Recommendations for Influenza Vaccination in Burns Patients Based on a Systematic Review of the Evidence.

Severe burn injury is a serious systemic insult that can lead to life-threatening secondary infections. Immunosuppression, inhalation injury, and prolonged length of hospital stay are factors that predispose patients to severe respiratory tract infections. Furthermore, evidence shows that burns can put one at risk of infection long after the original injury. Currently in the United Kingdom, the annual National Flu Immunisation programme outlines guidance for groups who are deemed high risk and, therefore, eligible for the influenza vaccine. At present, no guidance exists for the administration of the influenza vaccine in burn-injured patients, despite knowledge of immunosuppression. The aim of this literature review is to examine the evidence for associations between burn injury and influenza and, where available, evaluate efficacy of influenza vaccines in this cohort. In addition, literature was searched for the effectiveness of the influenza vaccine in patients 65 years and above and in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), two domains common to patients with severe burns. Three papers were found to suggest increased susceptibility to influenza following burn injury; however, no papers studying the effectiveness of the influenza vaccine in this group were found. Several studies demonstrated improved outcomes in patients over 65 years and patients admitted to ICU. Following the evaluation of the evidence, this review advocates for the consideration of hospitalized burn patients for the influenza vaccine. We suggest the avoidance of vaccine administration in the acute burn phase. Further prospective clinical trials would be required to validate these findings.

Curious case of a calcified food bolus.

Authors present an 80-year-old male attending with obstructive food bolus. Lateral soft tissue neck x-ray demonstrated a suspected calcified foreign body at the level of the larynx. Subsequent senior radiological input reported the findings as incidental calcification of carotid arteries. ENT surgeons should demonstrate increased awareness for potentially calcified soft tissues on interpreting such x-rays.