RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Tubal ectopic pregnancy (EP) is a life-threatening condition, especially if undiagnosed or misdiagnosed, tipically in low income countries and/or where women have limited access to health care. The current management protocol of tubal EP consists of either surgical management, or medical management with methotrexate. Recent studies, while few, have suggested that letrozole, an aromatase inhibitor, may play a role in the medical treatment of tubal EP. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of letrozole alone in the medical treatment of tubal EP. SEARCH STRATEGY: Electronic databases were searched until 31 December 2023. SELECTION CRITERIA: Retrospective or prospective studies reporting the treatment of tubal EP with letrozole alone were considered eligible for inclusion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Pooled results were expressed as OR with 95 %CI. Heterogeneity was assessed using Higgins I2. Subgroup analysis was performed to compare outcomes according to time after intervention. Subgroup differences were checked through χ2 test. RESULTS: A total of 152 patients were included. Seventy-nine patients (51.97 %) were treated with letrozole, 39 patients (16.54 %) with methotrexate, and 34 patients (31.49 %) underwent surgical treatment. Pooled data analysis supports the consistency of the effect of letrozole in reducing ß-hCG over time at a comparable rate among studies, and that treatment with letrozole is superior to surgery and has the same efficacy as methotrexate. However, all the included studies were judged at high risk of bias in terms of study design, sample representativeness, and sampling technique. Furthermore, short and long term side effects were not reported in any of the included studies. CONCLUSIONS: Letrozole is a promising alternative to methotrexate and surgical therapy in the treatment of tubal EP. Although this meta-analysis suggests efficacy and low hazard of the drug and encourages its application, the data available today remain extremely sparse, which weakens any claims that can be made, and is not sufficient to assert that letrozole is safe and effective in the treatment of EPs. There is an absolute need for randomized studies with accurate patient selection, fixed doses, large sample sizes, and reporting of short- and long-term side effects to refute or confirm this assumption.
RESUMO
Background: The incidence of pregnant women with uterine fibroids is increasing. As they are reactive to hormonal stimuli, in some cases, uterine fibroids tend to grow during pregnancy and potentially generate symptoms with different levels of severity, causing maternal-fetal complications. In very select cases, when other treatment strategies fail to manage symptoms and there is a substantial risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes, a surgical approach during pregnancy may be considered. Methods: From 2016 to 2021, the data from 28 pregnant women with symptomatic uterine fibroids who underwent laparotomic myomectomy during pregnancy were prospectively collected, and operative and maternal-fetal outcomes were analyzed (ClinicalTrial ID: NCT06009562). Results: The procedure was carried out between 14 and 16 weeks of pregnancy. Four (14.3%) patients had intraoperative complications (miscarriages) and nine (32.1%) had postoperative complications (threatened preterm birth). Overall, 24 (85.7%) women delivered at full term (mean: 38.2 gestational weeks), more than half (n = 13; 54.2%) by vaginal delivery, with normal fetal weights and 1 and 5 min Apgar scores. Conclusions: Laparotomic myomectomy during pregnancy can be considered in selected cases for uterine fibroids with severe symptoms when other treatment options have failed and there is high risk of adverse maternal-fetal outcomes.
RESUMO
Background: Adenomyosis and congenital uterine anomalies (CUAs) can compromise reproductive potential and may coexist in the same patient, especially in cases of infertility. This review (CRD42022382850) aims to evaluate the published cases of concurrent adenomyosis and syndromic and nonsyndromic CUAs. Methods: A literature search for suitable articles published in the English language was performed using the following databases from inception to 30 November 2022: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Global Health, the Cochrane Library, Health Technology Assessment Database, and Web of Science. Articles including both CUAs and adenomyosis, with data about their potential relationship, were included. Results: The literature search retrieved 14 articles that met the purpose of this review and summarized the most recent findings regarding the concurrent diagnosis of adenomyosis and CUAs. Conclusions: Adenomyosis can be found in both syndromic and nonsyndromic CUAs, and may arise from several etiologies. The hypothesis that obstructions in CUAs increase uterine pressure and promote the development of adenomyosis remains to be further elucidated, and additional findings may also play a role. The patient's genetic, epigenetic, and hormonal patterns, as well as normal physiological processes, such as pregnancy, may influence the growth of adenomyosis.