Sustained employment, work disability and work functioning in CKD patients: a cross-sectional survey study.

INTRODUCTION: Kidney failure negatively affects opportunities for work participation. Little is known about work functioning of employed CKD patients. This study investigates work-related outcomes, and examines associations between patient characteristics and employment status. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional survey study in nine nephrology outpatient clinics in the Netherlands among working age (18-67 years) CKD Stage G3b-G5, dialysis and transplant patients (n = 634; mean age 53.4 years (SD 10); 53% male; 47% Stage G3b-G5, 9% dialysis, 44% transplantation). We assessed employment status, work disability, work-related characteristics (i.e., work situation, working hours, job demands), work functioning (i.e., perceived ability to work, productivity loss, limitations in work), work environment (i.e., work accommodations, psychosocial work environment), as well as health status and fatigue. RESULTS: Sixty-five percent were employed reporting moderate work ability. Of those, 21% received supplementary work disability benefits, 37% were severely fatigued, 7% expected to drop out of the workforce, and 49% experienced CKD-related work limitations. Work accommodations included reduced working hours, working at a slower pace, adjustment of work tasks or work schedule, and working from home. Multivariable analysis of sustained employment showed associations with younger age, male gender, higher level of education, better general and physical health and pre-emptive transplantation. Transplant patients had the highest work ability and highest expectation to maintain work. Dialysis patients had the highest productivity loss and perceived the most limitations regarding functioning in work. Stage G3b-G5 patients reported the lowest social support from colleagues and highest conflict in work and private life. CONCLUSIONS: Employed CKD patients experience difficulties regarding functioning in work requiring adjustment of work or partial work disability. In addition to dialysis patients, stage G3b-G5 patients are vulnerable concerning sustained employment and work functioning.

Practical Value of Anti-Xa Activity in the Evaluation of Extracorporeal Circuit Anticoagulation during Haemodialysis: Results of a Cross-Sectional Single-Centre Study.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Anticoagulation of the extracorporeal circuit is essential for adequate haemodialysis (HD). Low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) are safe and sufficient towards achieving this goal. In the Netherlands, dosage is based on bodyweight and adjusted based on clinical events. LMWH levels during dialysis can be quantified through measurement of the anti-Xa activity and a target range of 0.5-1.0 IU/mL has been proposed. We aimed to evaluate the practical value of the anti-Xa activity to guide LMWH dosage in HD patients. Additionally, the value of the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) was investigated. METHODS: All prevalent adult HD patients of our dialysis clinic were included. APTT and anti-Xa activity were measured before, during and after 2 dialysis sessions. Clinical and dialysis characteristics, including LMWH dosage, were derived from digital patient charts. RESULTS: Our final study cohort consisted of 83 patients. LMWH dosage during dialysis was appropriate for bodyweight in 61% of cases, of which 50% reached an anti-Xa activity within the putative target range of 0.5-1.0 IU/mL. Forty-six percent of patients had an anti-Xa activity >1.0 IU/mL. Anti-Xa levels during and after dialysis were significantly correlated (r = 0.803, p < 0.01). No thrombotic or haemorrhagic complications were observed in this study. Correlation of APTT with anti-Xa activity was poor. CONCLUSION: Anti-Xa activity measurements during dialysis can identify patients in whom LMWH dosage should be lowered in a subsequent dialysis session. Whether such an intervention leads to a decrease in haemorrhagic complications needs to be evaluated in prospective studies.