Convalescent plasma in hospitalized pediatric and obstetric coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients.

BACKGROUND: Published data on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) convalescent plasma (CCP) use in children and obstetric patients are limited. We describe a single-center experience of hospitalized patients who received CCP for acute COVID-19. METHODS: A retrospective review of children 0-18-years-old and pregnant patients hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed acute COVID-19 who received CCP from March 1, 2020 to March 1, 2021 was performed. Clinical and laboratory data were collected to assess the safety of CCP administration. Antibodies to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) were measured in the CCP products and in patients before transfusion and at various time points post-transfusion. Correlation between the administered SARS-CoV-2 administered versus the SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike immunoglobulin response in patient serum was assessed. RESULTS: Twenty-two children and ten obstetric patients were eligible. Twelve pediatric and eight obstetric patients had moderate disease and ten pediatric and two obstetric patients had severe disease. Five pediatric patients died. Eighteen of 37 (48.6%) CCP titers that were measured met US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) criteria for high immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody titer. There were no complications with transfusion. High-titer CCP showed a positive correlation with rise in patient total immunoglobulin levels only in obstetric patients but not in pediatric patients. Among pediatric patients, the median serum antibody level increased over time after transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: Coronavirus 2019 convalescent plasma was administered safely to our patients. Our study suggested that CCP did not interfere with endogenous antibody production. The antibody titer of CCP correlated with post-transfusion response only in obstetric patients. Randomized trials in pediatric and obstetric patients are needed to further understand how to dose CCP and evaluate efficacy.

Factors affecting need for blood transfusion in paediatric patients undergoing open surgery for hip dysplasia.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The management of intraoperative blood loss in the surgical treatment of paediatric hip dysplasia is resource intensive. There are numerous clinical factors that impact the need for intraoperative transfusion. Identification of patient and surgical factors associated with increased blood loss may reduce the unnecessary use of resources. This study aimed to identify factors predictive of intraoperative transfusion in children undergoing hip dysplasia surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a single-centre retrospective review of patients undergoing surgery for hip dysplasia from 1 January 2012 to 15 April 2021. Patient demographic factors, anaesthetic, surgical and transfusion histories were reviewed. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors predictive of allogeneic red blood cell transfusion requirements during the intraoperative period. RESULTS: This study includes 595 patients who underwent open surgery for hip dysplasia, including 297 (52.6%) classified as developmental dysplasia (DD) and 268 (47.3%) as neuromuscular (NM) with a mean age of 9.1 years (interquartile range 3-14). Intraoperative allogeneic transfusion was identified in 26/297 (8.8%) DD and 73/268 (27.2%) NM patients. Adjusted factors associated with increased odds of intraoperative transfusion were NM (odds ratio [OR] = 2.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.76, 5.00]) and the number of osteotomies performed (OR = 1.82/osteotomy, 95% CI [1.40, 2.35]). Adjusted factors that reduced the odds of transfusion were the use of antifibrinolytics (OR = 0.35, 95% CI [0.17, 0.71]) and regional anaesthesia (OR = 0.52, 95% CI [0.29, 0.94]). CONCLUSION: For children undergoing surgery for hip dysplasia, the number of osteotomies performed is predictive of the need for allogeneic blood transfusion. Antifibrinolytics and regional anaesthesia are associated with reduced risk for allogeneic blood transfusion. Blood management initiatives, such a preoperative optimization of haemoglobin and the use of antifibrinolytics, could target patients at increased risk of intraoperative bleeding and transfusion.

Bivalirudin or Unfractionated Heparin for Anticoagulation in Pediatric Patients on Continuous Flow Ventricular Assist Device Support: Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES: Bivalirudin is a direct thrombin inhibitor that is being increasingly used for anticoagulation in children after ventricular assist device (VAD) implantation. While the data on bivalirudin use in pulsatile flow VADs are growing, reports on its use in patients on continuous flow (CF) VAD as well as comparisons of associated outcomes with unfractionated heparin (UFH) remain limited. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Single tertiary-quaternary referral center. PATIENTS: All patients less than 21 years old on CF-VAD support who received bivalirudin or UFH for anticoagulation between the years 2016 and 2020. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Clinical characteristics compared between the cohorts included time to target range of anticoagulation, markers of hemolysis, and prevalence of hemocompatibility-related adverse events such as major hemorrhagic complications, ischemic stroke, and pump thrombosis. In 42 unique patients (41 HeartWare HVAD [Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN], one HeartMate 3 LVAD [Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL]) during the study period, a total of 67 encounters of IV anticoagulation infusions (29 UFH and 38 bivalirudin) were retrospectively reviewed. In comparison with use of UFH, bivalirudin was associated with lesser odds of major bleeding complications (odds ratio [OR], 0.29; 95% CI, 0.09-0.97; p = 0.038). We failed to identify any difference in odds of major thrombotic complications (OR, 2.53; 95% CI, 0.47-13.59; p = 0.450). Eight of the patients (28%) on UFH were switched to bivalirudin due to hemorrhagic or thrombotic complications or inability to achieve therapeutic anticoagulation, while two of the patients (5%) on bivalirudin were switched to UFH due to hemorrhagic complications. Bivalirudin was used for a "washout" in eight cases with concern for pump thrombosis-six had resolution of the pump thrombosis, while two needed pump exchange. CONCLUSIONS: Use of bivalirudin for anticoagulation in patients on CF-VAD support was associated with lesser odds of hemorrhagic complications compared with use of UFH. Bivalirudin "washout" was successful in medical management of six of eight cases of possible pump thrombosis.

Coagulation and Bleeding Management in Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Clinical Scenarios and Review.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a life-saving procedure that requires careful coagulation management. Indications for ECMO continue to expand, leading to more complicated patients treated by ECMO teams. At our pediatric institution, we utilize a Coagulation Team to guide anticoagulation, transfusion and hemostasis management in an effort to avoid the all-to-common complications of bleeding and thrombosis. This team formulates a coagulation plan in conjunction with a multidisciplinary ECMO team after careful review of all available laboratory data as well as the patient's clinical status. Here, we present our general strategies for ECMO management in various clinical scenarios and a review of the literature pertaining to coagulation management in the pediatric ECMO setting.