Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 76
Filtrar
1.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39207672

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Chronic disease and depression are closely related, and depression, if left untreated, can worsen physical disease symptoms. Furthermore, treating depression can improve patient outcomes. Generally, treatment for depression is lower in minority groups. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between chronic disease burden and depression treatment and whether that relationship differs between white to non-white patient visits to primary care physicians. DESIGN: We conducted a quantitative secondary data analysis using data from 2014-2019 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS). PARTICIPANTS: Visits by adults with depression to primary care physicians (n = 3832). MAIN MEASURES: Logistic regressions estimated the odds of medication treatment, mental health counseling treatment, and any treatment. KEY RESULTS: Visits by patients with 3 or more chronic conditions had 1.39 times the odds of receiving medication treatment (p-value = 0.06). However, when examining treatment by race, visits by white patients with 1-2 chronic conditions had 3.04 times the odds of receiving mental health treatment (p-value = 0.09) compared to visits by non-white patients and 2.09 times the odds of receiving any treatment (p-value = 0.08) compared to visits by non-white patients. CONCLUSIONS: Although not significant at the p < .05 level, the results suggest that the odds of depression treatment is greater during visits by patients with multiple co-occurring chronic conditions compared to visits by people without chronic conditions. It appears that this effect is larger for visits by white patients compared to visits by non-white patients. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and determine how this association impacts minorities distinctly and what could be the reason behind the disparity. These findings could help physicians be aware of ongoing disparities in depression treatment and provide more equitable depression treatment.

2.
J Prim Care Community Health ; 15: 21501319241259685, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38840558

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: There has been a trend toward hospital systems and insurers acquiring privately owned physician practices and subsequently converting them into vertically integrated practices. The purpose of this study is to observe whether this change in ownership of a medical practice influences adherence to clinical guidelines for the management of type 1 and type 2 diabetes. METHODS: This is an observational study using pooled cross-sectional data (2014-2016 and 2018-2019) from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, a nationally representative probability sample of US office-based physician visits. A total of 7499 chronic routine follow ups and preventative care visits to non-integrated (solo and group physician practices) and integrated practices were analyzed to see whether guideline concordant care was provided. Measures included 7 services that are recommended annually for individuals with type 1 and type 2 diabetes (HbA1c, lipid panel, serum creatinine, depression screening, influenza immunization, foot examination, and BMI). RESULTS: Compared to non-integrated physician practices, vertically integrated practices had higher rates of hemoglobin A1C testing (odds ratio 1.58 [95% CI 1.07-2.33], P < .05), serum creatine testing (odds ratio 1.53 [95% CI 1.02-2.29], P < .05), foot examinations (odds ratio 2.03 [95% CI 0.98-4.22], P = .058), and BMI measuring (odds ratio 1.54 [95% CI 0.99-2.39], P = .054). There was no significant difference in lipid panel testing, depression screenings, or influenza immunizations. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that integrated medical practices have a higher adherence to diabetes practice guidelines than non-integrated practices. However, rates of services provided regardless of ownership were low.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Propriedade , Humanos , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Estados Unidos , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/análise , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/terapia , Idoso , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde
3.
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities ; 11(2): 1005-1013, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37014520

RESUMO

Headache is a common complaint of individuals seeking treatment in the emergency department (ED). Because pain is subjective, medical evaluation is susceptible to implicit bias that can lead to disparities in wait times. The aim of this study was to determine whether there are racial and ethnic disparities in ED wait times for headache. Our study used the 2015-2018 National Hospital Ambulatory Care Surveys (NHAMCS), a nationally representative sample of ambulatory care visits to EDs. Our sample consisted of visits made by adults for headaches, which were identified using ICD-10 diagnosis codes and NHAMCS reason for visit codes. There were 12,301,655 ED visits for headache represented by our sample. The mean wait time for headache visits was 38.1 min (95%CI: 31.1, 45.0). The mean wait time for Non-Hispanic White patients, non-Hispanic Black patients, Hispanic patients, and the other race and ethnicity groups were 34.7 min (95%CI: 27.5, 42.0), 46.4 min (95%CI: 26.5, 66.4), 37.9 min (95%CI: 19.4, 56.3), and 21.0 min (95%CI: 6.3, 35.7) respectively. After controlling for patient- and hospital-level covariates, visits by non-Hispanic Black patients had 40% (95%CI: -0.01, 0.81, p = 0.056) longer wait times and visits by Hispanic patients had 39% (95%CI: -0.03, 0.80, p = 0.068) longer wait times than visits by non-Hispanic White patients. While our findings suggest that there may be longer wait times for visits by non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic patients compared to visits by non-Hispanic White patients, further research is needed to confirm these findings and determine causes of wait times disparities in the ED.


Assuntos
Etnicidade , Listas de Espera , Adulto , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Cefaleia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde
4.
Womens Health (Lond) ; 18: 17455057221129388, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36300291

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Emergency department care is common among US pregnant women. Given the increased likelihood of serious and life-threatening pregnancy-related health conditions among Black mothers, timeliness of emergency department care is vital. The objective of this study was to evaluate racial/ethnic variations in emergency department wait times for receiving obstetrical care among a nationally representative population. METHODS: The study used pooled 2016-2018 data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, a nationally representative sample of emergency department visits. Regression models were estimated to determine whether emergency department wait time was associated with the race/ethnicity of the perinatal patient. Adjusted models controlled for age, obesity status, insurance type, whether the patient arrived by ambulance, triage status, presence of a patient dashboard, and region. RESULTS: There were a total of 821 reported pregnancy-related visits in the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey sample of emergency department visits. Of those 821 visits, 40.6% were among White women, 27.7% among Black women, and 27.5% among Hispanic women. Mean wait times differed substantially by race/ethnicity. After adjusting for potential confounders, Black women waited 46% longer than White women with emergency department visits for pregnancy problems (p < .05). Those reporting another race waited 95% longer for pregnancy problems in the emergency department than White women (p < .05). CONCLUSION: Findings from this study document significant racial/ethnic differences in wait times for perinatal emergency department care. Although inequities in wait times may emerge across the spectrum of care, documenting the factors influencing racial disparities in wait times are critical to promoting equitable perinatal health outcomes.


Assuntos
Hispânico ou Latino , Listas de Espera , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Estados Unidos , Etnicidade , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , População Negra
6.
J Gen Intern Med ; 37(10): 2475-2481, 2022 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34379279

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: After a certain age, cancer screening may expose older adults to unnecessary harms with limited benefits and represent inefficient use of health care resources. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the frequency of cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer screening among adults older than US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) age thresholds at which screening is no longer considered routine and to identify physician and patient factors associated with low-value cancer screening. DESIGN: Observational study using pooled cross-sectional data (2011-2016) from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, a nationally representative probability sample of US office-based physician visits. PARTICIPANTS: Analyses for cervical and breast cancer screening were limited to visits by women over age 65 (N=37,818) and ages 75 and over (N=19,451), respectively. Analyses for colorectal cancer screening were limited to visits by patients over age 75 (N=31,543). MAIN MEASURES: Cancer screening procedures were coded as low value using USPSTF age thresholds. KEY RESULTS: Between 2011 and 2016, an estimated 509, 507, and 273 thousand potentially low-value Pap smears, mammograms, and colonoscopies/sigmoidoscopies, respectively, were ordered annually. Low-valuecervical cancer screening was less likely to occur for visits with older (vs. younger) patients. Compared to visits by non-HispanicWhite women, low-valuecervical and breast cancer screening was less likely to occur for visits by women whose race/ethnicitywas something other than non-HispanicWhite, non-HispanicBlack, or Hispanic. Obstetrician/gynecologistswere more likely to order low-valuePap smears and mammograms compared to family/generalpractice physicians. CONCLUSIONS: Thousands of cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer screenings at ages beyond routine guideline thresholds occur each year in the USA. Further research is needed to understand whether this pattern represents clinical inertia and resistance to de-adoption of previous screening practices, or whether physicians and/or patients perceive a higher value in these tests than that endorsed by experts writing evidence-based guidelines.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Neoplasias Colorretais , Médicos , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorretais/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Feminino , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
7.
AIDS Care ; 33(12): 1608-1610, 2021 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33138625

RESUMO

In the United States (U.S.), to contain costs many state Medicaid programs offer specialty health insurance plans for costly conditions such as HIV/AIDS. This study compared service utilization between Florida Medicaid enrollees diagnosed with HIV/AIDS in standard Medicaid managed care plans to enrollees in HIV/AIDS specialty plans. We found lower mean utilization among HIV/AIDS enrollees in specialty plans compared to enrollees with HIV/AIDS in standard MMA plans for all services except inpatient which was approximately the same. While fewer emergency visits is a desired outcome, lower rates of other services may indicate suboptimal management of patients or lower engagement in care among enrollees in HIV/AIDS specialty plans. Continuous monitoring of experiences of patients in HIV/AIDS specialty plans is warranted to determine whether the observed utilization patterns represent better management through reductions in low value care or reduced engagement in care, and whether these utilization patterns persist.


Assuntos
Infecções por HIV , Planos Governamentais de Saúde , Florida , Infecções por HIV/terapia , Humanos , Programas de Assistência Gerenciada , Medicaid , Estados Unidos
8.
Med Care ; 59(1): 29-37, 2021 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33298706

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hospital-based acute care [emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations] that is preventable with high-quality outpatient care contributes to health care system waste and patient harm. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that an ED-to-home transitional care intervention reduces hospital-based acute care in chronically ill, older ED visitors. RESEARCH DESIGN: Convergent, parallel, mixed-methods design including a randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Two diverse Florida EDs. SUBJECTS: Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries with chronic illness presenting to the ED. INTERVENTION: The Coleman Care Transition Intervention adapted for ED visitors. MEASURES: The main outcome was hospital-based acute care within 60 days of index ED visit. We also assessed office-based outpatient visits during the same period. RESULTS: The Intervention did not significantly reduce return ED visits or hospitalizations or increase outpatient visits. In those with return ED visits, the Intervention Group was less likely to be hospitalized than the Usual Care Group. Interview themes describe a cycle of hospital-based acute care largely outside patients' control that may be difficult to interrupt with a coaching intervention. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Structural features of the health care system, including lack of access to timely outpatient care, funnel patients into the ED and hospital admission. Reducing hospital-based acute care requires increased focus on the health care system rather than patients' care-seeking decisions.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Cuidado Transicional/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Doença Crônica/terapia , Feminino , Florida , Hospitalização , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare/economia , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Estados Unidos
9.
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities ; 7(6): 1234-1240, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32277365

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study addresses racial/ethnic differences in adverse health care utilization among individuals with comorbid anxiety disorder and cardiometabolic syndrome (CMetS) risk factors. METHODS: Utilizing 2011-2015 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) data, logistic regression models were estimated to determine the likelihood of receiving CMetS-related medical treatment in the emergency department (ED) or via inpatient services and to determine if the likelihood is associated with race/ethnicity. Adjusted models controlled for age, sex, and insurance type. RESULTS: Significant racial-ethnic differences were observed for utilization (any emergency department and/or inpatient visit). The odds of non-Hispanic Black respondents reporting emergency department and/or inpatient utilization was 2.39 (p < 0.05) times the odds of non-Hispanic White respondents. CONCLUSION: Racial-ethnic variation in adverse healthcare utilization suggests an opportunity to improve care and outcomes for persons diagnosed with comorbid anxiety disorder and cardiometabolic syndrome. Integrated interventions could simultaneously improve mental health and facilitate CMetS disease self-management.


Assuntos
Transtornos de Ansiedade , Fatores de Risco Cardiometabólico , Comorbidade , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Grupos Raciais , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Autorrelato , Estados Unidos
11.
J Am Assoc Nurse Pract ; 32(2): 138-144, 2020 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30951008

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although workforce diversity has been cited as an important workforce issue, the contemporary U.S. nurse practitioner (NP) workforce is dominated by females. Provider diversity, specifically gender, has been found to directly influence patient preference. However, lack of gender diversity in the NP workforce has never been specifically evaluated in terms of job satisfaction and patterns of care. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess and evaluate NP gender, job satisfaction and practice patterns of care for U.S. clinical NPs. METHODS: This study used the 2012 National Sample Survey of Nurse Practitioners (NSSNP). Participants meeting inclusion criteria totaled 8,978 NPs, of which 92.8% were female. RESULTS: Although overall job satisfaction was not shown to be significantly different between genders, several patterns of care were found to be significant. Of the 11 measured patterns of care in the NSSNP, six were significantly different between genders, with a female majority indicating that they performed these services most often. In only one rendered service, performed medical procedures, did male NPs indicate that they did more than females. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study suggests the importance of a gender-diversified U.S. nurse practitioner workforce. This is indicated by differences highlighted in patterns of care by NP gender, which has been postulated to influence patient outcomes, including perceived quality of care and engagement in the health care process. Patient preferences for same-gender NPs, particularly patients with privacy issues, warrant further exploration.


Assuntos
Satisfação no Emprego , Profissionais de Enfermagem/classificação , Padrões de Prática em Enfermagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Sexuais , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Profissionais de Enfermagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos , Recursos Humanos/estatística & dados numéricos
12.
J Patient Exp ; 7(6): 1086-1093, 2020 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33457549

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patient experience is an important measure of hospital quality and performance. Since the passage of the Affordable Care Act, patient experiences with their care encounters are embedded into the framework of payment incentives. However, drivers of patient experience in the context of the supportive, nonclinical, services that relate to patient care have not been as well understood. AIMS: To assess the role of organizational factors on patient experience. METHODS: This cross-sectional analysis integrates hospital patient-experience scores from Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems, and Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Service data from 2013 to 2015 (N = 3392). Based on hospitals with "top-box" responses, the aggregate proportion of hospital patients responding "always" on a Likert scale represented a top-box hospital. Domains were split at the mean for analysis (above average = 1). Multivariable logistic regression models for each domain were analyzed against hospital factors and services, including offering a patient education center, patient-enabling services, and language services. RESULTS: Most hospitals reported a full-time hospitalist (64.4%) and a patient education center (60.4%), while fewer provided enabling/support services (33.7%). In multivariable models, small and medium hospitals performed better compared to the largest hospitals (300+ beds; P < .0001). Structurally, medium and small hospitals reported significantly greater odds of top-box patient-experience versus large hospitals. Across all domains, only hospitals with patient education centers returned better performance (adjusted odds ratio: 1.27-1.64; P = .0002-.0166). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Patient education centers provide relevant information at the point of service and may improve overall patient experience of care. Given the growing reliance on accountable care delivery models, opportunities to partner with community health education partners may be profitable.

13.
PLoS One ; 14(11): e0225125, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31710655

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal pain conditions incur high costs and produce significant personal and public health consequences, including disability and opioid-related mortality. Persistence of high-cost health care utilization for musculoskeletal pain may help identify system inefficiencies that could limit value of care. The objective of this study was to identify factors associated with persistent high-cost utilization among individuals seeking health care for musculoskeletal pain. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data (2008-2013) that included a non-institutionalized, population-based sample of individuals seeking health care for a musculoskeletal pain condition (n = 12,985). Expenditures associated with musculoskeletal pain conditions over two consecutive years were analyzed from prescribed medicine, office-based medical provider visits, outpatient department visits, emergency room visits, inpatient hospital stays, and home health visits. Persistent high-cost utilization was defined as being in the top 15th percentile for annual musculoskeletal pain-related expenditures over 2 consecutive years. We used multinomial regression to determine which modifiable and non-modifiable sociodemographic, health, and pain-related variables were associated with persistent high-cost utilization. RESULTS: Approximately 35% of direct costs for musculoskeletal pain were concentrated among the 4% defined as persistent high-cost utilizers. Non-modifiable variables associated with expenditure group classification included age, race, poverty level, geographic region, insurance status, diagnosis type and total number of musculoskeletal pain diagnoses. Modifiable variables associated with increased risk of high expenditure classification were higher number of missed work days, greater pain interference, and higher use of prescription medication for pain, while higher self-reported physical and mental health were associated with lower risk of high expenditure classification. CONCLUSIONS: Health care delivery models that prospectively identify these potentially modifiable factors may improve the costs and value of care for individuals with musculoskeletal pain prone to risk for high-cost care episodes.


Assuntos
Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/economia , Dor Musculoesquelética/economia , Visita a Consultório Médico/economia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Econômicos , Dor Musculoesquelética/epidemiologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Análise de Regressão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Autorrelato , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
14.
J Anxiety Disord ; 58: 18-22, 2018 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29935451

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Given that out-of-pocket (OOP) costs impact adherence to treatment and recent and proposed changes to the health insurance system that impact OOP costs, it is imperative to understand the OOP cost burden faced by individuals with anxiety disorders depending upon type of insurance coverage. The objective of this study was to determine the annual OOP cost burden faced by individuals with anxiety disorders and the variation of these costs by type of insurance coverage. METHODS: Using weighted nationally representative data from the 2011-2014 Medical Expenditure Panel Surveys, total OOP health care costs were assessed for all respondents who indicated that they had an anxiety disorder (N = 9985). Total OOP health care costs were also calculated separately by type of insurance. RESULTS: Average annual OOP costs among individuals with anxiety was $1152. The highest OOP cost were incurred by individuals with private fee-for-service (FFS) insurance ($1356/year, 4.1% of annual income), while individuals enrolled in HMOs with dual Medicare/Medicaid had the lowest OOP cost ($129/year, 6.8% of annual income). Individuals without insurance had high OOP cost burden ($1309/year, 12.5% of annual income). CONCLUSION: Individuals with anxiety disorders have a wide range of OOP cost depending upon their insurance coverage. Those with anxiety should carefully consider their choice of insurance coverage if interested in minimizing OOP costs.


Assuntos
Transtornos de Ansiedade/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Cobertura do Seguro/economia , Seguro Saúde/economia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estados Unidos
15.
Nurs Outlook ; 66(4): 379-385, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29703627

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: By 2025, experts estimate a significant shortage of primary care providers in the United States, and expansion of the nurse practitioner (NP) workforce may reduce this burden. However, barriers imposed by state NP regulations could reduce access to primary care. PURPOSE: The objectives of this study were to examine the association between three levels of NP state practice regulation (independent, minimum restrictive, and most restrictive) and the proportion of the population with a greater than 30-min travel time to a primary care provider using geocoding. METHODS: Logistic regression models were conducted to calculate the adjusted odds of having a greater than 30-min drive time. FINDINGS: Compared with the most restrictive NP states, states with independent practice had 19.2% lower odds (p = .001) of a greater than 30-min drive to the closest primary care provider. DISCUSSION: Allowing NPs full autonomy to practice may be a relatively simple policy mechanism for states to improve access to primary care.


Assuntos
Regulamentação Governamental , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/normas , Profissionais de Enfermagem/provisão & distribuição , American Medical Association/organização & administração , Censos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Profissionais de Enfermagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/normas , Atenção Primária à Saúde/tendências , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos
16.
J Behav Health Serv Res ; 45(4): 593-604, 2018 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29492794

RESUMO

This study examines variations in content of care for anxiety-related emergency department (ED) visits in the USA across various sociodemographic strata. The 2009-2012 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey was used to identify all visits to general hospital EDs in which an anxiety diagnosis was recorded (n = 1930). Content and equitability of care was assessed utilizing logistic regression models. There were an estimated 1,856,000 ED visits with anxiety-related discharge diagnoses in the USA annually. Content of care and disposition varied by age, race/ethnicity, and insurance status. Visits by Medicaid patients were more likely than visits by privately insured patients to include a toxicology screen (OR = 1.67, p < .05) and visits by patients with either Medicaid or Medicare were less likely to include an EKG (OR = 0.53, p < .05 and OR = 0.52, p < .05, respectively). Understanding variations in ED care for anxiety can identify opportunities for intervention, both in the ED and upstream in appropriate healthcare settings.


Assuntos
Transtornos de Ansiedade , Atenção à Saúde/métodos , Medicina de Emergência/métodos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Transtornos de Ansiedade/terapia , Demografia , Eletrocardiografia/estatística & dados numéricos , Etnicidade , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Medicaid , Medicare , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
17.
Gerontologist ; 58(5): 942-952, 2018 09 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28633469

RESUMO

Background and Objectives: Older adults seeking emergency department (ED) care often have multiple, complex chronic conditions. We sought to understand factors that influence ED care-seeking by older adults and present a theoretical framework illustrating this process. Research Design and Methods: In this grounded theory study, we interviewed 40 older adults with chronic illness within 90 days of an ED visit to explore their decision-making about seeking ED care. We also interviewed 10 primary care and ED physicians to explore conditions that influence ED referrals. Interview transcripts were analyzed using constant comparison and dimensional analysis. Results: ED care-seeking among older adults is complex and influenced by multiple internal and external conditions including symptom type, severity, and onset; previous experience with and meaning of similar symptoms; limited access to prompt primary care; social and financial concerns; and deciding if symptoms warranted immediate attention. When contacting their primary care providers (PCPs), patients were often referred to the ED. Discussion and Implications: Older adults seeking ED care make rational and appropriate choices which are often predicated by referrals from their PCPs. Expecting patients to have the requisite knowledge to determine if symptoms require emergency care is unrealistic. ED visits are often the best strategy for patients to receive appropriate care. A healthcare system that provides better continuity between PCPs and the ED, better access to PCPs for urgent care, and timely follow-up care that takes into account the multiple and complex medical and social needs of older community-living adults is needed.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Assistência Ambulatorial , Feminino , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pesquisa Qualitativa
18.
J Prim Care Community Health ; 8(4): 192-197, 2017 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29161972

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) in Florida see large numbers of vulnerable patients with diabetes. Patient-centered medical home (PCMH) models can lead to improvements in health for patients with chronic conditions and cost savings for providers. Therefore, FQHCs are increasingly moving to PCMH models of care. The study objective was to examine the effects of initial transformation to a level 3 National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) certified PCMH in 2011, on clinical diabetes outcomes among 27 clinic sites from a network of FQHCs in Florida. METHODS: We used de-identified, longitudinal electronic health record (EHR) data from 2010-2012 and multivariate logistic regression to analyze the effects of initial transformation on the odds of having well-controlled HbA1c, body mass index (BMI), and blood pressure (BP) among vulnerable patients with diabetes. Models controlled for clustering by year, patient, and organizational characteristics. RESULTS: Overall, transformation to a PCMH was associated with 19% greater odds of having well-controlled HbA1c values with no statistically significant impact on BMI or BP. Subanalyses showed transformation had less of an effect on BP for African American patients and HbA1c control for Medicare enrollees but a greater effect on weight control for patients older than 35 years. CONCLUSION: Transformation to a PCMH in FQHCs appears to improve the health of vulnerable patients with diabetes, with less improvement for subsets of patients. Future research should seek to understand the heterogeneous effects of patient-centered transformation on various subgroups.


Assuntos
Centros Comunitários de Saúde/organização & administração , Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/organização & administração , Adulto , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Preservação de Sangue , Índice de Massa Corporal , Diabetes Mellitus/metabolismo , Feminino , Florida , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/metabolismo , Hispânico ou Latino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Medicare , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Estados Unidos , Populações Vulneráveis , População Branca
19.
AIDS ; 31(18): 2515-2524, 2017 Nov 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28832409

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Depression is highly prevalent among people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) and has deleterious effects on HIV clinical outcomes. We examined changes in depression symptoms, viral suppression, and CD4 T cells/µl among PLWHA diagnosed with depression who initiated antidepressant treatment during routine care, and compared the effectiveness of dual-action and single-action antidepressants for improving those outcomes. DESIGN: Comparative effectiveness study of new user dual-action or single-action antidepressant treatment episodes occurring from 2004 to 2014 obtained from the Center for AIDS Research Network of Integrated Clinical Systems. METHODS: We identified new user treatment episodes with no antidepressant use in the preceding 90 days. We completed intent-to-treat and per protocol evaluations for the main analysis. Primary outcomes, were viral suppression (HIV viral load <200 copies/ml) and CD4 T cells/µl. In a secondary analysis, we used the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) to evaluate changes in depression symptoms and remission (PHQ <5). Generalized estimating equations with inverse probability of treatment weights were fitted to estimate treatment effects. RESULTS: In weighted intent-to-treat analyses, the probability of viral suppression increased 16% after initiating antidepressants [95% confidence interval = (1.12, 1.20)]. We observed an increase of 39 CD4T cells/µl after initiating antidepressants (30, 48). Both the frequency of remission from depression and PHQ-9 scores improved after antidepressant initiation. Comparative effectiveness estimates were null in all models. CONCLUSION: Initiating antidepressant treatment was associated with improvements in depression, viral suppression, and CD4 T cells/µl, highlighting the health benefits of treating depression in PLWHA. Dual and single-action antidepressants had comparable effectiveness.


Assuntos
Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Depressão/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por HIV/complicações , Infecções por HIV/patologia , Adulto , Contagem de Linfócito CD4 , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Testes Neuropsicológicos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resposta Viral Sustentada , Resultado do Tratamento , Carga Viral
20.
J Affect Disord ; 215: 179-186, 2017 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28340444

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Depression is the most common psychiatric comorbidity among people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA). Little is known about the comparative effectiveness between different types of antidepressants used to treat depression in this population. We compared the effectiveness of dual-action and single-action antidepressants in PLWHA for achieving remission from depression. METHODS: We used data from the Centers for AIDS Research Network of Integrated Clinic Systems to identify 1175 new user dual-action or single-action antidepressant treatment episodes occurring from 2005 to 2014 for PLWHA diagnosed with depression. The primary outcome was remission from depression defined as a Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score <5. Mean difference in PHQ-9 depressive symptom severity was a secondary outcome. The main approach was an intent-to-treat (ITT) evaluation complemented with a per protocol (PP) sensitivity analysis. Generalized linear models were fitted to estimate treatment effects. RESULTS: In ITT analysis, 32% of the episodes ended in remission for both dual-action and single-action antidepressants. The odds ratio (OR) of remission was 1.02 (95%CI=0.63,1.67). In PP analysis, 40% of dual-action episodes ended in remission compared to 32% in single-action episodes. Dual-action episodes had 1.33 times the odds of remission (95%CI=0.55,3.21), however the result was not statistically significant. Non-significant differences were also observed for depressive symptom severity. LIMITATIONS: Missing data was common but was addressed with inverse probability weights. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that single-action and dual-action antidepressants are equally effective in PLWHA. Remission was uncommon highlighting the need to identify health service delivery strategies that aid HIV providers in achieving full remission of their patients' depression.


Assuntos
Antidepressivos de Segunda Geração/uso terapêutico , Transtorno Depressivo/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por HIV/psicologia , Inibidores da Recaptação de Serotonina e Norepinefrina/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Pesquisa Comparativa da Efetividade , Bases de Dados Factuais , Transtorno Depressivo/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Indução de Remissão
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA