Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Comput Methods Programs Biomed ; 118(3): 322-9, 2015 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25682737

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Post-genomic clinical trials require the participation of multiple institutions, and collecting data from several hospitals, laboratories and research facilities. This paper presents a standard-based solution to provide a uniform access endpoint to patient data involved in current clinical research. METHODS: The proposed approach exploits well-established standards such as HL7 v3 or SPARQL and medical vocabularies such as SNOMED CT, LOINC and HGNC. A novel mechanism to exploit semantic normalization among HL7-based data models and biomedical ontologies has been created by using Semantic Web technologies. RESULTS: Different types of queries have been used for testing the semantic interoperability solution described in this paper. The execution times obtained in the tests enable the development of end user tools within a framework that requires efficient retrieval of integrated data. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed approach has been successfully tested by applications within the INTEGRATE and EURECA EU projects. These applications have been deployed and tested for: (i) patient screening, (ii) trial recruitment, and (iii) retrospective analysis; exploiting semantically interoperable access to clinical patient data from heterogeneous data sources.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Biologia Computacional , Sistemas de Gerenciamento de Base de Dados/estatística & dados numéricos , Bases de Dados Factuais/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Armazenamento e Recuperação da Informação/estatística & dados numéricos , Internet , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Terminologia como Assunto
2.
Clin Cancer Res ; 8(1): 95-102, 2002 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11801544

RESUMO

Preclinical studies suggest that amifostine could protect against toxicities induced by taxoids. We conducted a clinical and pharmacokinetic pilot study to assess the feasibility and toxicity of the docetaxel plus amifostine combination and the absence of influence of amifostine on docetaxel pharmacokinetics. We included 18 previously treated women with metastatic breast cancer (median age, 58.5 years; range, 34-74) in this single-center study. They were to receive a first course of docetaxel at 100 mg/m(2) i.v. as a 1-h infusion, then subsequent courses of docetaxel at 100 mg/m(2) preceded by amifostine at 910 mg/m(2) given as a 15-min i.v. infusion. Treatment was given every 3 weeks until disease progression or occurrence of unacceptable toxicity. We focused on neutrophils nadir (NN), time to nadir occurrence, and time to recovery of a neutrophil count >2 x 10(9)/liter, means of which were compared between cycle 1 and each of the other cycles by paired Student's t test. The total number of administered cycles was 84 (median number/patient, 4; range, 1-8). One patient received only the first course of docetaxel and was therefore not evaluable for amifostine effect. Neutropenia grade >2 occurred in 16 patients and was febrile in only 1. Other hematological and nonhematological toxicities were mild and manageable. Amifostine had no obvious influence on docetaxel-induced myelotoxicity as expressed by NN, time to nadir occurrence, and time to recovery. The mean NN (1 x 10(6)/liter) was 345 (18 patients) for cycle 1, then 318 (17 patients), 330 (13 patients), 340 (11 patients), 470 (8 patients), 200 (8 patients), 680 (5 patients), and 545 (4 patients) for cycles 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8, respectively (P >0.2). Individual pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of docetaxel estimated in 11 patients undergoing blood sampling showed no influence of amifostine on the PK profile of docetaxel. Mean clearances (liter/h/m(2)) and peak concentration (C(peak); ng/ml) were 29.9 at cycle 1 versus 32.8 at cycle 2 (not significant) and 2849.9 at cycle 1 versus 2542.5 at cycle 2 (not significant), respectively. The population analysis including those 11 patients and 49 additional patients receiving docetaxel in other studies confirmed those findings. This study does not support evidence for amifostine cytoprotection against docetaxel-induced myelosuppression and shows that there is no major influence of amifostine on docetaxel PK parameters. For the other toxicities, which are usually cumulative, the present study has design limitations and further comparative trials are warranted.


Assuntos
Amifostina/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos Fitogênicos/farmacocinética , Neoplasias da Mama/metabolismo , Paclitaxel/análogos & derivados , Paclitaxel/farmacocinética , Taxoides , Adulto , Idoso , Antineoplásicos Fitogênicos/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Docetaxel , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neutrófilos/metabolismo , Paclitaxel/efeitos adversos , Projetos Piloto , Taxa de Sobrevida , Vômito/induzido quimicamente
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA