Proof-of-principle of a lung sealant based on functionalized polyoxazolines: experiments in an ovine acute aerostasis model.

OBJECTIVES: More effective lung sealants are needed to prevent prolonged pulmonary air leakage (AL). Polyoxazoline impregnated gelatin patch (NHS-POx) was promising for lung sealing ex vivo. The aim of this study is to confirm sealing effectiveness in an in vivo model of lung injury. METHODS: An acute aerostasis model in healthy adult female sheep was used, performing bilateral thoracotomy, amputation lesions (bronchioles Ø > 1.5 mm), sealant application, digital chest tube for monitoring AL, spontaneous ventilation, obduction and bursting pressure (BP) measurement. Two experiments were performed: 1) Three sheep with two lesions per lung (N = 4 NHS-POx double-layer, N = 4 NHS-POx single-layer, N = 4 untreated) and 2) three with one lesion per lung (N = 3 NHS-POx single-layer, N = 3 untreated). In pooled linear regression, AL was analyzed per lung (N = 7 NHS-POx, N = 5 untreated) and BP per lesion (N = 11 NHS-POx, N = 7 untreated). RESULTS: Baseline AL was similar between groups (mean 1.38-1.47L/min, p = 0.90). NHS-POx achieved sealing in one attempt in 8/11 (72.7%) and in 10/11 (90.9%) in > 1 attempt. Application failures were only observed on triangular lesions requiring three folds around the lung. No influences of methodological variation between experiments was detected in linear regression (p > 0.9). AL over initial 3 h of drainage was significantly reduced for NHS-POx (median: 7 mL/min, interquartile range [IQR]: 333 mL/min) versus untreated lesions (367 mL/min, IQR: 680 mL/min, p = 0.036). BP was higher for NHS-POx (mean: 33, SD: 16cmH2O) versus untreated lesions (mean: 19, SD: 15cmH2O, p = 0.081). CONCLUSIONS: NHS-POx was effective for reducing early AL, and a trend was seen for improvement of bursting strength of the covered defect. Results were affected by application characteristics and lesion geometry.

Intrinsic pulmonary sealing, its mechanisms and impact on validity and translational value of lung sealant studies: a pooled analysis of animal studies.

Background: No validated and standardized animal models of pulmonary air leakage (PAL) exist for testing aerostatic efficacy of lung sealants. Lack of negative control groups in published studies and intrinsic sealing mechanisms of healthy animal lungs might contribute to a translational gap, leading to poor clinical results. This study aims to address the impact of intrinsic sealing mechanisms on the validity of PAL models, and investigate the conditions required for an ovine model of PAL for lung sealant testing. Methods: An ovine acute aerostasis model was developed, consisting of a bilateral thoracotomy with lesion creation, chest tube insertion and monitoring of air leaks using digital drains (≥80 minutes), under spontaneous respiration. Healthy mixed-breed adult female sheep were used and all in vivo procedures were performed under terminal anesthesia. Superficial parenchymal lesions were tested post-mortem and in vivo, extended lesions including bronchioles (deep bowl-shaped and sequential lung amputation lesions) were tested in vivo. Experiment outcomes include air leakage (AL), minimal leaking pressure (MLP) and histology. Results: Two post-mortem (N=4 superficial parenchymal lesions) and 10 in vivo experiments (N=5 superficial parenchymal and N=16 lesions involving bronchioles) were performed. In contrast to the post-mortem model, superficial parenchymal lesions in vivo showed less air leak [mean flow ± standard deviation (SD): 760±693 vs. 42±33 mL/min, P=0.055]. All superficial parenchymal lesions in vivo sealed intrinsically within a median time of 20 minutes [interquartile range (IQR), 10-75 minutes]. Histology of the intrinsic sealing layer revealed an extended area of alveolar collapse below the incision with intra-alveolar hemorrhage. Compared to superficial parenchymal lesions in vivo, lesions involving bronchioles induced significantly higher air leak post-operatively (normalized mean flow ± SD: 459±221 mL/min, P=0.003). At termination, 5/9 (55.6%) were still leaking (median drain time: 273 minutes, IQR, 207-435 minutes), and intrinsic sealing for the remaining lungs occurred within a median of 115 minutes (IQR, 52-245 minutes). Conclusions: Lung parenchyma of healthy sheep shows a strong intrinsic sealing mechanism, explained pathologically by an extended area of alveolar collapse, which may contribute to a translational gap in lung sealant research. A meaningful ovine model has to consist of deep lesions involving bronchioles of >⌀1.5 mm. Further research is needed to develop a standardized PAL model, to improve clinical effectiveness of lung sealants.

Sealing effectiveness of a novel NHS-POx based patch: experiments in a dynamic ex vivo porcine lung.

Background: Sealants are used to prevent prolonged pulmonary air leakage (PAL) after lung resections (incidence 5.6-30%). However, clinical evidence to support sealant use is insufficient, with an unmet need for a more effective product. We compared a novel gelatin patch impregnated with functionalized polyoxazolines (NHS-POx) (GATT-Patch) to commercially available sealant products. Methods: GATT-Patch Single/Double layers were compared to Progel®, Coseal®, Hemopatch® and TachoSil® in an ex vivo porcine lung model (first experiment). Based on these results, a second head-to-head comparison between GATT-Patch Single and Hemopatch® was performed. Air leakage (AL) was assessed in three settings using increasing ventilatory pressures (max =70 cmH2O): (I) baseline, (II) with 25 mm × 25 mm superficial pleural defect, and (III) after sealant application. Lungs floating on saline (37 ℃) were video recorded for visual AL assessment. Pressure and tidal volumes were collected from the ventilator, and bursting pressure (BP), AL and AL-reduction were determined. Results: Per sealant 10 measurements were performed (both experiments). In the first experiment, BP was superior for GATT-Patch Double (60±24 cmH2O) compared to TachoSil® (30±11 cmH2O, P<0.001), Hemopatch® (33±6 cmH2O, P=0.006), Coseal® (25±13 cmH2O, P=0.001) and Progel® (33±11 cmH2O, P=0.005). AL-reduction was superior for GATT-Patch Double (100%±1%) compared to Hemopatch® (46%±50%, P=0.010) and TachoSil® (31%±29%, P<0.001), and also for GATT-Patch Single (100%±14%, P=0.004) and Progel (89%±40%, P=0.027) compared to TachoSil®. In the second experiment, GATT-Patch Single was superior regarding BP (45±10 vs. 40±6 cmH2O, P=0.043) and AL-reduction (100%±11% vs. 68%±40%, P=0.043) when compared to Hemopatch®. Conclusions: The novel NHS-POx patch shows promise as a lung sealant, demonstrating elevated BP, good adhesive strength and a superior AL-reduction.

Evaluating and developing sealants for the prevention of pulmonary air leakage: A systematic review of animal models.

Sealants may provide a solution for pulmonary air leakage (PAL), but their clinical application is debatable. For sealant comparison, standardized animal models are lacking. This systematic review aims to assess methodology and quality of animal models for PAL and sealant evaluation. All animal models investigating lung sealing devices (e.g., staplers, glues, energy devices) to prevent or treat PAL were retrieved systematically from Embase, Pubmed and Web of science. Methodological study characteristics, risk of bias, reporting quality and publication bias were assessed. A total of 71 studies were included (N = 75 experiments, N = 1659 animals). Six different species and 18 strains were described; 92% of experiments used healthy animals, disease models were used in only six studies. Lesions to produce PAL were heterogenous, and only 11 studies used a previously reported technique, encompassing N = 5 unique lesions. Clinically relevant outcomes were used in the minority of studies (imaging 16%, air leak 10.7%, air leak duration 4%). Reporting quality was poor, but revealed an upward trend per decade. Overall, high risk of bias was present, and only 18.7% used a negative control group. All but one study without control groups claimed positive outcomes (95.8%), in contrast to 84.3% using positive or negative control groups, which also concluded equivocal, adverse or inconclusive outcomes. In conclusion, animal studies evaluating sealants for prevention of PAL are heterogenous and of poor reporting quality. Using negative control groups, disease models and quantifiable outcomes seem important to increase validity and relevance. Further research is needed to reach consensus for model development and standardization.