HIV-1 pol replication capacity predicts disease progression.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of pol replication capacity on the natural history of HIV-1 infection. DESIGN: Pol replication capacity was measured using a recombinant virus single cycle assay on baseline plasma specimens from subjects enrolled in the Hemophilia Growth and Development Study. SETTING: Children and adolescents with hemophilia and HIV-1 infection were enrolled at multiple sites across the USA into a natural history study. PARTICIPANTS: The Hemophilia Growth and Development Study enrolled 207 HIV-1-infected hemophiliacs between 6 and 19 years of age in 1989 and 1990. Subjects were followed every 6 months through 1997 with pol replication capacity measurements available from 128 of the subjects. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A univariate model defined the relationship between pol replication capacity and HIV-1 RNA and CD4 T-cell number. A random effects model assessed the ability of this measure to predict CD4 T-cell decline over time and a Cox proportional hazards model and Kaplan-Meier analyses defined how it predicts clinical progression. RESULTS: Pol replication capacity measures correlated with baseline HIV-1 RNA, R = 0.189 (P = 0.03) and CD4 T-cell number, -0.197 (P = 0.03). It also independently predicted CD4 T-cell decline over time and progression to AIDS. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that pol replication capacity independently influences the natural history of HIV-1 infection.

A randomized, prospective study of phenotype susceptibility testing versus standard of care to manage antiretroviral therapy: CCTG 575.

OBJECTIVE: To assess phenotype susceptibility testing (PHENO) with standard of care (SOC) to improve antiretroviral therapy. DESIGN: A prospective, multicenter study of 238 patients taking a stable antiretroviral regimen for > 6 months, with one or two protease inhibitors (PI) and entry HIV RNA > 400 copies/ml. METHOD: Patients were randomized to receive or not receive PHENO results for selecting antiretroviral regimens. Primary outcome was HIV RNA measures. RESULTS: At baseline, median CD4 cell count was 277 x 10 cells/l and HIV RNA was 10 000 copies/ml; 76% had not taken a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor drug (NNRTI). There were significant differences between the groups in selection of baseline nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI). At month 6, reduction in HIV RNA was 0.71 and 0.69 log10 copies/ml for PHENO and SOC, respectively; the proportion with < 400 copies/ml (48%) was the same for both groups. No differences were seen at month 12. In a subgroup with resistance to four or more PI, 50% of the PHENO versus 17% of the SOC had HIV RNA < 400 copies/ml at month 6 (P = 0.02). The number of NNRTI and PI, but not NRTI, in the regimen that were active by phenotype at baseline was a strong independent predictor of viral suppression (P < 0.006). Use of alternative NRTI sensitivity cut-offs improved their predictive value. CONCLUSIONS: Although virological outcome was similar in both groups, the potential benefit of PHENO was seen in patients with more resistant virus. Lack of appropriate cut-offs may have partially accounted for the lack of benefit from PHENO and demonstrated the need to identify clinically relevant sensitivity cut-off points.

Longitudinal assessment of immune response and viral characteristics in HIV-infected patients with prolonged CD4(+)/viral load discordance.

Although suppression of HIV-1 RNA below the limit of detection is associated with optimal outcomes, many patients can maintain or increase their CD4(+) count for prolonged time periods in the presence of persistent low-level viremia. We followed seven patients with prolonged (>5 years) discordant CD4(+)/viral load (VL) responses on protease inhibitor (PI)-based highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) prospectively for 1 year to assess evolution of immune function, viral phenotype, replication capacity (RC), and resistance profile. Immune function was assessed by qualitative and quantitative measurement of cellular activation (CD38(+)HLA-DR(+) and CD38 antibodies bound per cell), and the interferon (IFN)-() ELISpot assay. Presence of syncytium-inducing (SI) or nonsyncytium-inducing (NSI) viral strains was determined by MT-2 cell culture. RC was measured by a modified rapid recombinant virus assay. The resistance profile was characterized by both genotypic and phenotypic analysis. Over the year of follow-up, IFN-() production to gag persisted, responses to other HIV antigens increased, and markers of cellular activation did not change. NSI virus predominated. The genotypic (GSS) and phenotypic (PSS) susceptibility scores remained stable. Evolution of RC was variable over the year of follow-up, but the RC of viruses remained well below that of wild-type clinical isolates. Thus, CD4(+)/VL discordance can be maintained for periods exceeding 5 years in some patients receiving PI-based HAART without significant evolution of HIV resistance.

Effects of the G190A substitution of HIV reverse transcriptase on phenotypic susceptibility of patient isolates to delavirdine.

BACKGROUND: Cross resistance is common among the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs). G190A appears in 5-15% of the patients treated with nevirapine or efavirenz who develop clinical resistance. OBJECTIVES: In this study we investigated the effect of G190A and other NNRTI substitutions on the phenotypic susceptibility to this class of drugs. STUDY DESIGN: We identified 15 individuals, who after treatment with NNRTIs (nevirapine or efavirenz; median exposure of 20 months), developed isolated G190A, G190A in combination with K103N, or K103N alone. Phenotypic and genotypic analyses of stored plasma specimens were performed before and after the mutations occurred to assess NNRTI susceptibility. RESULTS: All isolates that developed only G190A substitution became less susceptible to nevirapine (median: 125-fold) and efavirenz (median: 10-fold) but were 2.5-fold more sensitive to delavirdine (Wilcoxon P = 0.06). In the group with only K103N substitution, acquisition of resistance to all NNRTIs was observed. In the group with the double substitutions, G190A and K103N, delavirdine susceptibility decreased 13-fold, while resistance to nevirapine and efavirenz decreased by 239- and 154-folds, respectively (Kruskal-Wallis H P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that the presence of a G190A substitution attenuates the phenotypic resistance associated with a K103N substitution, although resistance is still present. The in vivo significance of the increased phenotypic susceptibility to delavirdine is not known but could be evaluated in a clinical trial.

HIV-1 drug resistance in subjects with advanced HIV-1 infection in whom antiretroviral combination therapy is failing: a substudy of AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocol 388.

We evaluated phenotypic and genotypic markers of drug resistance in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) at the time of virologic failure (VF) in subjects in the AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocol 388 (ACTG 388) who received lamivudine-zidovudine (or lamivudine-stavudine) and either indinavir, efavirenz-indinavir, or nelfinavir-indinavir. At VF, phenotypically susceptible HIV-1 was found in 55% of subjects in the nelfinavir-indinavir arm, compared with 22% in the indinavir arm (P=.006). Phenotypic resistance to lamivudine was less common in the efavirenz-indinavir arm (33% of subjects; P=.002) and the nelfinavir-indinavir arm (43%; P=.003), compared with the indinavir arm (78%). Isolated phenotypic resistance to efavirenz at VF occurred in HIV-1 recovered from 33% of subjects in the efavirenz-indinavir arm; 24% of the subjects had HIV-1 with both efavirenz and lamivudine resistance. Results of genotypic tests were similar. The lower frequency of resistance in the nelfinavir-indinavir arm likely reflects decreased drug exposure that is due to intolerance, which is consistent with the lower potency and tolerability of this combination in ACTG 388. The lower frequency of lamivudine resistance in the efavirenz-indinavir arm is consistent with reports in other studies of potent regimens. Thus, although dual resistance to efavirenz and lamivudine occurred at VF in the efavirenz-indinavir arm, this risk was relatively low when evaluated in the context of the potency and tolerability of this regimen.

Higher CD4+ T cell counts associated with low viral pol replication capacity among treatment-naive adults in early HIV-1 infection.

BACKGROUND: Infection with primary drug-resistant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) has been associated with higher CD4(+) T cell counts in drug-naive patients, suggesting that altered viral pol replication capacity (RC) associated with drug resistance diminishes immune injury in vivo, independent of exposure to drugs. METHODS: Virus replication over a single cycle was measured by use of a viral test vector containing patient-derived HIV-1 protease and reverse transcriptase gene segments. RESULTS: Among 191 recently infected patients, pol RC ranged widely, with only 6% of the variance explained by drug-resistance mutations. Patients infected with a virus with a low pol RC (

Genetic basis of hypersusceptibility to protease inhibitors and low replicative capacity of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 strains in primary infection.

The initial virus strains from as many as 12% of individuals with primary human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection have a 50% inhibitory concentration

Broad nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor cross-resistance in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 clinical isolates.

Nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) are important components of most antiretroviral combination treatment regimens. Using a large collection of clinical isolates, we characterized patterns of cross-resistance among all NRTIs. Drugs were grouped by the effect of the M184V mutation: susceptibility to group 1 drugs (zidovudine, stavudine, tenofovir, and adefovir) increased when M184V was present, whereas susceptibility to group 2 drugs (didanosine, zalcitabine, abacavir, and lamivudine) decreased. Significant cross-resistance was observed among all NRTIs and was most notable when samples with or without M184V were analyzed separately. An increasing number of thymidine-analogue mutations (TAMs) was associated with a progressive reduction in drug susceptibility for all NRTIs. The modulating effect of M184I/V on drug susceptibility was present regardless of the number of TAMs. The broad range of susceptibility observed for viruses containing the same number of TAMs indicates that the genetic correlates of NRTI resistance remain to be fully elucidated.

Prolonged CD4+ cell/virus load discordance during treatment with protease inhibitor-based highly active antiretroviral therapy: immune response and viral control.

Mechanisms that underly discordant CD4+ cell/virus load (VL) responses in patients who receive highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) were studied in 30 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients, in 3 groups. Discordant responders maintained CD4+ cell levels >200/mm(3) with stable or increasing trend, despite sustained VLs of 500-5000 copies/mL, for >2 years. Treatment-success patients had CD4+ cell counts >200/mm(3) with stable or increasing trend and VLs <50 copies/mL, for >2 years. Treatment-failure patients initially responded to HAART, followed by decreasing CD4+ cell counts and increasing VLs. Interferon-gamma production to gag and noncytolytic CD8+ cell suppressive activity were greater in discordant responders. Cellular activation was greatest in patients with treatment failure. All discordant responders had non-syncytium-inducing (CCR5-tropic) viruses. Viruses from discordant responders and from patients with treatment failure had extensive resistance mutations; discordant responders had significantly lower viral replication capacities. These findings suggest that discordant responses may be related to enhanced HIV-directed immune responses, diminished cellular activation, decreased viral replication capacity, and preservation of non-syncytium-inducing virus strains.

Transmission fitness of drug-resistant human immunodeficiency virus and the prevalence of resistance in the antiretroviral-treated population.

Although the prevalence of drug-resistant strains in primary human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in North America has recently increased, their transmission fitness remains unknown. The present study estimated the frequency of transmission of drug-resistant HIV from patients receiving antiretroviral therapy using retrospective surveys of clinic data. It revealed that resistant virus was transmitted only approximately 20% as frequently as expected from these patients. Individuals with primary resistance may become a significant source of resistant strains.

Nucleoside and nucleotide analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors: a clinical review of antiretroviral resistance.

Although advances in highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) have made long-term suppression of HIV an achievable goal of therapy, a substantial proportion of first-line regimens will eventually fail. Successful longterm treatment requires consideration of downstream treatment options at the time of initiating or changing regimens. An understanding of the patterns and interactions of resistance mutations, and the appropriate use of genotypic and phenotypic testing is an important component of successful drug sequencing. Resistance to multiple nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) may result from several genotypically distinct pathways, including the Q151M (151 complex), the 69 insertion complex, two distinct thymidine analogue mutational pathways and the K65R mutation. Knowledge of the clinical implications of these and other resistance pathways, as well as the antagonism or synergy between mutations, helps guide individualized treatment choices from initial therapy in the treatment-naive patient to salvage therapy in the highly treatment-experienced individual. The development of effective sequencing strategies will depend upon the continued understanding of drug resistance mutation patterns and their associations with specific HAART combinations. This review summarizes research advances that further the understanding of nucleoside and nucleotide analogue resistance mutations, and their interplay.

Subtle decreases in stavudine phenotypic susceptibility predict poor virologic response to stavudine monotherapy in zidovudine-experienced patients.

To identify the level of phenotypic susceptibility for stavudine (d4T) that is associated with a diminished virologic response to d4T therapy, phenotyping was performed on archived baseline HIV isolates from 26 subjects who received d4T monotherapy in AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) 302 who had received >3 years of prior zidovudine (ZDV) monotherapy. Seven of 26 subjects achieved a virologic response of >0.3-log10 copies/mL reduction in plasma HIV RNA after 8 weeks of d4T. Responders had lower fold changes in susceptibility to d4T (1.0 vs. 1.6, p=.003), lower baseline viral loads (4.26 vs. 4.74 log10 copies/mL, p=.004), and fewer thymidine analog mutations (TAMS) (1 vs. 2, p=.059). Lower baseline d4T fold change in susceptibility predicted greater reductions in HIV RNA from baseline to week 8 after adjusting for baseline HIV RNA, ZDV fold change in susceptibility, and number of TAMS. Using the same phenotypic assay, drug susceptibility among 240 antiretroviral-naive patients found all HIV isolates to have d4T susceptibility

Phenotypic and genotypic HIV-1 drug resistance assays provide complementary information.

To determine the extent to which genotype (GT) or phenotype (PT) methods provide HIV-1 drug resistance information that is overlapping or complementary, both tests were performed on 1378 patient plasma samples. Discordance, defined as determination of reduced susceptibility measured by PT but sensitivity by GT (PT-R/GT-S), or vice versa (PT-S/GT-R), was common: 83, 62, 43, and 28% of samples with evidence of drug resistance had at least 1, 2, 3, or 4 drugs discordant, respectively. Three types of discordance were observed: PT-R/GT-S, and PT-S/GT-R with or without the presence of mixtures at resistance-associated positions (25%, 34%, and 41% of all discordance, respectively). After accounting for mixtures, results for didanosine (30%), zalcitabine (18%), tenofovir (17%), abacavir (14%), lamivudine (12%), and amprenavir (11%) were discordant in >or= 10% of samples. PT-S/GT-R results were most common for didanosine and zalcitabine, whereas PT-R/GT-S results were most common for lamivudine and amprenavir. PT provided quantitative assessment of the degree of reduced susceptibility and identified reduced susceptibility (PT-R/GT-S) or normal susceptibility (PT-S/GT-R) that was not recognized by the GT interpretation algorithm. GT provided valuable information when mixtures were present and minor populations of drug resistant virus were not detected by phenotyping (PT-S/GT-R results). This demonstrates the complementary nature of information provided by PT and GT tests and suggests that their combined use can provide additional clinically-relevant information.

The clinical relevance of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor hypersusceptibility: a prospective cohort analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical significance of hypersusceptibility to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI). DESIGN: Analysis of a prospective clinical trial cohort. PATIENTS: NNRTI-naive patients failing a stable antiretroviral regimen. MEASUREMENTS: HIV phenotype, HIV RNA, and CD4 cell counts were prospectively collected after patients changed to a new regimen. Hypersusceptibility to NNRTI was defined as a fold-change (FC) in IC50 (inhibitory concentration of 50%) of < 0.4. RESULTS: The 177 patients had a mean HIV RNA of 4.1 log10 copies/ml, CD4 cell count of 322 x 10(6) cells/l and 41 months of prior antiretroviral treatment. Hypersusceptibility to one or more NNRTI was present in 29%. Both longer duration and reduced susceptibility to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors were associated with efavirenz hypersusceptibility (P < 0.05). NNRTI-containing regimens were initiated in 106 patients at baseline. The mean change in log HIV RNA after 6 months was greater for patients with hypersusceptibility (-1.2 log10 copies/ml; n = 21) than in patients without (-0.8 log10 copies/ml; n = 77) (P = 0.016). Differences persisted to month 12 (P = 0.023). Multiple linear regression models confirmed that hypersusceptibility to NNRTI was a significant independent predictor of the magnitude of early (months 1-4) HIV RNA reduction, after accounting for the baseline HIV RNA and the number of drugs to which the patient's virus was susceptible (P < 0.02). CD4 cell increases (months 4-10) were 28- 60 x 10(6) cells/l greater in patients with hypersusceptible virus (P < or = 0.1). CONCLUSION: NNRTI hypersusceptibility occurred in more than 20% of nucleoside-experienced patients and was associated with greater reduction of HIV RNA and increase in CD4 cells.

Hypersusceptibility to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in HIV-1: clinical, phenotypic and genotypic correlates.

OBJECTIVE: The routine use of phenotypic drug resistance testing in patient management has revealed that many HIV-1 strains possess significantly increased drug sensitivity, or 'hypersusceptibility' compared with wild-type viruses. This study describes hypersusceptibility to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI) and was designed to determine the prevalence of and viral characteristics associated with NNRTI hypersusceptibility in patient-derived viruses. METHODS: Retrospective analyses were performed on a large clinical laboratory dataset containing phenotypic drug susceptibility and genotypic sequence results from HIV-1 patient isolates. Genetically engineered viruses were used to confirm the role of certain nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI)-resistance mutations in NNRTI hypersusceptibility. RESULTS: Hypersusceptibility to delavirdine, efavirenz and nevirapine was detected in 10.7, 10.8 and 8.0% of more than 17,000 consecutive plasma samples submitted for phenotypic susceptibility testing. In analyses limited to a subset of viruses derived from patients with known treatment histories, NNRTI hypersusceptibility was observed significantly more frequently among viruses from NRTI experienced/NNRTI-naive patients compared with viruses from NRTI/NNRTI-naive patients. Significant inverse correlations between NRTI and NNRTI susceptibility exist among the viruses from NRTI-experienced patients. Analyses of viruses classified according to their NNRTI susceptibility identified 18 positions in reverse transcriptase where substitutions were significantly associated with NNRTI hypersusceptibility. CONCLUSIONS: NNRTI hypersusceptibility is common among patient HIV-1 isolates, especially in NRTI-resistant viruses. Genotypic correlates of hypersusceptibility are complex and not easily defined by a simple analysis of NRTI-associated resistance mutations. NNRTI hypersusceptibility may provide an explanation for the superior virologic response to NNRTI-containing salvage regimens observed in NRTI-experienced patients in several clinical trials.

Antiretroviral-drug resistance among patients recently infected with HIV.

BACKGROUND: Among persons in North America who are newly infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), the prevalence of transmitted resistance to antiretroviral drugs has been estimated at 1 to 11 percent. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of susceptibility to antiretroviral drugs before treatment and drug-resistance mutations in HIV in plasma samples from 377 subjects with primary HIV infection who had not yet received treatment and who were identified between May 1995 and June 2000 in 10 North American cities. Responses to treatment could be evaluated in 202 subjects. RESULTS: Over the five-year period, the frequency of transmitted drug resistance increased significantly. The frequency of high-level resistance to one or more drugs (indicated by a value of more than 10 for the ratio of the 50 percent inhibitory concentration [IC50] for the subject's virus to the IC50 for a drug-sensitive reference virus) increased from 3.4 percent during the period from 1995 to 1998 to 12.4 percent during the period from 1999 to 2000 (P=0.002), and the frequency of multidrug resistance increased from 1.1 percent to 6.2 percent (P=0.01). The frequency of resistance mutations detected by sequence analysis increased from 8.0 percent to 22.7 percent (P<0.001), and the frequency of multidrug resistance detected by sequence analysis increased from 3.8 percent to 10.2 percent (P=0.05). Among subjects infected with drug-resistant virus, the time to viral suppression after the initiation of antiretroviral therapy was longer (P=0.05), and the time to virologic failure was shorter (P=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of new HIV infections that involve drug-resistant virus is increasing in North America. Initial antiretroviral therapy is more likely to fail in patients who are infected with drug-resistant virus. Testing for resistance to drugs before therapy begins is now indicated even for recently infected patients.

Time trends in primary HIV-1 drug resistance among recently infected persons.

CONTEXT: Transmission of multiclass drug-resistant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) may increase with wider use of antiretroviral therapy. OBJECTIVE: To determine trends in prevalence of HIV-1 drug resistance among recently infected individuals in a geographic area with a high penetration of antiviral treatment. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Consecutive case series of 225 patients referred to a San Francisco, Calif, hospital with recent HIV-1 infection from June 1996 through June 2001. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Time trends in the prevalence of genotypic and phenotypic primary drug resistance. RESULTS: Mutations associated with resistance to nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) steadily increased from 0% in 1996-1997 to 12 (13.2%) in 2000-2001 (P =.01). There was 1 mutation associated with protease inhibitor resistance in 1996-1997 (2.5%) and there were 7 (7.7%) in 2000-2001 (P =.25). Genotypic resistance to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) initially decreased and then returned to prior levels (P =.007 for test of homogeneity). Genotypic resistance to 2 or more classes of drugs increased from 1 (2.5%) to 12 (13.2%) (P =.004), but only 1 infection (1.2%) in the latter period was resistant to all 3 classes of agents (P =.58). Primary phenotypic resistance decreased for NRTIs from 21% to 6.2% (P =.03) and increased for NNRTIs from 0 to 8 (9.9%) (P =.02). Phenotypic resistance increased for protease inhibitors from 2.6% to 6.2% (P =.32). Median time to virologic suppression (<500 copies/mL) during therapy was 12 weeks for patients with genotypic evidence of resistance compared with 5 weeks for patients with drug-sensitive infections (P =.02). CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of primary resistance to NNRTIs is increasing, although resistance to all available classes of antiretroviral therapy remains rare. Genotypic resistance testing in recently infected persons predicts time to viral suppression during therapy.

CD4+ T cell kinetics and activation in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients who remain viremic despite long-term treatment with protease inhibitor-based therapy.

T cell dynamics were studied in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients who continued using antiretroviral therapy despite detectable plasma viremia (RNA copies >2500 /mL). CD4(+) cell fractional replacement rates, measured by the deuterated glucose technique, were lower in treated patients with detectable viremia than in untreated patients and were similar to those in patients with undetectable viremia. Cell cycle and activation markers exhibited similar trends. For any level of viremia, CD4(+) cell fractional replacement rates were lower in patients with drug-resistant virus than in patients with wild-type virus, which suggests that the resistant variant was less virulent. Interruption of treatment in patients with drug-resistant viremia resulted in increased CD4(+) cell activation, increased CD4(+) cell turnover, and decreased CD4(+) cell counts. These data indicate that partial virus suppression reduces CD4(+) cell turnover and activation, thereby resulting in sustained CD4(+) cell gains, and that measurements of T cell dynamics may provide an in vivo marker of viral virulence.