Clinical role of abbreviated and ultrafast mri in breast imaging.

Current breast cancer screening relies on mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis and breast ultrasound. In select populations, breast MRI is also of great utility. However, multiple factors limit widespread use of breast MRI for screening. Efforts have been made to increase the availability of breast MRI for screening, in large part due to the increased cancer detection rate of breast MRI compared to mammography. Techniques include shortening standard breast MRI protocols with the potential for accommodating MRI screening in a higher number of patients. This review will explain the role of abbreviated breast MRI and ultrafast breast MRI in breast imaging, and detail how these approaches differ from standard dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI. In addition, limitations and advantages of these techniques will also be discussed.

Update on Lobular Neoplasia.

Lobular neoplasia (LN) is a histopathologic entity that encompasses both lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) and atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH). Management of LN is known to be variable and institutionally dependent. The variability in approach after a diagnosis of LN at percutaneous breast biopsy derives in part from heterogeneity in the literature, resulting in a range of reported upgrade rates to malignancy after initial identification at percutaneous biopsy, and also from historical shifts in understanding of the natural history of LN. It has become increasingly recognized that not all LN is the same and that distinct variants of LN such as pleomorphic LCIS and florid LCIS have distinct natural histories and distinct likelihoods of upgrade to malignancy. In addition, it is also increasingly understood that appropriate management of LN relies on scrupulous radiologic-pathologic correlation. This review details the imaging features and histopathologic nature of ALH, classic-type LCIS, and the LCIS variants; addresses changes in the historical understanding of this entity contributing to confusion regarding its management; and discusses the importance of performing radiologic-pathologic correlation after percutaneous biopsy to help guide appropriate management steps when LN is encountered. In addition to the short-term implications of an LN diagnosis in terms of upgrade and surgical outcomes, the long-term implications of an LN diagnosis regarding risk of developing a later breast cancer are examined. ©RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available through the Online Learning Center.

Breast Cancer Screening Utilization and Outcomes in Women With Neurofibromatosis Type 1.

INTRODUCTION: Women with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) have up to a 5-fold increased risk for breast cancer before age 50 and a 3.5-fold increased risk of breast cancer overall. The purpose of our study was to assess breast cancer screening utilization and outcomes in this population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This IRB approved HIPAA compliant study retrospectively assessed consecutive NF1 patients (January 2012-December 2021) with recorded clinical visits and/or breast imaging. Patient demographics, risk factors, and screening mammogram and breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcomes were recorded. Descriptive statistics were obtained and standard breast screening measures were calculated. RESULTS: One hundred and eleven women (median age 43, range 30-82) were eligible for screening based on current NCCN guidelines. A total of 86% (95/111) of all patients and 80% (24/30) of patients under age 40 had at least 1 mammogram. In contrast, 28% (31/111) of all patients and 33% (25/76) of patients ages 30 to 50 had at least 1 screening MRI. Of 368 screening mammograms performed, 38 of 368 (10%) resulted in the recall, and 22 of 368 (6%) resulted in a biopsy. Of 48 screening MRIs performed, 19 of 48 (40%) short-term follow-ups and 12 of 48 (25%) biopsies were recommended. All 6 screen-detected cancers in our cohort were detected initially on screening mammograms. CONCLUSION: Results confirm the utility and performance of screening mammography in the NF1 population. The low utilization of MRI in our cohort limits the evaluation of outcomes via this modality and suggests there may be an education or interest gap among referrers and patients regarding supplemental screening recommendations.

Breast Cancer Screening in Survivors of Childhood Cancer.

Women who survived childhood cancers or cancers at a young age are at high risk for breast cancer later in life. The accentuated risk is notable among those treated at a young age with a high radiation dose but also extends to survivors treated with therapies other than or in addition to radiation therapy. The predisposing risk factors are complex. Advances in radiation therapy continue to curtail exposure, yet the risk of a second cancer has no dose threshold and a long latency period, and concurrent use of chemotherapy may have an additive effect on long-term risk of cancer. Early screening with annual mammography and MRI is recommended for chest radiation exposure of 10 Gy or greater, beginning 8 years after treatment or at age 25 years, whichever is later. However, there is a lack of recommendations for those at high risk without a history of radiation therapy. Because mortality after breast cancer among survivors is higher than in women with de novo breast cancer, and because there is a higher incidence of a second asynchronous breast cancer in survivors than that in the general population, regular screening is essential and is expected to improve mortality. However, awareness and continuity of care may be lacking in these young patients and is reflected in their poor screening attendance. The transition of care from childhood to adulthood for survivors requires age-targeted and lifelong strategies of education and risk prevention that are needed to improve long-term outcomes for these patients. © RSNA, 2023 See the invited commentary by Chikarmane in this issue. Quiz questions for this article are available through the Online Learning Center.

Predicting Upgrade of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ to Invasive Breast Cancer at Surgery With Ultrafast Imaging.

BACKGROUND. Biopsy-proven ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) lesions are often upgraded to invasive cancer at surgery. Therefore, accurate prediction of the likelihood of invasion is helpful for surgical planning, including the need for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). OBJECTIVE. The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether kinetic features of clinically available ultrafast MRI (UF-MRI) can predict upgrade of biopsy-proven DCIS to invasive cancer at surgical excision. METHODS. Consecutive patients with biopsy-proven pure DCIS lesions who underwent UF-MRI with conventional dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) and subsequently underwent surgery between August 2019 and January 2021 were identified. Patient and lesion characteristics, biopsy method and pathology, and lesion features on mammography, ultrasound, DCE-MRI, and UF-MRI were assessed to determine predictors of upgrade to invasive cancer. The Fisher exact test and Kruskal-Wallis test were used for association analysis. RESULTS. In 68 patients (median age, 52.0 years; range, 31-79 years) with 68 biopsy-proven pure DCIS lesions, 26 lesions (38%) were upgraded from in situ to invasive cancer. An upgrade of DCIS to invasive cancer was significantly associated with a shorter time to enhancement (TTE) on preoperative UF-MRI (p = .03), with a threshold of 11 seconds providing maximum specificity (50%) and sensitivity (76%) for upgrade. Larger lesion size on DCE-MRI (p = .001) and mammography (p = .04) was also significantly associated with upgrade; an optimal predictive threshold of 4.4 cm on DCE-MRI yielded sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 56%. No other specific variables were significantly associated with upgrade after surgery. Logistic regression of selected features combined with TTE produced a higher AUC (0.85) in predicting upgrade to invasive disease than did each factor alone, but this result was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION. Preoperative UF-MRI TTE and lesion size on DCE-MRI and mammography show potential in predicting upgrade of DCIS to invasive cancer at surgery. CLINICAL IMPACT. UF-MRI provides useful information that can be used in surgical planning, including determination of the need to perform SLNB.

New Horizons: Artificial Intelligence for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.

The use of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in breast cancer screening has become widely accepted, facilitating increased cancer detection and lower recall rates compared with those achieved by using full-field digital mammography (DM). However, the use of DBT, as compared with DM, raises new challenges, including a larger number of acquired images and thus longer interpretation times. While most current artificial intelligence (AI) applications are developed for DM, there are multiple potential opportunities for AI to augment the benefits of DBT. During the diagnostic steps of lesion detection, characterization, and classification, AI algorithms may not only assist in the detection of indeterminate or suspicious findings but also aid in predicting the likelihood of malignancy for a particular lesion. During image acquisition and processing, AI algorithms may help reduce radiation dose and improve lesion conspicuity on synthetic two-dimensional DM images. The use of AI algorithms may also improve workflow efficiency and decrease the radiologist's interpretation time. There has been significant growth in research that applies AI to DBT, with several algorithms approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for clinical implementation. Further development of AI models for DBT has the potential to lead to improved practice efficiency and ultimately improved patient health outcomes of breast cancer screening and diagnostic evaluation. See the invited commentary by Bahl in this issue. ©RSNA, 2022.

Breast Cancer Screening in Men.

Breast cancer screening has been highly successful in women in reducing mortality through early detection. In comparison, clinical detection of breast cancer remains the norm in men, and delay in diagnosis is reflected by a persistent survival disparity compared to women despite advances in modern therapy. Male breast cancer presents an interesting dilemma. While mammography is highly sensitive and specific for male breast cancer, routine screening is not justified by the overall low disease incidence. Yet there has been interest in leveraging mammography in targeted screening of men with identifiable risk factors to allow early detection, and early data may support this approach. The purpose of this article is to explore the potential utility of targeted breast cancer screening in men by examining unique clinical and biologic characteristics of male breast cancers that may lend themselves to mammographic detection. We will also discuss available evidence in screening outcomes in men and summarize recent updates in risk management recommendations in Society guidelines.

Health Disparity and Breast Cancer Outcomes in Asian Women.

Health disparities in Asian women are complex and multifactorial. Screening attendance is low among Asian women, regardless of nativity or acculturation, and breast cancer detection has decreased by more than half in this population during the COVID-19 pandemic. The follow-up rate after abnormal screening results is similarly poor among Asian women compared with that among other groups, often resulting in a delay of cancer diagnosis. Yet the incidence of breast cancer in Asian women is increasing in the United States, with no such increase observed in other racial and ethnic groups in recent years. The age distribution of breast cancer in Asian women is distinct and peaks in younger women, underscoring the importance of early screening. The predilection for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-enriched tumors may reflect the unique biologic characteristics of breast cancer among Asian subgroups, which are not well understood. Known biomarkers for breast cancer risk such as body mass index and mammographic density do not perform the same way in Asian women, as compared with other groups, owing to a lack of Asian population-specific data. Within that limitation, the association between body mass index and breast cancer is strongest in older Asian women, and the association between breast density and breast cancer is strongest in younger Asian women. There is an unmet need to improve breast cancer care in Asian women, a heterogeneous and growing population that is facing an increasing burden of breast cancer. An invited commentary by Leung is available online. ©RSNA, 2022.

Non-BRCA Early-Onset Breast Cancer in Young Women.

The incidence of breast cancer in younger women is rising. Although early-onset breast cancer is highly associated with biologically aggressive tumors such as triple-negative and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-positive cancers, the more recent increase is disproportionately driven by an increase in the incidence of luminal cancer. In particular, the increase in de novo stage IV disease and the inherent age-based poorer survival rate among younger women with even early-stage luminal cancers suggest underlying distinct biologic characteristics that are not well understood. Further contributing to the higher number of early-onset breast cancers is pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC), which is attributed to persistent increases in maternal age over time. Although guidelines for screening of patients who carry a BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutation are well established, this population comprises only a fraction of those with early-onset breast cancer. A lack of screening in most young patients precludes timely diagnosis, underscoring the importance of early education and awareness. The disproportionate disease burden in young women of certain racial and ethnic groups, which is further exacerbated by socioeconomic disparity in health care, results in worse outcomes. An invited commentary by Monticciolo is available online. ©RSNA, 2022.

Multiple Bilateral Circumscribed Masses at Screening Breast Ultrasound: Outcomes of New or Enlarging Masses at Follow-Up.

BACKGROUND. Breast screening ultrasound (US) has limited specificity but is increasingly performed because of widening state and federal legislation regarding breast density. There is a need for evidence-based management guidelines. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to assess outcomes of new or enlarging oval circumscribed parallel masses in the setting of multiple bilateral circumscribed masses (MBCM) at sequential rounds of US screening. METHODS. In this retrospective study of women found to have MBCM on screening breast US without mammography abnormalities, longitudinal review was performed to identify development of any new or enlarging or changing masses. Outcomes were recorded using biopsy results or minimum of 12 months of follow-up as reference standards. Lesion characteristics, BI-RADS classification, breast density, patient age, demographics, and risk factors were reviewed. Statistical analysis included multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS. There were 284 (2.4%) cases of MBCM in a total of 48,488 bilateral screening US examinations performed in 11,826 asymptomatic women between January 1, 2014, and July 31, 2019, that fit inclusion criteria. Of the 284 women (mean age, 46 years; range, 20-83 years), 150 (52.8%) subsequently developed 465 new, enlarging, and/or changing masses, 107 (23.0%) of which underwent biopsy. Of the 465 masses, 408 (87.7%) were oval circumscribed parallel masses and similar to other MBCM, and 57 (12.3%) were unique findings that were nonoval noncircumscribed masses. None of the new or enlarging oval circumscribed parallel masses were malignant. In total, the malignancy rate was 0% for women with MBCM with follow-up (median, 40.8 months; range, 12-75 months) and 0% for those that underwent biopsy (95% CI, 0-1.2%). Among women with concurrent MBCM and unique findings, four cancers were detected. Three were new irregular masses, and one previously oval mass changed in morphology to have new calcifications and an irregular border. A younger age was related to the likelihood of having enlarging masses (p < .001). CONCLUSION. In the setting of MBCM, new or enlarging oval circumscribed parallel masses are a common and benign event. Concurrent new irregular masses or previously oval masses that develop suspicious morphologic features should be carefully evaluated for malignancy. CLINICAL IMPACT. Breast radiologists who encounter new or enlarging oval circumscribed parallel masses with no suspicious morphologic change in the setting of MBCM can safely defer biopsies.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Transgender Breast Cancer Screening.

Breast cancer screening recommendations for transgender and gender nonconforming individuals are based on the sex assigned at birth, risk factors, and use of exogenous hormones. Insufficient evidence exists to determine whether transgender people undergoing hormone therapy have an overall lower, average, or higher risk of developing breast cancer compared to birth-sex controls. Furthermore, there are no longitudinal studies evaluating the efficacy of breast cancer screening in the transgender population. In the absence of definitive data, current evidence is based on data extrapolated from cisgender studies and a limited number of cohort studies and case reports published on the transgender community. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Impact of COVID-19 on Radiology Faculty - An Exacerbation of Gender Differences in Unpaid Home Duties and Professional Productivity.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic stresses the tenuous balance between domestic obligations and academic output for women across professions. Our investigation aims to evaluate the impact of the pandemic on the home duties and workplace productivity of academic radiologists with respect to gender. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 49-question survey was distributed to 926 members of Association of University Radiologists in October 2020. Several categories were addressed: demographics; workplace changes; stress levels and personal experiences with illness; time spent on domestic obligations; and perception of productivity during COVID-19. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4 software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). RESULTS: A total of 96 responses across 30 states, 53.1% male and 46.9% female were received. Women report spending more time on unpaid domestic duties than men prior to COVID-19, with men spending a median of 5-10 h/wk and women spending a median of 10-15 h/wk (p = 0.043). With pandemic onset, both genders reported that women did more of the homecare, when not split equally. Women with young children reported a significant decrease in work-from-home productivity compared to men with young children (p = 0.007). Men reported they had more time to be productive compared to women (p = 0.012). CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic threatens to disrupt the advancement of women in radiology leadership roles by creating disparate effects on productivity due to increased workloads at home for women. This could potentially lead to decreases in promotions and research productivity in years to come that far outlast the acute phases of the pandemic.

Breast MRI for Evaluation of Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy.

Neoadjuvant therapy is increasingly being used to treat early-stage triple-negative and human epidermal growth factor 2-overexpressing breast cancers, as well as locally advanced and inflammatory breast cancers. The rationales for neoadjuvant therapy are to shrink tumor size and potentially decrease the extent of surgery, to serve as an in vivo test of response to therapy, and to reveal prognostic information for the patient. MRI is the most accurate modality to demonstrate response to therapy and to help ensure accurate presurgical planning. Changes in lesion diameter, volume, and enhancement are used to predict complete response, partial response, or nonresponse to therapy. However, residual disease may be overestimated or underestimated at MRI. Fibrosis, necrotic tumors, and residual benign masses may be causes of overestimation of residual disease. Nonmass lesions, invasive lobular carcinoma, hormone receptor-positive tumors, nonconcentric shrinkage patterns, the use of antiangiogenic therapy, and late-enhancing foci may be causes of underestimation of residual disease. In patients with known axillary lymph node metastasis, neoadjuvant therapy may be followed by targeted axillary dissection to avoid the potential morbidity associated with an axillary lymph node dissection. Diffusion-weighted imaging, radiomics, machine learning, and deep learning methods are under investigation to improve MRI accuracy in predicting treatment response.©RSNA, 2021.