Social distancing and changes in drug use: Results from a cross-sectional study during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil.

Background: The outbreak of coronavirus disease 19 has led to measures of social distancing and quarantine worldwide. This stressful period may lead to psychological problems, including changes in substance use. In addition, sociodemographic factors are linked to changed levels of drug use and abuse observed during the COVID-19 pandemic, which are also associated with increased anxiety, depression, and other disorders. Thus, the aim of the study was to investigate (i) changes in drug use during the COVID-19 pandemic associated with social distancing, and (ii) to verify factors associated with those changes. Methods: A web-based cross-sectional observational survey was completed by a self-selected adult general population in Brazil (N = 2,435) during September/October 2020 (first wave) before and throughout the pandemic. Key outcomes: social distancing, self-reported drug use (ASSIST), and emotional states (DASS-21). Results: High social distancing was associated with fewer chances (prevalence ratio) of increased drug use for alcohol (0.71, CI95%: 0.64-0.80), tobacco (0.72; CI95%: 0.60-0.87), cannabis (0.65; CI95%: 0.55-0.78), and others. Low social distancing presented a higher DASS-21 score for anxiety (P = 0.017). Concerning covariates analysis by a general linear model, men (alcohol: 1. 71; cannabis: 3.86), younger age (alcohol: 0.97), less education (alcohol, tobacco, cannabis and cocaine/crack comparing several lower schooling categories vs. higher education), lower income (alcohol: 0.42; tobacco: 0.47; and cannabis: 0.36), and higher depression DASS-21 score (alcohol: 1.05; tobacco: 1.08; cannabis: 1.07; and cocaine/crack: 1.07) were associated with higher use prevalence of several drugs. Conclusions: Individuals reporting low social distancing increased the use of most drugs during the pandemic, while high social distancing significantly decreased drug use. Anxiety and depressive states and several sociodemographic factors (men; lower income; less education) were associated with higher drug use patterns.

The effect of intracerebroventricular allopregnanolone on depressive-like behaviors of rats selectively bred for high and low immobility in the forced swim test.

Depression is a highly incapacitating disorder known to have a multifactorial etiology, including a hereditary genetic background. The neurosteroid allopregnanolone (ALLO) is a positive allosteric modulator of the GABAA receptor and has been shown to have an antidepressant-like effect in animals. This study aimed to assess the behavioral effect of ALLO in animals with different backgrounds of depressive-like activity. An initial population (F0) of male and female Wistar rats was screened for immobility behavior utilizing the Forced Swim Test (FST). Rats with extreme immobility scores were selected for either the High Immobility (HI) group or the Low Immobility (LI) group for breeding, giving origin to the subsequent generations F1 and F2. Guide cannulas were implanted in the lateral ventricle of F2 males for intracerebroventricular infusions of 5 µg/rat of ALLO, 5 µg/rat of imipramine (IMI) or vehicle (CTR), which occurred 24, 5 and 1 h prior to the test session of the drug FST. In the pre-drug FST, a statistically significant difference was observed between the immobility scores from the HI and LI groups of F2 rats. HI rats from F2 also showed significantly higher immobility time when compared to F0. In these HI animals, both IMI and ALLO significantly reduced immobility when compared to the CTR group. IMI-treated rats also showed lower immobility than the ALLO group. In the LI rats, no difference in immobility was found between treatments. In conclusion, two strains of rats with significantly different immobility profiles in the FST were obtained in a relatively short time, after only two generations. Infusions of both ALLO and IMI showed a strain-dependent antidepressant-like effect, being detected in the HI animals but not in the LI animals, which is in line with the clinical understanding that antidepressants have higher efficacy in more severe forms of depression.

Environmental enrichment reduces cocaine neurotoxicity during cocaine-conditioned place preference in male rats.

Environmental enrichment (EE) has a neuroprotective role and prevents the development of cocaine addiction behavior in rats. Studies showing the role of EE in cocaine toxicity are nonexistent. We hypothesized that rats exposed to EE are protected from cocaine-induced changes in the redox profile and DNA damage after undergoing conditioned place preference (CPP). Ten male Wistar rats were placed in EE cages equipped with toys, a ladder and tunnels, and ten were provided clean, standard laboratory housing (non-EE). EE and non-EE rats were randomly allocated to the classical CPP cocaine vs. saline (COC/Saline) group, where cocaine (15 mg/kg; i.p.) was tested alternately with saline. Afterwards, intracellular reactive species and antioxidant enzymes were evaluated and the comet essay was performed in the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus of rats. As expected, EE rats spent less time in the cocaine-paired chamber, and as a new result, less cocaine-induced DNA damage was observed in the two brain structures. Altogether, our results demonstrate that EE decreases neurotoxicity in brain regions linked to cocaine addiction but does not extinguish it completely.