Future trends of additive manufacturing in medical applications: An overview.

Additive Manufacturing (AM) has recently demonstrated significant medical progress. Due to advancements in materials and methodologies, various processes have been developed to cater to the medical sector's requirements, including bioprinting and 4D, 5D, and 6D printing. However, only a few studies have captured these emerging trends and their medical applications. Therefore, this overview presents an analysis of the advancements and achievements obtained in AM for the medical industry, focusing on the principal trends identified in the annual report of AM3DP.

Novel Positioning Feedback System as a Guidance in Bone Tumor Resection.

Need: Bone resection using customized 3D-printed guides can improve accuracy, but the technique is still associated with clinically significant errors.Technical solution: We developed an inexpensive optical feedback system (OFS) that compares intraoperative 2D camera images to the pre-operative plan, and accurately depicts the surgeon's guide placement prior to cutting, reducing the errors in resection.Proof of concept: We simulated wide resections of a bone sarcoma on 24 cadaver femurs using 3 cutting guide types. Guide placement was measured using the OFS and compared to CT-scans showing the actual guide position. We carried out a second, controlled study on 20 sawbones, comparing the accuracy of the final bone cuts with and without the surgeon actively using the OFS to adjust the guide position before cutting.Results: For cadavers, in 2 of 3 planes, the position of the jig recorded by the OFS closely matched its actual position, with an accuracy of .87° ± .65°(r = .94) and 1.2° ± 1.3°(r = .81) in the transverse and sagittal planes, respectively. In the second study, OFS increased accuracy of the final cut about the transverse and sagittal planes, respectively by 53.1% (P = .011)/54.7% (P = .04) and 33% (P = .051)/38% (P = .042) in terms of rotation and translation.Next steps: Developing the OFS as a mobile application to reduce the processing time and improve accessibility in the operating room.Conclusion: The OFS could accurately depict the guide placement on the bone and significantly improve the surgical accuracy of 3D printed jigs.

Anatomical Engineering and 3D Printing for Surgery and Medical Devices: International Review and Future Exponential Innovations.

Three-dimensional printing (3DP) has recently gained importance in the medical industry, especially in surgical specialties. It uses different techniques and materials based on patients' needs, which allows bioprofessionals to design and develop unique pieces using medical imaging provided by computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Therefore, the Department of Biology and Medicine and the Department of Physics and Engineering, at the Bioastronautics and Space Mechatronics Research Group, have managed and supervised an international cooperation study, in order to present a general review of the innovative surgical applications, focused on anatomical systems, such as the nervous and craniofacial system, cardiovascular system, digestive system, genitourinary system, and musculoskeletal system. Finally, the integration with augmented, mixed, virtual reality is analyzed to show the advantages of personalized treatments, taking into account the improvements for preoperative, intraoperative planning, and medical training. Also, this article explores the creation of devices and tools for space surgery to get better outcomes under changing gravity conditions.

3D-Printed Guides in Bone Tumor Resection: Studying Their Error and Determining a Safety Margin for Surgery.

3D-printed guides, which have recently been introduced in orthopedic oncology, improve resection accuracy compared with traditional bone resection methods, but there are inaccuracies associated with them. These inaccuracies could lead to disastrous outcomes such as positive tumor resection margins. In this Sawbone study, we sought to quantitatively investigate the margin of error for various jig types and to determine a "safety margin" that could serve as a guide for surgeons and jig engineers in creating 3D-printed jigs that would reduce the risk of potential disastrous results such as positive margins. Various 3D-printed jigs were used to simulate wide resection of a distal femoral bone sarcoma on Sawbone specimens by 10 individuals with no specific prior expertise in cutting guides. We developed a mathematical model using kinematic theory. We defined a safety margin as the amount of change in the osteotomy lines that must be incorporated into the jig design to ensure that the surgeon is at least 98% likely not to have a positive tumor margin. Experiments were conducted to determine the mean deviation experienced in placing cutting guides on the bones. The mean deviation for the four types of cutting guides ranged from 2.86 mm to 6.54 mm. We determined that a jig design should have a safety margin of 4.8 mm for standard guides and 8.65 mm for gusset guides to minimize the possibility of cutting into the tumor as a result of human error in guide placement. Further studies involving cadavers and patients are warranted. [Orthopedics. 2022;45(3):169-173.].

Correction to: Biomechanical properties of 3D-printed bone scaffolds are improved by treatment with CRFP.

CORRECTION TO: J ORTHOP SURG RES (2017) 12: 195. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1186/S13018-017-0700-2: In the original publication of this article [1] there was an error in one of the author names. In this publication the correct and incorrect name are indicated.

Biomechanical properties of 3D-printed bone scaffolds are improved by treatment with CRFP.

BACKGROUND: One of the major challenges in orthopedics is to develop implants that overcome current postoperative problems such as osteointegration, proper load bearing, and stress shielding. Current implant techniques such as allografts or endoprostheses never reach full bone integration, and the risk of fracture due to stress shielding is a major concern. To overcome this, a novel technique of reverse engineering to create artificial scaffolds was designed and tested. The purpose of the study is to create a new generation of implants that are both biocompatible and biomimetic. METHODS: 3D-printed scaffolds based on physiological trabecular bone patterning were printed. MC3T3 cells were cultured on these scaffolds in osteogenic media, with and without the addition of Calcitonin Receptor Fragment Peptide (CRFP) in order to assess bone formation on the surfaces of the scaffolds. Integrity of these cell-seeded bone-coated scaffolds was tested for their mechanical strength. RESULTS: The results show that cellular proliferation and bone matrix formation are both supported by our 3D-printed scaffolds. The mechanical strength of the scaffolds was enhanced by trabecular patterning in the order of 20% for compression strength and 60% for compressive modulus. Furthermore, cell-seeded trabecular scaffolds modulus increased fourfold when treated with CRFP. CONCLUSION: Upon mineralization, the cell-seeded trabecular implants treated with osteo-inductive agents and pretreated with CRFP showed a significant increase in the compressive modulus. This work will lead to creating 3D structures that can be used in the replacement of not only bone segments, but entire bones.

Prostate cancer markers: An update.

As the most common noncutaneous malignancy in American men, prostate cancer currently accounts for 29% of all diagnosed cancers, and ranks second as the cause of cancer fatality in American men. Prostatic cancer is rarely symptomatic early in its course and therefore disease presentation often implies local extension or even metastatic disease. Thus, it is extremely critical to detect and diagnose prostate cancer in its earliest stages, often prior to the presentation of symptoms. Three of the most common techniques used to detect prostate cancer are the digital rectal exam, the transrectal ultrasound, and the use of biomarkers. This review presents an update regarding the field of prostate cancer biomarkers and comments on future biomarkers. Although there is not a lack of research in the field of prostate cancer biomarkers, the discovery of a novel biomarker that may have the advantage of being more specific and effective warrants future scientific inquiry.

Improving the accuracy of wide resection of bone tumors and enhancing implant fit: A cadaveric study.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Customized three-dimensional (3-D) jigs have been shown to increase the accuracy of skeletal tumor resection in comparison to freehand techniques. However, the utility of these jigs in subsequently enhancing the fit of endoprosthetic implants has yet to be determined. We hypothesized that custom jigs would improve implant fit compared to freehand resection. METHODS: Nine matched pairs of cadaveric femurs were scanned by CT. The images then had 'virtual' tumors positioned on the distal medial femoral condyle and preoperative resection plans were generated. Custom implants were designed to fit into the resected spaces and 3-D printed. Similarly, customized 3-D jigs were designed and printed for half of the femurs. Resections were then performed using the jigs or freehand. The implants were positioned in the resected femurs and the accuracy-of-fit was quantitatively assessed by re-scanning the resected femurs and calculating the deviation from the implant (in degrees) for each of the 3 cutting planes. The results were then compared between jig and freehand resections. RESULTS: For the first plane, the jig resulted in less deviation than the freehand cut, but it did not achieve statistical significance. However, for the 2nd and 3rd planes, the jigs deviated 1.78° and 2.20° from the implants compared to 4.41° and 7.96° for the freehand cuts, both of which were statistically significant improvements (p = 0.038 and p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: In summary, customized 3-D jigs were shown to improve the accuracy-of-fit between implants and host bone, moving this technology closer to clinical implementation.