Molecular Screening of Blood Donors for Babesia in Tyrol, Austria.

Introduction: Babesia is a tick-borne intraerythrocytic parasite that is globally ubiquitous, yet understudied. Several species of Babesia have been shown to be transfusion-transmissible. Babesia has been reported in blood donors, animals, and ticks in the Tyrol (Western Austria), and regional cases of human babesiosis have been described. We sought to characterize the risk of Babesia to the local blood supply. Methods: Prospective molecular testing was performed on blood donors who presented to regional, mobile blood collection drives in the Tyrol, Austria (27 May to October 4, 2021). Testing was conducted using the cobas® Babesia assay (Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.), a commercial PCR assay approved for blood donor screening that is capable of detecting the 4 primary species causing human babesiosis (i.e., B. microti, B. divergens, B. duncani, and B. venatorum). A confirmatory algorithm to manage initial PCR-reactive samples was developed, as were procedures for donor and product management. Results: A total of 7,972 donors were enrolled and screened; 4,311 (54.1%) were male, with a median age of 47 years (IQR = 34-55). No positive cases of Babesia were detected, corresponding with an overall prevalence of 0.00% (95% CI: 0.00%, 0.05%). Discussion: The findings suggest that the prevalence of Babesia is low in Austrian blood donors residing in the Tyrol, even during months of peak tick exposure. Although one cannot conclude the absence of Babesia in this population given the limited sample size, the findings suggest that the regional risk of transfusion-transmitted babesiosis is low.

Implementation of an HIV-1 Triple-Target NAT Assay in the Routine Screening at Three German Red Cross Blood Centres.

BACKGROUND: Blood product safety was significantly improved by the introduction of NAT testing in the late 1990s, resulting in a strong decrease of transfusion-transmitted infections (TTIs). Due to the occurrence of HIV-1 NAT test failures as a consequence of mismatch mutations in the amplicon regions of mono-target NAT assays, the Paul Ehrlich Institute mandated the implementation of multi-target NAT assays for HIV-1 in 2014. Commercial suppliers mostly developed dual-target NAT assays, with only one implementing a triple-target NAT assay. METHODS: The HIV-1 triple-target NAT assay v3 (GFE Blut) was tested on mutated specimens and synthetic DNA bearing mutations that resulted in sample underquantification or false-negative test results. In addition, data from 2 years routine testing at three German Red Cross Blood centres were analysed. RESULTS: The HIV-1 triple-target PCR could compensate for all mutations tested and could compensate the loss of one amplicon without a significant loss of sensitivity. Data from 2 years routine testing showed a solid performance. CONCLUSION: The HIV-1 triple-target v3 assay (GFE Blut) can compensate mutations in target sequences better than a dual-target assay and is applicable to high-throughput screening, thus increasing blood product safety.

Yield of HCV and HIV-1 NAT after screening of 3.6 million blood donations in central Europe.

BACKGROUND: HCV and HIV-1 NAT of all blood donations was initiated at our institutions in January 1997 to reduce the residual risk of transfusion-transmitted virus infections. The yield of NAT after testing more than 3.6 million donations in central Europe is reported. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Automated pipetting instruments were used to pool up to 96 donor samples including those that were antibody reactive. To compensate for dilution of the individual donor samples by pooling, viruses were enriched from the pools by centrifugation at 48,000 x g. A commercial PCR (Cobas Amplicor, Roche) and an in-house PCR were applied for HCV and HIV-1 amplification, respectively. RESULTS: Six HCV and 2 HIV-1 PCR confirmed-positive, antibody-negative donations (yield, 1 in 600,000 and 1 in 1.8 million, respectively) were identified. Thirty-nine and 11 multiple-time donors seroconverted for HCV and HIV, respectively, and look-back procedures were initiated. Archived samples from preseroconversion donations were thawed and retested by single-sample PCR and remained negative. The recipients of the blood components were traced and tested. All traced recipients were negative for HCV and HIV antibodies. CONCLUSION: The yield of NAT in central European Red Cross blood donors was less than expected from theoretical calculations for American and German multiple-time donors. Look-back procedures for HCV and HIV indicated that no donation given before seroconversion of the donor was missed by minipool PCR. Sensitivity of minipool PCR testing after virus enrichment seems to be sufficiently high to close the diagnostic window almost completely.

NAT for HBV and anti-HBc testing increase blood safety.

BACKGROUND: Routine HBV PCR screening of blood donations to our institutes was introduced in January 1997 to complete the NAT screening program for transfusion-relevant viruses. Testing was successively extended to customer transfusion services with a total of 1,300,000 samples tested per year. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Minipools of 96 blood donation samples were formed by automatic pipettors. HBsAg-reactive samples were included. HBV particles were enriched from the minipools by centrifugation. Conventional and in-house TaqMan PCRs were successively applied for HBV amplification. Sensitivity reached 1000 genome equivalents per mL for each individual donation. Confirmatory single-sample and single-sample enrichment PCRs were established with sensitivities of 300 and 5 to 10 genome equivalents per mL, respectively. RESULTS: After screening of 3.6 million donor samples, 6 HBV PCR-positive, HBsAg-negative donations were identified. Two samples were from infected donors who had not seroconverted and four were from chronic anti-HBc-positive low-level HBV carriers. Retesting by single-sample PCR of 432 samples confirmed positive for HBsAg identified 37 donations that were negative in minipool PCR. Donor-directed look-back procedures indicated that no infected donor who had not yet seroconverted was missed by minipool PCR. However, recipient-directed look-back procedures revealed two anti-HBc-positive recipients of HBsAg-negative minipool PCR-negative, anti-HBc-positive and single-sample PCR-positive blood components. After testing randomly selected 729 HBsAg-negative minipool PCR-negative, anti-HBc-positive donors by single-sample enrichment PCR, 7 were identified with < or = 10 HBV particles per mL of donor plasma. CONCLUSION: Minipool PCR testing after virus enrichment was sensitive enough to identify HBsAg-negative donors who had seroconverterd and HBsAg-negative, anti-HBc-positive chronic HBV carriers. HBV NAT in conjunction with anti-HBc screening would reduce the residual risk of transfusion-transmitted HBV infection.