Roles of the α1B-Adrenergic Receptor Phosphorylation Domains in Signaling and Internalization.

The function of the α1B-adrenergic receptor phosphorylation sites previously detected by mass spectrometry was evaluated by employing mutants, substituting them with non-phosphorylatable amino acids. Substitution of the intracellular loop 3 (IL3) sites did not alter baseline or stimulated receptor phosphorylation, whereas substitution of phosphorylation sites in the carboxyl terminus (Ctail) or both domains (IL3/Ctail) markedly decreased receptor phosphorylation. Cells expressing the IL3 or Ctail receptor mutants exhibited a noradrenaline-induced calcium-maximal response similar to those expressing the wild-type receptor, and a shift to the left in the concentration-response curve to noradrenaline was also noticed. Cells expressing the IL3/Ctail mutant exhibited higher apparent potency and increased maximal response to noradrenaline than those expressing the wild-type receptor. Phorbol ester-induced desensitization of the calcium response to noradrenaline was reduced in cells expressing the IL3 mutant and abolished in cells in which the Ctail or the IL3/Ctail were modified. In contrast, desensitization in response to preincubation with noradrenaline was unaffected in cells expressing the distinct receptor mutants. Noradrenaline-induced ERK phosphorylation was surprisingly increased in cells expressing IL3-modified receptors but not in those expressing receptors with the Ctail or IL3/Ctail substitutions. Our data indicate that phosphorylation sites in the IL3 and Ctail domains mediate and regulate α1B-adrenergic receptor function. Phorbol ester-induced desensitization seems to be closely associated with receptor phosphorylation, whereas noradrenaline-induced desensitization likely involves other elements.

G protein-coupled receptors as therapeutic target.

Receptors are proteins coded by DNA, some of which have already been crystalized, thus allowing the details of their structure at the atomic level and some aspects of their function to be known. This review focuses on the most diverse and abundant family of receptors, G protein-coupled receptors. This family of receptors recognizes and mediates the action of several endogenous ligands (hormones, neurotransmitters, growth factors and local hormones) and also intervenes in the pathogenesis of various diseases, which is why they are targeted by approximately 30 to 40% of medications that are used in daily clinical practice and of various illegal drugs as well. X-ray crystallography is one of the essential tools that has allowed to observe the structure of these receptors in the amino acids that participate in this interaction, which allows to know the binding site of the endogenous ligand and of synthetic molecules that act on them to modulate their action. Molecular modeling or "docking" is also a computational bioinformatics tool that supports research on receptor-ligand binding, which allows the design and development of increasingly specific drugs. These developments have brought along significant changes in fundamental pharmacodynamic concepts.

Los receptores son proteínas codificadas por el ADN, algunos de los cuales ya han sido cristalizados, lo que permite conocer los detalles de su estructura a nivel atómico y algunos aspectos de su función. Esta revisión se enfoca en los más diversos y abundantes, los receptores acoplados a la proteína G. Esta familia de receptores reconoce y media la acción de varios ligandos endógenos (hormonas, neurotransmisores, factores de crecimiento y hormonas locales) y también interviene en la patogenia de diversas enfermedades, por lo que son el blanco terapéutico de aproximadamente 30 a 40 % de los medicamentos que se emplean en la práctica clínica cotidiana y de diversas drogas ilegales. La cristalografía de rayos X es una de las herramientas clave que ha permitido observar la estructura de estos receptores en los aminoácidos que participan en esta interacción, lo que posibilita conocer el sitio de unión del ligando endógeno y de moléculas sintéticas que actúan sobre ellos para modular su acción. El modelado molecular es también una herramienta bioinformática computacional que apoya la investigación sobre la unión receptor-ligando, que hace posible el diseño y desarrollo de fármacos cada vez más específicos. A estos desarrollos se suman importantes cambios en los conceptos farmacodinámicos fundamentales.

Los receptores acoplados a proteínas G como blanco terapéutico / G protein-coupled receptors as therapeutic target

Resumen Los receptores son proteínas codificadas por el ADN, algunos de los cuales ya han sido cristalizados, lo que permite conocer los detalles de su estructura a nivel atómico y algunos aspectos de su función. Esta revisión se enfoca en los más diversos y abundantes, los receptores acoplados a la proteína G. Esta familia de receptores reconoce y media la acción de varios ligandos endógenos (hormonas, neurotransmisores, factores de crecimiento y hormonas locales) y también interviene en la patogenia de diversas enfermedades, por lo que son el blanco terapéutico de aproximadamente 30 a 40 % de los medicamentos que se emplean en la práctica clínica cotidiana y de diversas drogas ilegales. La cristalografía de rayos X es una de las herramientas clave que ha permitido observar la estructura de estos receptores en los aminoácidos que participan en esta interacción, lo que posibilita conocer el sitio de unión del ligando endógeno y de moléculas sintéticas que actúan sobre ellos para modular su acción. El modelado molecular es también una herramienta bioinformática computacional que apoya la investigación sobre la unión receptor-ligando, que hace posible el diseño y desarrollo de fármacos cada vez más específicos. A estos desarrollos se suman importantes cambios en los conceptos farmacodinámicos fundamentales.

Abstract Receptors are proteins coded by DNA, some of which have already been crystalized, thus allowing the details of their structure at the atomic level and some aspects of their function to be known. This review focuses on the most diverse and abundant family of receptors, G protein-coupled receptors. This family of receptors recognizes and mediates the action of several endogenous ligands (hormones, neurotransmitters, growth factors and local hormones) and also intervenes in the pathogenesis of various diseases, which is why they are targeted by approximately 30 to 40% of medications that are used in daily clinical practice and of various illegal drugs as well. X-ray crystallography is one of the essential tools that has allowed to observe the structure of these receptors in the amino acids that participate in this interaction, which allows to know the binding site of the endogenous ligand and of synthetic molecules that act on them to modulate their action. Molecular modeling or "docking" is also a computational bioinformatics tool that supports research on receptor-ligand binding, which allows the design and development of increasingly specific drugs. These developments have brought along significant changes in fundamental pharmacodynamic concepts.

Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3 modulates α1A-adrenergic receptor action and regulation.

The possibility that glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3) could modulate α1A-adrenergic receptor (α1A-AR) function and regulation was tested employing LNCaP and HEK293 cells transfected to express the enhanced green fluorescent protein-tagged human α1A-AR. Receptor phosphorylation and internalization, intracellular free calcium, α1A-AR-GSK3 colocalization, and coimmunoprecipitation were studied. The effects of the pharmacological GSK3 inhibitor, SB-216763, and the coexpression of a dominant-negative mutant of this kinase, as well as the signaling, desensitization, and internalization of receptors with S229, S258, S352, and S381 substitutions for alanine or aspartate, were also determined. SB-216763 inhibited agonist- and phorbol myristate acetate (PMA)-mediated α1A-AR phosphorylation, reduced oxymetazoline-induced desensitization, and magnified that induced by PMA. Agonists and PMA increased receptor-GSK3 colocalization and coimmunoprecipitation. Expression of a dominant-negative GSK3 mutant reduced agonist- but not PMA-induced receptor internalization. α1A-AR with the GSK3 putative target sites mutated to alanine exhibited reduced phosphorylation and internalization in response to agonists and increased PMA-induced desensitization. Agonist-induced, but not PMA-induced, receptor-ß arrestin intracellular colocalization was diminished in cells expressing the GSK3 putative target sites mutated to alanine. Our data indicated that GSK3 exerts a dual action on α1A-AR participating in agonist-mediated desensitization and internalization and avoiding PMA-induced desensitization.

Roles of the G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 and Rab5 in α1B-adrenergic receptor function and internalization.

Cells expressing eGFP-tagged Rab5 (wild-type or the GDP-Rab5 mutant) and the DsRed-tagged α1B-adrenergic receptors were employed and the roles of GRK2 were studied utilizing paroxetine and the dominant-negative mutant of GRK2 (DN-GRK2). The following parameters were studied: a) FRET (as an index of α1B-adrenergic receptor-Rab5 interaction): b) intracellular accumulation of DsRed fluorescence (receptor internalization); c) α1B-adrenergic receptor phosphorylation, and d) noradrenaline-induced increase in intracellular calcium concentration. Noradrenaline increased α1B-adrenergic receptor-Rab5 interaction, which was blocked by paroxetine and by expression of the dominant-negative GRK2 mutant. Similarly, paroxetine and expression of the DN-GRK2 or the GDP-Rab5 mutants markedly decreased receptor internalization, α1B-adrenergic receptor phosphorylation, and attenuated the ability of the adrenergic agonist to induce homologous desensitization (calcium signaling). The S406, 410,412A α1B-adrenergic receptor mutant did not reproduce the actions of GRK2 inhibition. The data indicate that GRK2 and Rab5 play key roles in α1B-adrenergic receptor phosphorylation, internalization, and desensitization. The possibility that Rab5 might form part of a signaling complex is suggested, as well as that GDP-Rab5 might interfere with the ability of GRK2 to catalyze α1B-adrenergic receptor phosphorylation.

Sites phosphorylated in human α1B-adrenoceptors in response to noradrenaline and phorbol myristate acetate.

Phosphorylation of the human α1B-adrenergic receptor (fused with the green fluorescent protein) was studied employing the inducible Flp-ln HEK293 T-Rex system for expression. Serine/alanine substitutions were performed in five sites corresponding to those previously identified as phosphorylation targets in the hamster ortholog. Desensitization was decreased in these mutants but receptor phosphorylation was still clearly detected. The protein phosphorylation of the wild-type receptor (fused to the green fluorescent protein) was studied, using mass spectrometry, under baseline and stimulated conditions (noradrenaline or phorbol myristate acetate). Basal phosphorylation was detected at sites located at the intracellular loop 3 and carboxyl terminus, and the number of sites detected increased under agonist activation and stimulation of protein kinase C. The phosphorylation patterns differed under the distinct conditions. Three of the phosphorylation sites detected in this work corresponded to those observed in the hamster receptor. The phosphorylation sites detected included the following: a) at the intracellular loop 3: serines 246, 248, 257, 267, and 277; and threonines 252, 264, and 268, and b) at the carboxyl terminus: serines 396, 400, 402, 406, 423, 425, 427, 455, and 470, and threonines 387, 392, 420, and 475. Our data indicate that complex phosphorylation patterns exist and suggest the possibility that such differences could be relevant in receptor function and subcellular localization.

Distinct phosphorylation sites/clusters in the carboxyl terminus regulate α1D-adrenergic receptor subcellular localization and signaling.

The human α1D-adrenergic receptor is a seven transmembrane-domain protein that mediates many of the physiological actions of adrenaline and noradrenaline and participates in the development of hypertension and benign prostatic hyperplasia. We recently reported that different phosphorylation patterns control α1D-adrenergic receptor desensitization. However, to our knowledge, there is no data regarding the role(s) of this receptor's specific phosphorylation residues in its subcellular localization and signaling. In order to address this issue, we mutated the identified phosphorylated residues located on the third intracellular loop and carboxyl tail. In this way, we experimentally confirmed α1D-AR phosphorylation sites and identified, in the carboxyl tail, two groups of residues in close proximity to each other, as well as two individual residues in the proximal (T442) and distal (S543) regions. Our results indicate that phosphorylation of the distal cluster (T507, S515, S516 and S518) favors α1D-AR localization at the plasma membrane, i. e., substitution of these residues for non-phosphorylatable amino acids results in the intracellular localization of the receptors, whereas phospho-mimetic substitution allows plasma membrane localization. Moreover, we found that T442 phosphorylation is necessary for agonist- and phorbol ester-induced receptor colocalization with ß-arrestins. Additionally, we observed that substitution of intracellular loop 3 phosphorylation sites for non-phosphorylatable amino acids resulted in sustained ERK1/2 activation; additional mutations in the phosphorylated residues in the carboxyl tail did not alter this pattern. In contrast, mobilization of intracellular calcium and receptor internalization appear to be controlled by the phosphorylation of both third-intracellular-loop and carboxyl terminus-domain residues. In summary, our data indicate that a) both the phosphorylation sites present in the third intracellular loop and in the carboxyl terminus participate in triggering calcium signaling and in turning-off α1D-AR-induced ERK activation; b) phosphorylation of the distal cluster appears to play a role in receptor's plasma membrane localization; and c) T442 appears to play a critical role in receptor phosphorylation and receptor-ß-arrestin colocalization.

Different phosphorylation patterns regulate α1D-adrenoceptor signaling and desensitization.

Human α1D-adrenoceptors (α1D-ARs) are a group of the seven transmembrane-spanning proteins that mediate many of the physiological and pathophysiological actions of adrenaline and noradrenaline. Although it is known that α1D-ARs are phosphoproteins, their specific phosphorylation sites and the kinases involved in their phosphorylation remain largely unknown. Using a combination of in silico analysis, mass spectrometry and site directed mutagenesis, we identified distinct α1D-AR phosphorylation patterns during noradrenaline- or phorbol ester-mediated desensitizations. We found that the G protein coupled receptor kinase, GRK2, and conventional protein kinases C isoforms α/ß, phosphorylate α1D-AR during these processes. Furthermore, we showed that the phosphorylated residues are located in the receptor's third intracellular loop (S300, S323, T328, S331, S332, S334) and carboxyl region (S441, T442, T477, S486, S492, T507, S515, S516, S518, S543) and are conserved among orthologues but are not conserved among the other human α1-adrenoceptor subtypes. Additionally, we found that phosphorylation in either the third intracellular loop or carboxyl tail was sufficient to regulate calcium signaling desensitization. By contrast, mutations in either of these two domains significantly altered mitogen activated protein kinase (ERK) pathway and receptor internalization, suggesting that they have differential regulatory mechanisms. Our data provide new insights into the functional repercussions of these posttranslational modifications in signaling outcomes and desensitization.

A549 cells as a model to study endogenous LPA1 receptor signaling and regulation.

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) modulates the function of many organs, including the lung. A549 is a lung carcinoma-derived cell line, frequently used as a model for type II pneumocytes. Here we show that these cells expressed messenger RNA coding for LPA1-3 receptors with the following order of abundance: LPA1 > LPA2 > LPA3 and that LPA was able to increase intracellular calcium, extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1/2 phosphorylation, and cell contraction. These effects were blocked by Ki16425, an antagonist selective for LPA1 and LPA3 receptors, and by the LPA1-selective antagonist, AM095. Activation of protein kinase C inhibited LPA-induced intracellular calcium increase. This action was blocked by protein kinase C inhibitors and enzyme down-regulation. Phorbol myristate acetate and AM095, but not Ki16425, decreased the baseline intracellular calcium concentration. Ki16425 blocked the effect of AM095 but not that of phorbol myristate acetate. The data indicate that LPA1 receptors exhibit constitutive activity and that AM095 behaves as an inverse agonist, whereas Ki16425 appears to be a classic antagonist. Furthermore, the LPA agonist, 1-oleoyl-2-O-methyl-rac-glycerophosphothionate, OMPT, induced a weak increase in intracellular calcium, but was able to induce full ERK 1/2 phosphorylation and cell contraction. These effects were blocked by AM095. These data suggest that OMPT is a biased LPA1 agonist. A549 cells express functional LPA1 receptors and seem to be a suitable model to study their signaling and regulation.

Protein Kinase C Activation Promotes α1B-Adrenoceptor Internalization and Late Endosome Trafficking through Rab9 Interaction. Role in Heterologous Desensitization.

Upon agonist stimulation, α1B-adrenergic receptors couple to Gq proteins, calcium signaling and protein kinase C activation; subsequently, the receptors are phosphorylated, desensitized, and internalized. Internalization seems to involve scaffolding proteins, such as ß-arrestin and clathrin. However, the fine mechanisms that participate remain unsolved. The roles of protein kinase C and the small GTPase, Rab9, in α1B-AR vesicular traffic were investigated by studying α1B-adrenergic receptor-Rab protein interactions, using Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET), confocal microscopy, and intracellular calcium quantitation. In human embryonic kidney 293 cells overexpressing Discosoma spp. red fluorescent protein (DsRed)-tagged α1B-ARs and enhanced green fluorescent protein--tagged Rab proteins, pharmacological protein kinase C activation mimicked α1B-AR traffic elicited by nonrelated agents, such as sphingosine 1-phosphate (i.e., transient α1B-AR-Rab5 FRET signal followed by a sustained α1B-AR-Rab9 interaction), suggesting brief receptor localization in early endosomes and transfer to late endosomes. This latter interaction was abrogated by blocking protein kinase C activity, resulting in receptor retention at the plasma membrane. Similar effects were observed when a dominant-negative Rab9 mutant (Rab9-GDP) was employed. When α1B-adrenergic receptors that had been mutated at protein kinase C phosphorylation sites (S396A, S402A) were used, phorbol ester-induced desensitization of the calcium response was markedly decreased; however, interaction with Rab9 was only partially decreased and internalization was observed in response to phorbol esters and sphingosine 1-phosphate. Finally, Rab9-GDP expression did not affect adrenergic-mediated calcium response but abolished receptor traffic and altered desensitization. Data suggest that protein kinase C modulates α1B-adrenergic receptor transfer to late endosomes and that Rab9 regulates this process and participates in G protein-mediated signaling turn-off.