTs after centralized pathology review. Compared to wildtype and KRAS-mutated SBTs, BRAF-mutated group of SBTs were less likely to exhibit micropapillary variant histology (p < 0.0001), were more frequently Stage I (p = 0.0023) and had a lower prevalence of associated endosalpingiosis (p = 0.0069). The histologic feature of diffuse presence of tumor cells with dense eosinophilic cytoplasm, while significantly associated with the BRAFV600E mutation (p < 0.0001), is 62% sensitive and 93% specific in identifying tumors with this mutation. After adjusting for age and stage, the risk of subsequent serous carcinoma was lower for SBTs harboring BRAF (HR 0.27, 95% CI 0.08-0.93), but not KRAS (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.45-2.23) mutations, in comparison to wildtype SBTs. This study establishes the potential utility of mutation testing for guiding clinical management of ovarian SBT and underscores the importance of accurate morphologic distinction of micropapillary SBT from SBT with eosinophilic tumor cells, given their disparate prognostic implications.

Clinicopathologic and Molecular Features of Paired Cases of Metachronous Ovarian Serous Borderline Tumor and Subsequent Serous Carcinoma.

Although risk factors have been established for the development of serous carcinoma after a diagnosis of serous borderline tumor (SBT), comprising atypical proliferative serous tumor (APST) (ie, conventional SBT) and noninvasive low-grade serous carcinoma (niLGSC) (ie, micropapillary SBT), subsequent invasive carcinoma still occurs in a subset of women who are not at increased risk. Whether subsequent serous carcinoma in women with a prior SBT represents malignant progression/recurrence or an independent primary tumor is unclear, and the combined clinicopathologic and molecular features of SBTs and their subsequent carcinomas have not been fully characterized. In this study, we analyzed a cohort of 42 women initially diagnosed with SBT who subsequently developed serous carcinoma of a total of 1025 cases of ovarian SBT from a nationwide population-based cohort. Review of the diagnostic slides was performed from this subset of SBTs and matched metachronous invasive serous carcinomas (39 low grade, 3 high grade). DNA was extracted from tissue blocks available for 41 cases (both SBT and carcinoma, n=36; SBT only, n=3; carcinoma only, n=2). Samples were subjected to digital droplet PCR to analyze mutation hotspots in KRAS (codon 12) and BRAF (V600E), which are frequently found in low-grade serous tumors. Eighty-one percent of SBTs (34/42) were APST, and 19% (8/42) were niLGSC. Forty percent of cases (17/42) were FIGO stage I, the majority of which were APST (14/17; 82%). The median time to development of carcinoma was 9 years (range, 0.6 to 25 y). Mutations in SBTs were distributed as follows: 5/39 (13%) BRAF mutant, 22/39 (56%) KRAS mutant, and 12/39 (31%) wild-type for both genes. There was a significant relationship between SBT gene mutation and histologic type, with BRAF mutations occurring exclusively in APST and a higher frequency of niLGSC among SBTs wild-type for BRAF and KRAS (P=0.01). The diffuse presence of tumor cells with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm was significantly associated with the BRAF mutation (P=0.001). Mutational analyses of matched SBT/carcinoma pairs revealed concordant profiles in 33/36 (92%) cases, of which 19 (53%) were KRAS mutant, 4 (11%) were BRAF mutant, and 10 (28%) were wild type for both genes. The 3 discordant cases consisted of a wild-type niLGSC with a subsequent BRAF-mutant invasive LGSC, a KRAS-mutant APST with a KRAS-mutant LGSC, and a BRAF-mutant APST with subsequent development of a KRAS-mutant high-grade serous carcinoma. In conclusion, some women with SBTs can subsequently develop serous carcinoma, occasionally over 10 years later. Most subsequent carcinomas are low grade, but a small subset can be high grade. The type of gene mutation in SBT correlates with various histologic features. While most cases of serous carcinoma developing after a diagnosis of SBT probably represent tumor progression, a minority are independent primary tumors, presumably arising from endosalpingiosis.

Mutation of NRAS is a rare genetic event in ovarian low-grade serous carcinoma.

Activating mutations involving the members of the RAS signaling pathway, including KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF, have been reported in ovarian low-grade serous carcinoma and its precursor lesion, serous borderline tumor (SBT). Whether additional genetic alterations in the RAS oncogene family accumulate during the progression of SBT to invasive low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC) remains largely unknown. Although mutations of KRAS and BRAF occur at a very early stage of progression, even preceding the development of SBT, additional driving events, such as NRAS mutations, have been postulated to facilitate progression. In this study, we analyzed NRAS exon 3 mutational status in 98 cases that were diagnosed with SBT/atypical proliferative serous tumor, noninvasive LGSC, or invasive LGSC. Of the latter, NRAS Q61R (CAA to CGA) mutations were detected in only 2 of 56 (3.6%) cases. The same mutation was not detected in any of the SBTs (atypical proliferative serous tumors) or noninvasive LGSCs. Mutational analysis for hotspots in KRAS and BRAF demonstrated a wild-type pattern of KRAS and BRAF in one of the NRAS-mutated cases. Interestingly, another LGSC case with NRAS mutation harbored a concurrent BRAF V600L mutation. These findings indicate that, although recurrent NRAS mutations are present, their low prevalence indicates that NRAS plays a limited role in the development of LGSC. Further studies to identify other oncogenic events that drive LGSC progression are warranted.

Long-term Behavior of Serous Borderline Tumors Subdivided Into Atypical Proliferative Tumors and Noninvasive Low-grade Carcinomas: A Population-based Clinicopathologic Study of 942 Cases.

Ovarian serous borderline tumors (SBTs) have been the subject of considerable controversy, particularly with regard to terminology and behavior. It has been proposed that they constitute a heterogenous group of tumors composed, for the most part, of typical SBTs that are benign and designated "atypical proliferative serous tumor (APST)" and a small subset of SBTs with micropapillary architecture that have a poor outcome and are designated "noninvasive low-grade serous carcinoma (niLGSC)". It also has been argued that the difference in behavior between the 2 groups is not due to the subtype of the primary tumor but rather the presence of extraovarian disease, specifically invasive implants. According to the terminology of the 2014 WHO Classification, typical SBTs are equivalent to APSTs and SBTs displaying micropapillary architecture are synonymous with niLGSC. In addition, "invasive implants" were renamed "low-grade serous carcinoma" (LGSC). The argument as to whether it is the appearance of the primary tumor or the presence of extraovarian LGSC that determines outcome remains unsettled. The current study was initiated in 2004 and was designed to determine what factors were predictive of outcome, with special attention to the appearance of the primary tumor (APST vs. niLGSC) and that of the extraovarian disease (noninvasive vs. invasive implants). Our study is population based, involving the entire female population of Denmark. None of the women in the study were lost to follow-up, which ranged up to 36 years (median, 15 y). All the microscopic slides from the contributing hospitals were rereviewed by a panel of 2 pathologists (R.V. and R.J.K.) who were blinded to the follow-up. After excluding those that were not SBTs by the pathology panel, as well as cases with a prior or concurrent cancer or undefined stage, 942 women remained, of which 867 were APSTs and 75 were niLGSCs. The median patient age was 50 years (range, 16 to 97 y). Eight hundred nine women (86%) presented with FIGO stage I disease, whereas 133 (14%) had advanced stage disease. Compared with APSTs, niLGSC exhibited a significantly greater frequency of bilaterality, residual gross disease after surgery, microinvasion/microinvasive carcinoma, advanced stage disease, and invasive implants at presentation (P-values <0.003). Because the cause of death is difficult to accurately ascertain from death certificates, we used development of invasive serous carcinoma as the primary endpoint as following development of carcinoma, the mortality is very high. In the entire cohort, subsequent development of carcinoma occurred in 4%, of which 93% were low grade and 7% high grade (median time, 10 y; range, up to 25 y). After adjusting for age at and time since diagnosis of APST or niLGSC, occurrence of subsequent carcinoma was significantly higher with niLGSC than APST among all stages combined (hazard ratio [HR]=3.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7-8.2). This difference was still significant for stage I but not advanced stage cases. Moreover, all-cause mortality was not statistically significantly different between APST and niLGSC. Of all women with advanced stage disease, 114 (86%) had noninvasive implants, whereas 19 (14%) were invasive. Noninvasive implants were significantly associated with subsequent development of carcinoma (HR=7.7; 95% CI, 3.9-15.0), but the risk with invasive implants was significantly higher (HR=42.3; 95% CI, 16.1-111.1). In conclusion, although invasive implants are the most important feature in predicting an adverse outcome, subclassification into APST and niLGSC is important as it stratifies women with respect to risk for advanced stage disease and invasive implants for all women and development of serous carcinoma for stage I cases.

Ovarian and tubal cancer in Denmark: an update on incidence and survival.

INTRODUCTION: The Nordic countries are areas with a high-incidence of ovarian cancer; however, differences between the countries exist. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We used the Danish Cancer Registry to identify 11 264 cases of ovarian cancer and 363 cases of tubal cancer during 1993-2013. We calculated age-standardized (world standard population) incidence rates for overall and subtype-specific ovarian cancer, and for tubal cancer. We compared age-standardized incidence rates, and 1- and 5-year age-standardized relative survival rates, respectively, for ovarian and tubal cancer combined in four Nordic countries using the NORDCAN database. RESULTS: The incidence rate of ovarian cancer overall in Denmark decreased statistically significantly by approximately 2.3% per year among women aged <70 years, whereas no change was seen among women aged 70+ years. In the <70-year age-group, the incidence of serous tumors was fairly steady, whereas that of other and unspecified epithelial tumors decreased significantly by 6.4% per year. The incidence of tubal cancer was quite stable. In Norway and Finland, the incidence rates of ovarian and tubal cancer combined decreased from 1993 to 2013 in women aged <70 years, whereas in Sweden the incidence rates decreased independently of age. The 1- and 5-year relative survival rates of ovarian and tubal cancer combined increased during the study period in all the Nordic countries. Denmark had the lowest survival; however, the survival rates approached those of the other countries in recent years. CONCLUSIONS: In Denmark, the positive development in ovarian cancer has continued during recent years with a lower incidence and an increased survival.

BRAF mutation is associated with a specific cell type with features suggestive of senescence in ovarian serous borderline (atypical proliferative) tumors.

Serous borderline tumor also known as atypical proliferative serous tumor (APST) is the precursor of ovarian low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC). In this study, we correlated the morphologic and immunohistochemical phenotypes of 71 APSTs and 18 LGSCs with the mutational status of KRAS and BRAF, the most common molecular genetic changes in these neoplasms. A subset of cells characterized by abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm (EC), discrete cell borders, and bland nuclei was identified in all (100%) 25 BRAF-mutated APSTs but in only 5 (10%) of 46 APSTs without BRAF mutations (P<0.0001). Among the 18 LGSCs, EC cells were found in only 2, and both contained BRAF mutations. The EC cells were present admixed with cuboidal and columnar cells lining the papillae and appeared to be budding from the surface, resulting in individual cells and clusters of detached cells "floating" above the papillae. Immunohistochemistry showed that the EC cells always expressed p16, a senescence-associated marker, and had a significantly lower Ki-67 labeling index than adjacent cuboidal and columnar cells (P=0.02). In vitro studies supported the interpretation that these cells were undergoing senescence, as the same morphologic features could be reproduced in cultured epithelial cells by ectopic expression of BRAF(V600E). Senescence was further established by markers such as SA-ß-gal staining, expression of p16 and p21, and reduction in DNA synthesis. In conclusion, this study sheds light on the pathogenesis of this unique group of ovarian tumors by showing that BRAF mutation is associated with cellular senescence and the presence of a specific cell type characterized by abundant EC. This "oncogene-induced senescence" phenotype may represent a mechanism that impedes progression of APSTs to LGSC.

Mutational analysis of BRAF and KRAS in ovarian serous borderline (atypical proliferative) tumours and associated peritoneal implants.

There is debate as to whether peritoneal implants associated with serous borderline tumours/atypical proliferative serous tumours (SBT/APSTs) of the ovary are derived from the primary ovarian tumour or arise independently in the peritoneum. We analysed 57 SBT/APSTs from 45 patients with advanced-stage disease identified from a nation-wide tumour registry in Denmark. Mutational analysis for hotspots in KRAS and BRAF was successful in 55 APSTs and demonstrated KRAS mutations in 34 (61.8%) and BRAF mutations in eight (14.5%). Mutational analysis was successful in 56 peritoneal implants and revealed KRAS mutations in 34 (60.7%) and BRAF mutations in seven (12.5%). Mutational analysis could not be performed in two primary tumours and in nine implants, either because DNA amplification failed or because there was insufficient tissue for mutational analysis. For these specimens we performed VE1 immunohistochemistry, which was shown to be a specific and sensitive surrogate marker for a V600E BRAF mutation. VE1 staining was positive in one of two APSTs and seven of nine implants. Thus, among 63 implants for which mutation status was known (either by direct mutational analysis or by VE1 immunohistochemistry), 34 (53.9%) had KRAS mutations and 14 (22%) had BRAF mutations, of which identical KRAS mutations were found in 34 (91%) of 37 SBT/APST-implant pairs and identical BRAF mutations in 14 (100%) of 14 SBT/APST-implant pairs. Wild-type KRAS and BRAF (at the loci investigated) were found in 11 (100%) of 11 SBT/APST-implant pairs. Overall concordance of KRAS and BRAF mutations was 95% in 59 of 62 SBT/APST-implant (non-invasive and invasive) pairs (p < 0.00001). This study provides cogent evidence that the vast majority of peritoneal implants, non-invasive and invasive, harbour the identical KRAS or BRAF mutations that are present in the associated SBT/APST, supporting the view that peritoneal implants are derived from the primary ovarian tumour.

Analgesic drug use and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer.

Analgesic use may reduce ovarian cancer risk, possibly through antiinflammatory or antigonadotropic effects. The authors conducted a population-based, case-control study in Washington State that included 812 women aged 35-74 years who were diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer between 2002 and 2005 and 1,313 controls. Use of analgesics, excluding use within the previous year, was assessed via in-person interviews. Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Overall, acetaminophen and aspirin were associated with weakly increased risks of ovarian cancer. These associations were stronger after more than 10 years of use (acetaminophen: odds ratio (OR) = 1.8, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.3, 2.6; aspirin: OR = 1.6, 95% CI: 1.1, 2.2) and were present for indications of headache, menstrual pain, and other pain/injury. Reduced risk was observed among aspirin users who began regular use within the previous 5 years (OR = 0.6, 95% CI: 0.4, 1.0) or used this drug for prevention of heart disease (OR = 0.7, 95% CI: 0.5, 1.0). These results, in the context of prior findings, do not provide compelling evidence of a true increase in risk of ovarian cancer among women who use these drugs. However, they add to the weight of evidence that, in the aggregate, provides little support for the use of analgesic drugs as chemoprevention for this disease.