Does software optimization influence the radiologists' perception in low dose paediatric pelvic examinations?

PURPOSE: To investigate whether software optimisation can improve an observers' perception of image quality in low dose paediatric pelvic examinations. METHODS: Twenty-five consecutive patients (3-7 years old) were referred for a pelvic digital radiography (DR) examination. They were prospectively enrolled in the study over a 3-month period. Images were taken at 80 kV and 2-4 mAs depending on pelvic thickness (9-15 cm). A small focal spot, 130 cm SID: 10 cm air gap and 1 mm Al and 0.2 mm Cu additional filtration were also utilised. Images were acquired on a Canon DR detector and optimised using five different combinations of the multi-frequency processing software (Canon DR system version NE, Version 7.1 with SPECTRA) to comply with the ALARA principle. Image quality was blindly evaluated using the subjective Visual Grading Analysis (VGA) by five experienced musculoskeletal radiologists, including the evaluation of six anatomical image quality criteria (scored from 1 to 5). RESULTS: Consistently, the VGA results indicated that by using software optimised parameters, image quality was suitable for diagnosis in 48-71% of all images. Based on a VGC analysis all software optimised images did have significant better image quality then the one with just the clinical settings. Noise reduction was the software setting which influenced the image quality the most, area under the curve (AUC) of 0.8172 95%CI 0.7953-0.8375. CONCLUSION: Software optimisation improve the radiologists' perception of image quality and should thus be thoroughly considered within clinical practise. Noise reduction is the software parameter which has the greatest influence.

Clinical magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopic findings in knees: a comparative prospective study of meniscus anterior cruciate ligament and cartilage lesions.

We compared the diagnostic and predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical findings with arthroscopy in 61 knees in a prospective study. In meniscal tears, the accuracy and positive predictive value of MRI was found to be nearly twice that of clinical examination. The sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value of MRI were comparable to the figures found in other studies. We recommend MRI as a clarifying diagnostic tool when a clinical examination indicates a lesion of the meniscus. In our study, the clinical relevance of MRI in anterior cruciate ligament lesions and especially in cartilage lesions was more doubtful. The combination of clinical and MRI findings would reduce the number of blank arthroscopies to 5%. MRI is a valuable diagnostic tool in planning the type of anesthesia and treatment, and could significantly reduce the need for a second arthroscopy.