Bariatric Surgery is Safe for Patients After Recovery from COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Studies of patients who have undergone surgery while infected with COVID-19 have shown increased risks for adverse outcomes in both pulmonary complications and mortality. It has become clear that the risk of complications from perioperative COVID-19 infection must be weighed against the risk from delayed surgical treatment. Studies have also shown that prior bariatric surgery conveys protection against mortality from COVID-19 and that obesity is the biggest risk factor for mortality from COVID-19 infection in adults under 45 years of age. Studies in patients who have fully recovered from COVID-19 and underwent elective surgery have not become widely available yet. OBJECTIVES: This multi-institutional case series is presented to highlight patients who developed COVID-19, fully recovered, and subsequently underwent elective bariatric surgery with 30-day outcomes available. SETTING: Nine bariatric surgery centers located across the United States. METHODS: This multicenter case series is a retrospective chart review of patients who developed COVID-19, recovered, and subsequently underwent bariatric surgery. Fifty-three patients are included, and 30-day morbidity and mortality were analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty-day complications included esophageal spasm, dehydration, and ileus. There were no cardiovascular, venous thromboembolism (VTE) or respiratory events reported. There were no 30- day mortalities. CONCLUSIONS: Bariatric surgery has been safely performed in patients who made a full recovery from COVID-19 without increased complications due to cardiovascular, pulmonary, venous thromboembolism, or increased mortality rates.

Effect of revisional bariatric surgery on type 2 diabetes mellitus.

INTRODUCTION: Bariatric and metabolic surgery significantly improves type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, a small percentage of patients after bariatric surgery either have persistent hyperglycemia or relapse of their T2DM. These patients are usually medically managed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of revisional surgery on the glycemic status of patients with T2DM who either failed to remit or relapsed after an initial remission following bariatric surgery. METHODS: Metabolic parameters and clinical outcomes of 81 patients with persistent or relapsed T2DM after revisional bariatric surgery at an academic center between 2008 and 2017 were studied. RESULTS: The most common types of revisional surgery were pouch and/or stoma revision of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) (n = 22, 27.2%), conversion of vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) to RYGB (n = 20, 24.7%), conversion of adjustable gastric banding (AGB) to RYGB (n = 14, 17.3%), and conversion of sleeve gastrectomy (SG) to RYGB (n = 13, 16%). Revision of pouch/stoma after RYGB yielded improvement of T2DM in 50% of patients and remission in 22.7%. Conversion to RYGB yielded improvement of T2DM in 55%, 35.7%, and 30.8% of patients who previously had VBG, AGB, or SG, respectively. Furthermore, conversion of VBG, AGB, and SG to RYGB was associated with diabetes remission rates of 35%, 35.7%, and 23.1%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Findings of this study, which is the largest series to date, indicate that revisional surgery in patients with persistent or relapsed T2DM after bariatric surgery can significantly improve glucose control and use of diabetes medications. Further clinical and mechanistic studies are needed to better demonstrate the role of revisional bariatric surgery in patients with residual T2DM.

Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Surgical Technique and Perioperative Care.

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is a bariatric surgical procedure created for long-term weight loss and improvement of metabolic syndrome abnormalities in morbidly obese patients. It has been shown to demonstrate durable results compared with other bariatric procedures. This article aims to describe the surgical technique and perioperative care for patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy based on current scientific literature and best standard practices.

Successful transplantation of HIV patients: the Louisiana experience.

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) seropositivity has historically been an absolute contraindication for solid organ transplantation. However, the successful application of HAART (highly active anti-retroviral therapy) drug regimens has greatly prolonged the life expectancy of HIV-positive patients. Therefore, it has become appropriate to consider this patient population for transplantation. HIV positive transplants are being performed around the country in controlled settings, usually as part of a research protocol. The aim of our study is to describe the Louisiana experience with organ transplantation into HIV-positive patients. We identified seven HIV-positive patients who underwent kidney or kidney/pancreas transplantation at our center between 2007 and 2010. We performed a retrospective chart review to ascertain graft function, as well as virologic and immunologic status post-transplant. Renal function (glomerular filtration rate and serum creatinine concentrations) improved in all subjects post-transplant, and six of seven (85.8%) subjects remained virologically suppressed with no progression to Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS). Overall, two-year graft and patient survival rates were 85.5%. HIV seropositive End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) patients represent a new population of patients that can be successfully transplanted. This offers a new dimension in care for successful HAART therapy to prolong the life of HIV-infected patients.