Quality of care measurement for patients with ovarian cancer in Japan.

AIM: Quality of care is important to reduce disease progression, and improve both survival and quality of life. The Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology has published treatment guidelines to promote standardized high-quality care for ovarian cancer in Japan. We developed quality indicators based on the guideline recommendations and used them on large datasets of health service use to examine the quality of ovarian cancer care. METHODS: A panel of experts developed the indicators using a modified Delphi method. Adherence to each indicator was evaluated using data from a hospital-based cancer registry of patients diagnosed in 2018. All patients receiving first-line treatment at participating facilities were included. The adherence rates were returned to participating hospitals, and reasons for nonadherence were collected. A total of 580 hospitals participated, and the study examined the care received by 6611 patients with ovarian cancer and 1879 with borderline tumors using 11 measurable quality indicators. RESULTS: The adherence rate ranged from 22.6% for "Estrogen replacement within 6 months of operation" to 93.5% for "Bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin for germ cell tumor more than Stage II." Of 580 hospitals, 184 submitted the reasons for nonadherence. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of ovarian cancer care should be continuously assessed to encourage the use of best practices. These indicators may be a useful tool for this purpose.

PD-1 inhibition with retifanlimab and/or arginase inhibition with INCB001158 in Japanese patients with solid tumors: A phase I study.

BACKGROUND: Retifanlimab is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting programmed death protein-1, and INCB001158 is an oral arginase inhibitor. This phase Ib study investigated retifanlimab, INCB001158, and their combination in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. METHODS: Patients received retifanlimab (500 mg every 4 weeks [Q4W] i.v.) or escalating doses of INCB001158 (75 or 100 mg twice daily [BID]) monotherapy in Part 1 and combination of retifanlimab (500 mg Q4W) and INCB001158 (100 mg BID) in Part 2. Primary endpoints were safety, tolerability, dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and determination of recommended phase II doses in Japanese patients. RESULTS: Eighteen patients (retifanlimab or INCB001158 monotherapy and combination; n = 6 each) were enrolled at 2 sites in Japan. There were no DLTs, fatal adverse events (AEs), or discontinuations due to AEs. Rash (all grade 1) was the most common treatment-emergent AE with retifanlimab (n = 6). Treatment-related AEs were reported with retifanlimab (n = 4) or INCB001158 (n = 2) monotherapy and with combination (n = 4); an immune-related AE (thyroid disorder, grade 2) was reported with combination. Two responses were observed with retifanlimab monotherapy (1 complete, 1 partial) and 1 stable disease (SD), for an overall response rate of 33.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.3-77.7) and disease control rate (DCR) of 50% (95% CI, 11.8-88.2). Three patients had SD with INCB001158 monotherapy (DCR 50%; 95% CI, 11.8-88.2). No responses or SD were observed with combination therapy. CONCLUSION: Retifanlimab, INCB001158, and their combination had acceptable safety profiles. Promising retifanlimab antitumor activity warrants further investigation in Japanese patients.

A first-in-human phase I study of TAS-117, an allosteric AKT inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: TAS-117 is a highly potent and selective, oral, allosteric pan-AKT inhibitor under development for advanced/metastatic solid tumors. The safety, clinical pharmacology, pharmacogenomics and efficacy were investigated. METHODS: This phase I, open-label, non-randomized, dose-escalating, first-in-human study enrolled patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors and comprised three phases (dose escalation phase [DEP], regimen modification phase [RMP], and safety assessment phase [SAP]). The SAP dose and regimen were determined in the DEP and RMP. Once-daily and intermittent dosing (4 days on/3 days off, 21-day cycles) were investigated. The primary endpoints were dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in Cycle 1 of the DEP and RMP and incidences of adverse events (AEs) and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in the SAP. Secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, pharmacogenomics, and antitumor activity. RESULTS: Of 66 enrolled patients, 65 received TAS-117 (DEP, n = 12; RMP, n = 10; SAP, n = 43). No DLTs were reported with 24-mg/day intermittent dosing, which was selected as a recommended dose in SAP. In the SAP, 98.5% of patients experienced both AEs and ADRs (grade ≥ 3, 67.7% and 60.0%, respectively). In the dose range tested (8 to 32 mg/day), TAS-117 pharmacokinetics were dose proportional, and pharmacodynamic analysis showed a reduction of phosphorylated PRAS40, a direct substrate of AKT. Four patients in the SAP had confirmed partial response. CONCLUSION: Oral doses of TAS-117 once daily up to 16 mg/day and intermittent dosing of 24 mg/day were well tolerated. TAS-117 pharmacokinetics were dose proportional at the doses evaluated. Antitumor activity may occur through AKT inhibition. TRIAL REGISTRATION: jRCT2080222728 (January 29, 2015).

Safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors after proton beam therapy in head and neck mucosal melanoma: a case series.

Proton beam therapy (PBT) has shown promising efficacy in treating locally advanced head and neck mucosal melanoma despite its poor prognosis. Although PBT may improve the efficacy of subsequent immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), the safety of ICIs in patients who have previously received PBT has not been established. Hence, this study evaluated the safety of ICIs in patients who had recurrent mucosal melanoma after PBT. Between April 2013 and June 2022, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients diagnosed with cutaneous or mucosal melanoma at the National Cancer Center Hospital East. Seven patients were treated with ICIs after their head and neck mucosal melanoma (HNMM) recurred after PBT. Four of the seven patients experienced grade immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Due to irAE in the irradiation field, two patients had grade 3 hypopituitarism. Other grade 3 or higher irAEs included an increase in serum alanine aminotransferase in two patients and gastritis in one, and two patients discontinued ICI due to the irAEs. All irAEs were resolved with appropriate management. Although administering ICIs after PBT may increase the risk of irAEs, especially in the irradiation field, they appear manageable. These findings could help in the development of a treatment strategy for locally advanced HNMM that includes PBT and subsequent ICIs.

First-in-human study of E7130 (a tumor microenvironment-ameliorating microtubule inhibitor) in patients with advanced solid tumors: Primary results of the dose-escalation part.

BACKGROUND: E7130 is a novel anticancer agent created from a total synthetic study of norhalichondrin B. The authors report the E7130 dose-escalation part of a first-in-human study of patients with advanced solid tumors (NCT03444701). METHODS: Japanese patients ≥20 years of age were enrolled. E7130 was administered intravenously in two cycles: day 1 of a 21-day cycle (Q3W) or days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle (Q2W). Doses were escalated from 270 to 550 µg/m2 for the Q3W group or 25-400 µg/m2 for the Q2W group. The primary end point of the dose-escalation phase was safety and tolerability as assessed by the incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and adverse events. Other end points included determination of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics. RESULTS: Forty-four patients were enrolled: 15 in the E7130 Q3W group and 29 in the Q2W group. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in all patients; the most common TEAE overall was leukopenia (78.6%). Grade 3-4 TEAEs occurred in 93.3% of patients in the Q3W group and 86.2% of patients in the Q2W group. None had a TEAE resulting in study drug discontinuation, and no treatment-related deaths were reported. Per the DLT evaluation, the MTDs were determined as 480 µg/m2 Q3W and 300 µg/m2 Q2W. Significant changes in multiple plasma biomarkers, including vascular endothelial growth factor 3 and matrix metallopeptidase 9, were dose-dependent after initial doses of 350-480 µg/m2 . CONCLUSIONS: E7130 480 µg/m2 Q3W was chosen for the dose-expansion part over 300 µg/m2 Q2W primarily per dose-dependent biomarker results.

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on perioperative chemotherapy for breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Since it was first reported in December 2019, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) spread rapidly across the globe resulting in a pandemic. As of August 2022, seven outbreak peaks have been confirmed in Tokyo, and the numbers of new cases in the fifth and later outbreak periods have been far greater than in the preceding periods. This retrospective study examined the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on perioperative chemotherapy for breast cancer. METHODS: Patients with breast cancer who received perioperative chemotherapy at the National Cancer Center Hospital East were divided into 2 groups: 120 and 384 patients who started chemotherapy before and during the pandemic, respectively. The incidence of critical events that had potential detrimental effects on the prognosis, such as start of adjuvant chemotherapy ≥91 days after surgery and relative dose intensity of chemotherapy <85% were compared between groups. RESULTS: No significant difference in the incidence of critical events was found. When stratified by outbreak period, the incidence of critical events was positively correlated with the increasing number of new cases of COVID-19 (r = 0.83, p = 0.04). Moreover, 25/173 patients (14%) who started perioperative chemotherapy during the fifth and sixth outbreak periods developed COVID-19 infection, 80% of whom (20/25) had a delay or interruption to their surgery or other perioperative treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Although the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on perioperative chemotherapy on whole groups of patients was not evident when comparing periods before and after the pandemic, the impact is becoming prominent in parallel with increasing numbers of new COVID-19 cases.

Clinical features of CDK4/6 inhibitor-related interstitial lung disease in patients with breast cancer: a case series study.

BACKGROUND: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors are the standard treatment for advanced hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Although interstitial lung disease is a rare (1-3.3%) but serious adverse event associated with CDK4/6 inhibitors, the incidence of interstitial lung disease in Japanese patients in the real world and the risk factors of interstitial lung disease are not clear. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated the incidence of interstitial lung disease in 224 patients with advanced breast cancer who received CDK4/6 inhibitors at our hospital between 31 January 2017 and 31 January 2021. The correlation of age (>50 vs ≤50 years), presence or absence of previous history of interstitial lung disease, lung metastasis, smoking history and chest radiation with the development of interstitial lung disease was evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 177 cases received palbociclib, 39 cases received abemaciclib and 8 cases received both palbociclib and abemaciclib, constituting a palbociclib group (n = 185) and an abemaciclib group (n = 47). At a median observation period of 607 days, 8.0% (18/224) cases (13 definite and 5 probable cases) had interstitial lung disease; 6.5% (12/185) of palbociclib-treated and 13% (6/47) of abemaciclib-treated cases. The median time to interstitial lung disease onset was 178 (range, 14-750) days. There was no significant correlation between the background factors studied and the development of interstitial lung disease. CONCLUSION: The frequency of CDK4/6 inhibitor-induced interstitial lung disease was higher than that reported in clinical trials. We did not identify any risk factors for the development of interstitial lung disease in this study, and thus, larger studies that include patient predisposition are required.

Impact of Older Age and Medico-social Factors on the Decision to Offer Adjuvant Chemotherapy to Patients With Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Although clinicians are expected to set a higher threshold for administering adjuvant chemotherapy to older than younger patients with breast cancer, the extent to which older patients are less likely to be offered adjuvant chemotherapy and the medico-social factors that influence decision-making are unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the correlations of clinicopathological factors, including age (≥75 years vs. <75 years), for all candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy, and of additional medico-social factors, including the number of family members living together, for older patients, with the rate of referral from breast surgeons to medical oncologists. RESULTS: Among 872 candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy, age ≥75 years was significantly correlated with a lower referral rate (24 % vs. 44%, p<0.001). In the analysis by age group, we did not identify specific medicosocial factors that were differentially emphasized, but older patients who lived with ≥2 other family members tended not to be referred to a medical oncologist compared to those who lived alone or with one family member (1/23 vs. 15/47). Although 5 of 22 older patients (23%) who were referred to a medical oncologist actually received adjuvant chemotherapy (vs. 60% of younger patients), all needed treatment modifications. CONCLUSION: Breast surgeons regard age ≥75 years as a key factor for avoiding adjuvant chemotherapy but they also consider similar medico-social factors irrespective of the patient's age regarding the decision to refer patients to medical oncologists.

Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in Japanese patients with persistent, recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer: Results from KEYNOTE-826.

Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab demonstrated prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) versus chemotherapy in patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer in the phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled KEYNOTE-826 study. We report outcomes in patients enrolled in Japan. Patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo Q3W for up to 35 cycles plus chemotherapy (paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 + cisplatin 50 mg/m2 or carboplatin AUC 5) with or without bevacizumab 15 mg/kg. Dual primary endpoints were PFS per RECIST v1.1 by investigator assessment and OS in the global population; these were evaluated in patients with tumors with PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥1, all-comers, and PD-L1 CPS ≥10. Fifty-seven patients from Japan were randomized (pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy, n = 35; placebo plus chemotherapy, n = 22). Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy improved PFS versus placebo plus chemotherapy in patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 (n = 51; hazard ratio [HR; 95% CI], 0.36 [0.16-0.77]), all-comers (n = 57; 0.45 [0.22-0.90]), and patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 (n = 25; 0.36 [0.12-1.07]). HRs (95% CI) for OS were 0.38 (0.14-1.01), 0.41 (0.17-1.00), and 0.37 (0.10-1.30), respectively. Incidence of grade 3-5 AEs was 94% in the pembrolizumab group and 100% in the placebo group. Consistent with findings in the global KEYNOTE-826 study, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab may prolong survival versus placebo plus chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab and had a manageable safety profile in Japanese patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer.

Phase 1 study of the liposomal formulation of eribulin (E7389-LF): Results from the breast cancer expansion cohort.

BACKGROUND: A liposomal formulation of eribulin, E7389-LF, may provide improved pharmacokinetics and allow increased access to tumour tissues. This expansion of a phase 1 study assessed the safety and efficacy of E7389-LF in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2-negative metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: Patients received E7389-LF 2.0 mg/m2 every three weeks. Tumour assessments were conducted every six weeks by the investigator by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours v1.1. All adverse events were monitored and recorded. Serum biomarker assessments were conducted. RESULTS: Of 28 patients included, 75.0% had hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (HR+ BC) and 25.0% had triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). The most common grade ≥3 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events included neutropenia (67.9%), leukopenia (42.9%), thrombocytopenia (32.1%), and febrile neutropenia (25.0%). Rates of neutropenia and febrile neutropenia were lower among patients who received prophylactic pegfilgrastim. Objective response rate was 35.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 18.6-55.9) for all patients and 42.9% (95% CI: 21.8-66.0) for patients with HR+ BC. Median progression-free survival was 5.7 months (95% CI: 3.9-8.3). The median overall survival was 18.3 months (95% CI: 13.2-not estimable). Among the 54 biomarkers assessed, 27, including 5 of 7 vascular markers, were significantly altered by E7389-LF treatment from baseline to any time point. CONCLUSION: E7389-LF was tolerable and favourable antitumour activity was observed, particularly in patients with HR+ BC. Prophylactic pegfilgrastim can be considered in patients at high risk for neutropenia and febrile neutropenia. GOV NUMBER: NCT03207672.

Changes in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes in Patients Without Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Systemic Chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Lehmann et al have identified four molecular subtypes of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC)-basal-like (BL) 1, BL2, mesenchymal (M), and luminal androgen receptor-and an immunomodulatory (IM) gene expression signature modifier. Our group previously showed that the response of TNBC to neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy (NST) differs by molecular subtype, but whether NST affects the subtype was unknown. Here, we tested the hypothesis that in patients without pathologic complete response, TNBC subtypes can change after NST. Moreover, in cases with the changed subtype, we determined whether epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) had occurred. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From the Pan-Pacific TNBC Consortium data set containing TNBC patient samples from four countries, we examined 64 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded pairs of matched pre- and post-NST tumor samples. The TNBC subtype was determined using the TNBCtype-IM assay. We analyzed a partial EMT gene expression scoring metric using mRNA data. RESULTS: Of the 64 matched pairs, 36 (56%) showed a change in the TNBC subtype after NST. The most frequent change was from BL1 to M subtypes (38%). No tumors changed from M to BL1. The IM signature was positive in 14 (22%) patients before NST and eight (12.5%) patients after NST. The EMT score increased after NST in 28 (78%) of the 36 patients with the changed subtype (v 39% of the 28 patients without change; P = .002254). CONCLUSION: We report, to our knowledge, for the first time that the TNBC molecular subtype and IM signature frequently change after NST. Our results also suggest that EMT is promoted by NST. Our findings may lead to innovative adjuvant therapy strategies in TNBC cases with residual tumor after NST.

Impacts of clinicopathological factors on efficacy of trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The previous second-line treatment for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer were ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1); however, its activity is decreased in tumors with heterogenous, reduced, or loss of HER2 expression. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) has recently been developed as a novel antibody-drug conjugate to overcome resistance to T-DM1. However, clinical evidence on its ability to overcome this resistance is limited. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data for patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer who received T-DXd at our institution from April 2020 to March 2021. We evaluated the associations between clinicopathological and molecular biomarkers and the efficacy of T-DXd. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were enrolled in this study. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.0-not reached [NR]), and the objective response rate (ORR) was 61.9%. The ORR and PFS were comparable between patients with HER2 immunohistochemistry scores of 3+ and 2+/1+ at initial diagnosis (ORR: 50.0% vs. 72.7%, p = 0.39; median PFS, 9.7 months [95%CI, 2.6-NR] vs. 8.3 months [95%CI, 7.1-NR]; hazard ratio, 1.86 [95%CI, 0.53-6.57], p = 0.34). Two patients with heterogenous HER2 expression had a partial response or long stable disease (≥6 months). Three of four patients with re-biopsy samples after anti-HER2 targeted therapy and with latest HER2 immunohistochemistry scores of 1+ experienced partial responses (75.0%) to T-DXd, but none had responded to prior T-DM1. CONCLUSIONS: T-DXd demonstrated favorable activity in clinical practice. Moreover, T-DXd showed meaningful benefit in patients with heterogeneity, reduction, or loss of HER2 expression.

Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of TAK-931, a Cell Division Cycle 7 Inhibitor, in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors: A Phase I First-in-Human Study.

Purpose: We conducted a first-in-human, dose-escalation study, to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and activity of TAK-931, a cell division cycle 7 inhibitor, in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. Experimental Design: Patients ages ≥20 years received oral TAK-931: once daily for 14 days in 21-day cycles (schedule A; from 30 mg); once daily or twice daily for 7 days on, 7 days off in 28-day cycles (schedule B; from 60 mg); continuous once daily (schedule D; from 20 mg); or once daily for 2 days on, 5 days off (schedule E; from 100 mg) in 21-day cycles. Results: Of the 80 patients enrolled, all had prior systemic treatment and 86% had stage IV disease. In schedule A, 2 patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of grade 4 neutropenia and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 50 mg. In schedule B, 4 patients experienced DLTs of grade 3 febrile neutropenia (n = 3) or grade 4 neutropenia (n = 1); the MTD was 100 mg. Schedules D and E were discontinued before MTD determination. The most common adverse events were nausea (60%) and neutropenia (56%). Time to maximum plasma concentration of TAK-931 was approximately 1-4 hours postdose; systemic exposure was approximately dose proportional. Posttreatment pharmacodynamic effects correlating to drug exposure were observed. Overall, 5 patients achieved a partial response. Conclusions: TAK-931 was tolerable with a manageable safety profile. TAK-931 50 mg once daily days 1-14 in 21-day cycles was selected as a recommended phase II dose and achieved proof of mechanism. Trial registration ID: NCT02699749. Significance: This was the first-in-human study of the CDC7 inhibitor, TAK-931, in patients with solid tumors. TAK-931 was generally tolerable with a manageable safety profile. The recommend phase II dose was determined to be TAK-931 50 mg administered once daily on days 1-14 of each 21-day cycle. A phase II study is ongoing to confirm the safety, tolerability, and antitumor activity of TAK-931 in patients with metastatic solid tumors.

Comparison of Treatment Completion Rate Between Conventional and Dose-dense Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide (AC) Followed by a Taxane in Patients With Breast Cancer: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis.

BACKGROUND/AIM: To maximize the effect of perioperative chemotherapy in breast cancer, it is critical to keep the relative dose intensity (RDI) high. While bi-weekly doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide, dose-dense AC (ddAC), instead of tri-weekly conventional AC (cAC) followed by a taxane has been adopted as standard perioperative chemotherapy, postponement or discontinuation are sometimes experienced during ddAC or subsequent taxane phase. This study aimed at evaluating whether ddAC, compared to cAC, was associated with reduced RDI. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We compared ddAC and cAC, both followed by a taxane, for perioperative breast cancer regarding the proportion of completion of planned treatment (%completion), defined as an RDI ≥85% for both AC and taxane phases. RESULTS: There was no remarkable difference between the groups in patient characteristics after propensity score matching (n=46 in ddAC, and n=86 in cAC). The %completion was similar between the groups (67.4% vs. 65.1%). Most other endpoints related to RDI were similar between groups. The incidence of pneumonia was higher in the ddAC group (13% vs. 3%) including one Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia. CONCLUSION: ddAC followed by a taxane can be considered with sufficient supportive measures and precautions for pneumonia.

TAS-116 (Pimitespib), an Oral HSP90 Inhibitor, in Combination with Nivolumab in Patients with Colorectal Cancer and Other Solid Tumors: An Open-Label, Dose-Finding, and Expansion Phase Ib Trial (EPOC1704).

PURPOSE: This is a phase Ib trial of TAS-116, an oral HSP90 inhibitor, plus nivolumab for colorectal cancer and other solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Enrolled patients received TAS-116 plus nivolumab in a dose-finding part to estimate the recommended dose. Additional patients were enrolled in a dose-expansion part. TAS-116 monotherapy (orally once daily, 80-160 mg) was administered for 2 weeks followed by the combination with nivolumab (intravenously every 2 weeks, 3 mg/kg). The primary endpoint was dose-limiting toxicities (DLT). We also conducted biomarker research using paired samples from repeated blood collections and tumor biopsies. RESULTS: A total of 44 patients with colorectal cancer (n = 29), gastric cancer (n = 8), sarcoma (n = 5), non-small cell lung cancer (n = 1), and melanoma (n = 1) were enrolled. Eleven patients had previously received immune-checkpoint inhibitors. No DLTs were observed at all dose levels, and TAS-116 160 mg was determined as recommended dose. The common grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events included liver transaminase increased (7%), creatinine increased (5%), and platelet count decreased (5%). Objective tumor response was observed in 6 patients, including 4 microsatellite stable (MSS) colorectal cancers, 1 microsatellite instability-high colorectal cancer, and 1 leiomyosarcoma, resulting in an objective response rate of 16% in MSS colorectal cancer without prior immune-checkpoint inhibitors. Biomarker analysis showed that TAS-116 inhibited the activity of regulatory T cells in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. CONCLUSIONS: TAS-116 160 mg plus nivolumab had manageable safety profiles and antitumor activity, especially for MSS colorectal cancer patients.

Safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of the PARP inhibitor talazoparib in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors: phase 1 study.

BACKGROUND: Talazoparib is a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase enzyme inhibitor. This open-label, non-randomized, phase 1 study of talazoparib investigated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary antitumor activity in Japanese patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors, regardless of mutations in DNA damage repair-related genes, who are resistant to/ineligible for standard therapies. METHODS: Patients received talazoparib dosed orally at 0.75 or 1 mg once daily using a modified 3 + 3 dose-escalation scheme. Primary endpoint was dose-limiting toxicities during the first cycle of talazoparib. RESULTS: Nine patients (median age 62.0 years) were included: 3 and 6 patients at the 0.75 and 1.0 mg once-daily dose levels, respectively. No dose-limiting toxicities were reported. The most commonly reported treatment-emergent adverse events (≥2 patients) were anemia, stomatitis, maculopapular rash, platelet count decreased, neutrophil count decreased, and alanine aminotransferase increased. Three patients had grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (anemia, brain metastases [1 patient each], and neutrophil and white blood cell count decreased [same patient]). Two patients temporarily discontinued treatment due to a treatment-emergent adverse event, and 1 patient required a dose reduction for neutrophil count decreased (all at 1 mg once daily). Talazoparib exposure (Cmax and AUC) after single and multiple dosing was slightly higher proportionally with talazoparib 1 mg than talazoparib 0.75 mg. The overall disease control rate was 44.4%, including 2 patients with stable disease. The recommended phase 2 dose of talazoparib was established as 1 mg once daily. CONCLUSIONS: Single-agent talazoparib was well tolerated and had preliminary antitumor activity in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03343054 (November 17, 2017).

The efficacy and safety of paclitaxel plus bevacizumab therapy in breast cancer patients with visceral crisis.

BACKGROUND: Visceral crisis in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is defined as severe organ dysfunction requiring rapidly efficacious therapy. Although weekly paclitaxel plus bevacizumab (wPTX + BV) achieves a high response rate in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative MBC, the efficacy and safety of wPTX + BV for visceral crisis is unclear. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated patients with MBC with visceral crisis who received wPTX + BV. Visceral crisis was defined as follows: liver dysfunction (aspartate or alanine aminotransferase >200 U/L or total bilirubin >1.5 mg/dl), respiratory dysfunction (carcinomatous lymphangiomatosis, SpO2 <93% in ambient air or required thoracentesis), superior vena cava (SVC) syndrome, or bone marrow carcinomatosis. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients on-treatment with wPTX + BV after 12 weeks. We also investigated time to treatment failure (TTF), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 44 patients with respiratory dysfunction (n = 29), liver dysfunction (n = 10), bone marrow carcinomatosis (n = 7), and SVC syndrome (n = 2) were eligible for this investigation. The proportion of patients on-treatment with wPTX + BV after 12 weeks was 63% (30/44), and the other patients discontinued wPTX + BV because of adverse events (n = 5) and disease progression (n = 9). Median TTF and OS, and the ORR were 131 days and 323 days, and 41%, respectively. No treatment-related death occurred. CONCLUSION: wPTX + BV achieved favorable efficacy and safety for treating patients with visceral crisis and may therefore be considered an option for the treatment of this acutely severe clinical condition.

Neo-Bioscore in Guiding Post-surgical Therapy in Patients With Triple-negative Breast Cancer Who Received Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

AIM: Patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) who have not achieved pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) were considered for adjuvant capecitabine. This study was to explore the utility of the Neo-Bioscore in guiding post-surgical therapy in TNBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Neo-Bioscore was calculated for patients with non-metastatic primary breast cancer who received NAC at National Cancer Center Hospital East, Japan. RESULTS: A total of 329 patients were evaluated. The Neo-Bioscore stratified prognosis after NAC better than clinical or pathological stage. The Neo-Bioscore performed well in the selection of patients with TNBC with excellent prognoses despite non-pCR; no death was observed in patients who had a Neo-Bioscore of 2, the lowest score in those with TNBC. CONCLUSION: The Neo-Bioscore can improve the prognostic stratification of patients after NAC for breast cancer over clinical and pathological staging and may enable the identification of patients with non-pCR TNBC who can avoid additional adjuvant chemotherapy.

Effects of Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine and Fam-Trastuzumab Deruxtecan on Metastatic Breast Cancer Harboring HER2 Amplification and the L755S Mutation.

Somatic mutations in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) are present in approximately 3% of breast cancers. Some HER2 mutations are activating, and they represent a mechanism of resistance to conventional anti-HER2 therapies such as trastuzumab and lapatinib. Consistently, in patients with HER2-amplified breast cancer, these mutations are predominantly observed in metastatic tumors obtained after exposure to anti-HER2 systemic therapies, possibly after clonal selection. Therefore, it is rare to find coexistent HER2 mutation and amplification in the early clinical course, and thus, the clinical relevance of HER2 mutation to the sensitivity to HER2-targeted drugs, particularly antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) such as ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) and the recently approved fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), remains unclear. In this article, we describe a patient with de novo metastatic breast cancer who exhibited both HER2 amplification and the L755S mutation in the untreated primary breast tumor obtained at the initial diagnosis, and the lesion responded to T-DM1 and T-DXd after exhibiting clinical resistance to other HER2-targeted drugs. Our current case findings suggested that anti-HER2 ADCs should be prioritized over conventional trastuzumab- or lapatinib-based therapies for patients with HER2-amplified and comutated tumors. KEY POINTS: Although HER2 mutations were implicated in resistance to anti-HER2 monoclonal antibodies or HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors in preclinical studies, their clinical impact on sensitivity to anti-HER2 drugs is unclear owing to the rarity of concomitant HER2 mutation and HER2 amplification. A case of de novo metastatic breast cancer harboring both HER2 amplification and the L755S mutation in an untreated breast primary tumor displayed clinical resistance to standard trastuzumab- or lapatinib-based therapies but good responses to ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) and fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd). Anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates such as T-DM1 and T-DXd may be prioritized over conventional trastuzumab- or lapatinib-containing therapies for patients with HER2-amplified and comutated tumors.

Phase 2 single-arm study on the efficacy and safety of niraparib in Japanese patients with heavily pretreated, homologous recombination-deficient ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of niraparib in Japanese women with heavily pretreated ovarian cancer. METHODS: This Phase 2 open-label, single-arm study enrolled Japanese women with homologous recombination deficiency-positive relapsed, high-grade serous ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer who had completed 3-4 lines of therapy. The starting dose of niraparib was 300 mg administered once daily in continuous 28-day cycles until objective progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal or discontinuation. The primary endpoint, objective response rate (ORR), was assessed by the investigator using RECIST version 1.1. Safety evaluations included the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), including serious TEAEs. RESULTS: Twenty women were enrolled and the confirmed ORR in the full analysis set (FAS) was 35.0% (7/20), consisting of 1 complete response and 6 partial responses. Disease control rate in the FAS was 90.0%. The most frequently reported TEAEs (>50%) were anemia, nausea, and platelet count decreased. One patient (5.0%) had TEAEs leading to discontinuation of niraparib whereas reductions or interruptions were reported in 14 (70.0%) and 15 (75.0%) patients, respectively. The median dose intensity (202.9 mg daily) corresponded to a relative dose intensity of 67.6%. CONCLUSION: Efficacy and safety of niraparib in heavily pretreated Japanese women was comparable to that seen in an equivalent population of non-Japanese women. No new safety signals were identified. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03759600.