A motor plan is accessible for voluntary initiation and involuntary triggering at similar short latencies.

Movement goals are an essential component of motor planning, altering voluntary and involuntary motor actions. While there have been many studies of motor planning, it is unclear if motor goals influence voluntary and involuntary movements at similar latencies. The objectives of this study were to determine how long it takes to prepare a motor action and to compare this time for voluntary and involuntary movements. We hypothesized a prepared motor action would influence voluntarily and involuntarily initiated movements at the same latency. We trained subjects to reach with a forced reaction time paradigm and used a startling acoustic stimulus (SAS) to trigger involuntary initiation of the same reaches. The time available to prepare was controlled by varying when one of four reach targets was presented. Reach direction was used to evaluate accuracy. We quantified the time between target presentation and the cue or trigger for movement initiation. We found that reaches were accurately initiated when the target was presented 48 ms before the SAS and 162 ms before the cue to voluntarily initiate movement. While the SAS precisely controlled the latency of movement onset, voluntary reach onset was more variable. We, therefore, quantified the time between target presentation and movement onset and found no significant difference in the time required to plan reaches initiated voluntarily or involuntarily (∆ = 8 ms, p = 0.2). These results demonstrate that the time required to plan accurate reaches is similar regardless of if they are initiated voluntarily or triggered involuntarily. This finding may inform the understanding of neural pathways governing storage and access of motor plans.

Uncertainty in when a perturbation will arrive influences the preparation and release of triggered responses.

The timing and magnitude of muscle responses to perturbations are critical for acting in uncertain environments. A planned movement can strongly influence average muscle responses to perturbations, but certainty in when a perturbation will arrive changes this effect. The objective of this study was to investigate how uncertainty in perturbation timing influences the preparation and release of involuntary, perturbation-triggered responses. We hypothesized that uncertainty would influence the average magnitude of triggered responses and how they develop in time. We investigated three levels of uncertainty in when a proprioceptive cue to move would arrive by changing the duration and variability of the time between a preparation and movement cue. Participants performed ballistic elbow extension movements in response to the movement cue. Unexpected, large perturbations that flexed the elbow were delivered at various times between the preparation and movement cues to evaluate how cue uncertainty influenced the development of triggered responses. We found that this uncertainty strongly influences how a motor response is prepared, and the efficacy of triggering that response by a postural perturbation. When timing was certain, the motor plan was prepared within 150 ms of the expected disturbance, and consistently released earlier by a perturbation than could be done voluntarily. Less predictable stimuli led to much earlier planning and a lower probability of releasing the plan early. These results clarify how uncertainty in when to move influences the planning and early release of perturbation-triggered responses, demonstrating an effect similar to previous reports on the planning of volitional movements.