Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 61(6): 730-7, 2006 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16722837

RESUMO

AIMS: Selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors have recently been implicated as enhancing risk of myocardial infarction (MI). Nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are also effective COX-2 inhibitors, so we investigated the hypothesis that they too increase risk of MI. METHODS: We conducted a case-control study with direct structured interview of cases and controls. Cases were all subjects (N = 205) with a first nonfatal MI who had no previously recognized cardiovascular disease. Community controls (N = 258) were randomly selected from the same practice as the index case. Hospital controls (N = 205) were those admitted at the same time as index cases for nonmyocardial conditions not influenced by NSAID use. The effects of aspirin, NSAIDs and previously recognized influences on MI were investigated by unconditional logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: NSAID use was associated with an increase risk of MI with an odds ratio of 1.77 (1.03, 3.03) vs. community controls and 2.61 (1.38, 4.95) vs. hospital controls. These values were 5.00 (1.18, 21.28) and 7.66 (0.87, 67.48), respectively, in aspirin users. Results were similar when naproxen was grouped with aspirin. Odds ratios for smoking and for use of antidiabetic medication were 3.91 (2.52, 6.04) and 3.92 (1.25, 12,33), respectively, vs. community controls. CONCLUSIONS: Like selective COX-2 inhibitors, non-selective NSAIDs [corrected] are associated with an increased risk of MI. The extent to which this reflects interference with aspirin warrants further investigation.


Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/efeitos adversos , Aspirina/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de Ciclo-Oxigenase 2/efeitos adversos , Isquemia Miocárdica/induzido quimicamente , Naproxeno/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/induzido quimicamente , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco
2.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther ; 16(3): 497-506, 2002 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11876703

RESUMO

AIM: To investigate the role of Helicobacter pylori, expressing the virulence marker CAGA (cytotoxin associated gene product A) in ulcer complications and its interaction with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and other risk factors. DESIGN: Case control study using conditional logistic regression analysis. SETTING: University and City Hospitals, Nottingham. SUBJECTS: 203 consecutive patients with ulcer bleeding and 203 age- and sex-matched controls. RESULTS: Ulcer bleeding was more likely with positive H. pylori serology (odds ratio = 3.3, 95% CI: 1.7--6.6 for CagA positive, but only OR = 1.6, 95% CI: 0.7-3.7 for CagA negative serology), current smoking (OR 2.2, 95% CI: 1.04-4.7), aspirin < or = 300 mg daily (OR 7.7, 95% CI: 2.8-20.6), all other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs: OR 10.6, 95% CI: 3.1-35.7 for < or = 1 defined daily dose lower and OR 22.6, 95% CI: 6.2-82.0 for higher doses) and past ulcer history (OR 5.6, 95% CI: 2.3-14.1). Aspirin < or = 300 mg daily was used by 25.1% of patients vs. 7.4% of controls. Smoking only enhanced risk in the presence of H. pylori, with a synergistic interaction (interaction odds ratio = 4.9, 2.4-9.9, P=0.002). Conversely, risks with non-aspirin NSAIDs were reduced in the presence of H. pylori, particularly if CagA-positive (interaction odds ratio=0.21, 0.05-0.9, P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: CagA positive H. pylori infection is associated with an increased risk of ulcer bleeding. The risk from non-aspirin NSAIDs is even higher, but is less in H. pylori infected people. Low-dose aspirin is now commonly associated with ulcer bleeding.


Assuntos
Antígenos de Bactérias , Infecções por Helicobacter/complicações , Helicobacter pylori/patogenicidade , Úlcera Péptica Hemorrágica/etiologia , Úlcera Péptica Hemorrágica/microbiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/efeitos adversos , Aspirina/efeitos adversos , Proteínas de Bactérias/genética , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Úlcera Duodenal/induzido quimicamente , Úlcera Duodenal/complicações , Úlcera Duodenal/etiologia , Úlcera Duodenal/microbiologia , Feminino , Infecções por Helicobacter/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Helicobacter/microbiologia , Helicobacter pylori/genética , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Úlcera Péptica Hemorrágica/induzido quimicamente , Úlcera Péptica Hemorrágica/complicações , Fatores de Risco , Fumar/efeitos adversos
3.
Gut ; 49(3): 372-9, 2001 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11511559

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Pharmacotherapy for upper gastrointestinal bleeding has been difficult to evaluate because clinical end points are infrequent and affected by other factors. AIMS: To evaluate whether blood in the stomach at endoscopy reflected severity of bleeding, predicted clinical outcomes, and could be altered by therapeutic agents. METHODS: We studied 414 consecutive admissions with suspected upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Patients were randomised to receive lansoprazole 60 mg followed by 30 mg four times daily, tranexamic acid 2 g followed by 1 g four times daily, both drugs, or placebo for four days, until discharge or a clinical end point occurred. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine predictors of endoscopic changes and clinical outcomes, and to investigate the effects of drug treatments on blood in the stomach. RESULTS: Of 414 patients with suspected upper gastrointestinal bleeding, 379 were endoscoped. Upper gastrointestinal bleeding was confirmed in 316. Sixteen required surgery within 30 days and 16 died on the index admission. Trial treatments were evaluable on a per protocol basis in 228 patients. The amount of blood in the stomach was found to reflect initial risk, with significant associations with high risk categorisation (odds ratio 3.7 (95% confidence interval 1.5-9.4) for more than a trace v none/trace), age (1.5 (1.1-1.9) per decade), and initial pulse (1.02 (1.00-1.04) per beat), and to predict rebleeding (9.2 (4.6-18.7)) and surgery (8.2 (2.9-22.9)). Other stigmata were less significant in these respects. The amount of blood in the stomach at endoscopy was reduced significantly by both lansoprazole (0.22 (0.07-0.63)) and tranexamic acid (0.27 (0.09-0.81)), although there was no evidence of synergy. CONCLUSIONS: Blood in the stomach reflects clinical features in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding and is reduced by treatment with lansoprazole and tranexamic acid.


Assuntos
Antiulcerosos/uso terapêutico , Antifibrinolíticos/uso terapêutico , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/terapia , Gastroscopia , Omeprazol/uso terapêutico , Ácido Tranexâmico/uso terapêutico , 2-Piridinilmetilsulfinilbenzimidazóis , Transfusão de Sangue , Volume Sanguíneo , Método Duplo-Cego , Sinergismo Farmacológico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiologia , Humanos , Lansoprazol , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Omeprazol/análogos & derivados , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Recidiva , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Gut ; 41(4): 459-62, 1997 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9391242

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Most ulcers are caused, one can deduce, by Helicobacter pylori or by use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Whether both together are worse than one alone is something that is quite unknown. AIM: To study both factors in order to see wither they interact together positively. METHOD: A case control study of ulcer bleeding in elderly patients chosen without weeding. RESULTS: NSAID usage increased risk substantially. So did H pylori infection (but relative risk less than three). Neither seemed to interact. Their actions were discretely intact. CONCLUSION: H pylori effects ulcer bleeding in an adverse manner but does not make the risk of NSAIDs worse.


Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/efeitos adversos , Infecções por Helicobacter/complicações , Helicobacter pylori , Úlcera Péptica Hemorrágica/etiologia , Idoso , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Aspirina/efeitos adversos , Aspirina/uso terapêutico , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Razão de Chances , Úlcera Péptica/induzido quimicamente , Úlcera Péptica Hemorrágica/induzido quimicamente , Úlcera Péptica Hemorrágica/microbiologia , Análise de Regressão , Fatores de Risco
5.
Gut ; 30(11): 1641-6, 1989 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2599449

RESUMO

Twelve patient information leaflets concerning common gastrointestinal diseases were produced by the British Digestive Foundation and evaluated to determine whether patients knew more about their disease if they received a leaflet. Eleven hundred and fifty patients attending gastroenterology clinics in the United Kingdom were assessed by postal questionnaire of whom half had received a leaflet relevant to their diagnosis six weeks before assessment. Seven hundred and fifty one replied (398 leafleted, 353 non-leafleted). Most patients found the leaflets helpful and easy to understand; few found them worrying. They were regarded as a better source of information than doctors, particularly for information about the characteristics of the illness and side effects of treatment. In all diagnostic groups assessed the patients' knowledge of their disease was significantly greater if they had received a leaflet than if they had not. Individual responses by patients without leaflets showed that fundamental misconceptions persisted about digestive diseases. The British Digestive Foundation leaflets are an effective means of imparting disease related information to patients.


Assuntos
Gastroenteropatias , Folhetos , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA