Exploring professional issues: the psychosocial component of genetic counseling in genomic healthcare.

Aim: To determine UK genetic counselors' (UKGCs) opinion regarding 'the psychosocial component of the UKGC remit in the new genomics era'. Methods: Facilitated discussions at a national conference (2016) using interactive methodologies (58 participants). Results: UKGCs recognized the rapid rate of change emerging with advances in genomic science. Change will be required to the UKGC remit and the roles, rules, relationships and responsibilities that underpin it (29 topics identified). UKGCs supported their 'unique selling point'; integrating knowledge and the explicit focus on psychosocial aspects of genomic healthcare. By 2019, some of the aspirations have been achieved. Conclusion: UKGCs should proactively position themselves to capitalize on the challenges and opportunities of genomic healthcare to maximize patient benefit.

Effect of the Medicare face-to-face visit requirement on hospice utilization.

BACKGROUND: Although many patients enter hospice close to death, some enroll for more than six months. In 2011 the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) required that these long-stay patients receive a face-to-face visit by a physician or nurse practitioner to ensure that they continue to meet eligibility criteria. OBJECTIVES: This study proposed to determine whether the face-to-face visit requirement increased the rate at which patients were decertified from hospice. DESIGN: The study was a retrospective cohort study in six U.S. hospices. Decertification from hospice within 10 months of enrollment was measured. RESULTS: Of 23,638 patients, 11,788 (49.9%) would have been affected by the face-to-face requirement. In bivariate analysis, there was a significant decrease in the decertification rate after the requirement was implemented-371/11,788 (3.2%) versus 578/11,850 (4.9%); odds ration (OR): 0.63; 95% CI 0.55-0.72; p<0.001. In a multivariable logistic regression model adjusting for changes in patient characteristics and clustered by hospice, there was still a reduction in decertifications-3.4% versus 5.2%; OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.47-0.97; p=0.034. Although the impact of the face-to-face requirement varied among hospices, all hospices had a decrease in decertification rates (absolute adjusted reduction between 1.4% and 3.6%). CONCLUSIONS: The face-to-face requirement may decrease hospice discharges, contrary to its intention.