Randomized controlled trial of EUS-guided fine needle aspiration techniques for the detection of malignant lymphadenopathy.

BACKGROUND: EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is a highly accurate method of detecting malignant lymphadenopathy. The optimal methods for performing EUS-FNA to maximize sensitivity and to minimize the number of needle passes necessary are unknown. This is a report of the results of a prospective randomized controlled trial to determine the effect of suction, the site of FNA (edge or center of lymph node), and the method of preparation of cytologic specimens on accuracy, number of needle passes needed, and specimen quality. METHODS: Consecutive patients with lymphadenopathy detected by EUS underwent FNA. Each lymph node was sampled with or without suction and from the edge or center in a 2 x 2 factorial design. The samples were expressed onto slides for cytology, and the residual material in the needle was analyzed by the cytospin-cellblock technique. Each aspirate was individually characterized for a diagnosis of malignancy, cellularity, and bloodiness. RESULTS: Forty-three patients with a total of 46 lymph nodes were evaluated. The final lymph node diagnosis was benign in 22 (48%), "suspicious for malignancy" in 6 (13%), and malignant in 18 (39%). The use of suction was associated with an increase in the cellularity of the specimen, but did not improve the likelihood of obtaining a correct diagnosis (OR 1.52: 95% CI [0.81, 2.85]). Samples obtained with suction were of worse quality because of excessive bloodiness (OR 4.7: 95% CI [1.99, 11.24]). Aspiration from the edge of the lymph node (compared with the center) did not increase the likelihood of a correct diagnosis (OR 1.16: 95% CI [0.42, 3.21]). For 78% of malignant lymph nodes, the correct diagnosis was obtained on the first needle pass and for 100% by the third pass. Cytospin-cellblock methods did not add any additional diagnostic information compared with direct smear cytology. CONCLUSIONS: The traditional method of applying suction during EUS-FNA does not improve diagnostic accuracy and worsens specimen bloodiness compared with FNA without suction. The site of FNA within the lymph node does not affect accuracy. When EUS-FNA is necessary, our recommendation is up to 3 FNAs without suction from the most convenient and safe location within abnormal-appearing lymph nodes.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for staging patients with carcinoma of the lung.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle aspiration is a safe, cost-effective procedure that can confirm the presence of mediastinal lymph node metastases and mediastinal tumor invasion. We studied the accuracy of EUS in a large population of lung cancer patients with and without enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes on computed tomographic (CT) scan. METHODS: From 1996 to 2000 all patients referred to our institution with lung tumors and no proven distant metastases were considered for EUS and surgical staging. Patients had endoscopic ultrasound with fine needle aspiration of abnormal appearing mediastinal lymph nodes and evaluation for mediastinal invasion of tumor (stage III or IV disease). Patients without confirmed stage III or IV disease had surgical staging. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-seven patients met the inclusion criteria, including 121 who had EUS. Endoscopic ultrasound and fine needle aspiration detected stage III or IV disease in 85 of 121 (70%). Among patients with enlarged lymph nodes on CT, 75 of 97 (77%) had stage III or IV disease detected by EUS. Among a small cohort of patients without enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes on CT, 10 of 24 (42%) had stage III or IV disease detected by EUS. For mediastinal lymph nodes only, the sensitivity of endoscopic ultrasound and CT was 87%. The specificity of EUS (100%) was superior to that of CT (32%) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic ultrasound with fine needle aspiration identified and histologically confirmed mediastinal disease in more than two thirds of patients with carcinoma of the lung who have abnormal mediastinal CT scans. Although mediastinal disease was more likely in patients with an abnormal mediastinal CT, EUS also detected mediastinal disease in more than one third of patients with a normal mediastinal CT and deserves further study. Endoscopic ultrasound should be considered a first line method of presurgical evaluation of patients with tumors of the lung.