RESUMO
The typical phenotype of hemophilia A (HA) is that of frequent bleeding episodes, up to several per month, unless prophylactic factor VIII (FVIII) replacement or alternatives are given. Related bleeding may be heightened in severity or frequency by co-morbid bleeding disorders. Based on the reported prevalence of von Willebrand disease (VWD) of up to 1% of the general population, the co-existence of HA and VWD occurs, but is likely less recognized. Prophylactic FVIII replacement may or may not adequately prevent bleeding in persons with HA and mild VWD, and plasma-derived concentrates containing FVIII and von Willebrand factor (VWF) may be used for more successful bleeding prophylaxis. However, therapy adherence remains problematic for many reasons, one being treatment via intravenous access. Emicizumab is a nonfactor subcutaneous prophylactic therapy for HA that may overcome this concern. We describe three patients, with severe HA and VWD, for whom regular FVIII/VWF prophylaxis was deemed inadequate. FVIII/VWF prophylaxis was replaced with weekly prophylactic injections of the bispecific monoclonal antibody, emicizumab. When the patients were transitioned to emicizumab, all experienced a significant reduction in their annualized bleed rate (ABR). Although the mechanism of action does not directly affect or replace VWF function, emicizumab may be an effective prophylaxis alternative to FVIII/VWF concentrate in patients with concomitant severe HA and VWD.
RESUMO
The rollout of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine is underway, and millions have already been vaccinated. At least 25 reports of "immune thrombocytopenia" (ITP) or "thrombocytopenia" following the Moderna or Pfizer vaccine have been added to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) in the US. ITP is a rare but known complication of several vaccinations. SARS-CoV-2 vaccine is new, with a novel mechanism of action, and understanding the epidemiology, clinical manifestations, treatment success and natural history of post-vaccination thrombocytopenia is evolving. We report a 74-year-old man who developed refractory thrombocytopenia within one day of receiving the Moderna SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Several hours after vaccination, he developed significant epistaxis and cutaneous purpura. Severe thrombocytopenia was documented the following day, and he developed extremity weakness and encephalopathy with facial muscle weakness. Over a 14-day period, thrombocytopenia was treated first with high dose dexamethasone, intravenous immunoglobulin, platelet transfusions, rituximab, plasma exchange (for presumed acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (AIDP)), and four daily doses of the thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RA) eltrombopag (Promacta™), without a platelet response. Three days later, he received the TPO-RA romiplostim (Nplate™). Five days later, his platelet count began to rise and by post-vaccination day 25, his platelet count was in the normal range. Thrombocytopenia was refractory to frontline and second-line treatment. The eventual rise in his platelet count suggests that one or both TPO-RAs may have impacted platelet recovery. Possibly, but less likely given the temporality, the drug-induced thrombocytopenia was subsiding. The aggressive use of immunosuppressive treatment may jeopardize the intended purpose of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, and earlier use of non-immunosuppressive second-line treatment for vaccine-related severe thrombocytopenia, such as with TPO-RAs, should be considered. While it is imperative to continue the global vaccination program, vigilance to the occurrence of post-vaccination severe thrombocytopenia is warranted.