The cost of surveillance after urethroplasty.

OBJECTIVE: To determine variability in urethral stricture surveillance. Urethral strictures impact quality of life and exact a large economic burden. Although urethroplasty is the gold standard for durable treatment, strictures recur in 8%-18%. There are no universally accepted guidelines for posturethroplasty surveillance. We performed a literature search to evaluate variability in surveillance protocols, analyzed costs, and reviewed performance of each commonly used modality. METHODS: MEDLINE search was performed using the keywords "urethroplasty," "urethral stricture," and "stricture recurrence" to ascertain commonly used surveillance strategies for stricture recurrence. We included English language articles from the past 10 years with at least 10 patients, and age >18 years. Cost data were calculated based on standard 2013 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services physician's fees. RESULTS: Surveillance methods included retrograde urethrogram or voiding cystourethrogram, cystourethroscopy, urethral ultrasound, American Urological Association Symptom Score, and postvoid residual and urine flowmetry (UF) measurement. Most protocols call for a retrograde urethrogram or voiding cystourethrogram at the time of catheter removal. After this, UF or PVR, cystoscopy, urine culture, or a combination of UF and American Urological Association Symptom Score was performed at variable intervals. The first-year follow-up cost of anterior urethral surgery ranged from $205 to $1784. For posterior urethral surgery, follow-up cost for the first year ranged from $404 to $961. CONCLUSION: Practice variability for surveillance of urethral stricture recurrence after urethroplasty leads to significant differences in cost.

A long-term evaluation of a required reproductive health training rotation with opt-out provisions for family medicine residents.

BACKGROUND: Family physicians are critical to reproductive health care provision. Previous studies have evaluated the immediate impact of training family physicians in abortion and reproductive health care but have not conducted long-term follow-up of those trained. METHODS: In a cross-sectional survey performed in 2009, all 2003--2008 graduates from four family medicine residency programs with a required abortion training rotation with opt-out provisions were asked to participate in a confidential online follow-up survey that was linked to rotation evaluations. The follow-up surveys addressed current reproductive health practice, desire to integrate services in ideal practice, perceived barriers, and desired support for provision of services. RESULTS: Of 183 eligible graduates, 173 had contact information, and 116 completed the survey. The majority of respondents had provided a range of reproductive health services since residency. Of full training participants, many had performed IUD insertion (72%), endometrial biopsies (55%), miscarriage management (52%), and abortion (27%), compared to 39%, 22%, 17%, and 0% of opt-out training participants, respectively. Of those residents intending future abortion provision, 40% went on to do so. In multivariate analysis among full participants, procedural volume was positively correlated with future abortion provision after controlling for intention to provide abortions, gender, and residency program (adjusted OR=1.42 [95% CI=1.03--1.94]). While most respondents considered comprehensive reproductive health services including miscarriage management and abortion as important to include in their ideal practice, many faced barriers to providing all the services they desired. CONCLUSIONS: Family medicine residency graduates fully participating in abortion training reported increased provision of most reproductive health services compared to opt-out graduates. Many intending to provide abortions reported a variety of barriers to provision. Training programs that provide assistance for overcoming obstacles to practice initiation may improve comprehensive reproductive health provision among graduates.

Opting out of abortion training: benefits of partial participation in a dedicated family planning rotation for ob-gyn residents.

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to describe the experiences of residents who opt out of some components of a dedicated abortion rotation. STUDY DESIGN: Eligible residents at programs receiving funding from the Kenneth J. Ryan Residency Training Program in Abortion and Family Planning were invited to complete a cross-sectional, online survey. RESULTS: The majority of residents who opted out of some portion of the family planning training reported that the rotation positively affected skills in pregnancy options counseling, cervical dilation, first-trimester ultrasound, techniques of first-trimester uterine evacuation and other skills. Twenty-one of the 65 (31%) did an elective abortion, and 56 (84%) completed aspirations for at least one non-elective indication including therapeutic abortion and miscarriage. While no resident desired additional elective abortion training, 11 (16%) wanted additional uterine aspiration and 14 (21%) wanted additional second-trimester uterine aspiration training for non-elective indications. CONCLUSION: Providing access to an abortion rotation for residents who do not plan to do elective abortions gives them the opportunity to improve their skills in family planning, therapeutic abortion and miscarriage management.

Early molar pregnancy: experience in a large abortion service.

BACKGROUND: With 1.1 million US women having first-trimester abortions annually, clinicians have an opportunity to diagnose molar pregnancy early. Early moles, however, may lack "classic" diagnostic hallmarks. STUDY DESIGN: This study aimed to assess the accuracy of the diagnosis of hydatidiform mole in women seeking abortion services at a large Planned Parenthood affiliate. We retrospectively identified women with a histopathologic diagnosis of mole from the affiliate's risk management database. The tissue specimens were reviewed by an expert independent pathologist and analyzed by flow cytometry and p57(KIP2) immunohistochemical staining to clarify the diagnosis. RESULTS: Of 21 patients who received an initial histopathologic diagnosis of mole, only six proved to have the condition. The interobserver correlation coefficient (kappa) for pathology examination was (-) 0.353. Overdiagnosis of partial moles was the most common error. CONCLUSIONS: Improved, cost-effective strategies for detection of early moles would benefit patients and providers.