Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol ; 44(2): e487-e492, 2022 Mar 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33181582

RESUMO

Mucositis, a painful and debilitating condition, is a common side effect of chemotherapy. The role of tramadol in the treatment of mucositis in pediatric patients has not yet been determined. In this retrospective study, we evaluate whether tramadol as single agent achieved a reduction of pain intensity among oncologic children admitted for mucositis. In total, 34 of 54 (63%) episodes were treated with tramadol alone and achieved adequate pain relief. Tramadol's side effects were mild and manageable.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos , Mucosite , Tramadol , Analgésicos Opioides , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Criança , Humanos , Mucosite/induzido quimicamente , Mucosite/tratamento farmacológico , Dor/induzido quimicamente , Dor/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tramadol/efeitos adversos
2.
Arthroscopy ; 38(1): 31-37, 2022 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34052386

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To compare the analgesic effects of pregabalin to those of single-shot interscalene brachial plexus block (ISBPB) in adults having arthroscopic rotator cuff (RC) repair, as well as ISBPB's effect on postoperative opioid consumption, patient satisfaction, and opioid-related adverse effects. METHODS: In this randomized trial, 79 adults having arthroscopic RC repair were randomized to receive perioperative oral pregabalin (Lyrica, twice daily starting the evening before surgery, for a total of 4 doses) or single-shot ISBPB (20 ml of bupivacaine 0.25%). Intra- and postoperative management was standardized. The primary outcome was median self-reported pain score (on a visual analog scale of 0 to 100) at rest during the initial 10 postoperative days. Other outcomes included pain during activity, postoperative opioid consumption, opioid-related adverse effects, quality of recovery, and pain satisfaction score. RESULTS: Of 71 eligible patients, 59 were analyzed, of whom 29 received pregabalin and 30 received ISBPB. Groups were similar regarding demographic, baseline, and intraoperative variables. Median pain score at rest over the 10 postoperative days was 51 (interquartile range 26, 76) in the pregabalin group and 52 (22, 74) in the ISBPB group (difference 0.5 points; 95% confidence interval [CI] -3.2 to 6.3; P = .53). Opioid consumption during the initial 10 postoperative days was also similar (difference in median 90 mg of morphine equivalents; 95% CI -32 to 177.5; P = .12). No differences were found in any other outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative use of pregabalin in adults undergoing arthroscopic RC repair provided analgesia comparable to that of ISBPB for 10 days after surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II, randomized controlled trial (high dropout rate).


Assuntos
Bloqueio do Plexo Braquial , Lesões do Manguito Rotador , Adulto , Anestésicos Locais , Artroscopia , Humanos , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Pregabalina/uso terapêutico , Manguito Rotador
3.
J Perianesth Nurs ; 34(1): 124-131, 2019 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29735341

RESUMO

PURPOSE: It has been widely reported that minority groups receive inferior emergency pain management. We aimed to determine whether this is true in the postoperative setting, as effective postoperative analgesia is an essential component of high quality medical care. DESIGN: A retrospective case-control study of paired 248 postsurgical Israeli patients. METHODS: Data were gathered from the European Union's "PAIN-OUT" registry. Quality of care measures, composite pain score, composite side effect score, and composite emotional score were analyzed. FINDINGS: Composite pain, side effect, and emotional scores were significantly higher among natives compared with non-natives. Opioid consumption did not differ between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, immigration status was not a predictor of inferior postoperative analgesia. In contrast, non-natives benefited more from analgesic care. We suggest this stems from differing patient expectations and attitudes toward pain management between the groups, with higher expectations for analgesia on the part of native patients accounting for these observations.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Emigrantes e Imigrantes/estatística & dados numéricos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Humanos , Israel , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor Pós-Operatória/etnologia , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos
4.
J Anesth ; 31(2): 237-245, 2017 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27885425

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Inadequate analgesia following abdominal surgery may affect outcome. Data in patients undergoing liver surgery suggested that postoperative coagulopathy might delay epidural catheter removal. Thus, alternative analgesic techniques should be evaluated. METHODS: We compared the analgesic efficacy of intraoperative intrathecal morphine [single injection 4 µg/kg before skin incision (ITM group, n = 23)] to intravenous opioids [iv remifentanil infusion during surgery followed by i.v. bolus of morphine, 0.15 mg/kg before the end of surgery (IVO group, n = 26)]. Forty-nine adult patients undergoing elective open resection of liver or pancreas lesions in the Tel Aviv Medical Center were randomized into the two analgesic protocols. Postoperatively both groups received i.v. morphine via a patient-controlled analgesia pump. Follow-up was till the 3rd postoperative day (POD). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in demographics and intraoperative data between groups. The primary outcome, pain scores on movement, was significantly worse in the IVO group when compared with the ITM group at various time points till POD3. In the secondary outcomes - need for rescue drugs - the IVO group required significantly more rescue morphine boluses. Complication related to the analgesia and recovery parameters were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that a single dose of ITM before hepatic/pancreatic surgery may offer better postoperative pain control than i.v. opioid administration during surgery. This beneficial effect is maintained throughout the first three PODs and is not associated with a higher complication rate; neither did it influence recovery parameters. ITM provides an appropriate alternative to i.v. morphine during major abdominal surgery.


Assuntos
Analgesia Controlada pelo Paciente/métodos , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Morfina/administração & dosagem , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Abdome/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos , Feminino , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas , Fígado/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor/métodos , Piperidinas/administração & dosagem , Estudos Prospectivos , Remifentanil
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA