Implementation of flow cytometry testing on rare matrix samples: Special considerations and best practices when the sample is unique or difficult to obtain.

The publication of Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute's guideline H62 has provided the flow cytometry community with much-needed guidance on development and validation of flow cytometric assays (CLSI, 2021). It has also paved the way for additional exploration of certain topics requiring additional guidance. Flow cytometric analysis of rare matrices, or unique and/or less frequently encountered specimen types, is one such topic and is the focus of this manuscript. This document is the result of a collaboration subject matter experts from a diverse range of backgrounds and seeks to provide best practice consensus guidance regarding these types of specimens. Herein, we define rare matrix samples in the setting of flow cytometric analysis, address validation implications and challenges with these samples, and describe important considerations of using these samples in both clinical and research settings.

Myelodysplastic Neoplasms (MDS) with Ring Sideroblasts or SF3B1 Mutations: The Improved Clinical Utility of World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification 2022 Definitions, a Single-Centre Retrospective Chart Review.

Myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) with ring sideroblasts (RS) are diagnosed via bone marrow aspiration in the presence of either (i) ≥15% RS or (ii) 5-14% RS and an SF3B1 mutation. In the MEDALIST trial and in an interim analysis of the COMMANDS trial, lower-risk MDS-RS patients had decreased transfusion dependency with luspatercept treatment. A total of 6817 patients with suspected hematologic malignancies underwent molecular testing using a next-generation-sequencing-based genetic assay and 395 MDS patients, seen at our centre from 1 January 2018 to 31 May 2023, were reviewed. Of these, we identified 39 evaluable patients as having lower-risk MDS with SF3B1 mutations: there were 20 (51.3%) males and 19 (48.7%) females, with a median age of 77 years (range of 57 to 92). Nineteen (48.7%) patients had an isolated SF3B1 mutation with a mean variant allele frequency of 35.2% +/- 8.1%, ranging from 7.4% to 46.0%. There were 29 (74.4%) patients with ≥15% RS, 6 (15.4%) with 5 to 14% RS, one (2.6%) with 1% RS, and 3 (7.7%) with no RS. Our study suggests that a quarter of patients would be missed based on the morphologic criterion of only using RS greater than 15% and supports the revised 2022 definitions of the World Health Organization (WHO) and International Consensus Classification (ICC), which shift toward molecularly defined subtypes of MDS and appropriate testing.

PCNEO, a New Proficiency Testing Program for Flow Cytometric Analysis of Plasma Cell Neoplasms From the College of American Pathologists Diagnostic Immunology and Flow Cytometry Committee.

CONTEXT.­: In 2018 the College of American Pathologists Diagnostic Immunology and Flow Cytometry Committee designed and implemented a new plasma cell neoplasia flow cytometry proficiency testing program-PCNEO-to allow clinical flow cytometry laboratories to monitor and assess their performance compared with a peer group. OBJECTIVE.­: To report the results from the first 4 years of the PCNEO program. DESIGN.­: Program participants were sent 2 sets of challenges per year, each including 1 wet challenge and 2 dry challenges, with associated clinical and laboratory findings. The wet challenges were composed of myeloma cell line specimens (with or without dilution in preserved whole blood) for flow cytometric analysis. The dry (paper) challenges were composed of clinical case summaries and images of flow cytometric test results from various flow cytometry laboratories of committee members. RESULTS.­: A total of 116 to 145 laboratories from 17 countries enrolled in the proficiency testing program. For the wet challenges, almost all participants (97%-100%; cumulative, 98.2%) correctly identified the presence of neoplastic plasma cell populations based on flow cytometric analysis of undiluted myeloma cell lines. Slightly fewer participants (89.0%-97.4%; cumulative, 95.2%) correctly identified the presence of neoplastic plasma cell populations based on flow cytometric analysis of diluted myeloma cell lines (10% or 50% dilutions into peripheral blood) intended to better represent a typical clinical sample. There was generally agreement among 80% or more of participants for positive or negative staining for CD38, CD138, CD19, CD20, and surface and cytoplasmic κ and λ light chains. Similarly, 84% to 100% of participants were able to correctly identify the presence of neoplastic plasma cell populations in paper challenges, including the presence of small, neoplastic plasma cell populations (0.01%-5.0% clonal plasma cells), or the presence of nonneoplastic plasma cell populations (correctly identified by 91%-96% of participants). CONCLUSIONS.­: Participant performance in the new proficiency testing program was excellent overall, with the vast majority of participants able to perform flow cytometric analysis and identify neoplastic plasma cell populations, and to identify small plasma cell clones or expanded populations of reactive plasma cells in dry challenge flow cytometry results. This program will allow laboratories to verify the accuracy of their testing program and test interpretations for the assessment of patients suspected of having a plasma cell neoplasm.

T-cell clonality testing for the diagnosis of T-cell large granular lymphocytic leukemia: Are we identifying pathology or incidental clones?

INTRODUCTION: T-cell clonality testing by T-cell receptor (TCR) gene rearrangement is key to the diagnosis of T-cell lymphoproliferative disorders such as T-cell large granular lymphocytic (T-LGL) leukemia. Benign clonal T-cell expansions, however, are commonly found in patients without identifiable disease, a condition referred to as T-cell clones of uncertain significance (T-CUS). In practice, T-cell clonality testing is performed for a range of reasons and results are often challenging to interpret given the overlap between benign and malignant clonal T-cell proliferations and uncertainties in the management of T-CUS. METHODS: We conducted a 5-year retrospective cohort study of 211 consecutive patients who underwent PCR-based T-cell clonality testing for suspected T-LGL leukemia at our institution to characterize the use of T-cell clonality testing and its impact on patient management. RESULTS: Overall, 46.4% (n = 98) of individuals tested had a clonal T-cell population identified. Patients with a monoclonal T-cell population were more likely to be older, have rheumatoid arthritis and have higher lymphocyte counts compared to patients with polyclonal populations. The majority of patients eventually diagnosed and treated for T-LGL leukemia had rheumatoid arthritis and lower neutrophil counts compared to untreated patients with monoclonal T-cell populations. A diagnosis of T-LGL leukemia was made in only a minority of patients (n = 48, 22.7%), and only a small proportion were treated (n = 17, 8.1%). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that T-cell clonality testing most commonly identifies incidental T-cell clones with only a minority of patients receiving a diagnosis of T-LGL leukemia and fewer requiring active treatment. These finding indicate an opportunity to improve utilization of T-cell clonality testing in clinical practice to better target patients where the results of testing would impact clinical management.

Clinical Utility of Implementing a Frontline NGS-Based DNA and RNA Fusion Panel Test for Patients with Suspected Myeloid Malignancies.

BACKGROUND: The use of molecular genetic biomarkers is rapidly advancing to aid diagnosis, prognosis, and clinical management of hematological disorders. We have implemented a next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay for detection of genetic variants and fusions as a frontline test for patients suspected with myeloid malignancy. In this study, we summarize the findings and assess the clinical impact in the first 1613 patients tested. METHODS: All patients were assessed using NGS based Oncomine Myeloid Research Assay (ThermoFisher) including 40 genes (17 full genes and 23 genes with clinically relevant "hotspot" regions), along with a panel of 29 fusion driver genes (including over fusion 600 partners). RESULTS: Among 1613 patients with suspected myeloid malignancy, 43% patients harbored at least one clinically relevant variant: 91% (90/100) in acute myeloid leukemia patients, 71.7% (160/223) in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), 77.5% (308/397) in myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN), 83% (34/41) in MPN/MDS, and 100% (40/40) in chronic myeloid leukemia patients. Comparison of NGS and cytogenetics results revealed a high degree of concordance in gene fusion detection. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate clinical utility and feasibility of integrating a NGS-based gene mutation and fusion testing assay as a frontline diagnostic test in a large reported cohort of patients with suspected myeloid malignancy, in a clinical laboratory setting. Overlap with cytogenetic test results provides opportunity for testing reduction and streamlining.

Measurable Residual Disease Detection in B-Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: The Children's Oncology Group (COG) Method.

Measurable (minimal) residual disease (MRD) in B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), as assessed by flow cytometry, is an established prognostic factor used to adjust treatment in most pediatric therapeutic protocols. MRD in B-ALL has been standardized by the Children's Oncology Group in North America and more recently in a multicenter Foundation for the National Institutes of Health-funded study. This article outlines the reagents, instrument setup, and analysis protocols required for the reproducible detection of residual leukemic cells in patients following induction therapy for B-ALL. © 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Staining and flow cytometry for B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) measurable residual disease detection Support Protocol: Specimen collection, handling, storage, and shipping Basic Protocol 2: Analysis and interpretation of data for B-ALL measurable residual disease detection Basic Protocol 3: Analysis of samples lacking sufficient CD19+ events.

Reducing cytogenetic testing in the era of next generation sequencing: Are we choosing wisely?

INTRODUCTION: In most laboratories, next generation sequencing (NGS) has been added without consideration for redundancy compared to conventional cytogenetics (CG). We tested a streamlined approach to genomic testing in patients with suspected myeloid and plasma cell neoplasms using next generation sequencing ("NGS first") as the primary testing modality and limiting cytogenetics (CG) to samples with morphologic abnormalities in the marrow aspirate. METHODS: Based on morphologic interpretation of bone marrow aspirate and flow cytometry, samples were triaged into four groups: (a) Samples with dysplasia or excess blasts had both NGS and karyotyping; (b) Samples without excess blasts or dysplasia had NGS only; (c) Repeat samples with previous NGS and/or CG studies were not retested; (d) Samples for suspected myeloma with less than 5% plasma cell had CG testing cancelled. RESULTS: Seven hundred eleven adult bone marrow (BM) samples met the study criteria. The NGS first algorithm eliminated CG testing in 229/303 (75.6%) of patients, primarily by reducing repeat testing. Potential cost avoided was approximately $124 000 per annum. Hematologists overruled the triage comment in only 11/303 (3.6%) cases requesting CG testing for a specific indication. CONCLUSIONS: Utilizing NGS as the primary genomic testing modality NGS was feasible and well accepted, reducing over three quarters of all CG requests and improving the financial case for adoption of NGS. Key factors for the success of this study were collaboration of clinical and genomic diagnostic teams in developing the algorithm, rapid turnaround time for BM interpretation for triage, and communication between laboratories.

Rapid and accurate agglutination-based testing for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies.

We have developed a rapid, accurate, and cost-effective serologic test for SARS-CoV-2 virus, which caused the COVID-19 pandemic, on the basis of antibody-dependent agglutination of antigen-coated latex particles. When validated using plasma samples that are positive or negative for SARS-CoV-2, the agglutination assay detected antibodies against the receptor-binding domain of the spike (S-RBD) or the nucleocapsid protein of SARS-CoV-2 with 100% specificity and ∼98% sensitivity. Furthermore, we found that the strength of the S-RBD antibody response measured by the agglutination assay correlated with the efficiency of the plasma in blocking RBD binding to the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 in a surrogate neutralization assay, suggesting that the agglutination assay might be used to identify individuals with virus-neutralizing antibodies. Intriguingly, we found that >92% of patients had detectable antibodies on the day of a positive viral RNA test, suggesting that the agglutination antibody test might complement RNA testing for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Epitope-specific antibody responses differentiate COVID-19 outcomes and variants of concern.

BACKGROUNDThe role of humoral immunity in COVID-19 is not fully understood, owing, in large part, to the complexity of antibodies produced in response to the SARS-CoV-2 infection. There is a pressing need for serology tests to assess patient-specific antibody response and predict clinical outcome.METHODSUsing SARS-CoV-2 proteome and peptide microarrays, we screened 146 COVID-19 patients' plasma samples to identify antigens and epitopes. This enabled us to develop a master epitope array and an epitope-specific agglutination assay to gauge antibody responses systematically and with high resolution.RESULTSWe identified linear epitopes from the spike (S) and nucleocapsid (N) proteins and showed that the epitopes enabled higher resolution antibody profiling than the S or N protein antigen. Specifically, we found that antibody responses to the S-811-825, S-881-895, and N-156-170 epitopes negatively or positively correlated with clinical severity or patient survival. Moreover, we found that the P681H and S235F mutations associated with the coronavirus variant of concern B.1.1.7 altered the specificity of the corresponding epitopes.CONCLUSIONEpitope-resolved antibody testing not only affords a high-resolution alternative to conventional immunoassays to delineate the complex humoral immunity to SARS-CoV-2 and differentiate between neutralizing and non-neutralizing antibodies, but it also may potentially be used to predict clinical outcome. The epitope peptides can be readily modified to detect antibodies against variants of concern in both the peptide array and latex agglutination formats.FUNDINGOntario Research Fund (ORF) COVID-19 Rapid Research Fund, Toronto COVID-19 Action Fund, Western University, Lawson Health Research Institute, London Health Sciences Foundation, and Academic Medical Organization of Southwestern Ontario (AMOSO) Innovation Fund.

A multicenter study evaluation of the ClearLLab 10C panels.

Multiparameter flow cytometry plays an important role in the diagnosis, staging, and monitoring of patients with a suspected hematological malignancy. The ClearLLab 10C Panels consist of four reagent panels (B-Lineage Tube, T-Lineage Tube, and 2 Myeloid Lineage Tubes), each consisting of 10 color/10 antibody conjugates utilizing Beckman Coulters proprietary dry format optimized for investigating patients with suspected leukemia or lymphoma. A multicenter study was conducted to evaluate the performance of the ClearLLab 10C Panels for qualitative assessment of normal versus abnormal phenotype in peripheral blood, bone marrow, and lymph node samples with suspected hematological malignancies. ClearLLab 10C was compared to laboratory developed tests (LDTs) and final clinical diagnosis. Four clinical sites were used to enroll patient's spent specimens (n = 453); three laboratories in North America and one in Europe. Of the 453 specimens, 198 had no malignancy and 255 contained an abnormal population. The diagnostic accuracy of the ClearLLab 10C Panels was achieved with sensitivity of 96% and specificity of 95% with respect to patient final clinical diagnosis. The agreement of phenotyping between ClearLLab10C Panels and LDTs was 98%. Any differences noted between ClearLLab 10C and LDT were due to either the presence of populations below the level of detection, the lack of clinical information provided to the evaluators, or marker(s) not present in these panels. Overall, the ClearLLab 10C demonstrated excellent agreement to LDTs and diagnosis. These four reagent panels can be adopted by individual laboratories to assess the presence or absence of malignancy.

A QA Program for MRD Testing Demonstrates That Systematic Education Can Reduce Discordance Among Experienced Interpreters.

BACKGROUND: Minimal residual disease (MRD) in B lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) by flow cytometry is an established prognostic factor used to adjust treatment in most pediatric therapeutic protocols. MRD in B-ALL has been standardized by the Children's Oncology Group (COG) in North America, but not routine clinical labs. The Foundation for National Institutes of Health sought to harmonize MRD measurement among COG, oncology groups, academic, community and government, laboratories. METHODS: Listmode data from post-induction marrows were distributed from a reference lab to seven different clinical FCM labs with variable experience in B-ALL MRD. Labs were provided with the COG protocol. Files from 15 cases were distributed to the seven labs. Educational sessions were implemented, and 10 more listmode file cases analyzed. RESULTS: Among 105 initial challenges, the overall discordance rate was 26%. In the final round, performance improved considerably; out of 70 challenges, there were five false positives and one false negative (9% discordance), and no quantitative discordance. Four of six deviations occurred in a single lab. Three samples with hematogones were still misclassified as MRD. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the provision of the COG standardized analysis protocol, even experienced laboratories require an educational component for B-ALL MRD analysis by FCM. Recognition of hematogones remains challenging for some labs when using the COG protocol. The results from this study suggest that dissemination of MRD testing to other North American laboratories as part of routine clinical management of B-ALL is possible but requires additional educational components to complement standardized methodology. © 2017 International Clinical Cytometry Society.

Novel lymphocyte screening tube using dried monoclonal antibody reagents.

We previously developed a 10-color 11-antibody combination including a viability dye, to screen T-, B-, and natural killer (NK)-cell populations in blood, bone marrow, tissue, and body fluids. Recently, Beckman Coulter has introduced a line of dried reagents that, unlike liquid reagents and cocktails, require no refrigeration, titration, or manipulation before using. We evaluated custom tubes based on our standard lymphocyte screening panel, focusing on comparative analysis, ease of use, and advantages compared with our liquid reagent set. We tested 42 samples from blood (n = 15), bone marrow (n = 17), and tissue (n = 10) with the combination CD4/CD8/KAPPA/LAMBDA/CD19/CD56/CD5/CD20/CD10/CD3/CD45 and a vital dye by both methods and compared positivity and staining intensity for each antigen. Of the 42 samples, 5 were normal samples, 3 were red cell disorders, 20 were B-cell malignancies, 5 T-cell malignancies, 4 myeloid malignancies, and the remaining 5 were other diagnoses. Dried reagents gave equivalent staining intensity results to our standard panel in a variety of sample types, with diagnoses including reactive lymphocytosis, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and various lymphomas. Our standard panel for evaluation of mature lymphoid malignancies allows rapid assessment of any sample type while providing direct assessment of viability. The dried reagent tube reduces preanalytical work, with simple addition of sample and the viability dye to the tube, saving time, reducing potential errors, and obviating need to titrate and monitor individual antibodies. With a shelf life of at least 12 months, the reagents also offer potential savings in reagent costs by reducing wastage due to expiration or tandem breakdown in standard liquid formulation.

Combined accurate platelet enumeration and reticulated platelet determination by flow cytometry.

BACKGROUND: Diagnosing the cause of thrombocytopenia often requires a bone marrow aspiration or biopsy, an invasive procedure. Reticulated platelets (RP) are immature RNA containing platelets, accurate RP enumeration has yet to be achieved, partially due to the lack of a robust reference method. GOAL: To refine previous work and gating strategies distinguishing RP from mature platelets while incorporating accurate platelet enumeration into the analysis. After reviewing previously published studies on Thiazole Orange (TO) staining of RP, we systematically evaluated CD41/CD61 in combination with a commercial source of TO (BDBiosciences). Previous RP methods have not taken advantage of platelet enumeration therefore our goal was to incorporate the ICSH platelet enumeration protocol into our method. METHODS: TO concentration, incubation, and fixation method were determined to be 10% of stock concentration, 30 min, and 1% formaldehyde respectively. Gating strategy to determine RP fraction used an unstained control tube to set the limit of TO staining. RESULTS: Normal range (n = 51) was 9.9 ± 3.1%. Analysis of 40 patients with immune-thrombocytopenia-purpura (ITP) showed a RP range from 4.3% to 81.2%. Platelet enumeration was consistent with our previous studies in this area. CONCLUSIONS: Combining CD41/CD61 platelet enumeration with TO RP percentage is possible. Accurate RP percentage requires an effective gating strategy, as background fluorescence cursor placement is important. This method for enumeration of RP percentage combined with accurate platelet enumeration, particularly in the low range, should prove useful in differentiating production from consumption issues in thrombocytopenia and monitoring response to therapy.

Adaptation of semiautomated circulating tumor cell (CTC) assays for clinical and preclinical research applications.

The majority of cancer-related deaths occur subsequent to the development of metastatic disease. This highly lethal disease stage is associated with the presence of circulating tumor cells (CTCs). These rare cells have been demonstrated to be of clinical significance in metastatic breast, prostate, and colorectal cancers. The current gold standard in clinical CTC detection and enumeration is the FDA-cleared CellSearch system (CSS). This manuscript outlines the standard protocol utilized by this platform as well as two additional adapted protocols that describe the detailed process of user-defined marker optimization for protein characterization of patient CTCs and a comparable protocol for CTC capture in very low volumes of blood, using standard CSS reagents, for studying in vivo preclinical mouse models of metastasis. In addition, differences in CTC quality between healthy donor blood spiked with cells from tissue culture versus patient blood samples are highlighted. Finally, several commonly discrepant items that can lead to CTC misclassification errors are outlined. Taken together, these protocols will provide a useful resource for users of this platform interested in preclinical and clinical research pertaining to metastasis and CTCs.

Determination of optimal replicate number for validation of imprecision using fluorescence cell-based assays: proposed practical method.

BACKGROUND: Assay validation includes determination of inherent imprecision across the reportable range. However, specific practical guidelines for determinations of precision for cell-based fluorescence assays performed on flow cytometers are currently lacking. METHODS: Replicates of 10 or 20 measurements were obtained for flow cytometric assays developed for clinical in vitro diagnostic use, including neutrophil CD64 expression for infection/sepsis detection, fetal red cell enumeration for fetomaternal hemorrhage detection, human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 quantitation in leukocytes for possible correlation with drug responsiveness, and CD34+ hematopoietic stem cell enumeration of apheresis products, using up to three different instrument platforms for each assay. For each assay, the mean, 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) of the mean, standard deviation, and coefficient of variation (CV) of sequential replicates were determined. RESULTS: For all assays and most instrument platforms, <5 replicates were found adequate to validate assay imprecision levels below the 5-10% CV for repeatability claimed by the manufacturers of these assays. Results plotted as a novel parameter derived from the 95% CI and the cumulative mean for replicates, termed variance factor (VF), provide a data-driven means for determining optimal replicate numbers. CONCLUSIONS: The novel VF can provide information to guide the practical selection of optimal replicate numbers for validation of imprecision in flow cytometric assays. The optimal number of replicates was assay and instrument platform dependent. Our findings indicate that three to four replicates are sufficient for most flow cytometric assays and instrument combinations, rather than the higher numbers suggested by CLSI guidelines for soluble analytes.

Determination of optimal replicate number for validation of imprecision using fluorescence cell based assays: Proposed practical method.

Background: Assay validation includes determination of inherent imprecision across the reportable range. However specific practical guidelines for determinations of precision for cell based fluorescence assays performed on flow cytometers are currently lacking. Methods: Replicates of 10 or 20 measurements were obtained for flow cytometric assays developed for clinical IVD use, including neutrophil CD64 expression for infection/sepsis detection, fetal red cell enumeration for fetomaternal hemorrhage detection, human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 (hENT1) quantitation in leukocytes for possible correlation with drug responsiveness, and CD34+ hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) enumeration of apheresis products, using up to three different instrument platforms for each assay. For each assay, the mean, 95% confidence intervals of the mean (95%CI), standard deviation and coefficient of variation (CV) of sequential replicates were determined. Results: For all assays and most instrument platforms <5 replicates were found adequate to validate assay imprecision levels below the 5-10% CV for repeatability claimed by the manufacturers of these assays. Results plotted as a novel parameter derived from the 95%CI and the cumulative mean for replicates, termed variance factor (VF), provide a data driven means for determining optimal replicate numbers. Conclusions: The novel VF can provide information to guide the practical selection of optimal replicate numbers for validation of imprecision in flow cytometric assays. The optimal number of replicates was assay and instrument platform dependent. Our findings indicate 3-4 replicates are sufficient for most flow cytometric assays and instrument combinations, rather than the higher numbers suggested by CLSI guidelines for soluble analytes. © 2013 Clinical Cytometry Society.